On 1/24/20 6:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Has anyone had any success recently booting Debian on qemu-system-alpha?
>
> I just built qemu-system using the alpha-softmmu target from git and tried
> to run Debian's Alpha port but the output hangs very early:
>
>
On 05/04/12 07:07, Camm Maguire wrote:
Nothing here should affect any kfreebsd_amd64 machine, right?
Correct.
r~
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 05/04/12 06:39, Camm Maguire wrote:
I'm wondering if there is a simple configure time test to detect when
this has been fixed. If I just aborted using __builtin___clear_cache if
it is in fact a noop on alpha, ppc, ppc64, and ia64, would this suffice?
I can't think of any simple, portable
On 05/29/2011 05:39 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 03:36:52PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
The regular expression in testsuite/ld-plugin/plugin-6.d only expects
one line with the undefined reference to `func' but on Alpha two such
(identical) lines are generated.
Should two such
On 05/06/2011 03:25 AM, Michael Cree wrote:
So my question is, what is this [other: 80]? Does it matter? Is this
failure a false report?
It's these:
/* Legal values for st_other field of Elf64_Sym. */
#define STO_ALPHA_NOPV 0x80/* No PV required. */
#define
On 05/05/2011 01:16 PM, Witold Baryluk wrote:
As of QEMU i must say Cool!.
I was going to work on qemu-alpha after fixing linker and compiler issue
in current versions. Is there any repository for you work?
See
git://repo.or.cz/qemu/rth.git axp-iommu-1
git://repo.or.cz/linux-2.6/rth.git
On 04/30/2011 07:25 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
First off is bug 12608 [1] which I believe I have identified the
problem and have posted a patch to the bug tracker. I am hoping that
if it is acceptable that you can commit it.
I'll have a look.
Secondly, I noted a number of test suite failures
On 07/30/2009 09:29 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Thanks for this patch I have tried it, and it does not have the original
problem I have reported. Unfortunately it does not pass the glibc
testsuite. I'll try to debug the problem later (I don't own an alpha
machine, and need to have internet access
On 07/26/2009 04:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Knowing that $31 could be used for prefetch, I have modified the
assembly code from memchr.S to use it. It passes all the testsuite.
This isn't intended to be a prefetch instruction, it's
meant to be fetching the data for the next word. I.e.
On 07/13/2009 03:16 PM, Matt Turner forwarded:
The problem is that the memchr() function on alpha uses prefetch, which
can cause a page boundary to be crossed, while the standards (POSIX and
C99) says it should stop when a match is found.
That's not supposed to matter -- faults from prefetch
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:43:46AM +1000, Samad, Alex wrote:
This brings me to my original question why isn't isolcpus working when I
boot with isolcpus=2 I thought it isolated cpu 2 from the schedular and
thus removed any chance of it running any tasks, threads etc Is this
as good as
11 matches
Mail list logo
