On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 01:14:10PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> So, we're all fine? Not so much: for our 32-bit Debian arches, we will
> need to basically rebuild the world to be 2038-safe. When we had to do
> something like this in the past, to deal with the libc5->libc6
> transition, we had an
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 08:15:15PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 09:45 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > Yes, but that still says:
>
> Ack.
>
> > I think a proper procedure should involve a script that:
> >
> > - is packaged in De
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:19:34AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > One way in which the need to keep armel around would be reduced is if we
> > could somehow upgrade from armel machines to armhf ones, without
> &g
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 08:50:40PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
[...asking for armel to be retained...]
One way in which the need to keep armel around would be reduced is if we
could somehow upgrade from armel machines to armhf ones, without
requiring a reinstall.
After all, armel has been around
(sorry for jumping in late here)
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 07:51:55AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 01:37 +0300, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> > At the openmainframeproject EU meetup, it was indicated that SUSE
> > joined with indication that Open Build Service might be able to
Hi,
(haven't seen the original mail, so replying to this one)
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Alexander Wirt dixit:
Could you
On 14-06-13 21:11, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Wouter, Mikael: input on switching C/C++ to 4.8?
We don't have much data either way, do we?
I suppose it shouldn't be too much of a problem, but I can't be sure. In
the past we've usually taken the plunge, and filed bugs if things go
really bad.
--
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 01:51:11PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Interestingly, and confusingly...
I get no such messages on an OpenRD base sitting right beside the
ultimate running an essentially identical software load.
Any thoughts?
I guess you've got some broken bits in your flash. There
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 06:28:40PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to use the daily image for the armel installer on
my ss4000-e but running into some issues.
When I try to upload the .pkg image file to the web interface it
always gets to about 15% then stalls and reboots.
to the
writings of a lot of people (especially Ard Van Bremen, Tobias Frost
and Martin Michlmayr - many, many thanks to you, by the way, you've
helped me a lot, even without knowing it !).
Wouter Verhelst (CCed) has just finished porting the debian-installer
to this device, so he should be able
(this really isn't Debian-arm specific; please direct follow-ups, if
any, to the debian-user mailinglist)
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 05:11:43PM +0200, Xan wrote:
Hi,
I have a NSLU2 device (armel computer). With Debian 5.0.2 installed.
I cannot use reportbug because exim4 is not configured
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:56:37PM +0100, Björn Wetterbom wrote:
What kind of time frames are we talking about when it comes to Debian
support for Kirkwood for us ordinary users who don't compile our own
kernels and want our machine to start every day, every time?
Will initial support
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 04:38:18PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Dieter Bloms debian@bloms.de [2009-03-06 15:19]:
Is it possible to get a core dump via network or dump it to disc ?
I don't think so, but maybe someone else has an idea. (There is a
netconsole, but I doubt this'll work
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 04:36:29PM -0800, Weidong Li wrote:
Thanks for the info! I tried with your method, and it went pretty fast
in doing the right thing. But then apt-get had a segmentation fault.
Please file a bug about that one (if you haven't already)
--
Lo-lan-do Home is where you
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:05:32PM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
First trap versatile image is initramfs and not initrd. So I integrated
the cpio archive into my kernel and booted the Debian installer. But it
is really netboot.
This is correct; the 'netboot' installer image does not contain
Hi,
I've often thought that it would be useful to have tags in the BTS so
that users or maintainers could mark a bug as specific to a particular
architecture. This way, when I have some spare time, I could go to the
BTS, fetch a list of bugs that are specific to an architecture I care
about, and
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:02:57AM -0700, johncohn wrote:
I then cd'd into /usr/src/modules/zf1211-source and did a 'make' and got
this
[...]
SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/zd1211-source modules
make: *** /lib/modules/2.6.18-6-ixp4xx/build: No such file or directory.
This means you haven't
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 07:41:53PM -0700, johncohn wrote:
Note.. I posted this same query in the nabble nslu2-linux forum. Someone
there suggested I try here as well. tnx
Folks.
I'm a total newb in both the debian and slug worlds... but I'm already
having a blast... and want to get fluent
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 07:28:17PM +0100, David Fokkema wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 21:32 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:17:46PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
Ok, I've set up a 5GB swap over NBD. If the system reboots, it won't
automagically reattach it.
