Bug#1053751: d-i.debian.org: security repo being set up with HTTP even if HTTPS is selected

Control: reassign -1 apt-setup Control: forcemerge 860467 -1 On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 14:11:19 +0300, Viktor Voloshko wrote: > debian-installer has a choice between HTTP/HTTPS/FTP while setting up package > manager in expert install mode. > > If HTTPS is chosen and security repository enabled

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 12:42:27PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > El 28/9/23 a las 11:50, Julien Cristau escribió: > > I still think that is absolutely the wrong thing to do, and makes > > debootstrap more fragile for no good reason. > > Julien, I believe you are mixing two

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Hi all, > > On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 06:01:13 +0200 Johannes Schauer wrote: > > Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2017-06-24 20:23:25) > > > Julien Cristau (2016-09-12): > > > > This is a transient situation because some Essential pa

Re: Firmware GR result - what happens next?

On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 05:17:59PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 05:08:57PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 05:13:22PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > > > Maybe and idea would to do something like isa-support does for e.g

Re: Firmware GR result - what happens next?

On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 05:13:22PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > Maybe and idea would to do something like isa-support does for e.g > sseX-support > on CPUs that does not have that feature: It fails on installation with an > debconf message, IIRC. > So that would allow something like "new

Re: Firmware GR result - what happens next?

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 15:45:25 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 10:11:27PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > >On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 08:21:31PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 11:08:47AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > >>

Re: Firmware GR result - what happens next?

On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 08:21:31PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 11:08:47AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > >On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 03:53:00PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 04:43:47PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> > What's the plan for

Bug#1015887: debian-installer: Adding https repo doesn't work without manually installing ca-certificates

On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 03:49:55PM +1200, Richard Hector wrote: > Package: debian-installer > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > Using netinst bullseye 11.4 installer: > > https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-11.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso > > I chose to add a

Re: debian-installer FTBFS after openssl transition

On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 09:30:46AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi! > > I have observed debian-installer on some architectures such m68k, powerpc and > sparc64 > after the openssl transition. The issue does not affect all architectures, > ia64, hppa > and ppc64 are not affected,

Bug#998867: debootstrap: --no-merged-usr became a no-op

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 01:54:36PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > Also, build chroots must still be created without merged-usr for > > sid/bookworm, until something's been done to migrate user systems. > > But Julien, you said that buildds run stable, meaning they are > unaffected by this

Bug#998867: debootstrap: --no-merged-usr became a no-op

Control: severity -1 grave On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 07:49:03AM +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Package: debootstrap > Version: 1.0.126 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > since 1.0.126 the --no-merged-usr option became a no-op if for any code > name but >

Bug#982194: choose-mirror: Rename mirror.netcologne.de to debian.netcologne.de

Control: reassign -1 mirrors Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 11:40:32AM +0100, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > I noticed the following change in Git commit d51997a5: > > -Site: debian.netcologne.de > +Site: mirror.netcologne.de > +Alias: debian.netcologne.de > > This wasn't a very

Re: choose-mirror upload

On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:47:40PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi Julien, > > would it be ok to upload choose-mirror with the attached diff? > There is a translation update pending, and I wonder if I should include a > "make Mirrors.masterlist" ? > Yes I think that should be fine. I'll try

Re: 10.9 planning

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:14:31PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > In fact, how about: we *could* go ahead with the 10.9 point release as > already planned, and expect to do a 10.10 a couple of weeks later with > basically *just* the shim/SB changes? I'm OK to go with that option if > that's our

Bug#700633: Why this eatmydata patch still not applied to debootstrap? My USB storage devices are slow

Control: tag -1 wishlist On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 03:16:51PM +0300, Askar Safin wrote: > severity -1 normal > thanks > > Hi. > > Why this bug ( https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700633 ) > still is not fixed? > > I did some experiments and here are results: if I run debootstrap

