Quoting Karl Hegbloom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: base-config
Version: 2.29
Severity: normal
Used d-i 2004/06/28 to install in a VMware. All good, up until base-
Which image exactly? Which locale? I'm doing detailed tests of both
sarge_d-i and sid_d-i images and this well known problem
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 22:59, Per Olofsson wrote:
I agree. But how do we provide a smooth upgrade here? Default to the
new behaviour on new installations but ask using debconf during
upgrades from earlier versions with the old behaviour?
Yes, that would be a good way. And the debconf question
busybox-cvs_20040623-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
busybox-cvs_20040623-1.dsc
busybox-cvs_20040623.orig.tar.gz
busybox-cvs_20040623-1.diff.gz
busybox-cvs-static_20040623-1_i386.deb
busybox-cvs_20040623-1_i386.deb
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 03:47:03 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#251302: fixed in busybox-cvs 20040623-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
s390-netdevice_0.0.5_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
s390-netdevice_0.0.5.dsc
s390-netdevice_0.0.5.tar.gz
s390-netdevice_0.0.5_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
network-console_0.0.1_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
network-console_0.0.1.dsc
network-console_0.0.1.tar.gz
network-console_0.0.1_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Accepted:
busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb_20040623-1_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb_20040623-1_i386.udeb
busybox-cvs-static_20040623-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-static_20040623-1_i386.deb
busybox-cvs-udeb_20040623-1_i386.udeb
to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 253543 pending
Bug#253543: doesn't notice if there is no default route from dhcp
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Accepted:
s390-netdevice_0.0.5.dsc
to pool/main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.5.dsc
s390-netdevice_0.0.5.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.5.tar.gz
s390-netdevice_0.0.5_s390.udeb
to pool/main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.5_s390.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
(new) network-console_0.0.1.dsc optional debian-installer
(new) network-console_0.0.1.tar.gz optional debian-installer
(new) network-console_0.0.1_s390.udeb optional debian-installer
Provides a console via ssh
Changes: network-console (0.0.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Initial Release by Bastian
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
s390-netdevice_0.0.5_s390.udeb: package says priority is optional, override says
standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and
Alle 07:45, martedì 29 giugno 2004, Christian Perrier ha scritto:
Used d-i 2004/06/28 to install in a VMware. All good, up until base-
Same bugs appeared to my install, same d-i build, locale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which image exactly? Which locale? I'm doing detailed tests of both
sarge_d-i
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040626/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
uname -a: Linux OlafTowr 2.6.6-1-686 #1 Wed May 12 14:57:57 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: So Jun 27 12:57:04 CEST 2004
Method:
Hello all,
I have to do a project requiring an auto-installation and auto
configuration of many machines. I have looked at fai and
autoinstall but am looking for other possibilities as well. Can
d-i do this? or would i be better off taking some pieces of it
and using them in fai?
Some references
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: RC1 Sarge Business Card ISO
Date: 28-6-04
Method: Boot off CD
Machine: Viglen
Processor: p2 350.
Memory:128Mb RAM,
Root Device: 40Gb IDE HDD
Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX Host bridge (rev 03)
00:01.0
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 07:45 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Karl Hegbloom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: base-config
Version: 2.29
Severity: normal
Used d-i 2004/06/28 to install in a VMware. All good, up until base-
Which image exactly? Which locale? I'm doing detailed
Brian Sutherland wrote:
Hello all,
I have to do a project requiring an auto-installation and auto
configuration of many machines. I have looked at fai and
autoinstall but am looking for other possibilities as well. Can
d-i do this? or would i be better off taking some pieces of it
and using them
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:06:51 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#251035: (forw) Bug#251035: New version available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On 27 2004 09:21, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[Christian Perrier]
As a way to circumvent this, I propose that we pre-seed
xserver-xfree86 settings about keyboard, mostly
xserver-xfree86/config/inputdevice/keyboard/model and
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 08:33:54AM -0400, Warren A. Layton wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 09:43:38AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
Here it is
| snip what=trivial patch/
Pardon my delay - I have the package ready and it will be uploaded later
this afternoon.
Yep, I'm a hurry :-)
The .deb
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 09:25:42PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 05:48:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 06:14:32PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
snip/
With the images from beta4 the same results :-(
They are also larger then 4Mb
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:00:52PM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:07:21AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:25:21AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
openssh-client-udeb is sufficient for me. I only meant some SCP like
functionality. I really doubt needs
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 04:21:39PM -0400, Nathan Widmyer wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:23:46 -0400, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Widmyer wrote:
I'm trying to install Debian sarge on a hard drive in a USB enclosure.