Hi Eduard,
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 06:19:47PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Hello,
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=apt-cacher-ngver=0.1.9-1arch=armstamp=1197418736file=log
failed again because if missing libsupc++.a. I have seen this trouble before
in
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:21:20PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2007-12-19, Martin Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/12/19, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
kde4 release candidates are in experimental. The experimental arm buildd
seems to fail to build with some weild errors from libstdc++
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 04:23:34PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 03:17:05PM +0100, Michael Lantzen wrote:
convert from the ImageMagick package is awfully slow on my N2100, it
takes about 5 minutes to convert a 8mpixel jpg from the cam to a
640x480. When i loo at top
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:42:43AM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
Hi all,
I'm about to order a re-badged N2100 for use as a home NAS, and have a
few questions about getting Debian onto it.
I see that 4.0r1 is broken, is it best to install r0 or are there
installer images with the fixed kernel
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:25:05PM +0400, Sergey Smirnov wrote:
Riku Voipio wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:30:33PM +0400, Sergey Smirnov wrote:
Do anybody have firefox/iceweasel for armel?
firefox from Debian repository crash on my Zaurus with Debian armel.
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 10:56:21AM +0200, Rainer Hlawaty wrote:
Hi Martin,
I want to let you know that in my opinion it is still possible to
install Debian 4.0 on NSLU2 using the normal installation method.
I used the unofficial image (with the driver for the internal network
interface
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 03:36:35PM +0200, Michele Bini wrote:
Hello everybody,
first, let me beg your pardon in advance if this is not the proper place to
ask,
It is.
but I'm afraid that debian-users is not either.
I wouldn't know why not, actually, though I'll agree that more people
know
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 06:00:09PM +0100, Steve Gane wrote:
On the N2100, does it behave the same so that one can simply cat
to the mtdblock partitions?
Martin's page seems to suggest that, yeah:
http://www.cyrius.com/debian/iop/n2100/deinstall.html
As that page shows, you don't even actually
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 02:12:31PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:08:02PM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote:
Can you define the characteristics of an architecture that isn't
in good shape?
How about this one:
An architecture is said to be 'not in good shape' at
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:26:42AM -0700, Bernard Dudley wrote:
I want to use my Palm PDA as a terminal for my slug, and it works well,
except that ncurses apps don't work properly. I started a thread at the
debian forums - http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=14617 - but no
responses.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 07:04:45AM -0600, Gordon Farquharson wrote:
Hi John and Markus
On 4/18/07, John Fieldsend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could not connect to ftp.uk.debian.org:80 (1.0.0.0), connection timed out
Ok, so now we need to figure out what is causing the following message
in
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:32:59PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
Wookey wrote:
It is not clear to me how much demand there is for such a
distro as few machines actually _need_ to run BE, so most will be
using armel.
I seem to remember someone saying that armeb may have network performace
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 06:50:12PM +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006, Bill Gatliff wrote:
For the faster arches, i.e. the ARM9 machines and above, I'm thinking
that we should stick with real hardware so there's no question that the
binaries will run properly.
Pardon
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 07:27:03PM +, Martin Guy wrote:
2006/12/20, Wookey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We ought to discuss if there
is any significant reason not to use qemu 'machines' instead of actual
hardware for slower arches.
As Wookey knows, I have been building Debian packages to
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 05:01:39PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 12:23:13PM +0200, Martin Guy wrote:
What is lost is the ability to compile a program in Thumb mode and
link it against the standard Debian libraries. I would think that
people who need space optimisation
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 11:20:20AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 08:56:34PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
* Debian build-dependencies do not distinguish between stuff that's
needed because you need to run it, and stuff that's needed because you
need the .so
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 06:40:59AM -0700, Peter Naulls wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
xulrunner 1.8.0.4-1 is in need for a build on arm. The buildd failed it
because it took too much time, and elmo seems to be away. This
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 08:51:34AM -0700, Peter Naulls wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian does not do crosscompiling for packages.
