On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 05:23:14PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
As suggested by Frans, with many good points, we'll release with
2.6.22 but just after it, we'll start to work to release another beta
with 2.6.24 kernel.
This should allow us to install a etchnhalf 2.6.24 on hardware supported
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:53:43AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Finally I created the etch-support udeb which does two things:
1) add an early base-installer hook script that sets the 'altmeta'
template
2) add an partman init.d hook script that changes the default
inode_size from 256 to 128
-Mensaje original-
De: Robert Millan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: martes, 05 de febrero de 2008 0:23
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Asunto: Re: [win32-loader] Updater
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:53:40PM +0100, Pedro wrote:
I suggest improve DIL (Debian
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 10:23:49AM +0100, Pedro Macanás wrote:
Yes and no. Yes, because within the USB MODEM there are only the Windows
driver files
No because I could download the drivers from Internet (*.deb package), but
it is broken because I could not install wvdial and other package
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD rom
Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r2/i386/iso-cd/
Date: today / yesterday
Machine: Intel db33bu motherboard, 2 Gb RAM, DVD/CD rw drive model DH-20A4P,
paralel ATA.
reassign 425648 grub-installer
thanks
Hi folks; GRUB 2 doesn't have this problem, and nobody seems interested in
debugging this bug for Legacy version of GRUB. Not worth it IMHO, since it
is going to disappear really soon now.
How about if we solve this in grub-installer by probing for
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 09:54 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Sylvain Garcia]
I use debian live to create liveCD, and usediscover-data to
configure Xorg, my computer use Intel i910 and display is not
automatically determined, vesa is configured. But when I set
manually i810 X start
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 425648 grub-installer
Bug#425648: 100% reproducible grub-install hang when run in x86_64 qemu
Bug reassigned from package `grub' to `grub-installer'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 11:56:06AM +0200, janis wrote:
Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r2/i386/iso-cd/
Machine: Intel db33bu motherboard, 2 Gb RAM, DVD/CD rw drive model DH-20A4P,
paralel ATA.
System
But the Loader only uses DHCP, not PPP protocol (I tried to install and this
was the problem). This is the problem. One would add also PPP (the user
could manually configure or the program could try to configure as much as
possible).
If you want I can give the web address of the driver, so one
debian-installer_20070308etch2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20070308etch2.dsc
debian-installer_20070308etch2.tar.gz
debian-installer_20070308etch2_amd64.deb
debian-installer-images_20070308etch2_amd64.tar.gz
Greetings,
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 03:04:31PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
Good news , m68k is reentered in d-i !
Well, the building of the daily D-I images has never really been disabled as
far as I know.
But
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
Good news , m68k is reentered in d-i !
Well, the building of the daily D-I images has never really been disabled as
far as I know.
But
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/m68k/iso
-cd/
are forbidden for users
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
What's the procedure for that? At the moment, sid is pretty broken for
installation (we're far behind), but no reason not to start the process.
You need a local mirror and debian-cd.
I have scripts I use to make things easier for both, feel
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, janis wrote:
Comments/Problems:
System cannot detect cd-rom. i trying both debian version, stable and
unstable, with many options - pci=nommconf, all-generic-ide, and changed
hdd mode in bios throught native, agci, ide, etc, but results is not
changed - after
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Debian Installer wrote:
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
Rejected: debian-installer-images_20070308etch2_amd64.tar.gz: changes
file doesn't say debian-installer-images_20070308etch2 for Source
Rejected: debian-installer-images_20070308etch2_amd64.tar.gz: should
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 09:45:17PM +0100, pascal wrote:
Machine: ASUS P5B
Processor: Intel duo E6600
Memory: 2G
Partitions: (two disks, one group for each)
# lvscan
ACTIVE'/dev/monvg/ltmp' [400,00 MB] inherit
ACTIVE'/dev/monvg/lusr' [12,00 GB] inherit
ACTIVE
This one time, at band camp, Jérémy Bobbio said:
[1] No bootloader currently understands LVM on top of RAID setup, AFAIK.
Lilo can handle LVM over software RAID1, AFAICR. Unfortunately, it doesn't
boot Xen last I checked.
--
-
|
Package: installation-guide
version: 20070319
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080129 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on mips
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on mips.
Relevant part:
Writing build.out/html/apds02.html for
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 06:44:59PM +0700, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.01.26.1834 +0700]:
Please Martin, could you comment on that?
