Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Will Dyson wrote:
|
| I would be very interested in knowing how the gcc-3.4 archive is
| built, what the real problem is, and if there is any way I can help
| out.
|
AFAIK there is _no_ automatic cron
greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I try to get http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 packages for
upgrade purpose, but I think
there's a broken dependency or something:
libcupsys2-dev: Depends: libcupsys2-gnutls10 (= 1.1.22-2) but 1.1.22-3 is
installed
$ dpkg -l
Anders Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KR == Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KR On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:35:28PM +0100, Anders Boström wrote:
As I wrote in my original question is /debian-pure64 not updated. Last
update was 20041215.
Small update. Q did build a few new
Clive Menzies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
I just took delivery of a Acer 1524WLMi (AMD64) and after shrinking the
XP partition using qtparted (from OSSwatchKnoppix), installed a sarge
i386 system and a sid-amd64 system using the sarge-amd64-netinst.iso
from 9 Jan 2005.
Everything
Anders Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GvB == Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Goswin!
GvB Anders Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KR == Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KR On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:35:28PM +0100, Anders Boström wrote:
As I wrote
Peter Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, my mirror of the amd64 archive recently broke becaues of the
following errors:
gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 20 17:40:22 2005 EST using DSA key ID 2FE487B0
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 20 17:40:22 2005
Andrei Mikhailovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello everyone
Does anyone know about the status of openoffice updates?
For the past couple of months the openoffice.org-debian-files package
can't be updated due to dependency issues:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Egon Willighagen wrote:
Ok, so for each architecture, the Packages.gz has to be made separately?
Yes, I believe so. An archive of all binary-all packages would be
rather unusual, although I guess for
Per Bojsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I did some debugging and found out that the segfault in Zope on amd64
is due to some non-64-bit-compatible code in the initgroups.c source
file (lib/Components/initgroups/initgroups.c in the Zope source
package). Here is a patch that fixes this
Doh,
I forgot to CC debian-amd64 on my mail below.
Please reply to the one on debian-devel to preserve threading if
possible.
MfG
Goswin
--
Hi,
given the current sarge deadline and the opinions expressed by some of
Bharath Ramesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just upgraded my machine and I find that cron is broken. It looks for
/usr/bin/crontab while trying to upgrade. Because exim and a few more
packages depend on cron they are also not upgraded and dont install
again.
Thanks,
Bharath
See BTS. fixed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small) writes:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 02:46:40PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
Can you elaborate on the expected potential failure?
You do have something specific your worried about, otherwise
you wouldn't mention anything :-)
Thanks. And I'll try to help out
Matt Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I noticed Eterm for AMD64 is broken. When I start a term, my buffer is
filled
with @s and boxes and other garbage characters.
I tracked down a fix on the enlightenment-devel list at
http://www.mail-archive.com/enlightenment-devel%
Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hello,
i'm interested in the latest plans on creating a testing buildd, and if
I started the archive creation yesterday. Currently alioth does a GID
renumbering so I can't check its progress. It might even have been
killed or completly mess up now. But
Hi,
everyone with 4GB or more or who had problems with grub in the past
should test the lates grub with and inited kernel and send a short
reply if it works or what the error is.
Please include what motherboard, cpu, ram and kernel/initrd you use.
Reports of it failing have been sketchy and the
Peter Cordes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 05:42:30PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
First, what I'm suggesting: two new packages for sarge and one modified
package. They would allow 64-bit applications using a small set of standard
libraries to run on an otherwise i386
Miham KEREKES [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi All,
everyone with 4GB or more or who had problems with grub in the past
should test the lates grub with and inited kernel and send a short
reply if it works or what the error is.
I've updated grub in this morning to version
Miham KEREKES [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi All,
everyone with 4GB or more or who had problems with grub in the past
should test the lates grub with and inited kernel and send a short
reply if it works or what the error is.
I've updated grub in this morning to version
Andy Main [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi there,
Just wondering whether you can install a sarge pure64 system using the
debian-installer isos? I only ask because they are marked as sid.
Thanks,
Andy
I'm still in the process of setting up the sarge repository and
haven't even tried a
Peter Cordes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 02:29:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
It won't use the extra registers in 32bit mode.
Yeah, I know there's no CPU mode that does that. I wish, though...
It would be
theoretically possible to build for 64bit
Andy Main [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi there,
Just wondering whether you can install a sarge pure64 system using the
debian-installer isos? I only ask because they are marked as sid.
