Re: No port maintainers?

2008-01-17 Thread Thomas Evans
I would like to help as well, but I'm not super experienced with the Debian way of doing things. I am a decent developer, but I found attempting to get libc fixed for Alpha to be just simply traumatic. Could someone tell me offline what would be involved? I have a few Alpha systems here

Re: No port maintainers?

2008-01-08 Thread Paul Slootman
On Fri 04 Jan 2008, Steve Langasek wrote: Looks like I'm still the only porter listed on http://wiki.debian.org/alphaLennyReleaseRecertification. No one else is going to help? :) I'd love to help, but unfortunately I'm unusually short of time the last year or so, and additionally I can't

Re: No port maintainers?

2008-01-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:56:42AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Can you please start a wiki page for the alpha requalification process for lenny based on [0]. Please only add yourself as porter if you're actively working on alpha issues. Looks like I'm still the only porter listed on

Re: No port maintainers?

2007-11-02 Thread Tim Cutts
On 2 Nov 2007, at 8:23 am, James Andrewartha wrote: On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Tom Evans wrote: I remember this process for Etch - what will need to be done to re- certify Alpha for the next Debian release? I've created http://wiki.debian.org/alphaLennyReleaseRecertification from the template.

Re: No port maintainers?

2007-11-02 Thread James Andrewartha
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Tom Evans wrote: I remember this process for Etch - what will need to be done to re-certify Alpha for the next Debian release? I've created http://wiki.debian.org/alphaLennyReleaseRecertification from the template. Sections that needs work include: Availability

Re: No port maintainers?

2007-11-01 Thread Tom Evans
I remember this process for Etch - what will need to be done to re-certify Alpha for the next Debian release? ...tom Luk Claes wrote: Hi Can you please start a wiki page for the alpha requalification process for lenny based on [0]. Please only add yourself as porter if you're actively