Hi Team,
I performed a test of the new Beta3 and made some screenshots and a
Howto for new users along the way. In case you're interested: it's on
thedebianuser.org under
http://blog.thedebianuser.org/?p=27 (text mode install), and
http://blog.thedebianuser.org/?p=79 (graphical install)
Thanks
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 01:28:51AM -0300, Iuri Sampaio wrote:
I've installed on my machine a dual boot system, one to debian and other
windows.
But I reinstalled my windows OS and now I lost lilo boot loader and I can
boot my linux.
Do you know a way to get into my debian box?
Is it necessary to have the installer guide msgids in po files one
huge line? It would seem to me they could be indented to make them
more readable.
I mean, text like this is pretty bad for reading:
msgid
The benefit you gain depends on a type of a MD device you are creating.
Currently
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:32:11AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
That's a known issue. Unfortunately there seems to be no way the extra
processors can be detected while running a UP kernel.
And fixed with 2.6.17 for i386 and amd64. 2.6.17 don't longer provide UP
versions of the kernels.
Bastian
--
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
With the grafical installer (I've tested only beta3), the touchpad of my
Compaq Presario 1800 (18XL19L) doesn't work. I have to set up my system
with the keyboard. When I start my Debian, the touchpad works perfecty.
-- System Information:
Debian
dann frazier a écrit :
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 03:05:35PM +0200, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Hello,
I have 2 days to install debian etch on our production server.
I download the last daily build of the cdrom (release
debian-testing-ia64-netinstall.iso 20060815).
But missing the driver
Package: debian-installer
Version: etch beta3
debian-installer naturally tries to connect to security.debian.org
but I have a few issues with the current implementation:
the connection timeout is too long
a user should be able to specify - beforehand in expert mode and
as a fallback in
2006-08-18 (금), 14:12 +0900, Changwoo Ryu 쓰시길:
2006-08-18 (금), 00:45 +0200, Frans Pop 쓰시길:
- Where does the build/templates/header.ko.tex file come from? Did you
write it yourself or was it available somewhere? I think we do need
to know this for copyright reasons. It would probably
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 03:19:18AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Has *anybody* had any success getting the Linux version 2.6.16-2-
powerpc (Debian 2.6.16-17) kernel to boot an OldWorld machine with
BootX? Or *any* kernel after 2.6.15?
I think the anwser is plainly no. :(
Well, you would
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: usb-stick
Image version: etch Beta 3: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
downloaded 17. Aug. 06 from the debian HP
Date: 17. Aug. 06 , end of day
Machine: desktop, selfmade
Processor: AMD64 Sempron 2800+, VIA chipset
I do not know if this is the proper forum for this concern
or not, but I'm going to report a problem.
During installation of Debian etch I ran into a problem.
I downloaded the ISO file from debian.org web site and burn a CD. This
procedure went without a hitch. I then inserted a CD in
On Friday 18 August 2006 11:33, you wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:32:11AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
That's a known issue. Unfortunately there seems to be no way the
extra processors can be detected while running a UP kernel.
And fixed with 2.6.17 for i386 and amd64. 2.6.17 don't longer
Accepted:
crypto-modules-2.6.17-2-s390-di_0.06_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.17-2-s390-di_0.06_s390.udeb
dasd-modules-2.6.17-2-s390-di_0.06_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6/dasd-modules-2.6.17-2-s390-di_0.06_s390.udeb
On 18/08/06, Tapio Lehtonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it necessary to have the installer guide msgids in po files one
huge line? It would seem to me they could be indented to make them
more readable.
I mean, text like this is pretty bad for reading:
msgid
The benefit you gain depends on a
On 18/08/06, Tapio Lehtonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it necessary to have the installer guide msgids in po files one
huge line? It would seem to me they could be indented to make them
more readable.
I mean, text like this is pretty bad for reading:
msgid
The benefit you gain depends on a
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:32:11AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Any idea if the HTT flag being present would be a reliable indication of
dual-core?
Not sure, but it sounds like a reasonable assumption.
Looks easy enough to implement if we get confirmation.
Care to send in the output of dmidecode
oops, most of these follow-ups should've gone into 383544.
i'll bounce these messages back to 383544, sorry for the duplication
please ignore for the purposes of 383540.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Aug 18, 2006, at 7:59 AM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 03:19:18AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Has *anybody* had any success getting the Linux version 2.6.16-2-
powerpc (Debian 2.6.16-17) kernel to boot an OldWorld machine with
BootX? Or *any* kernel after 2.6.15?
I
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:33:59AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:32:11AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
That's a known issue. Unfortunately there seems to be no way the extra
processors can be detected while running a UP kernel.
And fixed with 2.6.17 for i386 and amd64.
Package: installation-reports
Hi!
I tried installing Debian 4.0 beta3 using the ISO for installation
via network on my Dell Inspiron 8000, which hosted already various
Linux distro the last 6 years.
