On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:42:23PM -0500, Alex Winbow wrote:
> I've heard word that /usr destined to be going away, but frankly I'm
> very
> surprised that multiple local filesystems is a rarity these days. The debian
> installer even creates these semi-automatically. It is seriously the
On Sun, 27 Jan 2019, Frank Scheiner wrote:
Does anyone have an archive of "samba-common_4.7.3+dfsg-1_all.deb"?
That seems like it may be missing piece for installing the older samba
4.7.3 for now on alpha (the binary packages still being present in the
archive).
snapshot.debian.org seems to
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 12:25:52PM -0800, Alex Winbow wrote:
> I'm seeing this also, after installing using the Debian 8.0 installer
> and dist-upgrade'ing to unstable (using the SMP kernel trick to get past the
> GENERIC issue). My understanding is that it's not initramfs-tools that
> mounts all
On 1/27/19 22:53, Alex Winbow wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019, Michael Cree wrote:
samba build-depends on ceph [1] but ceph hasn't built on Alpha for
some time [2]. Looks like dtp-relative relocation errors during
linking in the build of ceph [3] is the reason. I have a theory that
gcc is not
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019, Michael Cree wrote:
samba build-depends on ceph [1] but ceph hasn't built on Alpha for some
time [2]. Looks like dtp-relative relocation errors during linking in
the build of ceph [3] is the reason. I have a theory that gcc is not
taking the spec file listed in its
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 12:25:52PM -0800, Alex Winbow wrote:
> Samba isn't installable, and in fact I can't even build-dep to build
> myself locally; looks like the dependency chain goes all the way back to a
> specific version of libboost!?!?
samba build-depends on ceph [1] but ceph hasn't
Bob,
I'm seeing this also, after installing using the Debian 8.0
installer and dist-upgrade'ing to unstable (using the SMP kernel trick
to get past the GENERIC issue). My understanding is that it's not
initramfs-tools that mounts all the (non-root) local filesystems, but
systemd (which
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:19:52AM +, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> (much useful information set in the appropriate historical context)
Thank you for your thoughts.
The earlier reported problem with "/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd" evidently
requiring AF_UNIX socket support to be built-in rather
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Odd thing about the disk partitioning scheme. The disk label definitely
> has to be "bsd" for SRM to be happy, but if Linux is the only OS on the
> disk, all the rest of the BSD partitioning conventions don't have to be
> observed as far as slice "c"
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 01:10:14AM -0600, Bob Tracy wrote:
> (initramfs / systemd / udevd issue)
I think I may have this one painted into a corner...
CONFIG_UNIX (at least) needs to be "y" instead of "m". This is a
relatively new dependency.
For userland applications used in the boot process
10 matches
Mail list logo
