Dear all,
is there anything more I can (or need to) do?
Thanks,
RIchard
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Hi,
On 20/05/14 at 14:26 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
Dear all,
is there anything more I can (or need to) do?
No, that's on my TO-DO list now.
Thanks,
Lucas
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
On 02/05/14 at 19:47 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
Dear all,
as announced some time ago, we will incorporate DebConfDeutschland
e.V. tomorrow.
All founding members will be DDs with the full list being sent as a
reply to this email after the fact.
Given that:
* We will not be
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org wrote:
As you already described how you met the TO criteria in
cad77+gqwz0opgzi2qsgre3y3vbungtg6b4beqtcqbrz-wjh...@mail.gmail.com,
I think that we can safely say that the minimum two weeks discussion
period started on 2014-04-26
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org wrote:
The last step was never used so far AFAIK.
But it could probably be implemented as a d-d-a email providing the updated
list of TOs, and a page on the Debian website listing TOs and referencing
the d-d-a email.
(Similar
Dear all,
as announced some time ago, we will incorporate DebConfDeutschland
e.V. tomorrow.
All founding members will be DDs with the full list being sent as a
reply to this email after the fact.
Given that:
* We will not be using the name Debian
* We are not planning to run for more than
Hi,
On 26/04/14 at 23:42 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
2. The organization should remain loyal to Debian
See 1.
Going against Debian's best interest now or in the future would not
only be stupid beyond description, it would also wipe out our
collective reputations and remove the common
On 26/04/14 at 23:42 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
Before anyone raises this point: Yes, we tried contacting[1] FFIS, but
they have not even answered in more than four weeks; we are not
confident that they would be more reactive going forward and do not
consider them an option any more.
also sprach Andreas Barth a...@ayous.org [2014-04-27 01:09 +0200]:
(For this reason, after some more thinking I wouldn't recommend to
name it Debconf15 e.V, but rather Debconf Deutschland e.V..)
Yes, this was my intention: design it as a throw-away, but without
stating so. And of course this
* martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [140427 08:31]:
also sprach Andreas Barth a...@ayous.org [2014-04-27 01:09 +0200]:
If you get money where you provide some value for (and sponsorship
might fall into that category, if e.g. logos are shown somewhere),
then this money is VAT-taxable
also sprach Andreas Barth a...@ayous.org [2014-04-27 10:53 +0200]:
However, one need to check if all of Debconf falls into that, or if
parts don't. Tax authorities don't necessarily consider one event
treated all as one, see e.g. page 39, nr 206 of
* martin f krafft (madd...@debconf.org) [140427 11:00]:
also sprach Andreas Barth a...@ayous.org [2014-04-27 10:53 +0200]:
However, one need to check if all of Debconf falls into that, or if
parts don't. Tax authorities don't necessarily consider one event
treated all as one, see e.g. page
also sprach Andreas Barth a...@ayous.org [2014-04-27 11:23 +0200]:
According to regularation for tax advisors (Standesrecht) this
won't be legal.
It won't be legal to represent us towards the tax authorities, but
there is nothing, IMHO, that speaks against free advice.
However there are
Dear all,
the German local team for DebConf15 is in the process of incorporating itself.
We need a legal shell for signing contracts, taking in donations, and
for insurance reasons. Plus, we are expecting to gain non-profit
status which means tax exemption and thus more money for making
* Richard Hartmann (richih.mailingl...@gmail.com) [140426 23:42]:
* Debian Deutschland e.V.
* DebConf Deutschland e.V.
* DebConf15 Deutschland e.V.
From our understanding, German tax authorities don't like
throw-away/single-use non-profit organisations, but we have no proof
of that, so
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Andreas Barth a...@ayous.org wrote:
I'm running some throw-away non-profit organisations, and have not
experienced problems.
Have the tax authorities been made aware of this in advance? For how
long are those organisations running?
Debconf has a different
* Richard Hartmann (richih.mailingl...@gmail.com) [140427 00:40]:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Andreas Barth a...@ayous.org wrote:
I'm running some throw-away non-profit organisations, and have not
experienced problems.
Have the tax authorities been made aware of this in advance?
* Andreas Barth (a...@ayous.org) [140427 01:10]:
* Richard Hartmann (richih.mailingl...@gmail.com) [140427 00:40]:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Andreas Barth a...@ayous.org wrote:
Debconf has a different tax situation than a normal TO setup
(especially given the amount of money
18 matches
Mail list logo