- Using default installation it went well, but it failed just after
download the
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:10:58 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#382888: closed by Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re:
Bug#382888: debian-installer: needs install continuation capability)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 09:19:01AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:10:58 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#382888: closed by Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Re: Bug#382888: debian-installer: needs install continuation
(new) acpi-modules-2.6.17-2-amd64-di_1.12_amd64.udeb extra debian-installer
ACPI support modules
This package contains linux kernel modules for ACPI.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-amd64-di_1.12_amd64.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:11:58 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: Re: Bug#382891 closed by Frans Pop [EMAIL
PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#382891: debian-installer: configurations that delay
package installation)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.12_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.12.dsc
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.12.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.17-2-amd64-di_1.12_amd64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.17-2-amd64-di_1.12_amd64.udeb
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:48:27 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing Bug#383667: Issues installing Debian Etch/Beta3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to
Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 18 August 2006 11:33, you wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:32:11AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
That's a known issue. Unfortunately there seems to be no way the
extra processors can be detected while running a UP kernel.
And fixed with 2.6.17 for i386 and amd64.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:44:23AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Perhaps the Debian PTBs should simply admit that PowerPC OldWorld
Macintosh is an unsupported sub-arch for Debian etch? /-8
What is PTBs? :)
Well, aside the issue of booting, the kernel runs just
fine and so does the user
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
What is PTBs? :)
Powers that be...
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Well, aside the issue of booting, the kernel runs just
fine and so does the user space... As you can look at
http://www.us.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/errata, I think
it is partially admitted in Oldworld powerpc boot floppies will not
The three brand name drugs available to improve sex lives are now available in
generic form at a significantly
lower price.
Pick up the one that is best for you at:
http://9yf0ezf4x8ewjr9ker9ker99.jerkyjc.st
jewel day
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 03:06:03PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
I don't think the errata takes any notice of the fact that, quite
independent of freeness considerations, there is *no* working boot
loader for the 2.6.16 kernel on an OldWorld Mac. I've tried both
bootx and quik and neither
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:56:52PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Do you think it will be ready for inclusion in etch at release time?
Hard to say, since Piotr and I have no deadline... :)
Cheers,
--
.''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :' :
`. `'` Free Software Developer
`- Unix Sys Net Admin
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:52:24PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
What is PTBs? :)
Powers that be...
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:44:23AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Perhaps the Debian PTBs should simply admit that PowerPC OldWorld
Macintosh is an
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.1.3-2
Severity: serious
Attempting to build busybox on sarge yields the following during build:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/busybox-1.1.3/debian/build/build-udeb'
cp debian/build/build-udeb/docs/BusyBox.1
debian/build/build-udeb/docs/busybox.1
touch
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:58:07PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:52:24PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
What is PTBs? :)
Powers that be...
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:44:23AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Perhaps the
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
busybox-static_1.1.3-3_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and
Accepted:
busybox-static_1.1.3-3_amd64.deb
to pool/main/b/busybox/busybox-static_1.1.3-3_amd64.deb
busybox-udeb_1.1.3-3_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/b/busybox/busybox-udeb_1.1.3-3_amd64.udeb
busybox_1.1.3-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/b/busybox/busybox_1.1.3-3.diff.gz
busybox_1.1.3-3.dsc
to
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:33:59AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:32:11AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
That's a known issue. Unfortunately there seems to be no way the extra
processors can be detected while running a UP kernel.
And fixed with 2.6.17 for i386 and amd64.
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:47:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#383710: fixed in busybox 1:1.1.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:41:53AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I've removed the exception and will add an erratum for beta3.
Thanks Frans!
You should be able to work around this by passing this as boot parameter:
base-installer/kernel/linux/initramfs-2.6=true
I tried this, but it yielded the
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:47:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#378654: fixed in busybox 1:1.1.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
busybox_1.1.3-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
busybox_1.1.3-3.dsc
busybox_1.1.3-3.diff.gz
busybox_1.1.3-3_amd64.deb
busybox-static_1.1.3-3_amd64.deb
busybox-udeb_1.1.3-3_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 12:18:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:58:07PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:52:24PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
What is PTBs? :)
Powers that be...
On Fri,
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 03:59:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
And is there a way to override SMP detection on the kernel commandline?
2.6.17 still doesn't give me a reliable clock on my amd64 system when
running smp.
Boot with nosmp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 381973 partman-crypto
Bug#381973: cryptsetup: segfaults in luksOpen with -c blowfish-cbc-essiv:sha256
-s 448
Bug reassigned from package `cryptsetup' to `partman-crypto'.
bye
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
hello,
Currently, under i386 at least, the CD or DVD for [1]beta 3 of d-i is
poorly seeded. In fact, other than binary-1, most torrents have only
one seed. Is there supposed to be an official set of machines seeding
all of the images? Could we get volunteers for at least one seed per
continent?
Package: quik-installer
Severity: normal
Due to a bug in the quik manpage stating that root and /boot can be on
different partitions quik-installer was 'fixed' to allow installation
of quik when /boot and root were not the same partition (but on the
same disk). This is incorrect as testing
On Aug 18, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:52:24PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
What is PTBs? :)
Powers that be...
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:44:23AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Perhaps the Debian PTBs
On Aug 18, 2006, at 6:43 PM, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 12:18:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:58:07PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:52:24PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Do not ignore me bplease,
bI found your email somewhere aand now decided to write you.
I am coming to your pblace in few weeks and thought we
can meet each other. Let me know if you do nobt mind.
I am a nicae pretty girl. Don't reply to this email.
Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
52 matches
Mail list logo
