On Wed, 2021-01-13 at 17:24 -0500, John Scott wrote:
> > We don't ship udebs for firmware. So please discuss first how this
> > s[h]ould work
>
> I presumed a udeb was necessary for it to be usable during installation. If
> it's not needed, that's good to hear and I guess I'll hold off.
>
> If
> We don't ship udebs for firmware. So please discuss first how this
> s[h]ould work
I presumed a udeb was necessary for it to be usable during installation. If
it's not needed, that's good to hear and I guess I'll hold off.
If that's because the ordinary .deb is suitable (it conforms to udeb
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 03:49:40PM -0500, John Scott wrote:
> It's going to take a while for me to figure out how to incorporate it into
> the
> installer for Bookworm, but just because it's otherwise ready I'm thinking of
> doing an upload of firmware-ath9k-htc adding a udeb.
We don't ship
It's going to take a while for me to figure out how to incorporate it into the
installer for Bookworm, but just because it's otherwise ready I'm thinking of
doing an upload of firmware-ath9k-htc adding a udeb.
I've seen in some places the docs mention adding a -udeb suffix, but other
places
4 matches
Mail list logo
