If we had an armel buildd that used ccache and had pre-built versions of
all the security sensitive packages in its cache, updates for most
packages could probably be built in a timeframe that compares with other
architectures. Aside from the complexity of setting this up and desire
for KISS, is
Joey Hess wrote:
If we had an armel buildd that used ccache and had pre-built versions of
all the security sensitive packages in its cache, updates for most
packages could probably be built in a timeframe that compares with other
architectures. Aside from the complexity of setting this up and
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 07:44:30PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
We could just declare arm a second-class architecture for security updates,
i.e. DSAs being released once all archs are available except arm and arm
updates being released once available. For small to
Riku Voipio wrote:
The security buildd is a different story. Parallell buildd's compiling
several packages at time don't help[1], they want single builds
completed fast, so they can release security advisories with minimal
delay. For this reason, Moritz from the security team expressed
being
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 06:12:10PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Riku Voipio wrote:
The security buildd is a different story. Parallell buildd's compiling
several packages at time don't help[1], they want single builds
completed fast, so they can release security advisories with minimal
delay.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 07:44:30PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
We could just declare arm a second-class architecture for security updates,
i.e. DSAs being released once all archs are available except arm and arm
updates being released once available. For small to
On 2008-02-19 16:05 +, Colin Tuckley wrote:
Talking to tbm on irc this afternoon, it seems there is some confusion about
how many armel buildd boxes there are and how many are needed.
Current situation:
There are 3 buildd boxes (all of them Thecus N2100 boxes), two hosted by
Riku and
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:23:34PM +, Wookey wrote:
Givenwhat Riku said about buildd plans (3 more thecus, existing ones-
porter machines, search for something even faster for security work),
it suggests that this Kuro box is probably only useful for developing
installer support?
Usefull
* Wookey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-19 16:55]:
Does anyone know if current installer images will work? I find some
rather old (2.4 kernel) stuff here:
Not yet, but I'm currently working on Orion support for d-i.
If there is something I can expect to 'just work' then I'll have a
Nope.
--
Talking to tbm on irc this afternoon, it seems there is some confusion about
how many armel buildd boxes there are and how many are needed.
Current situation:
There are 3 buildd boxes (all of them Thecus N2100 boxes), two hosted by
Riku and the third by me. They are almost keeping up with the
Firstly, congrats for Zobel, we understand that you have more
important stuff to do than read this mail now :)
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 04:05:17PM +, Colin Tuckley wrote:
There are 3 buildd boxes (all of them Thecus N2100 boxes), two hosted by
Riku and the third by me. They are almost
On 2008-02-19 16:55 +, Wookey wrote:
On 2008-02-19 16:05 +, Colin Tuckley wrote:
A box for use as a porter machine would help with fixing problems.
I have a kurobox pro here donated by marvell for Debian use.
Givenwhat Riku said about buildd plans (3 more thecus, existing ones-
12 matches
Mail list logo