Bug#981196: override: ca-certificates:misc/standard

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: override X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, jcris...@debian.org See discussion starting at https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/01/msg00305.html for the rationale. Thanks, Julien

Re: RFC: raising ca-certificates package Priority to standard or important

Hi Antonio, On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 02:47:25PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 03:10:47PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > And which of standard or important made most sense (AIUI, standard > > means "installed by default in d-i" and i

RFC: raising ca-certificates package Priority to standard or important

[bcc: {openssl,ca-certificates}@packages.d.o] Hi, the ca-certificates package is currently "Priority: optional", like most of the archive. It's Recommended by a bunch of packages, Depended on by an equivalent number, but I'm not sure if this is optimal. I suspect most packages can be

Re: Missing libgudev-1.0-0 udeb package?

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 09:26:49PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running a Sid graphical installer on my Lenovo Yoga C630 laptop > (arm64). For some reason, the cursor movement via touchpad doesn't > work there. It works in an installed Debian Sid system though. One > difference I

Bug#968998: debian-installer: grub and shim are missing from built-using

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 20:15:45 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 25.08.20 18:18, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Package: debian-installer > > Version: 20150324 > > Severity: important > > X-Debbugs-Cc: jcris...@debian.org > > > > d-i EFI images include a c

Bug#968998: debian-installer: grub and shim are missing from built-using

Package: debian-installer Version: 20150324 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: jcris...@debian.org d-i EFI images include a copy of grub (and shim, on architectures with secure boot). Those should be listed in Built-Using so we don't end up without the corresponding source in the archive.

Re: Missing GnuPG signatures for checksums

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 06:38:48PM +0200, Laurențiu Păncescu wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to put a preseed file on the same USB stick as the installation, > using hd-media/boot.img.gz is easier than remastering the iso. It works, but > there seems not to be any signed checksum file for these

Bug#951709: /boot should get a bigger share of disk in default installation

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 09:50:07PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi, > > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 18:50 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > Package: debian-installer > > > Version: 20190702+deb10u3 > > > Severity: important > > > > > > With initrd around 60+ MBs, 236 MB

Bug#949651: installation-reports: install on lenovo server fails guided partitioning

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:48:57PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 01:33:15PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:04:22 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> > >> Hmmm, odd. Something is picking up on those M2 modules multipl

Bug#949651: installation-reports: install on lenovo server fails guided partitioning

Hi Steve, On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:04:22 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hey Julien! > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 09:18:54AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > >Package: installation-reports > >Severity: normal > > > >Boot method: CD > >Image version: >

Re: Planning 10.3 and 9.12

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:42:29PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > It's (really past) time to consider a date for the next point releases > for buster and stretch. > > I've listed some suggested dates below; please indicate which you would > be available for. > > - January 25th > -

Re: Bug#935589: cdimage.debian.org: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics package missing in xfce-CD-1 iso

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:32:11 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > But you can't really expect users to look at xserver-xorg-input-libinput > at all. Why should they? There is no pointer to it from the "obsolete" > package. What kind of deprecation is that? Most users will probably > read the first

Bug#935589: cdimage.debian.org: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics package missing in xfce-CD-1 iso

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 23:42:44 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > control: reassign -1 task-xfce-desktop > > Hi Karthik, > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 04:10:53PM +0530, karthik wrote: > >Package: cdimage.debian.org > >Severity: normal > > > >Dear Maintainer, > > > >*** Reporter, please consider

Bug#939266: debootstrap fails to create a sid chroot with Error executing gpgv to check Release signature

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 21:27:46 +0500, Pirate Praveen wrote: > How do I get this file? There is no such log in /var/log. There is no > logfile option I can find in manpage. > Look in /srv/chroot/debian-sid. Cheers, Julien

Bug#939266: debootstrap fails to create a sid chroot with Error executing gpgv to check Release signature

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 21:13:13 +0500, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:36 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo > > > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 20:53:13 +0500, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > > Pa

