[Debconf-team] Reducing the bandwidth of -announce?

2014-08-26 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
People, We've sent 8 (+1) mails to -announce today, I'm wondering if we could maybe reserve our most important announces for that list to keep our attendees focused on what really matters to them? Please consider directing your general informations to -discuss. (Yes, I've been playing that

Re: [Debconf-team] Reducing the bandwidth of -announce?

2014-08-26 Thread Allison Randal
I'm kind of curious why we have two lists? I know one has more free permissions for posting, but it seems like a single list with open posting would be sufficient. On 08/26/2014 05:54 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: People, We've sent 8 (+1) mails to -announce today, I'm wondering if we could

Re: [Debconf-team] Reducing the bandwidth of -announce?

2014-08-26 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le mardi, 26 août 2014, 19.11:14 Allison Randal a écrit : I'm kind of curious why we have two lists? I know one has more free permissions for posting, but it seems like a single list with open posting would be sufficient. I see -announce as a platform for official or mandatory communications,

Re: [Debconf-team] Reducing the bandwidth of -announce?

2014-08-26 Thread Norman García
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:16:16 -0700 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debconf.org wrote: Le mardi, 26 août 2014, 19.11:14 Allison Randal a écrit : I'm kind of curious why we have two lists? I know one has more free permissions for posting, but it seems like a single list with open posting would be

Re: [Debconf-team] Reducing the bandwidth of -announce?

2014-08-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 05:54:29PM -0700, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: People, We've sent 8 (+1) mails to -announce today, I'm wondering if we could maybe reserve our most important announces for that list to keep our attendees focused on what really matters to them? Please consider