put into
d-i.
I sincerely hope that, at some time, new energies will show up in D-I
development. We desperately need it.
It seems like that's always the case. :)
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
step...@marenka.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
to happen.
Indeed.
Opinions, comments and suggestions welcome.
No objections.
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
step...@marenka.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
it doesn't know about m68k?
Yes, indeed. We can upload to debian-ports, but not to the main archive
(which is why I suggested not to worry about it ;)
Argh! I forgot about that. Also uploading source to d-ports is only
allowed for unreleased not for sid.
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka
too much about it but if we can keep
it in sync with rest it is better and makes porter's life easier too.
I can upload it if that would make life easier. :)
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
step...@marenka.net
signature.asc
Description
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 06:43:03AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Stephen R Marenka (step...@marenka.net):
FWIW: m68k still builds too [1].
[1] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/images/daily/
Hmmm, I can't check right now (offline) but I don't remember seeing
arches for which there is any real excuse for this are
FWIW: m68k still builds too [1].
[1] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/images/daily/
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
step...@marenka.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Is there already a way to fire up just the ssh server portion of network
console or something equivalent?
I don't really want to run the whole installer under network-console,
but I would like to be able to ssh in when the installer hangs.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's
of the switch
to debian-ports. I use approx, so I changed it once and forgot about it.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:30:31PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 26 September 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 09:52:40PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
During installation you basically want to avoid displaying the mirror
list. But you also want to allow users to use
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 01:12:09PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 07:35:58PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 30 May 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:08:02PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
So basically this is what needs to be done to get uploads
).
Contact DSA if you have such a case.
Your sysadmins
---
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(this includes the s390 regression).
And maybe the atari patch? Pretty please? ;)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
works for now (at least until I've tested it by using it).
I'll go crawl back under my rock for now. :)
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hoped that having sid images would be better than
no images at all.
Maybe we'll have a lenny to build from one day. :)
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
are in more than one package
| command exited with status 1
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
specific ones, that needs
uploading:
arch/m68k/vmelilo-installer
I'm taking care of this for wouter. Can someone point me in the right
direction please?
I run output-l10n-changes -d . but no translations seem to have changed.
Is there something I'm missing?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:02:53PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:42:58PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Please porters, let's start the work for upgrading Debian Installer to
2.6.24. Those changes (for kernel-wedge
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:47:04PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 15 February 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:33:05AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Following are the packages, architecture specific ones, that needs
uploading:
arch/m68k/vmelilo-installer
decide together if we do or not each upload.
Would partman-base and partman-partitioning fall into this somewhere?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:32:11PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:54:39AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Tomorrow we need to mass upload packages that has translation
updates. All modules that has no other changes
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 06:04:24PM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:29:33PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 04:27:56AM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote:
I did download and try to boot the m68k build of this installer. The
Which initrd? cdrom and hd
kicks in at 64Mb and level2 at 32Mb. I
haven't pushed any of those numbers in quite a long time, so we can
likely get by with less than that.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
What's the procedure for that? At the moment, sid is pretty broken for
installation (we're far behind), but no reason not to start the process.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:42:59AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
(CCing Stephen as I'm not sure if he's subscribed)
I'm subscribed.
Recently you committed this change in r50759:
+partman-base (116) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ [ Stephen R. Marenka ]
+ * m68k: don't make partman uninstallable
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.7
Please apply this one line patch to allow etch-m68k to be installed.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Makefile.orig 2007-11-13 19:51:03.0 -0600
+++ Makefile 2008-01-03 15
The _rtld_global problem is confirmed fixed for m68k.
Thanks!
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:07:56AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:49:37PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Please show objdump -p /lib/libc.so.6.
[...]
NEEDED ld.so.1
[...]
And mklibs-readelf -n /lib/libc.so.6.
$ mklibs-readelf -n /lib/libc.so.6
ld.so.1
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:59:37PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:29:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:24:11AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Is there any workaround I can do to get this working again?
No idea. A not uptodate build
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:50:15PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:29:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:24:11AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Is there any workaround I can do to get this working again?
No idea. A not uptodate build
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 11:59:43PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 04:24:14PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Please find attached.
Yeah.
| D *UND* _rtld_global
vs.
| DO *UND* 05ae GLIBC_PRIVATE _rtld_global
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:29:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:24:11AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Is there any workaround I can do to get this working again?
No idea. A not uptodate build environment?