I have: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/01/msg00929.html
Joerg Jaspert did some tests to measure the
On Sunday 03 February 2008, pascal wrote:
Comments/Problems:
I intended to make an install using both LVM+softRAID (not SATA-RAID).
The installer proposes LVM on one disk and does not want to re-use
already existing volumes.
I understand your question somewhat different from Jérémy, so maybe
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
Not worth it IMHO, since it (grub) is going to disappear really soon now.
You keep saying that, but with the first freeze starting in March, I wonder
if it is realistic. Last I know is that there were still important
regressions in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forcemerge 453204 464171
Bug#453204: installation-guide: FTBFS: Error: build of pdf failed with error
code 1
Bug#464171: installation-guide: FTBFS: The following formats failed to build:
pdf
Bug#451434: installation-guide: FTBFS: Failure on Russian
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
I would be in favor of trusting Joerg's comments and tagging this bug as
wontfix in order to document the issue. Any other opinions?
Sounds fine.
forcemerge 453204 464171
thanks
Duplicate of #453204. A new version will be uploaded next week that should
fix this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would be in favor of trusting Joerg's comments and tagging this bug as
wontfix in order to document the issue. Any other opinions?
[1] http://blog.ganneff.de/blog/2008/01/30#mdraid_bitmap_internal_bad
It would be interesting to contact upstream and
* dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-05 01:13]:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 05:23:14PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
As suggested by Frans, with many good points, we'll release with
2.6.22 but just after it, we'll start to work to release another beta
with 2.6.24 kernel.
This should
libdebian-installer_0.55_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdebian-installer_0.55.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.55.tar.gz
libdebian-installer4_0.55_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.55_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.55_amd64.udeb
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given we're doing a beta based on 2.6.22 now, how quickly could we get
another beta based on 2.6.24 out? Can you be done relatively quickly
after the beta based on 2.6.22?
I guess we can.
d-i itself isn't receiving deeply changes latelly (except
Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.55_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.55_amd64.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.55_amd64.deb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.55_amd64.deb
On Monday 04 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
You've probably seen that a new grub has been uploaded, which should
solve this issue for unstable and etch^Wlenny.
However, there are also plans to use the Lenny Beta release of the
installer for Etch+1/2 installations: installs of Etch, but with
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:04:17PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
Not worth it IMHO, since it (grub) is going to disappear really soon now.
You keep saying that, but with the first freeze starting in March, I wonder
if it is realistic. Last I know
* Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-05 16:43]:
d-i itself isn't receiving deeply changes latelly (except latest Frans
partman improvements but that has been very well test by him, as
usual) and other minor things. I guess we could do another in begin of
April or so, dunno for sure.
I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
tags 442209 pending
Bug#442209: making it possible to enable KDE, XFCE, etc (Re: win32-loader)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
tags 442474 pending
Bug#442474: preseed parameter list may get truncated because of Linux cmdline
256 B limit
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping
Package: win32-loader
Version: 0.6.0~pre3
Severity: normal
Hi,
More details on how to use the tool is welcome,
I unpacked it under windows, ran it and it stops with error message :
cannot find win32-loader.ini
BTW, I noticed that upstream version at gbms is more recent (r4)
but still do
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 12:24:52AM +0100, Philippe Coval wrote:
Package: win32-loader
Version: 0.6.0~pre3
Severity: normal
Hi,
More details on how to use the tool is welcome,
I unpacked it under windows, ran it and it stops with error message :
cannot find win32-loader.ini
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 01:05:14AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
win32-loader is not supposed to be used directly. You want to either use
it in the official Debian CD builds, or the network version as provided by
http://goodbye-microsoft.com/
But I admit that description could explain that
On Sunday 03 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Also note that I have _never_ intended the massbuild script to be used
for mass uploads when switching to a new kernel minor version [1]. I
still feel that porters should be responsible for checking their
configurations and included
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:36:08PM -0600, Olof Johansson wrote:
Below patch adds support to PA Semi's eval systems. Let me know if it's
preferred to provide this through the bug system instead.
Btw, I ended up adding power6 selection of the right kernel while I was
at it, that was intentional
Hi,
Below patch adds support to PA Semi's eval systems. Let me know if it's
preferred to provide this through the bug system instead.
Bug 463200 is open to request enablement of the platform code in the
generic powerpc64 kernel used on powerpc, that change together with this
will provide
41 matches
Mail list logo
