these with a very quick scan, but I'm afraid there will be more.
By the way, http://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/releasenotes has the same
issue.
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: USB
Image version: Official Snapshot i386 NETINST Binary-1 20130414-09:20
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 2013-04-15
On 2013-05-06 00:33, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 00:01 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
severity 706659 normal
thanks
On 2013-05-05 21:29, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 20:57 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
[...]
Previously, you wrote:
Therefore, the prompt
Hi Ben,
could you explain why you changed this report's severity to wishlist? wishlist
severity is designed for mere RFEs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
severity 706659 normal
thanks
On 2013-05-05 21:29, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 20:57 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Ben,
could you explain why you changed this report's severity to wishlist?
wishlist severity is designed for mere RFEs.
This *is* a request for enhancement
Package: hw-detect
Version: 1.92
Severity: normal
check-missing-firmware.sh asks administrators whether they want to install
non-free firmware which would expand the capabilities of their computer:
ask_load_firmware () {
if [ $first_try ]; then
first_try=
return 0
fi
Both these tickets report bugs identical or similar. I didn't
investigate enough to tell what to do though.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
It seems on the Lenovo (and all UEFI systems?) Windows is not anymore
booted through the nt loader but through an efi boot loader
residing in the efi partition.
I can assert that some EFI systems are not affected by this. My Windows
8 install on an ASUS F2A85-M can be booted from the GRUB
Hi Colin,
Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 06:33:53AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
PCMCIA is so uncommon nowadays that installing pcmciautils on every laptop
by default is imho no longer warranted. I would thus like to see it removed
from task-laptop, similar to apmd.
PCMCIA
severity 650819 normal
close 684265 3.2.29-1
forcemerge 650819 686314
thanks
This is no longer RC. A workaround has finally been applied, namely the
first one, adding fuse. It will take some time before the fix makes it
to install media. Note that I did not verify that the current symptom is
On 2012-06-27 11:34, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
On 2012-04-05 20:20, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
This didn't generate as much feedback as I hoped, but I filed a
ticket asking task-desktop to install synaptic:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667703
Joey Hess changed tasks to bring
On 2012-07-13 17:56, Christian PERRIER wrote:
It installs kde-standard that actually install juk.
So there's indeed no need for Yet Another Multimedia Player. If you
thing that amarok should replace juk, then please file a bug report
against kde-standard.
Amarok is not Yet Another Multimedia
On 2012-04-05 20:20, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
This didn't generate as much feedback as I hoped, but I filed a ticket
asking task-desktop to install synaptic:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667703
Joey Hess changed tasks to bring Synaptic in KDE, LXDE and Xfce. Only
the GNOME
Hi Matthias,
On 2012-06-27 14:54, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
Hi!
How odd that I didn't notice that bug... (I'm the GPK/PK maintainer)
Well, I think pulling in Synaptic on KDE might be a bad idea, probably
KDE desktop packages should pull in Apper instead, a KDE package
manager based on PackageKit
apt 0.9.6 migrated to testing on June 17th thanks to hinting from Adam
D. Barratt. I verified that dailies are finally fixed. I was able to
install using
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/20120619-5/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Weeklies may be fixed too (last
retitle 666750 Please avoid differences between OS-en detected in the
installer and those offered in GRUB
severity 666750 wishlist
tags 666750 - wheezy sid
thanks
This no longer happens with grub2 1.99-19 (Add grub-probe to
grub-mount-udeb).
I'm keeping this report as a wish to prevent new
Now that grub2 1.99-19 was uploaded, this doesn't just affect grub.cfg:
* Add grub-probe to grub-mount-udeb (LP: #963471).
grub-installer's prompt before installing GRUB is now, from what I can
see, always broken, so it's at least as bad as the grub.cfg actually
generated. Therefore, this
Thank you for the fix Milan. I verified that 0.9.6 fixes the problem on
my testing install. However, this report shouldn't have been downgraded.