Really. Perhaps you ought to try a more helpful repsonse. I'll get you
started:
Debian packages
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 11:04:57AM -0700, Peter Naulls wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 08:51:34AM -0700, Peter Naulls wrote:
for cross compiling. However, for cases like Mozilla and other large
ARM packages
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 12:07:02PM -0700, Peter Naulls wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* To be able to cross-build packages, a cross-toolchain has to be
installed. There are no prebuilt packages for this, you need to build
them
Hi,
Could anyone please have a look at fixing xorg for armeb? There used to
be a patch for xorg-x11, but it needs to be revisited for xorg.
A whole bunch of things are waiting on this (gtk and everything that
depends on it -- which includes gcj, therefore db4.4, and therefore
perl), so it'd be
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 04:41:26PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 04:08:14PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Could anyone please have a look at fixing xorg for armeb? There used to
be a patch for xorg-x11, but it needs to be revisited for xorg.
#367188: xorg
Hi,
Could anyone please kick bob? It isn't listening for SMTP or SSH
anymore, although it does still reply to pings.
Thanks,
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, Ashes to Ashes, stardate 53679.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hi,
I'm starting to see issues on armeb/unstable when configure is running,
trying to detect the C compiler; it sometimes errors out with error: C
compiler cannot create executables.
Looking through config.log, I see the following:
gcc -Wall -ggdb -O2 -z defs conftest.c
gcc: defs: No such file
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 10:18:24AM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
From gecode's arm build log:
arm-linux-gnu-g++ -I. -I. -DNDEBUG -fPIC -Wall -ggdb -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing
-finline-limit=3000 -ffast-math -DGECODE_BUILD_SET \
-c -o set/rel-op-const.o set/rel-op-const.cc
make[1]: ***
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 01:08:33PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Tomasz Chmielewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-23 12:43]:
It runs some sort of Linux (big-endian), but I thought it would be a
better idea to try to run Debian-armeb on this device.
To do this, I would need some sort of a
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 07:38:50AM -0300, Christoph Simon wrote:
Hi,
I've just installed debian in a NSLU2. Now, I would like to get
bluetooth to work. I've done this already on a common desktop box, but
here, I'm unable to find the modules. I've installed and re-installed
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 04:01:01PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:45:37AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 10:57:05AM +0200, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
Why are hyphens bad? We already have hurd-i386...
Which is os-arch. Not quite the same
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:32:04AM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote:
Bill Gatliff wrote:
David:
David Weinehall wrote:
Changing the name for the existing ARM arch in Debian is *NOT* an
option. It's been stated several times already.
I'm not suggesting that we change the name of
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 10:14:25AM +0100, Martin Guy wrote:
Rather than choose a soapbox to stand on, I'll suggest a few criteria
for it to fit in with the schemes for existing Debian architecture
variants (there is a list at popcorn.debian.org) and to future-proof
Hi guys,
It'd been a while since I'd seen a build log from either bob or wendy
(armeb buildd hosts), so I went and checked them out. Looks like they
both had localedef, as user 'buildd', in an infinite loop.
I don't know whether this is an armeb specific thing and/or whether it's
been fixed in
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:41:16AM -0500, Woody Suwalski wrote:
To everybody else:
Would anybody on the list know if James is still on Planet Earth???
Still in Debian Universe??? And if so - how to reach him???
Last I heard, James was busy in Ubuntu Below Zero. Not sure how long
that's going
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 10:46:04AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 03:44:10PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
You can browse the build logs on buildd.debian.org.
I did. It says mpich was build (probably succesful) 2 months ago. It
does not tell me why it still hasn't
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 03:52:16PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Hi guys!
Could you please reschedule freesci in the autobuilder for m68k and
arm?? The builds was failing because of dependency problems of SDL,
but those have been fixed a while back already.
Actually, the build on m68k failed
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 02:06:51PM -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
Could someone please check into the status? I remember there have been
some problems in the past with the log files being too big for automatic
handling, so this may be the case again.
Yes, that's what happened indeed. I've
Hi guys. Don't know whether you've seen this, but here's a message from
joey that arrived in my mailbox lately. Containing something I'd like to
ask you guys about:
- Forwarded message from Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Development
55 matches
Mail list logo
