Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:57:34AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > A question: Why did you not apply the documentation patch threrby closing bug > #790664? From the build logs no texi files were processed, how come? because I could not figure what your patches actually did, and building without it

Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 09:58:07PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:57:59PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > As fas as I understand it is OK to NMU this package, based on the > > latest replies by Xavier. Unfortunately nobody from debian-ada has > > stepped forward, and

Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:57:59PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > As fas as I understand it is OK to NMU this package, based on the > latest replies by Xavier. Unfortunately nobody from debian-ada has > stepped forward, and Xavier is too busy, maybe you can help out here. > I'm available whenever

Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 17:01 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:18:08PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > >  > > > I'm very short of time for the month - may be someone on debian- > > > ada > > > can test your patched package ? Can you provide an url to > > > download it >

Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:18:08PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 14:14 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote: > > No, I think you don't need more tests since you have found the > > conflict source as far as I understand. > > > > I'm very short of time for the month - may be someone on

Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:18:08PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 14:14 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote: > > No, I think you don't need more tests since you have found the > > conflict source as far as I understand. > > > > I'm very short of time for the month - may be someone on

Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 14:14 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote: > No, I think you don't need more tests since you have found the > conflict source as far as I understand. > > I'm very short of time for the month - may be someone on debian-ada > can test your patched package ? Can you provide an url to

Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

Sorry, the correct entries should be: tcp 0  0  0.0.0.0:5001  0.0.0.0:*  LISTEN  11061/./bank_server  tcp 0  0  0.0.0.0:9099  0.0.0.0:*  LISTEN  11060/po_cos_naming  Then I don't know where the problem is.

Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

Hi again, seems like the conflicting application is qemu-system-x86_64 whichever port I choose in examples/dsa/bank/polyorb.conf: # cat polyorb.conf [dsa] name_service=corbaloc:iiop:1.2@127.0.0.1:9099/NameService/00024fF800 0 [iiop] polyorb.protocols.iiop.default_port=5001 # cat

Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

In last polyorb version, you should use po_gnatdist. - Mail original - De: "Svante Signell" À: "Xavier Grave" Cc: "Mattia Rizzolo" , 835...@bugs.debian.org, debian-ada@lists.debian.org Envoyé: Lundi 5 Septembre

Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

Hi again, When issuing make examples execuables in the two test directories examples/polyorb and example/moma are built, not the other ones. Running the tests as indicated in the corresponding README, all four tests in polyorb pass and in moma the tests I) to II) in the README pass and test III)

Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

Hi, Seems like gnatdist is needed to run the bank example. Where can I find a modern version of it? On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 10:37 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote: > Hi, > > I can't upload anything any longer I'm sorry. And one have to be cautious with > polyorb, compilation of the package doesn't mean

Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 12:43 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:26:20PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > >  > > With the attached patches polyorb builds fine with gcc-6/gnat-6. With these > > patches all serious bugs are fixed. > > > >   * Enable build with gnat-6: Closes

Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:26:20PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 16:34 +0200, xavier grave wrote: > > Sadly, I haven't time for maintaining work anymore. > > I have filed a RFA (#834605) against wnpp. I wonder whether that should have been an O instead.. but your call. >

Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 16:34 +0200, xavier grave wrote: > Hi Mattia, > > Sadly, I haven't time for maintaining work anymore. > I have filed a RFA (#834605) against wnpp. > > Thanks for your concern, cordially, xavier > > Le 29/08/2016 à 16:30, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit : > > > > source: polyorb >

Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

Hi Mattia, Sadly, I haven't time for maintaining work anymore. I have filed a RFA (#834605) against wnpp. Thanks for your concern, cordially, xavier Le 29/08/2016 à 16:30, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit : source: polyorb version: 2.11~20140418-3 severity: serious Dear maintainer, polyorb is the