Re: [Debconf-team] Formal meeting: Wednesday 18:30 UTC: Delegation for DebConf

Steve, Patty I think you hit the nail on the head. TLDR: I'm not suited to this. Not TLDR: Please let me indulge my reflections: Patty's comment "you haven't really evaluated Debian, or DebConf," no, I didn't. At all. I had no idea what I was getting into. What was I thinking? I was happily

Re: [Debconf-team] Formal meeting: Wednesday 18:30 UTC: Delegation for DebConf

Am 18.11.2015 um 08:17 schrieb Patty Langasek: You are walking into the middle of a debate that has been raging for years. So it's time to end this (or if not possible at least postpone it) and draw conclusions. To me there is no value in looking at egos colliding for much longer. Possibly all

Re: [Debconf-team] Formal meeting: Wednesday 18:30 UTC: Delegation for DebConf

also sprach Bernelle Verster [2015-11-16 00:56 +1300]: > My personal opinion is also, that these three proposals are pretty > much the same, and the only thing stopping them from converging is > ego. The reason I support the no-delegation (which I don't see as equal to the

Re: [Debconf-team] Formal meeting: Wednesday 18:30 UTC: Delegation for DebConf

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 07:21:58PM +1300, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Bernelle Verster [2015-11-16 00:56 +1300]: > > My personal opinion is also, that these three proposals are pretty > > much the same, and the only thing stopping them from converging is > > ego.

[Debconf-team] Formal meeting: Wednesday 18:30 UTC: Delegation for DebConf

Hi all This email relates to having a meeting to decide how to move forward with the Chair/Delegation situation. The three proposals at play are: [1] - A two-person delegation [2] - A new -ctte annually [3] - The original 2011 proposal Can we discuss this at a formal meeting this Wednesday