Bug#939266: debootstrap fails to create a sid chroot with Error executing gpgv to check Release signature

Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 20:53:13 +0500, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Package: debootstrap > Version: 1.0.114, 1.0.115~bpo10+1 > Severity: important > > I think debootstrap should be able to create a sid chroot but fails with > this error, > > $ sudo

Bug#926036: net-retriever: missing support for Acquire-By-Hash

Package: net-retriever Version: 1.51 Severity: minor Tags: patch olasd tried to install his new laptop. He got hashsum mismatches. That made him sad. We don't want a sad olasd. Patch up at https://salsa.debian.org/jcristau/net-retriever/commit/2653045287c502399c31495e1dfd502e03efbc08 Cheers,

Bug#926035: net-retriever: missing support for InRelease

Package: net-retriever Version: 1.51 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, net-retriever downloads Release and Release.gpg instead of trying InRelease first. Patch up at https://salsa.debian.org/jcristau/net-retriever/commit/1237e465cc83a0832c365f8b9f67f98943229dd6 Cheers, Julien

Re: Problems with shim and shim-signed in unstable, and proposed solutions to unblock us

On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 23:35:45 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > So, we're looking at three hacky options options here to work our way > out of this hole. In (probably?) descending order of hackitude: > > 1. Ask the nice ftpmaster people to bodge the archive by hand: [...] > > OR

Re: Scheduling 9.8 (was: Re: Scheduling 9.7)

On 1/28/19 8:45 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2019-01-18 at 18:44 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> 9.7 is a bit overdue already (current events being a bit of a time- >> sink). >> >> Please indicate your availablility out of: >> >>  - (Feb 2 unlikely, FOSDEM) >>  - Feb 9 >>  - Feb 16 >

Bug#918722: debootstrap: says InRelease file expired

On 1/8/19 7:46 PM, Michael Büsch wrote: > Package: debootstrap > Version: 1.0.113 > Severity: normal > > When bootstrapping Raspbian with debootstrap it fails since version 1.0.113: > > debootstrap --arch=armhf --foreign --verbose > --keyring=raspbian.public.key.gpg stretch /my/directory >

Re: Bug#906016: transition: gjs built with mozjs60

On 12/17/18 4:08 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 12/17/18 3:56 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: >> gjs recently switched from mozjs52 to mozjs60, and mozjs60 doesn't work >> on s390x (#909536; about 80% of its tests fail, which means I have no >> confidence that the resulting binaries would be

Re: Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default

On 11/28/18 4:14 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Julien Cristau writes ("Re: Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled > merged /usr by default"): >> On 11/28/18 2:49 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: >>> This is a special case of a general problem: buster systems with

Re: Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default

On 11/28/18 2:49 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Recently debootstrap was changed to do merged-/usr by default, so that > /bin -> /usr/bin etc. > > It was discovered that when this change took effect on the Debian > buildds, the buildds started to build packages which do not work on > non-merged-/usr

Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default

On 11/28/18 1:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Package: debootstrap > Version: debootstrap/1.0.110 > Severity: serious > > Merged /usr is now the default in buster. As discussed on > debian-devel, however, binary packages built on a merged-usr system > are not installable on a non-merged-usr system.

Bug#910560: [choose-mirror] fails to build when parallel build is activated

There's a bug in choose-mirror. It's just not serious. Julien On October 8, 2018 12:38:40 PM GMT+02:00, Holger Wansing wrote: >Hi, > >Philipp Kern wrote: >> On 2018-10-08 09:08, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> > On 10/8/18 7:51 AM, Holger Wansing wrote: >> >> Since version 2.92,

Bug#910560: [choose-mirror] fails to build when parallel build is activated

Control: severity -1 wishlist On 10/08/2018 07:51 AM, Holger Wansing wrote: > Package: choose-mirror > Severity: serious > Version: 2.92 > > Since version 2.92, choose-mirror fails to build with > "dpkg-buildpackage -j", the debian/iso_3166.tab file seems to be removed by > error: > > (can

