On 07/30/2009 09:29 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Thanks for this patch I have tried it, and it does not have the original
problem I have reported. Unfortunately it does not pass the glibc
testsuite. I'll try to debug the problem later (I don't own an alpha
machine, and need to have internet access
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 05:24:59PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 07/26/2009 04:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Knowing that $31 could be used for prefetch, I have modified the
assembly code from memchr.S to use it. It passes all the testsuite.
This isn't intended to be a prefetch
On 07/26/2009 04:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Knowing that $31 could be used for prefetch, I have modified the
assembly code from memchr.S to use it. It passes all the testsuite.
This isn't intended to be a prefetch instruction, it's
meant to be fetching the data for the next word. I.e.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 01:45:06AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:29:33PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:48:02PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 07/13/2009 03:16 PM, Matt Turner forwarded:
The problem is that the memchr() function on
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:29:33PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:48:02PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 07/13/2009 03:16 PM, Matt Turner forwarded:
The problem is that the memchr() function on alpha uses prefetch, which
can cause a page boundary to be crossed,
On 07/13/2009 03:16 PM, Matt Turner forwarded:
The problem is that the memchr() function on alpha uses prefetch, which
can cause a page boundary to be crossed, while the standards (POSIX and
C99) says it should stop when a match is found.
That's not supposed to matter -- faults from prefetch
Hi all,
With a lot of patches (E)GLIBC 2.10 builds on alpha, but it fails on the
testsuite for the memchr() function, which is an optimized assembly code
on alpha. Unfortunately I don't speak alpha assembly very well, so help
is needed.
The problem is that the memchr() function on alpha uses
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Aurelien Jarnoaurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
With a lot of patches (E)GLIBC 2.10 builds on alpha, but it fails on the
testsuite for the memchr() function, which is an optimized assembly code
on alpha. Unfortunately I don't speak alpha assembly very well, so help
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:24:00PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Aurelien Jarnoaurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
With a lot of patches (E)GLIBC 2.10 builds on alpha, but it fails on the
testsuite for the memchr() function, which is an optimized assembly code
on
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Aurelien Jarnoaurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:24:00PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Aurelien Jarnoaurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
With a lot of patches (E)GLIBC 2.10 builds on alpha, but it fails on the
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 07:16:16PM -0300, Matt Turner wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Aurelien Jarnoaurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:24:00PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Aurelien Jarnoaurel...@aurel32.net
wrote:
With a lot
11 matches
Mail list logo
