Cyril Brulebois (2021-07-26):
> > ## proposed solution
> >
> > If others agree, I suggest we add the following somewhere in the
> > installation guide (I don't think we should have a specific warning
> > in the installer; or more specifically it would be way too late to
> > have it be shown
Hi Salvatore,
Salvatore Bonaccorso (2021-07-26):
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 06:14:09AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > @KT:
> >
> > I haven't uploaded it since I'm seeing iwlwifi requesting what appears
> > to be a debug-only firmware (iwl-debug-yoyo.bin), that's even requested
> > via an
HI Cyril,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 06:14:09AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> @KT:
>
> I haven't uploaded it since I'm seeing iwlwifi requesting what appears
> to be a debug-only firmware (iwl-debug-yoyo.bin), that's even requested
> via an aptly-named firmware_request_nowarn() function in
TL;DR: No progress on the social side (doc) yet, but lots of progress on
the technical side (making firmware-enabled images work better)!
Kernel team, feel free to skip to @KT for a little question.
I'd like to thank Ben again for the modalias thing, this made it very
easy to deploy
On Sat, 2021-07-24 at 10:27 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 at 09:05:59 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > If we were to go the “(almost) all in” route, it might make sense to
> > either blacklist (some of) those, or to whitelist the known-ok ones,
> > which would require some
Hi Paul,
Paul Gevers (2021-07-24):
> On 24-07-2021 09:05, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > @RT: I'd be happy to have some feedback from your regarding this
> > approach; telling people to enable contrib/non-free so that
> > they can install firmware packages is definitely *not*
> >
Hi Cyril,
On 24-07-2021 09:05, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> @RT: I'd be happy to have some feedback from your regarding this
> approach; telling people to enable contrib/non-free so that they
> can install firmware packages is definitely *not* something I take
> lightly, but I'd be
On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 at 09:05:59 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> If we were to go the “(almost) all in” route, it might make sense to
> either blacklist (some of) those, or to whitelist the known-ok ones,
> which would require some monitoring of new additions over time (which
> dillon, behind
Hi,
I thought I'd file two separate bug reports with details of test
installations (with main-only images, and with firmware-enabled images),
on two test machines (one with Radeon, one with Nvidia), but after
having collected information from a single test installation, I fear
this is going to be
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
Hi,
This is an umbrella bug report that I intend to use to track at least
two separate issues (that are really the two sides of the same coin):
- Official installation images (main-only) might lead to a successful
installation but result in a
10 matches
Mail list logo