Thanks,
Andy
I'm still in the process of setting up the sarge repository and
haven't even
Sebastian Steinlechner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I just installed the amd64 port using the most recent netinst image
(dated august, 6th). Now I have a report and a question:
- kernel-headers-2.6.7-5 depends on kernel-kbuild-2.6-1, which isn't
available. I built a fake package and
Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ Monday 09 August 2004 19:49 ]
| That would be 0.95+cvs20040624-7.0.0.2.pure64 or
| 0.95+cvs20040624-7.0.0.3.pure64 then. Earlierversions didn't have the
| lines below. :)
here are the messages from .3 at boot time
moveto = 0xcbff
addr
Micky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scrive Pere Castañer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PS:I have this: deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sid main
and I can't install nothiing, What I'm doing wrong?
You tell us. Nothing wrong with that deb source.
I've this:
deb
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi folks,
I tried to do a netinst using the gcc-3.4 pool on alioth and
a monolithic image of a few days ago, but this failed with
the error message
Bad archive error
The specified Debian archive mirror is either not available,
or does not
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Jochens wrote:
On 04-Aug-11 15:25, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
Using aptitude of the gcc-3.4 pool I got an error message
aptitude: Symbol `_ZTIN4SigC6ObjectE' has different size in shared
object, consider re-linking
Rebuilding aptitude
Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 04-Aug-11 02:57, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
can now be compiled directly in an amd64 environment. All it needs is
an additional Build-Depends on 'gcc-3.4-i386' (and the amd64-specific
grub-patch
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
That sounds more like an user error. Are you sure you specified the
right url? pure64 and gcc-3.4 identical archive software and have
an identical layout.
I am very sure. I replaced /gcc-3.4
Philipp Frauenfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear Goswin
Am Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:50:40PM +0200 hat Goswin von Brederlow getippert:
Please send a patch to the BTS, easiest with reportbug -A patch
nvidia-graphics-drivers.
I would already have done this if the patch would be
a) simple
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I think I found it. gcc-3.4 has only sid. There is no sarge, no
testing and no unstable, only sid.
D-I uses sarge/testing to check the mirror and unstable later to
install, iirc.
D-i had not asked to select between
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Jochens wrote:
On 04-Aug-12 08:32, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Several other packages could not be installed, but libstdc++6
was never tried.
Why were gcc-3.3-base and libstdc++5 selected instead of
gcc-3.4 and libstdc++6?
This is because the
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any schedule out to get rid of gcc-3.3 for amd64 completely?
I am using gcc 3.4 and 3.4.1 for my private projects since they
were released. Works for me.
Doesn't look like its going
VETSEL Patrice [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why is the sid-amd64-netinst.iso older (1 week) than the 2 other isos ?
(http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/)
Cheers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
in order to have at least a minimal support for amd64 in sarge, we need
a sponsor to upload kernel-image-2.6.7-amd64 2.6.7-6, built on a i386
host with gcc 3.4.1-6 (hitting the archive tonight).
Thats gcc 3.4.1-7 (will be superceeded by -8
Sebastian Steinlechner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 12:34, Sebastian Steinlechner wrote:
So, could someone please rebuild the debian-files package to not depend
on openoffice.org-bin, but openoffice.org instead?
I just realised that this is wrong of course. Further
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pete Harlan) writes:
What's the future of amd64 compiled with gcc-3.4?
As I see it the sarge-amd64 fork will be gcc-3.3 compiled since
gcc-3.4 would need a lot more changes. That means the main sid archive
will also stay with gcc-3.3 and follow the normal debian transition to
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Jochens wrote:
On 04-Aug-26 15:22, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Is there a list of packages in pure64, that have serious problems
if built with gcc-3.4?
The attached list of packages from 'sid' has build problems for the
amd64/gcc-3.4 archive.
[snip]
Pete Harlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for your reply!
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 01:55:05PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
As I see it the sarge-amd64 fork will be gcc-3.3 compiled since
gcc-3.4 would need a lot more changes. That means the main sid archive
will also stay with gcc
Jérôme Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le jeu 26/08/2004 à 13:50, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Sebastian Steinlechner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 12:34, Sebastian Steinlechner wrote:
So, could someone please rebuild the debian-files package to not depend
Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 07:03:45PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
That is a major design flaw of debian-installer. If something goes
wrong you can't do the step by hand and continue with the next
one. D-I will always want to complete
Tom Vier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is the sarge port usable? could someone point me to an installer? i've tried
several. all of them fail for different reasons. tia.
