(Switched back to my main address, accidentally switched to GMail)
On 4/1/20 5:05 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> So, the currently only candidate for this scenario is mipsel and I think this
>> is a risk that is bearable, in particular since upstream considers 32-bit
>> mips
>> one of the
Le mercredi 01 avril 2020 à 16:56 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 4/1/20 4:51 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > > FWIW, sbcl builds fine for me on mipsel if clang is used as the C
> > > compiler,
> > > I'll file a separate bug report for that.
> >
> > I have mixed feelings about
Hi,
Le mercredi 01 avril 2020 à 16:43 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 3/16/20 1:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > sbcl has partial support for alpha, hppa, mips*, ppc64 and riscv64
> > and if we try to build sbcl on any architecture using clisp, we will
> > be able to
Hi!
On 3/16/20 1:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> sbcl has partial support for alpha, hppa, mips*, ppc64 and riscv64
> and if we try to build sbcl on any architecture using clisp, we will
> be able to provide upstream with a build log of sbcl on any architecture
> that might be supported
On 3/16/20 5:34 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
> With patch, I get following error:
See [1], the build system is not very smart, unfortunately.
Adrian
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939453
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer -
Source: sbcl
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi!
In order to provide some basic level of continuous integration for
sbcl upstream, it would be great if the sbcl package could be tried
to build on any of the currently unsupported architectures using
clisp.
sbcl has partial support for alpha, hppa,
6 matches
Mail list logo
