cdebconf_0.219_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:41:40 +0100 Source: cdebconf Binary: cdebconf cdebconf-gtk libdebconfclient0 libdebconfclient0-dev cdebconf-udeb cdebconf-priority libdebconfclient0-udeb cdebconf-text-udeb cdebconf-newt-udeb

Processing of cdebconf_0.219_i386.changes

cdebconf_0.219_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdebconf_0.219.dsc cdebconf_0.219.tar.xz cdebconf-dbgsym_0.219_i386.deb cdebconf-gtk-dbgsym_0.219_i386.deb cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.219_i386.udeb cdebconf-gtk_0.219_i386.deb

apt-setup_0.122_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:40:44 +0100 Source: apt-setup Binary: apt-setup-udeb apt-mirror-setup apt-cdrom-setup Architecture: source all i386 Version: 1:0.122 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install

Processing of apt-setup_0.122_i386.changes

apt-setup_0.122_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apt-setup_0.122.dsc apt-setup_0.122.tar.xz apt-cdrom-setup_0.122_all.udeb apt-mirror-setup_0.122_all.udeb apt-setup-udeb_0.122_i386.udeb apt-setup_0.122_i386.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian

Re: kernel modules missing Stretch net installation

Hi, Felix Miata (2016-10-11): > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737750 seems to be the > only installer bug about missing kernel modules. Has something changed about > the way HTTP installation started from Grub works since Jessie? I tried on > two

Bug#844579: console-setup: CyrAsia font missing Kazakh letter

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 08:20:52PM +0500, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov wrote: >> >> Should I prepare a patch for it? It is only 3 lines change. > > I suppose you shouldn't. > >> >> WARNING: U+2116: no glyph defined > > Hmm, now

Processed: Re: Bug#817236: schroot: no access to pseudo-terminals in new chroots

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 817236 debootstrap 1.0.85 Bug #817236 [schroot] schroot: no access to pseudo-terminals in new chroots Bug reassigned from package 'schroot' to 'debootstrap'. No longer marked as found in versions schroot/1.6.10-2. Ignoring request to

Re: Bug#817236: schroot: no access to pseudo-terminals in new chroots

reassign 817236 debootstrap 1.0.85 reassign 841935 debootstrap forcemerge 817236 841935 affects 817236 pbuilder sbuild schroot stop On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 08:03:25AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ben Hutchings (2016-11-07): > > On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:02:14 +0100 Ansgar

Re: Planning for d-i Stretch Alpha 9

Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2016-11-21): > Just replying regarding the general "d-i Stretch Alpha 9" question: I'd > like to get win32-loader 0.8.0 into stretch for the next d-i alpha. > > There's more win32-loader work needed, but 0.8.0 is a pile of changes > that are long needed in

Re: Default theme for Stretch

Aurélien COUDERC (2016-11-20): > Works, thank you. Great. :) > We’ll see what we can do to avoid shocking long time d-i contributors… > :-) A first small improvement to avoid that-big-gap-at-the-top is to > raise the menu a little. Trivial patch and result screenshot attached.

Bug#845254: unblock: win32-loader/0.8.0

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package win32-loader 0.8.0. win32-loader is special in that it is always 'block'ed, because it needs manual ftpmaster intervention on migration: > # doesn't actually produce

Re: Planning for d-i Stretch Alpha 9

Just replying regarding the general "d-i Stretch Alpha 9" question: I'd like to get win32-loader 0.8.0 into stretch for the next d-i alpha. There's more win32-loader work needed, but 0.8.0 is a pile of changes that are long needed in stretch. -- Cheers, OdyX

Re: Planning for d-i Stretch Alpha 9

Ben Hutchings (2016-11-20): > On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 04:06 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > [...] > > [Actual question] > > > > I'd like to know whether you already have some kind of planning for the > > next ABI bump(s?) on the linux side, so that we could align further d-i

Bug#844549: network-console broken: no screen to be resumed matching sh

Seems I'm late for the d-i/screen party, but .. On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > Oh, good point. > > I think that's what we want but I'm not sure. Maybe Roger can > comment. In his old code, there was also a $NETBOOT_SCREEN variable > which afaict

Bug#844579: console-setup: CyrAsia font missing Kazakh letter

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 08:20:52PM +0500, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov wrote: > > Should I prepare a patch for it? It is only 3 lines change. I suppose you shouldn't. > >> WARNING: U+2116: no glyph defined Hmm, now I realise that this looks very suspicious because the numero sign is defined in most

Bug#845220: debootstrap wrongly assumes that newest package is last

Source: debootstrap aptly sorts the packages from newest to oldest, so the previous assumption made in #649319 fails. tried in debootstrap trusty 1.0.59ubuntu0.6 also in debootstrap master ftom debian git

Bug#844579: console-setup: CyrAsia font missing Kazakh letter

Hi, On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 12:14:33AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> >> I'm not sure what's involved to add support for those. Maybe it's >> sufficient to add two lines with the codepoint to the file you >> mentioned?

Bug#844579: console-setup: CyrAsia font missing Kazakh letter

On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 12:14:33AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I'm not sure what's involved to add support for those. Maybe it's > sufficient to add two lines with the codepoint to the file you > mentioned? Yes, it is sufficient, provided there is enough space in the font (only 256 glyphs

Bug#844579: console-setup: CyrAsia font missing Kazakh letter

Although it seems like these letters are also referenced in https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/console-setup.git/tree/Fonts/fontcodesets On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Cyril Brulebois