Are you saying the symbol version is missing from glibc? I
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 09:40:23AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:07:48AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I fired up the latest daily for m68k and ran into the following problem.
| /bin/sh: symbol lookup error: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined symbol:
_rtld_global
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 11:01:00PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 10:10:14AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
No difference, see attached.
Okay. Please show the same from libc.so.6.
Please find attached.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun
I fired up the latest daily for m68k and ran into the following problem.
| /bin/sh: symbol lookup error: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined symbol: _rtld_global
Is this a mklibs problem? Any ideas?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:20:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 01 June 2007 17:07, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I fired up the latest daily for m68k and ran into the following
problem.
| /bin/sh: symbol lookup error: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined symbol:
| _rtld_global
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:20:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 01 June 2007 17:07, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I fired up the latest daily for m68k and ran into the following
problem.
| /bin/sh: symbol lookup error: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined symbol:
| _rtld_global
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:49:11PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:20:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
P.S. Could you also have a look at the space problem for the m68k floppy
images?
There seems to be a /usr/share/acorn directory, but I haven't figured
out where
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 03:27:22PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 04:02, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I was wondering if someone can help me out. I started to update
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6 to 2.6.18 and I ran into the following error.
I suppose something changed since I
-m68k-2.6
| dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.79
| dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Stephen R. Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| dpkg-buildpackage: source version without epoch 0.79
| fakeroot debian/rules clean
| kernel-wedge gen-control debian/control
| dh_testdir
| dh_clean `find modules -type
a number of sanity checks though.
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/01/msg01054.html
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
at the beach.)
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
would certainly benefit from it,
whereas I doubt we'll ever get gtk working on all m68k subarchs.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
if necessary.
In other words, don't worry about holding on to any kernels just for us.
I hope to keep some 2.4 and 2.2 support in d-i until we get everything
moved, but I'll try to keep it out of the way or in a branch.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL
wireless-mode Managed
wireless-key MY_HEX_KEY
If you're using resolvconf, you'll also need entries like
dns-nameservers and dns-search.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On the d-i homepage, the link to other images under beta 2 points
to ftp.debian.org, which is either currently broken or at least
doesn't have m68k (or much else) any more.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:46:21PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Today the 20060218 builds have been installed for all arches, so tomorrow
Technically still not true, as the m68k build continues to sit in
byhand.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:29:38PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 27 February 2006 14:39, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:46:21PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Today the 20060218 builds have been installed for all arches, so
tomorrow
Technically still not true
built with the new atari-
bootstrap for your testing pleasure.
[1] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/images-m68k/daily/
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
generated file and
lost. Needs followup.
Rats. (Why are automatically generated files in cvs?)
Anyway, thanks to manty for fixing my fix.
m68k/amiga kernels are on the daily sarge cds, so I think this is fixed.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL
/preseed.sh', which is also in package
file-preseed
| (Noting disappearance of file-preseed, which has been completely replaced.)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
without a network or such.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
! Thanks for your feedback.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 11:31:29PM +0200, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I've tried to document all the magic in
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.m68k/index.html.
But, I tried finding the string initrd22 in the document from the URL
above. In chapter 3.3.1.1
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 10:50:44AM +0200, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
As per Joey's request I've downloaded the daily build of the debian
installer initial ramdisk image, and the kernel, and retried the
installation.
Exactly which image from which day?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 08:25:03PM +0200, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 10:50:44AM +0200, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
As per Joey's request I've downloaded the daily build of the debian
installer initial ramdisk image, and the kernel, and retried
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 09:27:57PM +0200, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 08:25:03PM +0200, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 10:50:44AM +0200, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
As per Joey's request I've
.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
) $(MVME147BOOT) $(MVME147ROOT) $(MVME16XBOOT)
$(MVME16XROOT)
If you want to punt vme, so be it. I'd rather see the release than have
me hold it up for anything. Hopefully, we can catch it in a point
release.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:43:26PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
What other architectures besides i386 and powerpc are updated well
enough to avoid such a warning?
I think m68k is in pretty good shape.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:22:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
partitioner (m68k mips or s390)
(has code changes, should be tested before upload)
vmelilo-installer (m68k)
done.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
I've just committed a workaround for #269077 to rootskel. It only
affects 2.2 kernels.
It should be properly fixed, but now probably isn't the time.
Would someone please upload?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED
packages an existing kernel in a udeb. I think you're
expected to have the kernel package specified in kernel-versions
installed on your system. Short of that, you probably can place the
kernel and modules in the same type place with the same names.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun
the m68k
reorg yet. 2.2.25/2.4.27 is correct. common-kernels is the only place
need to change kernel versions now.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-to-TTRAM GEMDOS header flag and more. (Thanks Petr!)