Thank you also for applying the fix David, although it would be nice to
watch credits in the future.
It would also have been nice to upload a new
On 2012-06-05 17:09, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
This is now fixed.
My guess this was fixed with apt 0.9.5.1.
It's still broken here (testing).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Package: installation-guide
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: 666...@bugs.debian.org
According to 4.3.1. Copying the files — the easy way:
Note that, although convenient, this method does have one major
disadvantage: the logical size of the device will be limited to 256
MB, even if the capacity
Thank you Cyril and everyone.
In terms of presentation, this looks fine to me. In terms of content, I
added all issues from DebianInstaller/Today which I'm confident affect
alpha1 (that is, 1 issue).
On 2012-05-12 15:50, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi folks,
I prepared the following draft,
Hi Christian,
On 2012-04-06 01:15, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Filipus Klutiero (chea...@gmail.com):
The idea of having each desktop provide its package manager was
good, but kpackage was very far from matching Synaptic. It was even
removed from KDE later, with the result that installing
Sorry, I hadn't read Holger's reply when I sent my previous message.
Thanks Holger. The difference between my 20 MB and your 24 mostly comes
from docbook-xml, which is a dependency of rarian-compat. kdoctools
already depends on docbook-xml, which is why I didn't notice it. So the
situation
On 2012-04-07 15:56, Joey Hess wrote:
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Josselin, why would the gnome metapackage already pull synaptic? I
don't see any direct relation. This is what happens on my
testing/unstable mix:
nautilus recommends synaptic.
In Squeeze, but not in Wheezy (see
http
On 2012-04-05 08:16, Touko Korpela wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 07:58:17PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
severity 650819 serious
tags 650819 + confirmed patch
retitle 650819 GRUB entries (grub.cfg) sometimes lacking other
operating systems, particularly installing 686 or amd64 images
(i386
Package: task-desktop
Version: 3.09
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: 586...@bugs.debian.org
Synaptic is no longer in the desktop task since tasksel 2.43:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/t/tasksel/current/changelog#version2.43
*
#655437 is now fixed, which will increase this bug's exposure.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f7c920f.5090...@gmail.com
On 2012-04-04 17:02, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 04.04.2012 22:48, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 04.04.2012 19:50, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
I just reinstalled Debian and for the first time did it via my wireless
network (with WPA encryption), without even requiring non-free firmware.
It was disappointing
Hi Christian,
On 2012-03-26 01:17, Christian PERRIER wrote:
reassign 665775 netcfg
tags 665775 wontfix
thanks
Quoting Filipus Klutiero (chea...@gmail.com):
On the other hand, if your administrator tells you that a DHCP
server is available and is recommended, then you don't need
With KDE 4.7, things are quite different. We have new metapackages,
including a convenient kde-standard, which is pretty much the same as
the proposed kde-typical. Considering that kaffeine is less interesting
now (kaboodle was replaced by dragonplayer), the only important thing
from
Source: tasksel
Version: 3.08
Severity: wishlist
This is similar to #413250, making tasks usable without having to
install tasksel. Now having packages for tasks is great (although it
does make a fair amount of task packages!), as tasks can now be used
without using tasksel. But tasks cannot
Original Message
Subject: Bug#666977: Acknowledgement ([src:tasksel] Please remove
dependencies of tasks on tasksel)
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 02:51:04 +
From: ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Reply-To: 666...@bugs.debian.org
To: Filipus
Package: debian-installer, grub-installer
Severity: serious
This is a fake bug to document a particularly bad scenario caused by
#650819 for users and ease finding it.
When the installer installs a Linux image of a different flavour than
the flavour it uses, the GRUB installed does not offer
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.51
Severity: normal
20microsoft's detection of Windows Vista and ulterior is problematic.
First, it's stuck in Vista times. The comment and the fallback case
should be updated. Perhaps Windows Vista or superior, Unrecognized
Windows version or Recent Windows
Package: grub-common, os-prober, grub-installer
Version: 1.99-17
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: 650...@bugs.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: 563...@bugs.debian.org
GRUB doesn't depend on os-prober, it only recommends it.