Bug#908804: [task-desktop] Move xserver-xorg-video-all to recommends

On 09/14/2018 09:03 AM, Alexander Kernozhitsky wrote: > Package: task-desktop > Version: 3.45 > Severity: wishlist > > Now task-desktop depends on xserver-xorg-video-all, which forces to have all > the video drivers in the system, even if they appear unused. I suggest to > move >

Bug#907704: choose-mirror: default to deb.debian.org

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 21:57:41 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 10.09.2018 09:20, Philipp Kern wrote: > > [+mirrors@] > > > > On 07.09.2018 14:42, Julien Cristau wrote: > >> Control: retitle -1 choose-mirror: hide mirror selection by default > >> >

Bug#907704: choose-mirror: default to deb.debian.org

Control: retitle -1 choose-mirror: hide mirror selection by default On 09/04/2018 11:07 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > If switching the mirror question from high to medium priority proves > controversial I guess I could separate that to its own bug too, to at > least get the defaul

Bug#907704: choose-mirror: default to deb.debian.org

On 09/03/2018 10:44 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Like Karsten, my experience with deb.debian.org has been inconsistent. > With a 50 Mb/s ADSL line in Montréal, most of the top candidates > mirrors from netselect will consistently deliver ~6200 kB/s, but > deb.debian.org often connects to an AWS

Bug#907704: choose-mirror: default to deb.debian.org

Control: tag -1 + patch On 08/31/2018 06:27 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > Package: choose-mirror > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-Cc: tfh...@debian.org > > I think it's time for choose-mirror to stop asking by default. AFAIK > deb.debian.org works well enough now that w

Bug#907704: choose-mirror: default to deb.debian.org

Package: choose-mirror Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: tfh...@debian.org I think it's time for choose-mirror to stop asking by default. AFAIK deb.debian.org works well enough now that we don't need users to manually select a mirror close to them. PoC patch, completely untested: diff --git

Re: Status and open questions for debian-installer with backports support

On 08/13/2018 01:57 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 10:56:59AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> => Question: should we restrict architectures we build images for? > > Probably. I'm only thinking x86, arm64 and maybe armhf. Wait for > people to ask for others and add on a

Re: g++-8 and g++-7 installed, reproducing a FTBFS

On 07/24/2018 11:08 PM, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 05:51:08AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Geert Stappers (2018-07-23): >>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 02:09:45AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: FWIW the severity of this bug report just got upgraded to serious but it

Bug#897718: cdebconf: ftbfs with GCC-8

On 07/18/2018 02:09 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Matthias Klose (2018-05-04): >> The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with >> gcc-8/g++-8, but succeeds to build with gcc-7/g++-7. The >> severity of this report will be raised before the buster release. >> >> The

Bug#611250: Bug

Control: tag -1 - help wontfix Control: tag -1 + patch On 05/02/2018 07:09 PM, Michal Humpula wrote: > Hi again, > > so it's 2018 and I've already booted quite a few machines with this patch, so > it comes the time to ask, whether it could be included in netcfg now? > > As posted above, if the

Bug#886016: debootstrap: add support for Acquire-By-Hash for downloading indices

On 02/15/2018 11:31 AM, Philipp Kern wrote: > Control: tag -1 - patch > > On 2018-01-01 17:01, Julien Cristau wrote: >> following patch looks at the Acquire-By-Hash field in (In)Release to get >> Packages from the by-hash directory if available and avoid races.  I >> t

Bug#839046: debootstrap: enable --merged-usr by default

On 02/13/2018 04:29 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I believe that we have had quite some testing already last time and I > would be surprised if we got many more RC bugs on dpkg that had to be fixed > on a short timeframe. I guess nobody can give you any assurance but > I'm sure that you can

