Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

2023-06-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Can I suggest that if you file a few bugs and add some information in it so that maybe someone can look at it? If it only affects one architecture, send a mail to that list asking for help. Kurt

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

2023-06-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 05:52:44AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Am 19.06.23 um 23:29 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > > > The pragmatic option would be to run only a smoketest for build success > > > on architectures not tested by upstream. > > > > And have Format->Character in Impress crash

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

2023-06-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On June 18, 2023 11:37:55 PM GMT+02:00, Rob Landley wrote: >On 6/18/23 14:58, Rene Engelhard wrote: >>> Three years ago Samba maintainer Jeremy Allison lamented that "Both GPLv3 >>> and >>> the AGPL have been rejected soundly by most developers" and talked about >>> how he >>> regretted the

Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] openssl sha1 not working with large files on stretch arm.

2019-04-11 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 04:51:50PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:24 AM peter green wrote: > > > > I got a report from a user about "openssl sha1 " not working for > > large files on raspbian stretch. > > > > I investigated the problem and found that when I tried to

Re: armel after Stretch (was: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16)

2016-12-13 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 03:53:31PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > AFAIK there are potentially still similar problems with ARMv5 - lack > of architcture-defined barrier primitives for C++11 atomics to > work. (I'd love to be corrected on this if people know better!) This > is one of the key points

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

2016-08-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:05:06PM +0200, ni...@thykier.net wrote: > * If we were to enable -fPIE/-pie by default in GCC-6, should that change >also apply to this port? [0] If -fPIE is the default will -fPIC override it? It will also default to tell the linker to use -pie, but then don't do

Re: DSA concerns for jessie architectures

2013-08-08 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 09:06:31PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: On 06/22/2013 07:26 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: * sparc: no working nflog (mild concern); no stable kernels in stable (compiling clisp for instance crashes the kernel reliably on smetana). We need to run sparc with oldstable

Re: DSA concerns for jessie architectures

2013-06-22 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:21:29PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote: Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.org writes: * armel: no remote management (being worked on); no archive kernel for the machines we use. afair buildd are: marvell DB-78x00 - should be supported by armel kernel flavour

Re: DSA concerns for jessie architectures

2013-06-22 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:45:17PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote: Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be writes: On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:21:29PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote: Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.org writes: * armel: no remote management (being worked on); no archive kernel

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-04-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: I'll make GCC 4.6 the default after the release of GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at least on amd64, armel, i386 and powerpc. If you do the switch, please

Re: DSO linking changes for wheezy

2010-11-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The rationale is summarized in

Re: Please give back paraview on armel

2010-08-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:49:36AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: After discussion on the debian-arm mailing list. Martin Michlmayr offered his help and tried to reproduce the FTBFS on armel, but he could not (*) So I would like to request a give back on paraview on armel gb