Re: Bug#954031: [Sbcl-devel] Bug#954031: sbcl: Please allow building with clisp on currently unsupported architectures

2020-04-01 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
(Switched back to my main address, accidentally switched to GMail) On 4/1/20 5:05 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote: >> So, the currently only candidate for this scenario is mipsel and I think this >> is a risk that is bearable, in particular since upstream considers 32-bit >> mips >> one of the

Re: Bug#954031: [Sbcl-devel] Bug#954031: sbcl: Please allow building with clisp on currently unsupported architectures

2020-04-01 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Le mercredi 01 avril 2020 à 16:56 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : > On 4/1/20 4:51 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > > FWIW, sbcl builds fine for me on mipsel if clang is used as the C > > > compiler, > > > I'll file a separate bug report for that. > > > > I have mixed feelings about

Re: Bug#954031: [Sbcl-devel] Bug#954031: sbcl: Please allow building with clisp on currently unsupported architectures

2020-04-01 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Hi, Le mercredi 01 avril 2020 à 16:43 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : > On 3/16/20 1:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > sbcl has partial support for alpha, hppa, mips*, ppc64 and riscv64 > > and if we try to build sbcl on any architecture using clisp, we will > > be able to

Re: [Sbcl-devel] Bug#954031: sbcl: Please allow building with clisp on currently unsupported architectures

2020-04-01 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi! On 3/16/20 1:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > sbcl has partial support for alpha, hppa, mips*, ppc64 and riscv64 > and if we try to build sbcl on any architecture using clisp, we will > be able to provide upstream with a build log of sbcl on any architecture > that might be supported