One obvious effect is that when installing GRUB, other operating systems
are
(Debian Bug Tracking System)
Reply-To: 666...@bugs.debian.org
To: Filipus Klutiero chea...@gmail.com
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded
tags 655437 + confirmed
thanks
I have to confirm this. This (the problem reported by Martin) is
particularly confusing when several flavours are possible. On a x86-64
system, I get this:
Mar 29 15:53:14 base-installer: info: kernel linux-image-686-pae
usable on 686-pae 686-bigmem amd64 686
severity 650819 serious
tags 650819 + confirmed patch
retitle 650819 GRUB entries (grub.cfg) sometimes lacking other operating
systems, particularly installing 686 or amd64 images (i386)
reassign 650819 os-prober, grub-common
thanks
I have to confirm this. I was hit by this when installing
Joey Hess wrote:
AFAICS, the grub configuration generated by otheros.sh is entirely
grub-legacy syntax. If it ever worked with grub-pc it was due to luck or
compatability hacks in grub-pc. So I suspect my patch fixes this bug,
and that modifying otheros to use --set=root is unnecessary, and
merge 618498 608025
severity 618498 serious
thanks
Colin Watson wrote:
clone 618498 -1
reassign 618498 grub-installer: grub-mkconfig does not pick up correct
os-prober output when run from installer
reassign -1 os-prober: Puppy Linux not detected
thanks
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 06:29:12PM
Package: grub-installer
Version: 1.70
Severity: normal
grub-installer generally prompts once, to confirm the list of other
operating systems detected:
Template: grub-installer/with_other_os
Type: boolean
Default: true
# :sl1:
_Description: Install the GRUB boot loader to the master boot
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.51
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
When installing, the following is logged to syslog:
Mar 29 16:03:30 anna-install: Installing fuse-modules
Mar 29 16:03:30 os-prober: unknown udeb fuse-modules
This is due to /usr/lib/os-probes/init/10filesystems which uses the same
Package: installation-guide
Severity: normal
According to 4.3.1. Copying the files — the easy way:
A second disadvantage is that you cannot copy a full CD image onto the
USB stick, but only the smaller businesscard or netinst CD images.
Package: installation-guide
Severity: normal
According to section 5.1.4:
Let's assume you have prepared everything from Section 3.6.2, Boot
Device Selection
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch03s06.html#boot-dev-select
and Section 4.3, Preparing Files for USB Memory Stick Booting
I agree the current GRUB 2 path is too complicated.
I don't know if the proposed patch has functional regressions, but the
code gets inconsistent in the sense that grub2 functions like
grub2_write_chain() are kept but not used.
Another version of this, with the same issue, is on
Package: netcfg
Version: 1.70
Severity: normal
From as far as I can remember, debian-installer prompts for a domain
name during the installation. I never knew what to enter there.
The prompt:
Template: netcfg/get_domain
Type: string
# :sl1:
_Description: Domain name:
The domain name is
Package: task-xfce-desktop
Version: 3.08
Severity: minor
The short description reads:
XFCE desktop environment
As explained in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xfce#History Xfce is no
longer completely uppercase, but only takes a capital X nowadays.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Le April 5, 2009 06:59:43 pm Frans Pop, vous avez écrit :
tags 519508 pending
thanks
On Friday 13 March 2009, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
In section 5.1.3, if using GRUB, the procedure says to add lines
kernel (hd0,0)/boot/newinstall/vmlinuz
initrd (hd0,0)/boot/newinstall/initrd.gz
Package: installation-guide
Severity: minor
In section 5.1.3, if using GRUB, the procedure says to add lines
kernel (hd0,0)/boot/newinstall/vmlinuz
initrd (hd0,0)/boot/newinstall/initrd.gz
This will of course only work if the files were copied to
(hd0,0)/boot/newinstall/.
