On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 12:20:43PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:24:41AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
ofpathname is part of the ibm-powerpc-utils package (not the same as the
package currently in debian), and Aurelien Gerome is packaging it, since
yaboot also needs
My apologies for the delay in sending
this additional info. What follows is
what appears on the screen when I get
the kernel panic. The first 20 lines
have 8-digit hex numbers in front of
them starting with a 'b'. I have
omitted those numbers.
cdrom_start_packet_command+0xf2/0x129 [ide_cd]
Patch attached ...
Index: debian/nobootloader.templates
===
--- debian/nobootloader.templates (revision 40806)
+++ debian/nobootloader.templates (working copy)
@@ -7,10 +7,10 @@
Type: note
#flag:translate!:3,6
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 03:32:28PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
severity 342053 important
thanks
Lowering the severity of this bug to important.
This issue is the main reason that g-i is only provided as experimental
mini.iso for powerpc. However, that does not make RC for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:58:14 +0200 Frederik Schueler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 06:16:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:38:50PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Second: this release contains ALL binary firmware
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:53:21PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I honestly believe that moving linux-2.6 to non-free hurts our users
more than stripping non-free parts of the Debian-precompiled kernel.
of course.
Also, section 4 of the SC talks equally about users and free
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 00:53 +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:50:23PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Ross, since you maintain it, I'd appreciate any thoughts you have about
whether avahi should be included in the default desktop install. IMHO,
you should have veto power over
[Dropping -release from cc anyway; there's no possible reason this needs to
be cross-posted to 4 lists]
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:12:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:58:31AM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:52:15AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
I just tried a root-on-RAID1 setup and the only issue was that GRUB was
only installed to the MBR of the first hard disk, so when I simulated
the failure of the first disk, the system would not boot.
--
Sam Morris
http://robots.org.uk/
PGP key id 1024D/5EA01078
3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forcemerge 383946 388671
Bug#383946: installation-report: Double-click doesn't work in choose country
dialog
Bug#388671: cdebconf-gtk-udeb: should support double click and pressing enter
in partitioner menu
Bug#382357: double click on leaf item in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 388591 pending
Bug#388591: nobootloader: [powerpc]
Tags were: d-i patch
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Am Freitag, den 22.09.2006, 00:53 +0200 schrieb Sjoerd Simons:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:50:23PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Ross, since you maintain it, I'd appreciate any thoughts you have about
whether avahi should be included in the default desktop install. IMHO,
you should have veto power
On Thursday 21 September 2006 19:01, Frans Pop wrote:
It will only hit the mirrors tonight or maybe even tomorrow (not sure).
I will try to run an installation test tomorrow to see if 2.6.17 is
picked up correctly.
Tested and OK.
pgpcD2wdz1o73.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 22 September 2006 09:42, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
any progress in packaging the Bladr and HighContrastLarge GTK themes
for g-i ? IIRC it was proposed to pack them into rootskel-gtk package.
Yes, I'm working on it. We need some other changes first, but those are in
progress. I can
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:19:28AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 12:20:43PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:24:41AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
ofpathname is part of the ibm-powerpc-utils package (not the same as the
package currently in
(Reply-to set to debian-boot; please only add relevant port if needed.)
/me wonders why there have been almost no reactions to this mail
The first part is mostly information (though a cool or thanks would be
appreciated), but the second part has some issues that need attention.
Have D-I porters
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 388464 debian-installer
Bug#388464: debian-installer: ~2.6.17-2 amd64 kernel appears to be missing
lvm-mod
Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6' to `debian-installer'.
tags 388464 + unreproducible
Bug#388464:
reassign 388464 debian-installer
tags 388464 + unreproducible
thanks
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 16:34, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Installing a Dell 1950 Server (x86_64), LVM support is broken as there
is no LVM support in the kernel (-8 or -9, I believe), and no LVM
modules available.
Frans Pop scrisse:
Question: are all the PNGs currently included in your tarball
actually used? Could any of them be left out?
IIRC there are still some of them which can be stripped down, but
first I need to see which icons and pixmaps are needed by the new
graphical partitioner.
Cheers,
On Friday 22 September 2006 14:39, Luca Bruno wrote:
Frans Pop scrisse:
Question: are all the PNGs currently included in your tarball
actually used? Could any of them be left out?
IIRC there are still some of them which can be stripped down, but
first I need to see which icons and pixmaps
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 09:37:28AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 03:32:28PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
severity 342053 important
thanks
Lowering the severity of this bug to important.
