Re: netinst sums and signatures?

On 2/11/19 4:04 AM, john doe wrote: > On 11/1/2019 2:13 PM, Richard Hector wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I usually install using a netinst image, which I find here: >> >> https://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/ >> >> I figured I should verify the checksum and signature, though, and looked >> at this page: >>

Debian netboot daily images

Hey, I've noticed that the netboot ISOs (mini.iso) aren't produced or generated after the 26-10-2019. You can see on this link that mini.iso is available: https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/20191026-00:17/netboot/ and on all days before the 26th but after that the ISO isn't available. Is

Bug#942238: installer: update apt sources for security

Control: tags -1 + pending Holger Wansing wrote: > Control: tags -1 + patch > > Holger Wansing wrote: > > > > Pavel Kosina wrote: > > > Package: installation-guide-amd64 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > > > *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions,

Processed: Re: Bug#942238: installer: update apt sources for security

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #942238 [apt-setup] installer: update apt sources for security Added tag(s) pending. -- 942238: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942238 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#855151: #855151: tasksel: should not be Priority: important

Control: tags -1 + pending Holger Levsen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:52:22PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > > tasksel is currently at Priority: important and thus installed in every > > > > installation, including chroots installed via debootstrap. It doesn't > > > > seem a useful

Processed: Re: Bug#855151: #855151: tasksel: should not be Priority: important

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #855151 [tasksel] tasksel: should not be Priority: important Added tag(s) pending. -- 855151: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855151 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#367515: Bug#749991: debian-installer: Wrong kernel in debian-installer package

Hi, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > That looks reasonable. > > I have prepared a proposal for this: > > The new text looks good to me. > > [...] > > > Also, this should be an error message, not a question. > > > > For this, I would need some help, since I'm lacking the needed skills there. > > The

Bug#830308: marked as done (d-i.debian.org: l10n-sync script breaks headers in individual package files in some situations)

Your message dated Fri, 1 Nov 2019 22:36:32 +0100 with message-id <20191101223632.41728fe9215d40d2d9ddf...@mailbox.org> and subject line Bug#830308: d-i.debian.org: l10n-sync script breaks headers in individual package files in some situations has caused the Debian Bug report #830308, regarding

Bug#830308: d-i.debian.org: l10n-sync script breaks headers in individual package files in some situations

I have tested the script: committed a broken german de.po file, to see what happens. The result was: the script correctly detected the syntax error and stopped processing, giving a proper error message. So this bug has just been forgotten to close, apparently. Closing it now. Holger --

Re: finish-install warning

On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 03:20:49PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 08:08 +0100, john doe wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Looking in the log after a fresh install of Debian Buster, I'm seeing > > the following in /var/log/installer/syslog: > > > > "... finish-install: dpkg-divert:

Re: finish-install warning

On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 08:08 +0100, john doe wrote: > Hi, > > Looking in the log after a fresh install of Debian Buster, I'm seeing > the following in /var/log/installer/syslog: > > "... finish-install: dpkg-divert: warning: diverting file > '/sbin/start-stop-daemon' from an Essential package

Re: netinst sums and signatures?

On 11/1/2019 2:13 PM, Richard Hector wrote: > Hi all, > > I usually install using a netinst image, which I find here: > > https://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/ > > I figured I should verify the checksum and signature, though, and looked > at this page: > > https://www.debian.org/CD/verify > The

Bug#749991: debian-installer: Wrong kernel in debian-installer package

On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 00:09 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi, > > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-10-27 at 20:18 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > Bugreport against kernel version mismatch, when using outdated or broken > > > netboot images: > > > > > > > > > Since it's unlikely that

netinst sums and signatures?

Hi all, I usually install using a netinst image, which I find here: https://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/ I figured I should verify the checksum and signature, though, and looked at this page: https://www.debian.org/CD/verify That tells me there should be signed checksum files alongside the

finish-install warning

Hi, Looking in the log after a fresh install of Debian Buster, I'm seeing the following in /var/log/installer/syslog: "... finish-install: dpkg-divert: warning: diverting file '/sbin/start-stop-daemon' from an Essential package with rename is dangerous, use --no-rename" I tried to look at (1)