I got the 110MB sarge image.
Which version?
The date
[Konstantinos Margaritis]
* of all the conffiles.d, we only need xfree86-kbd, and probably
kde(but updated for kde 3)
If possible, make sure the package work in Woody as well as in
Sarge/Sid.
* ispell needs to be updated to new versions which are (I think)
debconf base
Yes, some major
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 03:32:43PM -0700, Karl Hegbloom wrote:
I thought I'd let everyone know that the www.sysresccd.org beta has a
qtparted on it that runs on a framebuffer, and can successfully resize a
Windows XP NTFS partition. Boot the CD, type run_qtparted. After the
resize, boot XP,
lspci:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P DRAM
Controller/Host-Hub Interface (rev 02)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P PCI to AGP Controller
(rev 02)
:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB
UHCI #1 (rev 02)
:00:1d.1 USB Controller:
Quoting Karl Hegbloom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
It's the sarge netinst snapshot from 2004/06/28, US English.
Which kernel ? 2.4 or 2.6 ?
2.6. I notice that the d-i CD uses 2.6.5, but the base-installer put in
2.6.6-1-386.
Uh
My last test in such conditions (sarge_d-i, 2.6, en_US) was
Environment: VmWare
Platform : i386
Kernel : 2.4
Locale : fi_FI
Image : netinst
Priority : high
Result : OK
Comment : Finnish is really really hard to understand..:-). But the
translation showed no special glitch (no too long screen and
so on). Of
Hi;One of my hard drive is not being
detected.
The only problem is on that drive there is
alot of data that I dont want to lose.
How can I get it back. Once I go to computer
administrator it gives me an error that my
hard drive coould not be initialized. And it
was working well untill just the
* Christian Perrier [2004-06-29 14:13:07+0200]
Quoting Karl Hegbloom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
It's the sarge netinst snapshot from 2004/06/28, US English.
Which kernel ? 2.4 or 2.6 ?
2.6. I notice that the d-i CD uses 2.6.5, but the base-installer put in
2.6.6-1-386.
Uh
My
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HeIlo
I have Asus A7N8X-E motherboard with sil SATA and only disk IBM 80GB
SATA. I haven´t instaled debian yet. Debian instalating program can´t
detedt my disk. where can I get module for my SATA or how can I use
newer
cdebconf_0.66_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.66.dsc
cdebconf_0.66.tar.gz
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.66_powerpc.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.66_powerpc.deb
cdebconf_0.66_powerpc.deb
cdebconf-udeb_0.66_powerpc.udeb
On 29 2004 14:12, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Konstantinos Margaritis]
* of all the conffiles.d, we only need xfree86-kbd, and probably
kde(but updated for kde 3)
If possible, make sure the package work in Woody as well as in
Sarge/Sid.
ok, how about spliting the conffiles to two dirs,
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:32:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#251973: fixed in cdebconf 0.66
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: discover1
Version: 1.6.1
Severity: normal
Hi,
It seems discover1 should have versioned dependancy on libdiscover1,
because when I've installed newest version of discover1 (1.6.1)
on my system were left very old version of libdiscover1 (1.1-6).
Btw, it seems discover1 dependancies
Accepted:
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.66_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.66_powerpc.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.66_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.66_powerpc.udeb
cdebconf-text-udeb_0.66_powerpc.udeb
to
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 05:01:32PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
snip/
For the beta4 it needs attached patch.
Please apply it.
Index: english/devel/debian-installer/ports-status.wml
===
RCS file:
Olaf Mandel wrote:
First tried to use USB-Stick
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/hd-media/2.6/boot.img.gz
It seems to be defective, creates an invalid partition-table on my 128MB-Stick.
That is the reason for using CD-based install
Well, it does not contain a partition table.
Hi,
Well, things are getting clear. I was able to figure out why this bug
appeared in sarge images, but not in sid. As you may recall, I fixed a
problem in languagechooser/prebaseconfig regarding the console font
ACMs: #250376. (See the threads of the bug report for details.) The
new
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 256569 discover1-data
Bug#256569: installation report, SATA not working on daily build
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover1-data'.
End of
Ian Miller wrote:
Couldn't find standard IDE CD drive - worked fine with old Woody
installer. Beta4 and any other daily images I've tried have same problem.