--
Tom Vier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DSA Key ID 0x15741ECE
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Ludovic watteaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi everybody !
I've a problem with my keytable in X11 but not in a console tty.
I can't use the Alt Gr key to tape the characteres : ~#{[|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm a French user and a use the latin1 (102 keys) because the latin9 with Euro
work
Sven Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi.
I am planning to deploy the amd64/pure64 version of Debian on a new
system. However while investigating the netinst images at
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-installer/daily/netboot/
I noticed that the initrd misses something I would
Sven Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow [u] wrote on 06/09/2004 21:04:
Sven Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am planning to deploy the amd64/pure64 version of Debian on a new
system. However while investigating the netinst images at
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am 2004-09-07 16:45:49, schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I have a machine without CD-Rom (no place in
there) and only a Floppy Drive.
Please, can anyone tell me, why
Dirk H. Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi folks,
I hope this is the right place for this kind of question:
I want to run a server with more than 4 GB of RAM. I do not need
applications/processes to address more than 4 GB each. Let's say I
want to have 2 instances of apache on the
Karl Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 01:32 +0300, Kyuu Eturautti wrote:
I know it's a bit off-subject, but I'd like to point out the very painful
USB keyboard problem with Grub at least on AMD64 which was discussed a bit
earlier.
Does anyone know the specifics of
Karl Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 18:22 -0700, Karl Hegbloom wrote:
On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 01:32 +0300, Kyuu Eturautti wrote:
I know it's a bit off-subject, but I'd like to point out the very painful
USB keyboard problem with Grub at least on AMD64 which was
Jean-Michel POURE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear Friends,
First of all, thanks for this great job working on a pure 64 Debian port.
Just a few remarks and questions:
1) Using the new debian installer at first, it did not seem clear to me that
I
had to choose an expert installation.
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Both binary-amd64/Packages and
debian-installer/binary-amd64/Packages are empty. I have no idea
why.
If it is allowed to make a wild guess: I would suggest to
check the free disk space on the machine used to generate
the Packages
Karl Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 14:17 -0700, Karl Hegbloom wrote:
Perhaps for a very important
production server you should have both a staging system and the real
thing, so that you can test updates on the staging box before putting
them onto the deployment
Martin Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello
I tried to install the amd64 Port with the netinst image.
The installation fails with:
-
Errors were encountered while processing:
exim4-daemon-light
at
exim4
exim4-config
mailx
Karl Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 09:52 +0200, Massimo Perga wrote:
Please, could you help me ?
I don't think that the installer will support installing to a firewire
drive right now. (unless they fixed that) You may be able to get it to
work installing by
Fred Marmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I just wonder how difficult it is to have a good system working at home.
I'll buy athlon64 in few weeks (I hope very next week...).
I'm currently on mandrake on a athlonXP (32bits) at home, but use debian at
work (i386 too).
1: how to install
Nils Valentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Debian fans on the list,
Thank you very much for the many, many responds I received when posting my
last threat in October called K8S Pro (S2882UG3NR) + Sil 3114 (Raid 1) +
Sarge.
In the meantime I managed to follow up on software raid and
Alexandru Cabuz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Turns out there was some kind of bug in the ata_piix module so that it
had to be loaded after the ide_generic module and all kinds of
incomprehensible kernel babble, all of which can be skipped by simply
installing 2.6.9. I was still on 2.6.8.
Now
Alexandru Cabuz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Generally using ide-generic is a bad idea (it does not allow DMA) and
the specific driver should be used instead.
This is true, now that you mention it. I can't enable DMA, which is
particularly annoying when playing DVDs. The image is jerky.
What
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi folks,
I tried to build and test d-i on amd64 (gcc-3.4), but for
the current version 'make build-monolithic' failed with
some broken dependencies and missing packages:
...
Would somebody mind to update the udebs for amd64 (gcc-3.4)?
Many thanx
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, yes please, could someone give a bit more information about that.
I have looked the
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/archive-structure.txt
This file details plans for the near future and comments and
improvements to it are
Stefan Lüthje [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I read this list since last week. But my question is, which tree I should
use.
At the moment I have the /pure64. Make it sense to use the /gcc-3.4?
If yes, what is the easiest way, to change the distribution.