BTW, I have no idea
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: Target hard drive
Image version: i386 initrd.gz, vmlinuz and debian-500-i386-DVD-1.iso
Date: 2009-03-13 02:24
Machine: ECS K7S5A (SiS 735 chipset), 256 MB SDRAM, 250 GB PATA
Partitions:
FilesystemType
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: DVD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/5.0.0/i386/iso-dvd/debian-500-i386-DVD-1.iso
2009-02-14
Date: 2009-02-17
Machine: Soltek NV400-L64-based clone (desktop)
Partitions:
Filesystem
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: DVD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/5.0.0/i386/iso-dvd/debian-500-i386-DVD-1.iso
2009-02-14
Date: Feb 16 18:00
Machine: ASUS Z71A
Partitions:
FilesystemType 1K-blocks
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/.lenny_bibble/amd64/iso-cd/debian-Lenny-DI-rc2-amd64-businesscard.iso
2009-01-28
Date: Jan 30 05:21:49
Machine: Compal FL90 with Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
Everything went as expected installing
debian-Lenny-DI-rc2-amd64-businesscard.iso on a Compal FL90.
Thank you very much
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/.lenny_bibble/amd64/iso-cd/debian-Lenny-DI-rc2-amd64-businesscard.iso
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
Le October 15, 2008 05:34:44 am Frans Pop, vous avez écrit :
tags 501175 pending
thanks
On Sunday 05 October 2008, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
So I suggest
Looks for ISO images, which may be on an optical disk or on a hard
drive.
Actually it does not look on real CDs at all, so I've
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version:
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/netboot.tar.gz 20081004
Date: 2008-10-06 02:38:59.0 -0400
Machine: ECS K7S5A (SiS 735 chipset), 256 MB SDRAM, 80 GB
Package: installation-guide
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
In section 6.2, iso-scan is described as
Looks for ISO file systems, which may be on a CD-ROM or on the hard drive.
This sounded to me as if iso-scan would only look on the [primary] hard drive,
but it looks on any hard drive
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version:
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/netboot.tar.gz 20081004
Date: 2008-10-05 01:18:09.0 -0400
Machine: Soltek NV400-L64-based clone (desktop)
Partitions:
Package: installation-guide
Severity: normal
Tags: security
Section 4.4.1. Copying the files — the easy way contains:
You only have to extract it directly to your USB stick:
# zcat boot.img.gz /dev/sda
Sounds simple and easy, doesn't it? Granted, there's a bold Warning just
below:
Using this
Package: installation-guide
Severity: wishlist
4.4.2.1. USB stick partitioning on Intel x86
contains:
copy the following files from the Debian archives to the stick:
[...]
Optional kernel modules
Although the from the Debian archives is quite vague, the file name helps to
find the first files.
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: Debian GNU/Linux testing Lenny - Official Snapshot i386
NETINST Binary-1 20080820-09:34
Date: 2008-08-21 06:21 GMT-5
Machine: ECS K7S5A (SiS 735 chipset), 256 MB SDRAM, 80 GB PATA
Package: win32-loader
Version: 0.6.3
Severity: normal
On a new laptop on which I never used win32-loader successfully before, I
succeeded to run win32-loader now that it works on Vista 64-bit (thank you),
but it failed once rebooting and trying to launch d-i. After selecting in
Windows'
FWIW, I've already filed a report for a package dealing with KDE extragear;
see #401861.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: tasksel-data
Version: 2.66
Severity: wishlist
language-env currently has important bugs when used for french which
make it more problematic than helpful for French and probably many other
languages. It would be best to remove it at least from the french task.
Japanese seems to be an
I'm submitting the following patch, result of many corrections thanks to tests
on all release architectures and kfreebsd-i386.
Seriously, this is an untested patch which I think is quite important to apply
for Etch. We released Sarge without the PHP version recommended by upstream,
and
Package: tasksel-data
Version: 2.66
Severity: wishlist
Please remove foomatic-gui from the common desktop task, presumably
moving it to gnome-desktop and maybe xfce-desktop.