Scheduling 9.4

Hi, we shipped 9.3 a couple of months ago, so we're overdue for 9.4. Can you please let us know your availability on the following: - March 3 - March 10 - March 17 - March 24 - March 31 Thanks, Julien signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#839046: debootstrap: enable --merged-usr by default

On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 09:16:40 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 23, md wrote: > > > On Dec 20, Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > > This change was reverted in 1.0.87 as dpkg-shlibdeps didn't cope > > > > properly with a m

Bug#886016: debootstrap: add support for Acquire-By-Hash for downloading indices

>From 1555d75078a200bfadb05e7cd30942fd050934ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 12:24:44 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add Acquire-By-Hash support. --- debian/changelog | 6 ++ functions| 6 ++ 2 files changed, 12 i

Re: Bug#872953: stretch-pu: package at-spi2-core/2.22.0-6

Control: tag -1 d-i On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 22:43:25 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Blind users have reported that their screen reader, Orca, would > sometimes crash when switching from window to window (Bug#872912), > affecting both stable and testing. Upstream released a fix, which was >

Re: Bug#869667: stretch-pu: package xkeyboard-config/2.19-1

Control: tags -1 = stretch d-i confirmed On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 14:12:38 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adam D. Barratt (2017-07-30): > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo d-i > > > > On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 19:20 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > This fixes serious bug

Re: Kernel ABI bump in stretch

On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 01:45:48 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > There are several changes in the 4.9-stable branch which I don't think > we can take without changes to the kernel module ABI that will affect > out-of-tree modules. This would mean an ABI bump, changing the names > of all

Re: Please dak copy-installer 20170828, please force it into testing

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 20:09:54 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > FTPmasters, please sync the installer from sid to testing: > > dak copy-installer 20170828 > > (The mips64el build is missing because of gcc-7 fun: #873465) > > > Release team, please force it into testing. > Force

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 17:17:10 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > It also currently uses httpredir.debian.org as only mirror, so we should > decide if it makes sense to consolidate onto deb.debian.org for win32- > loader too. > Yes please. Cheers, Julien

Bug#854801: Network Manager, Stretch and ipv6

+rdisc6 maintainer On 05/26/2017 06:49 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On 05/26/2017 06:33 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> (2017-05-23): >>> Control: severity 854801 serious >>> Control: reassign 854801 netcfg >&

Bug#854801: Network Manager, Stretch and ipv6

On 05/26/2017 06:33 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Michael Biebl (2017-05-23): >> Control: severity 854801 serious >> Control: reassign 854801 netcfg >> >> Hi >> >> This is https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854801 >> >> Since this issue is now cropping up

8.8 planning

It's time to start thinking about our next stable point release. Here are some dates, please let us know which ones would work. * April 8-9 * April 15-16 * April 22-23 * April 29-30 * May 6-7 I know at least Adam can't do 15-16 so that one is most likely out anyway. Cheers, Julien

Bug#856210: libdebian-installer: please parse SHA256 field and add it to di_* structs

On 02/27/2017 04:40 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Bastian Blank wrote: >> This change breaks the existing ABI and therefor needs an ABI bump, but >> it is missing from the patch. > > The attached patch tries to bump the soname to 5. This makes the diff > much larger, but the code changes are

Bug#852215: FTBFS on non-release architectures

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 16:03:20 +, James Clarke wrote: > Package: debian-installer > Version: 20170112 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ports-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Hi, > As you know, debian-installer does not build on non-release > architectures, since

Bug#851539: Stretch RC1 netinst installer prompts for additional CDs

On 01/16/2017 07:56 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:30:03PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:51:43PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 01:13:13AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 04:53:26PM -0800, Josh

Re: Please dak copy-installer 20170112

On 01/12/2017 01:37 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Release team, please hint it into testing: > > urgent debian-installer/20170112 > > Done. Cheers, Julien