Please tell us some details about your CD drive, like what model it is,
how it's connected to the ide controller, and the kernel log from
Hi, I'm a first timer trying to install Woody 3.0 r2. Somebody else burnt
the installation CDs for me. My hardware is rather old, its a used system
originally made by Austin Computer Systems. The CD-ROM drive is old too. I
booted up with the default options (I just pressed enter at the prompt)
Hi All,
I tried to install sarge on a HP ZX6000 IA64 workstation using beta-4 and
some daily builds (eg 20040628) sarge-ia64-netinst.iso.
so far I'm not able to boot onto the CD.
Are there any special tricks to make it work ?
I'm able to boot onto the HP Enablement Kit for Linux CD so it seems
Hi all translators,
netcfg 0.71 is going to be an exciting release with a flurry of bugfixes
and useful, _well-tested_ features! I intend to get the package in
before dinstall today. To avoid a big translation upload, I hope that
some translators can translate the new templates
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:55:26PM +, Da-Breegster at BFDB wrote:
Hi, I'm a first timer trying to install Woody 3.0 r2. Somebody else burnt
the installation CDs for me. My hardware is rather old, its a used system
originally made by Austin Computer Systems. The CD-ROM drive is old too. I
I'm trying to install Debian Woody 3.0 r2 from CD-ROMs on a rather old
system, i386 architecture. When I got to the device driver screen, I chose
to install the drivers from the CD-ROM 1 because it found the drivers there.
It was on the Installing drivers from
Jim,
My pb is even before the installation, I'm not able to boot on the
installation CD.
EFI is giving me the following messages :
LOADING bootable cd
STARTING bootable cd
then the workstation stay stuck and the system led blink red.
the only thing I can do is power off/on the server.
for
netcfg_0.71_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.71.dsc
netcfg_0.71.tar.gz
netcfg_0.71_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.71_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.71_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:17:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#255187: fixed in netcfg 0.71
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:17:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#243543: fixed in netcfg 0.71
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:17:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#253543: fixed in netcfg 0.71
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:17:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#239284: fixed in netcfg 0.71
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:17:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#239284: fixed in netcfg 0.71
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:17:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#255185: fixed in netcfg 0.71
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:17:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#255984: fixed in netcfg 0.71
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:17:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#239591: fixed in netcfg 0.71
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.71_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.71_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.71_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.71_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.71.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.71.dsc
netcfg_0.71.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.71.tar.gz
vmelilo-installer_1.2_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
vmelilo-installer_1.2.dsc
vmelilo-installer_1.2.tar.gz
vmelilo-installer_1.2_m68k.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: installation-reports
Version: daily iso, 2004-06-29
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
I've just tried an install with the daily iso (2004-06-29) and no way to mount
the CD after the hardware detection (2.4 or 2.6 kernels).
After the Detecting hardware phase I got a :
Detect and mount
I've not gotten back to attempting to install from a USB stick, but
thought I'd try and mount the stick from the second console just to make
sure it's possible. None of the laptops I've seen recently have a
floppy drive (thank goodness; I hate floppies) so the ability to easily
access the USB
Accepted:
vmelilo-installer_1.2.dsc
to pool/main/v/vmelilo-installer/vmelilo-installer_1.2.dsc
vmelilo-installer_1.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/v/vmelilo-installer/vmelilo-installer_1.2.tar.gz
vmelilo-installer_1.2_m68k.udeb
to pool/main/v/vmelilo-installer/vmelilo-installer_1.2_m68k.udeb
On 29 2004 17:34, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
ok, how about spliting the conffiles to two dirs, for woody/sarge,
or with a suffix in the filename (eg. kde2.woody, kde3.sarge).
Ok, here is what i have now:
conffiles.d/:
sarge woody
conffiles.d/sarge:
ispell.preinst xfree86-kbd.preinst
Christian Perrier wrote:
It seems that a quite large agreement is achieved about the new
languagechooser/countrychooser scheme. having it in tc2 would seem to
be a very important improvement, and is also needed for BiDi support
in 2nd stage.
This is not strictly release critical and I still
Antoine EMERIT wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
gives an Unable to load some modules error, reporting that ide-mode,
ide-probe-mod, ide-detect, ide-generic, ide-floppy, ide-disk, ide-cd,
isofs modules are unavailable.