I believe this will allow to avoid that gksu be pulled by the common
desktop task.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.66
Severity: normal
When I tried to install the desktop task, tasksel went to install 400
packages, which I found surprising. When checking with --task-packages
that install desktop really installed the desktop task and not
Desktop environment, tasksel outputted the
Package: netcfg
Version: 1.32
Severity: normal
d-i detects my FireWire card, but doesn't recognize the model as lspci:
01:01.2 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Ricoh Co Ltd R5C552 IEEE 1394 Controller
(rev 04)
Instead, it reports it as Ethernet or Fast Ethernet, which is
misleading.
Unless you want to
Package: tasksel-data
Version: 2.59
Severity: wishlist
KDE provides kooka for scanning. Having xsane in the base desktop is
bloat for KDE people. Please move xsane to the desktops which don't
provide their own scanning program.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: installation-manual
Severity: minor
Section E.2 reads that If you have problems or suggestions regarding
this document, you should probably submit them as a bug report against
the package debian-installer-manual.
debian-installer-manual should be changed for installation-guide.
--
To
Package: installation-manual
Severity: minor
The note in section 6.3.1.5 ends with Alternatively, you can install
etherconf, which will step you through your network setup.
This should be removed, as etherconf is no longer in Etch.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Package: tasksel-data
Version: 2.58
Severity: wishlist
The web-server task should install PHP5, not 4. Please substitute
libapache2-mod-php4 by libapache2-mod-php5.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt-setup
Version: 1:0.16
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n
trunk/packages/po/fr.po revision 42479 contains at line 6111 Le
programme d'installation n'a pas accéder au miroir.
There's a pu missing, so this should read Le programme d'installation n'a
pas pu accéder au miroir.
Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
Hi,
3 days ago Frederik Schueler mentioned the following item for then's
today in his Kernel schedule proposal for Etch:
start migration of 2.6.17 kernel and udebs to testing
I asked him on #d-kernel precisely what was being done about this but
got no answer
Hi,
3 days ago Frederik Schueler mentioned the following item for then's
today in his Kernel schedule proposal for Etch:
start migration of 2.6.17 kernel and udebs to testing
I asked him on #d-kernel precisely what was being done about this but
got no answer. I didn't see anything happen
A reportbug bug explains the duplicated information. Please ignore the
second part of the report.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-report
Version: 2.17
Severity: minor
/usr/share/bug/installation-report/script calls tail with tail +2 at line 53,
which is deprecated, generating a
tail: Warning: +number syntax is deprecated, please use -n +number
A trivial correction should fix this.
--
To
Note that this is blocked for Etch by the fact that [decent] PPP support
is no more present.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to recapitulate on what was said. Please correct me if I got
something wrong.
cdebconf
Joey Hess approved unblocking cdebconf 0.101. Then, Colin Watson noticed
this thread after uploading 0.102 and said he was sorry. I discussed
this with him on IRC:
cheal [...] first, what are
Hi,
I'm trying to see if the newt transition could be done. I didn't see
blockers yet. cdebconf needs to go in with this transition, which means
libdebian-installer has to go in too.
I'd like somebody to (approve/explain issues with) unblocking
libdebian-installer and cdebconf, so that I can
Sven Luther a écrit :
Some thoughts by someone else than me about this issue :
Those are not thoughts about this issue. Those are general impressions
with a null argumentational value.
So, Frans and other of the d-i team, please read them, and think a bit before
you get offended because
-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Quoting Filipus Klutiero ([EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 20041217
uname -a: Linux leo.ido.ath.cx 2.6.8-1-k7 #1 Thu Nov 25 04:13:37 UTC
2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 20041230
Method: linux26 install from CD 1 of 2.
Machine: nForce 2
Processor: Barton 2500+
Memory: 256 MB
Root Device:
83 matches
Mail list logo