Best Regards
Stefan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
I would like to ask this:
...
Is there any way in wich I can have both kind of libraries in my system?,
I mean, something like this:
lib : 32bits libraries.
lib64: 64bits libraries.
and have almost all of my system running 64bits binaries (except by:
Alexandru Cabuz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I set up a chroot last night following the instructions in the howto.
By the way, that AMD64 howto needs some updating. There are some details
that are not mentioned. Like when and how to run base-config to set up
the chroot environment, and whatnot,
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
I thought EFI was only an ia64 thing. Strange. Could you send a tarball
of /var/log/debian-installer/ from the installed system so I can try to
see why it was doing EFI stuff?
I just see this now so maybe Harald
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello debian-amd64,
I wanted to check whether my packages worked on amd64 and after much
puzzling because I could not rebuild packages available on alioth.
I finally get across the following discrepancy between Debian source
package and source
Mike Reinehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've heard that's it's improper to reply to your own message, but I need to
acknowledge that I've solved this problem, before anyone wastes any time on
it.
A quick search of the mailing list archive turned up this very same question
in July along
Chris Wakefield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greetings x86_64 users.
I'm trying to boot to my x86_64 debian install on /dev/hde11 I am
wanting a simple way to boot from the mini.iso (netboot.img??) or the
debian from scratch iso or some such image.
With the old 32 bit debian rescue floppy,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
You can use /emul/ia32-linux/lib (as the ia32-libs, ia32-libs-dev
and ia32-libs-openoffice.org packages already do). The drawback of
this method is that you can't just apt-get install foobar to
install a 32bit package
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
Phil Warrick wrote:
I'm going with the chroot approach then.
Following the AMD64 HOWTO in section Running applications inside the
chroot, I followed the instructions and then I wanted to try to run a
32-bit program.
First I wanted to try to run
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
But if 'dchroot' is configured with the ia32-linux chroot then you can
just say dchroot apt-get install foobar to install a 32bit package.
dchroot will only work if you have a chroot
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had problems installing kernel 2.6 on Seagate ST380013AS SATA drive.
I put old 2GB Seagate ATA HD in the box, retaining SATA drive but
setting BIOS to boot off old ATA drive.
Have you tried modprobe sata_sil in console 2 when you're notified
Hank Barta [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been trying to install some flavor of Debian AMD-64 to a system I
upgraded last night with little success.
Hardware
Abit AV8 with VIA K8T800 Pro/ VT8237 chipset
SATA/RAID (not in use yet)
VT8237 IDE
Audio (AC-97?)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Another alternative I am working through the details for right now is
the exact reverse. A 32-bit base system with a 64-bit /emul layer.
Then the small number of programs that need the larger memory space
run transparently
Philip Warrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My /etc/apt/sources.list in the chroot looks like this:
deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main
deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main
# deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main
as created by apt-setup (I said no the the
Philip Warrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My /etc/apt/sources.list in the chroot looks like this:
deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main
deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main
# deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main
as created by apt-setup (I said no the the
Jin Zhao [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just had a look and found it still timestamped as 26-Oct-2004 05:56,
but other images are updated daily.
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/
Does everybody use net boot image to test amd64?
Jin
Some people do and I update the
Simon Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi There, Can someone please answer a hardware/usage question for me? We
have used woody on 386/686 servers for ages, normally on pentium 3 and AMD
athlons. We are currently susing a new production mail server... which
will have the following
Jin Zhao [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following is what I ran into during a stage 2 installation on a
dual opteron 250 machine. The full installation report was submitted
to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Comments/Problems:
base-config failed on taskselect -- aptitude. There are entries in
We have
Nils Valentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Leopold,
I am trying to do the same here in Tokyo, but I cant get the mirror.sh to
work
which Goswin posted 2 days ago. I assume you used that as well ?
It will say rsync error; error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at
io.c (359)
You
Hank Barta [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 11:52:32 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow
Have any spare parts around? Another cpu, different MB.
Unfortunately this the only XMD64 hardware I have. I've just ordered a
new LAN card (Intel) to replace the ancient Tulip based card. I
Hank Barta [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 14:15:44 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hank Barta [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
./get-packages ???
Uploaded.
What should go in my soures.list.udeb? At present I have:
deb http://debian.uchicago.edu
Lourens Steenkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I broke my system and do not have a clue about getting it up and running
again.
