glide: added alpha support, need testers

2003-08-27 Thread Guillem Jover
[ Please respect the MFT as I'm not suscribed ] Hello, I'm trying to fix #174035 (glide3-alpha FTBFS), so I've unified both packages and now glide supports alpha. But escher.d.o is down and I cannot build it. Can someone try building it ? And also I would like someone with an Alpha and a 3Dfx

Re: glide: added alpha support, need testers

2003-08-30 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi Dannis and Gianluca, On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 07:59:16PM +0200, Dannis 't Hart wrote: On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 07:59, Guillem Jover wrote: I'm trying to fix #174035 (glide3-alpha FTBFS), so I've unified both packages and now glide supports alpha. But escher.d.o is down and I cannot build

Re: Bug#255270: xfree86: libglide3 has now ia64 and amd64 support

2004-07-17 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:19:13AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 11:58:45PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: I've ported libglide3 to amd64 and ia64. So now xfree86 can Build-Depend on libglide3-dev on those arches. I've integrated this patch: $ svn log -r 1640

[RFC] The PIE unholy mess

2017-01-17 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! I'd like to get some feedback from porters and package maintainers, given that this affects at least both groups. Some background first. One of the reasons PIE has in the past not been enabled by default in dpkg-buildflags, is because it introduced some slowness on some arches, although this

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

2016-08-21 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 08:22:09 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Kurt Roeckx: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:05:06PM +0200, ni...@thykier.net wrote: > >> * If we were to enable -fPIE/-pie by default in GCC-6, should that change > >>also apply to this port? [0] > > > > If -fPIE is the

Re: Bug#845193: dpkg: recent -specs PIE changes break openssl

2016-11-24 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:52:33 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > clone 845193 -1 > reassign -1 dpkg > retitle -1 dpkg: please do not add -specs= flags only on some architectures > thanks I'm afraid I'll have to wontfix this because it is not really implementable. See below… :/ >

Re: Bug#1040062: dpkg-dev: Please drop pie-{compile,link}.spec

2023-10-31 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 13:12:48 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 09:23:43AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Sun, 2023-07-02 at 00:02:46 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > There are some problems with this: > > > > > > 1. PIE sho

Re: Bug#1040062: dpkg-dev: Please drop pie-{compile,link}.spec

2023-07-04 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2023-07-02 at 00:02:46 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.21.22 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org, debian-i...@lists.debian.org > Since stretch all release architectures are using PIE by default, > and all future release

Re: Bug#1040062: dpkg-dev: Please drop pie-{compile,link}.spec

2023-11-23 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Tue, 2023-10-31 at 10:52:40 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > I guess I could do it the other way, and given this is apparently > causing issues as reported by Adrian, and as seen recently from > the referenced bug report which might require patching a specific > package to