Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Okay, in that case, I strongly disagree. That would be like saying
the efforts to get it working until now are worthless.
No, it would simply be a statement of fact. If d-i cannot be made to
support oldworld powerpc in time for etch despite everyone's work, then
it makes
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 02:33:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Okay, in that case, I strongly disagree. That would be like saying
the efforts to get it working until now are worthless.
No, it would simply be a statement of fact. If d-i cannot be made to
support oldworld
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 02:33:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Okay, in that case, I strongly disagree. That would be like saying
the efforts to get it working until now are worthless.
No, it would simply be a statement of fact. If d-i cannot be made to
support oldworld
Re: Aurélien GÉRÔME 2006-08-19 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On a side note, I am also fscked up in
NM without even starting, because someone in the Front Desk seems to
dislike me, even though I maintain 11 packages in Debian, so there
is really no hurry...
I think you mean even though I only started
Well... That's interesting news. And I'm glad you're having success
with your system.
But, unfortunately, the bottom line for this bug report is still that
nobody has yet succeeded in getting the 2.6.16 kernel to boot under
BootX.
Keep in touch. I'll be particularly interested in
Hi,
On Friday 18 August 2006 22:49, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:56:52PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Do you think it will be ready for inclusion in etch at release time?
Hard to say, since Piotr and I have no deadline... :)
I'm not sure what you mean by this. If you mean,
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:30:20PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Friday 18 August 2006 22:49, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:56:52PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Do you think it will be ready for inclusion in etch at release time?
Hard to say, since Piotr and I have
Hi Aurélien,
please don't cc: me - I'm subscribed to both lists, it's against the mailing
lists code of conduct (something you agree on when joining debian..) and it's
annoying. Thanks.
On Saturday 19 August 2006 14:05, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by this. If you mean,
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:15:21PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
please don't cc: me - I'm subscribed to both lists, it's against the mailing
lists code of conduct (something you agree on when joining debian..) and it's
annoying. Thanks.
Sure, no problem and I apologise, which leads me to: how
On Saturday 19 August 2006 14:05, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
I did not mean it is low priority. ;) I meant we are not paid
Canonical employees to do a job following a timeline.
Not sure what this has to do with things as practically nobody on this
project is employed by Canonical. I know I'm
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:15:21PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
I am also really afraid to interact with Frans, because I would rather
not be treated as dipshit like Sven was. :(
Frans is a nice guy. Just don't constantly throw dipshit like Sven did and
neither Frans nor anybody else will
Hi,
On Saturday 19 August 2006 16:17, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Sure, no problem and I apologise, which leads me to: how would I know
you are subscribed? ;)
Thanks for caring! :)
Of course you cannot know if someone is subscribed. But you can know that the
default is not to cc: people and
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 05:21:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Why don't you try interacting with me before making assumptions?
I have explained the reasons why Sven was removed from the project often
enough and also that it was _not_ because of personal dislike.
For someone who had no personal
Does anyone know of an online tutorial, designed for laymen, on how to install and use miBoot? I'm tech-savvy but somewhat obtuse when it comes to compiling and all that, but I can get through the task (which is kind of fun, actually) once I have enough of a starting point. Unfortunately, I'm not
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 03:19:18AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Has *anybody* had any success getting the Linux version 2.6.16-2-
powerpc (Debian 2.6.16-17) kernel to boot an OldWorld machine with
BootX? Or *any* kernel after 2.6.15?
I think the anwser is plainly no. :(
Well, you would
On Aug 18, 2006, at 7:59 AM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 03:19:18AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Has *anybody* had any success getting the Linux version 2.6.16-2-
powerpc (Debian 2.6.16-17) kernel to boot an OldWorld machine with
BootX? Or *any* kernel after 2.6.15?
I
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:44:23AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Perhaps the Debian PTBs should simply admit that PowerPC OldWorld
Macintosh is an unsupported sub-arch for Debian etch? /-8
What is PTBs? :)
Well, aside the issue of booting, the kernel runs just
fine and so does the user
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
What is PTBs? :)
Powers that be...
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Well, aside the issue of booting, the kernel runs just
fine and so does the user space... As you can look at
http://www.us.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/errata, I think
it is partially admitted in Oldworld powerpc boot floppies will not
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 03:06:03PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
I don't think the errata takes any notice of the fact that, quite
independent of freeness considerations, there is *no* working boot
loader for the 2.6.16 kernel on an OldWorld Mac. I've tried both
bootx and quik and neither
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:56:52PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Do you think it will be ready for inclusion in etch at release time?
Hard to say, since Piotr and I have no deadline... :)
Cheers,
--
.''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :' :
`. `'` Free Software Developer
`- Unix Sys Net Admin
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:52:24PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
What is PTBs? :)
Powers that be...
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:44:23AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Perhaps the Debian PTBs should simply admit that PowerPC OldWorld
Macintosh is an
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:58:07PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:52:24PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
What is PTBs? :)
Powers that be...
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:44:23AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Perhaps the
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 12:18:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:58:07PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:52:24PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
What is PTBs? :)
Powers that be...
On Fri,
On Aug 18, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:52:24PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
What is PTBs? :)
Powers that be...
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:44:23AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Perhaps the Debian PTBs
On Aug 18, 2006, at 6:43 PM, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 12:18:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:58:07PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:52:24PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
I just tried the etch Beta3 kernel on my Beige G3 OldWorld PowerPC
Macintosh.
Same results as noted in the original bugreport by this number. It
hangs almost immediately. The picture of Tux never appears at the
top of the screen. See the original bug report for details.
Seriously,
27 matches
Mail list logo