This issue is the main reason that g-i is only provided as
Sven Luther wrote:
snip/
Last times the g-i was tested on PPC, it turned tout that
Known good : radeonfb, vesafb (or whatever x86 uses).
vesafb is not built on powerpc, and the laptop we had in extremadura used a
radeon chipset, altough of the R300 variety.
isn't fbonly the PPC equivalent
On Thursday 21 September 2006 23:32, Davide Viti wrote:
I have just tested keymap switching with a slightly modified patch
(attached) with the current 2.8 GTK libs.
Attilio: is this patch OK with you?
The testresults:
- keymap switching works now :-)
- VT1 does get quite a few messages Reloading
Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 09:42, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
any progress in packaging the Bladr and HighContrastLarge GTK themes
for g-i ? IIRC it was proposed to pack them into rootskel-gtk package.
Yes, I'm working on it. We need some other changes first, but those are
Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 14:39, Luca Bruno wrote:
Frans Pop scrisse:
Question: are all the PNGs currently included in your tarball
actually used? Could any of them be left out?
IIRC there are still some of them which can be stripped down, but
first I need to see which
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:31:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
(Reply-to set to debian-boot; please only add relevant port if needed.)
/me wonders why there have been almost no reactions to this mail
The first part is mostly information (though a cool or thanks would be
appreciated), but the
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:25:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
[Dropping -release from cc anyway; there's no possible reason this needs to
be cross-posted to 4 lists]
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:12:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:58:31AM -0500, Bill Allombert
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:16:02 +0200 Frederik Schueler wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:53:21PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I honestly believe that moving linux-2.6 to non-free hurts our users
more than stripping non-free parts of the Debian-precompiled kernel.
of course.
Also,
Arrgh!
Please ignore my post a moment ago. In a moment of carelessness I
forgot my promise of throwing no more flames in this thread :-(
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:52:24PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
snip/
Last times the g-i was tested on PPC, it turned tout that
Known good : radeonfb, vesafb (or whatever x86 uses).
vesafb is not built on powerpc, and the laptop we had in extremadura used a
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:13:14PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
And exactly this is what it is all about: find a way to satisfy BOTH
priorities, not just one.
No. It is about the definition of our users.
If our users are dependent on non-free software, then we indirectly
say
Package: debian-installer
Version: no idea. Netinstall image was DL'ed on 22-Sep-2006
During the installation step Select and install software, progress
ground to a halt. It said running tasksel, the progress bar remained
at 1% for several minutes.
A motionless progress bar doesn't convey much
On Friday 22 September 2006 15:12, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
I think we may want let icons PNGs in place because this would allow
me to replace the special PNGs used for the error (error_icon.png)
and warning (note_icon.png) questions with PNGs belonging to the
current theme in use (e.g.:
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 11:00, Loïc Minier wrote:
Gtk 2.10.1-1 was uploaded yesterday to experimental (and 2.10.3-1
after dinstall). This new upstream release is not compatible with
modules built with prior Gtk versions. Some longstanding issues have
been addressed in this release
Sorry if this is getting out of hand; I'm not experienced with reporting
bugs.
In reply to Don Wright:
The secret is to scroll to the top of the list of countries
and pick enter information manually.
That's not the issue. The issue is that it expects me to enter a
server and a path part of
Accepted:
oldsys-preseed_0.4.dsc
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_0.4.dsc
oldsys-preseed_0.4.tar.gz
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_0.4.tar.gz
oldsys-preseed_0.4_i386.udeb
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_0.4_i386.udeb
Override entries for your
Hi Attilio,
With the new GTK 2.8 upload by Loïc [1] and the changes in keymap support,
we now have only one RC problem remaining in G-I: the disappearing text
on the current line in multi-select lists.
I do not think that 2.10 will be in unstable in time for the RC1 release,
so it would be
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:03:09PM -0500, Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 13:03 +0530, Deepak Kumar Tripathi wrote:
From: Rajasekaran J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 9/18/2006 4:30 PM
Hi All,
I am Rajasekaran J.
I am using debian for the past two
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:56:30PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:24:17PM +0200, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Another question : where I post this kind of report ?
If debian-boot is not the good place, ok, sorry for the disturb, but where ?
I assume that the pointer to
Hi Geert,
Thanks for your response - I hope the installation report is useful to
someone.
I'm replying off-bug because I'm not sure any of the following is
relevant/useful - feel free to add in if you wish.
See some comments below,
Geert Stappers wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 06:31:00PM
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 06:51:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Xen should be okay. According to the maintainer of this tree, ia64
should work fine also.
The ia64/xen folks here think so too - I'm not too familiar with Xen,
but if you want to enable ia64/xen in linux-2.6 I should be able to
get
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:46:06AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
The ia64/xen folks here think so too - I'm not too familiar with Xen,
but if you want to enable ia64/xen in linux-2.6 I should be able to
get help from HP people if we run into ia64-specific problems.