Re: dillon: additional build-depends for installation-guide

On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:39:41 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hello, > > we have recently switched the creation of PDFs for the debian-installer's > manual (package "installation-guide") from jade to dblatex. > Benefit is, that this way we can create PDFs for Chinese, Greek, Japanese, > and

Re: 8.7 planning

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 14:19:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > we're overdue for the next jessie point release. Here are some possible > dates, please reply with availability. > Thanks all for the quick replies. Let's plan for 8.7 on Jan 14th/15th. Cheers, Julien

Bug#839046: debootstrap: enable --merged-usr by default

On 12/20/2016 01:35 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Control: found -1 1.0.87 > > Hi there! > > On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:47:21 +0200 Ansgar Burchardt > wrote: >> Package: debootstrap >> Version: 1.0.83 >> >> As mentioned earlier, I would like to see --merged-usr enabled by >> default

8.7 planning

Hi, we're overdue for the next jessie point release. Here are some possible dates, please reply with availability. Jan 7th/8th Jan 14th/15th Jan 21st/22nd Jan 28th/29th - Cambridge BSP, probably not ideal Feb 4th/5th - FOSDEM, probably not great either Feb 11th/12th Thanks, Julien

Bug#836525: debootstrap: doesn't support arch-qualified dependencies

Control: severity -1 normal On 12/19/2016 10:58 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > On 2016-11-12 20:32 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > >> On 2016-09-04 19:28 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: >> >>> Control: tags -1 + patch >>> >>> The attached patch should fix the problem with

Bug#842040: Please add https support

On 12/07/2016 10:18 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: > choose-mirror does not ask for the protocol by default, as the question > is priority medium. I did my installation by passing priority=medium on > the command-line, but you could as well preseed the protocol to https I > think. In that case it does

Bug#842040: Please add https support

On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:52:09 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 20.11.2016 11:45, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >> But you are absolutely correct in for this to be universally useful, > >> we'd also need a ca-certificates-udeb. I can take a look at that but I > >> somewhat fear that it won't be that

Bug#819300: should provide default HTTPS mirrors for non-Debian releases too

Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 10:51:21AM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote: > Package: debootstrap > Version: 1.0.80 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > > currently debootstrap only knows about an HTTPS mirror for Debian, but not > e.g. for Ubuntu. Does ubuntu even run https mirrors? A

Bug#838388: debootstrap: Fails to strap squeeze since 1.0.83

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 19:00:20 +, Stephan Suerken wrote: > Package: debootstrap > Version: 1.0.83 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainers, > > since 1.0.83 (1.0.82 tested successfully), deboostrap fails to > strap (at least) squeeze. For example: > > --- > sudo /usr/sbin/debootstrap

Re: debootstrap InRelease file support

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 14:56:00 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > A bit of a hack but I believe posix compliant would be: > > sed '1,/^$/d;/^-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-$/,$d' < "$inreldest" | tr '\n' > '\a' | sed 's/\a$//' | tr '\a' '\n' > "$reldest" > > So simply replace all newlines with

Re: debootstrap InRelease file support

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 14:06:51 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 08:02:10PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 13:55:53 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 06:59:44PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote

Re: debootstrap InRelease file support

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 13:55:53 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 06:59:44PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 20:35:12 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:12:02 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrot

Re: debootstrap InRelease file support

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 20:35:12 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:12:02 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > > > If you restore support for `InRelease` and want to use `gpgv`, please > > split `InRelease` into two files, i.e. `Release` and `Release.gp

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 14:07:04 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Package: debootstrap > Version: 1.0.81 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > in Debian, every binary package implicitly depends on all binary > packages marked as Essential:yes and every source package implicitly > build-depends on the

Re: debootstrap InRelease file support

ng InRelease files, by splitting +up detached signature from signed data. + + -- Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> Fri, 02 Sep 2016 20:26:38 +0200 + debootstrap (1.0.81) unstable; urgency=medium [ Luca Falavigna ] diff --git a/functions b/functions index 031721f..407cc38 1006