This is normal, not all modules will be available on floppy installs
during the first
After 3 people told me to note the date, I looked at my download logs
and I was correct, it was TC1. The URL I downloaded from is:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/tc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Now, how can I go about getting this working. I saw a few emails from
Karl
Hello there
I am Rev,(Mrs.)Varsha Singh, Director of Living
Insight Translator. we undertake translation work in all the Indian languages,
mainly Hindi and Marathi. so far we translated more that 1000 book and other
christian material. The publishers that we have translated so far are
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 09:27 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 22:59, Per Olofsson wrote:
I agree. But how do we provide a smooth upgrade here? Default to the
new behaviour on new installations but ask using debconf during
upgrades from earlier versions with the old
Beantwortung einer MMS per E-mail
-
Sie haben versucht, eine MMS in Ihrem Posteingang per E-Mail zu beantworten.
Bitte beachten Sie, dass diese Antwortfunktion momentan noch nicht
unterstützt wird.
Sind Sie Kunde/Kundin von Swisscom Mobile? Dann versenden Sie mit
Karl Hegbloom wrote:
There is no menu entry for mounting that USB stick device... Perhaps
it's mentioned in the Installation Manual? (checking...) It is not
explained, thus only an expert installer will know how to do this... I
suppose that only an expert will know how to build the required
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/tc1/
sarge-i386-netinst.iso
(download 27 June 2004)
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 29 June 2004
Method:
- Netinstall from
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.60_source+m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.60.dsc
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.60.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.2.25-mac-di_0.60_m68k.udeb
nic-shared-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.60_m68k.udeb
[Konstantinos Margaritis]
Ok, here is what i have now:
conffiles.d/:
sarge woody
Not sure if it is a good idea to hardcode in the names of debian
releases like that. The package should work also after sarge is
released, and a new version is being developed.
It will read the
fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.60_m68k.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.60_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.60_m68k.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.60_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.60_m68k.udeb
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Debian netinstaller sarge beta 4
(CD was part of a german linux magazine)
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 28th June 2004
Method: Netinstaller, linux 2.6, debian installer
Base System
[Konstantinos Margaritis]
There is no reason why it should not work, after all, I can just add
a new option for the next release.
Well, sure, you can keep adding new options all the time, but it will
be a maintenence problem keeping it correct and up to date.
unpredictable ways? I don't
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 03:32:43PM -0700, Karl Hegbloom wrote:
I thought I'd let everyone know that the www.sysresccd.org beta has a
qtparted on it that runs on a framebuffer, and can successfully resize a
Windows XP NTFS partition. Boot the CD, type run_qtparted. After the
resize, boot XP,
On 30 2004 00:39, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Not sure if it is a good idea to hardcode in the names of debian
releases like that. The package should work also after sarge is
released, and a new version is being developed.
There is no reason why it should not work, after all, I can just add
(For those who don't follow the thread about preseeding X debconf
values, I need a way to support both woody, sarge and future releases
and I need a way to know the current release)
Can I count on /etc/debian_version holding specific and well known
values? (aside from the case a stupid user
On 30 2004 01:39, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Well, sure, you can keep adding new options all the time, but it
will be a maintenence problem keeping it correct and up to date.
True, but this applies for everything, and maintaining will be easy
for older releases, only the latest will actually
Per Olofsson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 19:54 -0300, Robin Blondon wrote:
In the installer, I found that instead of ejecting and reinserting the
card I can go into the shell and kill and restart cardmgr. The
intstaller then detected the card after choosing to detect network
hardware from
ceeqnwb
Get all the software imaginable for prices substantially lower than in stores.
Our software is 5-10 times cheaper than sold by our competitors.
Examples:
50USD Windows XP Professional
50USD Norton System Works 2003
60USD Adobe Photoshop 7.0
60USD Freehand MX 11
50USD Windows 2000
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 10:11:42PM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
I am just poking around :) 20040624/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
In gunzipped and mounted initrd, I see
lib/debian-installer.d/.svn directory.
Maybe if it is like CVS, source should be read with CVS export like
command instead
Package: lowmemcheck
Version: 0.10
Severity: minor
Osamu Aoki found a .svn directory in /lib/debian-installer.d on
the CD image. It comes from the lowmemcheck package. The
uploader should use an exported copy of the sources instead of a
working copy to build the package.
--
Matt Kraai
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.65
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
The first time ethdetect calls db_unregister, the read command
fails. This prevents it from reading parameters, which prevents
it from loading the ne module, which prevents the network from
working, which prevents the installation
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:12:11PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Osamu Aoki wrote:
Busybox does not have sleep on this version. (Why?)
Just to save space, though I understand it's in sid now.
I will put updated patch, iso-image example, syslog-commented, etc at
85 matches
Mail list logo