The question is, do we want/can
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:14:09PM +0100, stephen mulcahy wrote:
Hi Geert,
Thanks for your response - I hope the installation report is useful to
someone.
I'm replying off-bug because I'm not sure any of the following is
relevant/useful - feel free to add in if you wish.
Because we both
Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 11:00, Loïc Minier wrote:
Gtk 2.10.1-1 was uploaded yesterday to experimental (and 2.10.3-1
after dinstall). This new upstream release is not compatible with
modules built with prior Gtk versions. Some longstanding issues have
been addressed in
Well,
My first naive test with the unstable g-i, gives just a blue screen. I can
alt-ctr-f2 away, and check a bit.
We did never implement the thingy which disables the acceleration in the
directfbrc, right ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:52:24PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
snip/
Last times the g-i was tested on PPC, it turned tout that
Known good : radeonfb, vesafb (or whatever x86 uses).
vesafb is not built on powerpc, and the laptop we had in
Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 21 September 2006 23:32, Davide Viti wrote:
I have just tested keymap switching with a slightly modified patch
(attached) with the current 2.8 GTK libs.
Attilio: is this patch OK with you?
Yes, i think the patch by davide should be applied: when we switch to
Davide Viti wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:04:47AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 18 September 2006 23:45, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
I did not test this by myself, but davide did it and the patch proved
to work (Davide, any hint about how to reproduce a correct keymap
change in the g-i
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:31:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
(Reply-to set to debian-boot; please only add relevant port if needed.)
/me wonders why there have been almost no reactions to this mail
The first part is mostly information (though a cool or thanks would be
appreciated), but the
On Friday 22 September 2006 21:32, Sven Luther wrote:
We did never implement the thingy which disables the acceleration in
the directfbrc, right ?
I've committed a patch now that always disables it for ppc.
pgpu2hF2ZnaR2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 22 September 2006 22:03, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Yes, i think the patch by davide should be applied: when we switch to
GTKDFB later, we'll have the chance to re-enable the check on the GDK
backend used, so that the GTK frontend works again with GTKX.
You did not read the patch I
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 09:37:28AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Last times the g-i was tested on PPC, it turned tout that
Known good : radeonfb, vesafb (or whatever x86 uses).
Known bad : atyfb, nvidiafb
when acceleration was enabled.
But that was with GTKDFB 2.0.9 and DFB 0.9.22,
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
I tried to install debian behind an apt-proxy and the installations
hangs when fetching packages during installation (Errormsg on ALT-F4).
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=388769 .
It seems that all Debian etch installations behind
I also tried to install debian behind an apt-proxy and the installations hangs
when fetching packages during installation (Errormsg on ALT-F4).
It seems that all Debian etch installations behind a sarge apt-proxy
fail because of apt-proxy bug 374405:
Incompatible with full URL HTTP requests
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:10:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 15:12, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
I think we may want let icons PNGs in place because this would allow
me to replace the special PNGs used for the error (error_icon.png)
and warning (note_icon.png)
Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 05:25:13PM -0700, RParr wrote:
I am still unable to get Debian installed on this machine.
I AM able to boot Knoppix LiveCD and NOT have any device conflicts.
Knoppix (5.0.1) assigns the 3ware /dev/sde and the USB card reader as
/dev/sda, sdb,
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:40:34PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 21:32, Sven Luther wrote:
We did never implement the thingy which disables the acceleration in
the directfbrc, right ?
I've committed a patch now that always disables it for ppc.
Thanks,
Friendly,
Package: installation
Severity: wishlist
I tried to install debian behind an apt-proxy and the installations
hangs when fetching packages during installation (Errormsg on ALT-F4).
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=388769 .
It seems that all Debian etch installations and
On Friday 22 September 2006 23:58, RParr wrote:
Any guidance would be most appreciated; especially any way to capture
the early boot messages; /etc/default/bootlogd enabling does not seem
to help.
Which kernel is being booted? If it is 2.6.16 the cause may be that your
hardware needs 2.6.17.
Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 23:58, RParr wrote:
Any guidance would be most appreciated; especially any way to capture
the early boot messages; /etc/default/bootlogd enabling does not seem
to help.
Which kernel is being booted? If it is 2.6.16 the cause may be that
Sjoerd Simons wrote:
If avahi is install by default though, libnss-mdns should probably be in too.
Good point..
Although that package needs some work (ensuring automatic setup of nsswitch..)
I thought this was fixed since #348580 is closed, but it seems it's not.
Color me puzzled.
--
see
Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 23:58, RParr wrote:
Any guidance would be most appreciated; especially any way to capture
the early boot messages; /etc/default/bootlogd enabling does not seem
to help.
Which kernel is being booted? If it is 2.6.16 the cause may be that
62 matches
Mail list logo
