Processing of rootskel_1.99_amd64.changes

2011-12-31 Thread Debian FTP Masters
rootskel_1.99_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rootskel_1.99.dsc rootskel_1.99.tar.gz rootskel_1.99_amd64.udeb rootskel-bootfloppy_1.99_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

rootskel_1.99_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-12-31 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: rootskel-bootfloppy_1.99_amd64.udeb to main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.99_amd64.udeb rootskel_1.99.dsc to main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.99.dsc rootskel_1.99.tar.gz to main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.99.tar.gz rootskel_1.99_amd64.udeb to main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.99_amd64.udeb

Bug#653840: rootskel-bootfloppy: depends on unavailable klibc-utils-floppy-udeb on ia64

2011-12-31 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: rootskel-bootfloppy Version: 1.98 Severity: grave britney says: rootskel-bootfloppy/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: klibc-utils-floppy-udeb (= 1.5-2) Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#653513: debian-installer: build/README lies, code says: USE_UDEBS_FROM ?= unstable

2011-12-31 Thread Joey Hess
Cyril Brulebois wrote: Daily builds are defined nowhere, so it can't be concluded whether running “make build_something” under build/ is considered a daily build. (Or maybe the intent was to document that daily builds are the reasons for the default's being unstable. I guess it can be

Processed: limit source to kernel-wedge, tagging 653500

2011-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: #kernel-wedge (2.74+squeeze4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * Add isci to scsi-extra-modules. CLoses: #653500 # limit source kernel-wedge Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'kernel-wedge' Limit currently set to

Bug#653576: marked as done (base-installer: When a device needs a non-free package, the displayed message isn't very user-friendly)

2011-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Dec 2011 12:07:40 -0400 with message-id 20111231160740.gd5...@gnu.kitenet.net and subject line Re: Bug#653576: base-installer: When a device needs a non-free package, the displayed message isn't very user-friendly has caused the Debian Bug report #653576, regarding

Bug#653840: rootskel-bootfloppy: depends on unavailable klibc-utils-floppy-udeb on ia64

2011-12-31 Thread Joey Hess
Julien Cristau wrote: rootskel-bootfloppy/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: klibc-utils-floppy-udeb (= 1.5-2) This is not a new dependency, it's from 2008 and klibc-utils-floppy-udeb is not built on ia64. But why are you trying to use boot floppies, let alone on ia64 anyway? -- see shy jo

Bug#653669: Installation failed with BTRFS

2011-12-31 Thread Joey Hess
Miguel Figueiredo wrote: i tried to install the businesscard image and also failed while using btrfs. The installation log was full of btrfs kernel errors, these errors repeated itself until installation fails reporting no space left on device. I trimmed the 22 MB log, with the first 2000

Bug#653840: rootskel-bootfloppy: depends on unavailable klibc-utils-floppy-udeb on ia64

2011-12-31 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Joey Hess jo...@debian.org (31/12/2011): But why are you trying to use boot floppies, let alone on ia64 anyway? You left out “britney” in your quote. That one: http://release.debian.org/tools.html Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#653840: rootskel-bootfloppy: depends on unavailable klibc-utils-floppy-udeb on ia64

2011-12-31 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:14:20 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Julien Cristau wrote: rootskel-bootfloppy/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: klibc-utils-floppy-udeb (= 1.5-2) This is not a new dependency, it's from 2008 and klibc-utils-floppy-udeb is not built on ia64. But why are you trying

Re: Adding ISO-search support to the CD (netinst) images?

2011-12-31 Thread Joey Hess
Evgeni Golov wrote: How to use: boot as cdrom OR grub2: loopback loop /debian-7.0-amd64-NETINST-findiso.iso set root=(loop) linux /install.amd/vmlinux findiso initrd /install.amd/initrd.gz boot OR kvm: kvm -kernel dest/cdrom/vmlinuz -initrd dest/cdrom/initrd.gz \ -append

Processed: severity of 653840 is normal

2011-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # old bug, apparently severity 653840 normal Bug #653840 [rootskel-bootfloppy] rootskel-bootfloppy: depends on unavailable klibc-utils-floppy-udeb on ia64 Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#653840: rootskel-bootfloppy: depends on unavailable klibc-utils-floppy-udeb on ia64

2011-12-31 Thread Joey Hess
Julien Cristau wrote: I'm not, I'm just looking at grep-excuses, which suggests either klibc-utils-floppy-udeb should exist on ia64 or rootskel-bootfloppy should be killed there. Quite likely rooskel-bootfloppy and klibc-utils-floppy-udeb should be killed *everywhere*. It's not like the kernel

Processed: limit source to rootskel, tagging 653840

2011-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: #rootskel (1.100) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * Remove rootskel-bootfloppy. The age of the floppy is officially over. #Closes: #653840 # limit source rootskel Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'rootskel'

Re: Adding ISO-search support to the CD (netinst) images?

2011-12-31 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:30:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Evgeni Golov wrote: grub2: loopback loop /debian-7.0-amd64-NETINST-findiso.iso set root=(loop) linux /install.amd/vmlinux findiso initrd /install.amd/initrd.gz boot So for this to work, the user has to go out of their