Strange, I thought I had replied to this:
> This is bug #981302 (which I thought we'd actually fixed already).
> I don't think busybox needs to change.
The two are not really the same. The other ticket is just about the
missing symlinks... but uudecode is really not even intended to use
that
On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 16:00 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Package: busybox
> Version: 1:1.30.1-7+b1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream patch
>
>
> Hey.
>
> Since it's unclear whether and when upstream will react and how long it then
> takes that this actually lands in Debian, could
On Fri, 2021-11-19 at 20:02 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This is bug #981302 (which I thought we'd actually fixed already). I
> don't think busybox needs to change.
I think that would only be a workaround... and a potentially unsafe
one, as the files could still be not around (or have been
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.30.1-7+b1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream patch
Hey.
Since it's unclear whether and when upstream will react and how long it then
takes that this actually lands in Debian, could you possibly consider to
cherry pick the patch I provided at:
4 matches
Mail list logo