3) q40 hasn't been tested. I haven't even told Richard Zidlicky that I'm
building images yet. No bootloader or documentation. I'm slack.
Hopefully we can get that cleaned up soon.
All comments welcome.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka
previous
suggestion to try and fix that one.
I wonder if it's not because inittab has respawn for vc/3 vc/4?
Do you see an easier solution than to pass a kernel parameter? Is there
one you're already passing that we could overload for 2.2 kernels
(console= maybe)?
--
Stephen R. Marenka
vc devices?
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to 2 times faster.
Progress!
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
compiled into the 2.2.25-mac kernel (as of
kernel-image-2.2.25-mac 2.2.25-4). I use it regularly.
Glad you finally got it installed.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
netboot-initrd.gz
tftplilo.conf
tftplilo.mvme
tftplilo.txt
vmlinuz-2.2.25-mvme16x
vmlinuz-2.4.26-mvme16x
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital
.bin and manifest. amiboot and linux.bin aren't there.
Probably would be handy if I had these files :)
Hopefully I have fixed this bug in cvs. I'll let you know when it's
fixed for sure.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED
and in the daily
builds.
The following from the checklist are okay.
mac cdrom22
mac hd-media
mac nativehd
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 11:54:39PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 06:49:03AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 11:17:22PM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
- Added support for more subarches for arm (riscpc, riscstation),
m68k (bvme6000, mvme147
Does this machine usually run linux? If so, what version of the kernel?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 01:38:57PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I was cleaning up the m68k portion of the installation manual and
deleted some old entities. Unfortunately, that causes all the
translations to fail to build.
Should I add the entities back, even
as I can tell, m68k is the only arch using it.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 01:31:13AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
On (20/07/04 10:31), Stephen R Marenka wrote:
nc -l -p 2080 -e /bin/sh
on tty2 or whatever suits.
Thanks Stephen
I used the above on tty2, which from the man page I understand means
that this machine will listen
don't have further
evidence, then this bad boy seems closed.
Woo hoo!
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-e /bin/sh
on tty2 or whatever suits.
hth,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to reproduce it?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 05:47:34PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Simon Richter will look after m68k/Amiga a bit.
Yeah!!!
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
and perhaps the mount
point to / for the first partition formatted.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:11:38AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
If this was a normal package, I'd binNMU it to get the fixed images
available for testing. Since I can't do that, I've put them at
http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/test/tc1/.
mv cdrom22-initrd-tc1
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 11:04:05AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Well on my autobuilders buildd has sudo rights. I don't know if this is
still policy everywhere or just a holdover. I can switch to a dd, mke2fs
scheme, at least for the initrd's destined for 2.2 kernels. I
workaround that I'm aware of requires
root.
dd
mke2fs
sudo mount -o loop
sudo cp
sudo umount
gzip
Ideas welcome.
Thanks,
Stephen
- --
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Do you have enough space and kernel support to use cramfs as a
workaround?
2.2 doesn't seem to have cramfs. It also doesn't have tmpfs, so we need
to be able to write to the initrd (unless someone has a better idea).
--
Stephen R
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 09:25:26PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 09:48:57AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
It seems to be eject-udeb. I'd file a bug, but I'm not sure what to say.
You should now just need to arrange for 2.0.13deb-5.1 to be built on
m68k.
Looks like
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
As far as I know, these images have never been tested and may well not
work. I've completed as much of the m68k/vme port of debian-installer
as I can for now. The rest is up to you.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description
, but it could be made to work
otherwise.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-1 at position 523495 (bytes: 16 Used chars: 1928 (523495 processed)
The full log is at
http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/images-m68k/daily/build_cdrom.log.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 04:24:06PM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
The m68k/atari port is now building with the dailies, so both the image
and iso links may be updated appropriately.
The m68k/vme ports now have a test build with iso's available at
http://http
, it's essential that we cover
all arches and as many installation methods as we can. An important
I'll only be near my test box on the 24th, so that limits what m68k/mac
testing is going to get done by me.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right
a link to the bug should go on the ports page?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 03:04:53PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-18 08:44]:
Unfortunately, I didn't pay enough attention to the fact that partconf
uses parted also. Since no support for atari exists in parted, d-i
simply can't support atari
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 10:52:32AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Please update the ports page to show that m68k/atari nativehd, floppy,
and cdrom images and iso's are at
http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/test/atari/current/.
I suppose they should be listed
1 - 100 of 303 matches
Mail list logo