Re: 8.6 planning

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 23:04:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > September 3rd/4th > Won't work for me. > September 10th/11th > > September 17th/18th > Should be ok. Cheers, Julien

Re: debootstrap InRelease file support

ecifically, in 1.0.47 and earlier) and that was removed by Julien > Cristau because it also pulled in a fuller gpg, which comes with its own > set of potential issues. > > Seems like we could well put it back in and just replace the bit that > extracts the signed data in InRelease (sam

Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#827951: libssl udeb inclusion in Jessie

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:55:54 +0200, Yann Soubeyrand wrote: > Le jeudi 23 juin 2016 à 11:20 +0200, k...@roeckx.be a écrit : > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:58:54AM +0200, Yann Soubeyrand wrote: > > > Package: openssl > > > Severity: normal > > > Version: 1.0.1t-1+deb8u2 > > > X-Debbugs-CC:

Upcoming stable point release (8.5)

Hi, The next point release for "jessie" (8.5) is scheduled for Saturday, June 4th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Cheers, Julien

Upcoming oldstable point release (7.11)

Hi, The next (and last) point release for "wheezy" (7.11) is scheduled for Saturday, June 4th. Processing of new uploads into wheezy-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Cheers, Julien

Re: 8.5 and 7.11 planning

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 20:20:28 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to > avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around > the same time, so if that works for everyone let's do them bot

8.5 and 7.11 planning

Hi, with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around the same time, so if that works for everyone let's do them both on the same Saturday again. Some suggested dates: June 4th/5th June 11th/12th June

Re: 8.4 and 7.10 planning

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:24:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > We're due both Jessie and Wheezy point releases, and are proposing doing > both on the same weekend again, as we did for 8.2 and 7.9, as the CD > team seem happy to try it again. > > Some suggested dates: > > March 12th /

Re: Bug#806164: installation-reports: jessie install on dell xps 13 9350 (grub-installer issues)

Control: reassign -1 grub-installer 1.117 Control: severity -1 important Control: retitle -1 grub-installer: too much hardcoding of device names, fails with /dev/nvme* On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 00:06:57 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Installation went fine (well, had to stay close to the scr

Bug#806164: installation-reports: jessie install on dell xps 13 9350 (grub-installer issues)

Package: installation-reports Boot method: USB Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/current/amd64/iso-cd/firmware-8.2.0-amd64-netinst.iso Date: November 24, 2015 Machine: Dell XPS 13 9350 Partitions: fdisk -l Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 477 GiB,

Re: download links for Jessie 404

On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 18:40:24 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > The "8.2.0" directory in http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/ is completely > missing. > > That makes me wonder if the "Dropping CDs entirely?!" story was also > adopted to the stable and oldstable point releases??? > No

Re: d-i/jessie upload (was: dinstall trigger problems?)

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 01:13:56 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I plan to upload debian-installer from the jessie branch somewhen this > monday (after I see grub-installer/jessie move to Installed to be on the > safe side, even if it's usually pulled outside d-i build), if that's fine > with

Re: Bug#702278: busybox upload

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 00:09:15 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Control: tag -1 -confirmed Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru (2013-05-09): Control: reopen -1 05.05.2013 12:00, Michael Tokarev wrote: Control: retitle -1 pu: busybox/1:1.20.0-8 Hmm. I didn't notice the bug has been

Re: 8.2 and 7.9 planning

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 19:52:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some potential September dates: 5/6th - okay for me 12/13th - the 12th doesn't work for me until at least mid-afternoon 19th/20th - looks okay 26th/27th -

Re: Please dak copy-installer 20150813 hint it into testing

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 17:43:59 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Release team, please hint it into testing: urgent debian-installer/20150813 Hint added. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: arch name of ppc64el

On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 20:36:34 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: Hi, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 17:13 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: in build/entities/common.ent there was the name of the architecture missing. So what's the exact pronunciation of

  1   2   3   4   5   >