Here are the last few lines displayed before she stops:
Attached scsi disk sda at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun0
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 05:45:18PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As for debian-cd: What do you think about adding an option to use
different archs for the debs and udebs on a cd? Or including both
sets?
I'm
Don Hayward [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following error occured while upgrading from gcc-3.4. What should I do?
Thanks.
Don
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18.0.0.1.amd64 (using
.../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-19.0.0.1.gcc4_amd64.deb) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 148:
Mike Reinehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My apt sources.list was created by the monolithic.iso d-i from the sarge
repository
and I haven't made any changes to it since the install:
#deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/sarge sarge main
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/sarge
David Liontooth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 11:45 -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Same time the official sarge will be released (+ a day or two) the
unofficial sarge amd64 should be finished.
Hey, that's great news! (News
Rafael Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi. Any simple command so in a shell i can know if i'm into my 32-bit chroot
or in the main system?
Thx,
Rafael Rodríguez
Use linux32 when you go into the chroot and then uname will show a
32bit system.
Apart from this (and other manualy things
Rafael Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi. Has anybody got acrobat reader working? Tried apt-get -b source acroread
from marillat's mirror but fails:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unable to find dependency information for shared
library libXt (soname 6, path
Alexandru Cabuz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Here's an example of the kind of error I've been getting trying to run
apt-get upgrade on my amd64 system.
Réception de : 23 ftp://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main libsane 1.0.15-3 [2634kB]
Err ftp://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main libsane 1.0.15-3
David Liontooth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dec 11 12:59:13 clitunno ud[6280]: Uptime daemon starting...
Dec 11 12:59:13 clitunno kernel: ud[6280]: segfault at
958a7d00 rip 002a956e9980 rsp 007fbfffecb8 error 4
The daemon really does stop running, every time I try to start
it.
David Liontooth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Goswin,
So this is not behavior others are seeing? I have the pleasure of sending you
a thousand EBADF reports below --
I have no clue. I don't have ud installed and know of noone having it
running. I'm just trying to guide you to finding the
Corin Langosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
after further testing it shows that the official mysql
binary from www.mysql.com
mysql-standard-4.1.7-unknown-linux-x86_64-glibc23.tar.gz
doesnt' work with the latest pure64 or gcc-3.4.
as mentioned, always the locks block the whole mysql-server
Drew Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
binutils-dev only supplies a static archive for libiberty. On AMD64,
this means that you can't use libiberty functions in shared libraries,
because libiberty.a isn't compiled with -fPIC.
Seems to me that all library packages on AMD64 should come with
Corin Langosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
thanks everyone for your help so far!
by the way, when trying to install mysql-server
(currently a 4.0 version) it also wants to install
exim4 etc. this isnt necessary at all and should
be fixed for mysql 4.1 package?
mysql-server depends on
Bharath Ramesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just re-installed my machine and started to use udev. Every restart I
udev seg faults. This what it gives out in the dmesg
What does your /etc/apt/sources.list look like?
MfG
Goswin
ocl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bharath Ramesh wrote on 2004-12-14 02:04:
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Bharath Ramesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just re-installed my machine and started to use udev. Every restart I
udev seg faults. This what it gives out in the dmesg
Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
you need to create the /lib64 - /lib symlink.
I just uploaded a patched base-files_3.1.1.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb
to alioth.
Greetings
Frederik Schueler
Args, that was supposed to happen only after/with the glibc changed to
take over the
Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 04-Dec-15 18:41, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If you find the time please also add a 'Replaces: base-file (
current version + 1)' for libc6 and the /lib64 and and /usr/lib64
links and upload a patched base-files that 'Pre-Depends: libc6
Lorenzo Milesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just uploaded a patched base-files_3.1.1.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb
to alioth.
yesterday evening I was trying to do a dist-upgrade but the base-files
package won't install. it says it's going to try to overwrite
/usr/X11R6/lib64 which is in
Lorenzo Milesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That would be a bug of xfree86-driver-synaptics and nvu. If we even
have a usr/X11R6/lib64 link then it belongs in the xfree86
package. The link in base-files is just a hack because it is easier to
patch.
should I open a bug for this on
Sergio Almenara [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, i'm trying to install Debian AMD64. When i'm installing the base
system, it returns a error that explains it can't install pppoeconf
because gettext (version = 0.13) hasn't been installed yet, however,
gettext-base 0.14 has been installed
1 - 100 of 1045 matches
Mail list logo
