Fwd: Upgrading from arm to armel

2008-03-16 Thread Martin Guy
Well, to quote *all* of the personal mail I sent to Tobias... *sigh* -- Forwarded message -- From: Martin Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 15.3.2008 22:03 Subject: Re: Upgrading from arm to armel To: Tobias Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are there any problems to be expected because of

Re: Fwd: Upgrading from arm to armel

2008-03-16 Thread Tobias Frost
I just loaded the Mar-15 d-i for armel, and till now everthing ok. (Mirror: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/iop32x/netboot/) I try to make notes if there is someting not as expected... 1) the md5sums of the kernel inside the n2100.bin and the kernel on the mirror are

Re: Fwd: Upgrading from arm to armel

2008-03-16 Thread Tobias Frost
Update: LuKS and Reiser can be seen as compatible for direct migration from arm to armel. (fsck.reiserfs --check said everthings ok) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Fwd: Upgrading from arm to armel

2008-03-16 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Tobias Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-16 13:34]: 1) the md5sums of the kernel inside the n2100.bin and the kernel on the mirror are different. The inird are identical. I used the kernel out of n2100.bin This is expected. The kernel in n2100.bin contains a few bytes telling the machine