Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-09-06):
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org (2014-09-05):
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:55:24AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-31):
On 31/08/14 07:00, Philipp Kern wrote:
Is perhaps the same true for
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-31):
On 31/08/14 07:00, Philipp Kern wrote:
Is perhaps the same true for stop_rdnssd() on the next line?
So Steven committed a patch in to git, getting rid of the dhcp part;
Philipp, should I upload that and we'll figure out the rdnssd part
another
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:55:24AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-31):
On 31/08/14 07:00, Philipp Kern wrote:
Is perhaps the same true for stop_rdnssd() on the next line?
So Steven committed a patch in to git, getting rid of the dhcp part;
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org (2014-09-05):
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:55:24AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-31):
On 31/08/14 07:00, Philipp Kern wrote:
Is perhaps the same true for stop_rdnssd() on the next line?
So Steven committed a
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:25:28PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I'd be slightly happier if Philipp would comment on this since he seems
to be the one having committed this change.
See:
| commit 8802ca520d9e91542d92bbfa5b2fc412a31cf2e2
| Author: Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org
| Date:
Hi Philipp,
On 31/08/14 07:00, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:25:28PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
See:
| commit 8802ca520d9e91542d92bbfa5b2fc412a31cf2e2
| Author: Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org
| Date: Sun Jan 30 22:29:42 2011 +1100
|
| IPv6 support for using rDNS
Hi,
Please may I commit this to d-i/netcfg (assuming my d-i Git privileges
include that repository).
As well as kfreebsd, I expect hurd is currently affected by this bug,
so this patch would also fix it there.
Thanks.
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+netcfg
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-29):
Please may I commit this to d-i/netcfg (assuming my d-i Git privileges
include that repository).
(Yes, we have no per-repository settings that I'm aware of.)
As well as kfreebsd, I expect hurd is currently affected by this bug,
so this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 757711 + patch
Bug #757711 [src:netcfg] netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
757711:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:45:25AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
That I don't know. Maybe try and compare with netcfg + dhcp client du
jour on Linux, and see whether netcfg's behaviour is different in both
cases, or the dhcp client's one, or the kernel's one.
In the end there's a lot of
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:45:25AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
That I don't know. Maybe try and compare with netcfg + dhcp client du
jour on Linux, and see whether netcfg's behaviour is different in both
cases, or the dhcp client's one, or the kernel's one.
netcfg kills the running DHCP
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-12):
Except - I'm not sure how heavily systemd is going to feature in d-i
for jessie or jessie+1?
Last I checked we were using busybox init…
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 757711 + patch
thanks
I'd like to propose this patch to netcfg as a fix for this bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/757711#52
On 12/08/14 20:53, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-12):
Except - I'm not sure how heavily systemd is going to feature in d-i
for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 757711 netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface
Bug #757711 [debian-installer] DHCP client shutdown right after network
detection (Hyper-V VM)
Changed Bug title to 'netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface'
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-11):
retitle 757711 netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface
reassign 757711 src:netcfg
found 757711 netcfg/1.118
severity 757711 grave
user debian-...@lists.debian.org
usertags 757711 + kfreebsd
thanks
Steve, if you want to
retitle 757711 netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface
reassign 757711 src:netcfg
found 757711 netcfg/1.118
severity 757711 grave
user debian-...@lists.debian.org
usertags 757711 + kfreebsd
thanks
Hi,
On 11/08/14 08:18, Jan Henke wrote:
[...] DHCP client terminating directly
Control: found -1 netcfg/1.117
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-08-11):
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-11):
retitle 757711 netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface
reassign 757711 src:netcfg
found 757711 netcfg/1.118
severity 757711 grave
Eeww, I
Processing control commands:
found -1 netcfg/1.117
Bug #757711 [src:netcfg] netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface
Marked as found in versions netcfg/1.117.
--
757711: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757711
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
found 757711 1.108+deb7u1
thanks
On 11/08/14 23:57, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
found 757711 netcfg/1.118
severity 757711 grave
Eeww, I missed that.
Sorry, assumed you'd seen this... though I did feel the severity was
justified since DHCP is the most common use-case. I also don't know yet
it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 757711 1.108+deb7u1
Bug #757711 [src:netcfg] netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface
Marked as found in versions netcfg/1.108+deb7u1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
757711:
AFAICT so far:
* netcfg kills the running DHCP client after a hostname is set - this
could be a bug
* on kFreeBSD, isc-dhcp-client-udeb is used; killing it releases the
DHCP lease and deconfigures the interface, which could be intentional
* on Linux, Busybox udhcpc is used, killing it seems to
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-12):
found 757711 1.108+deb7u1
thanks
On 11/08/14 23:57, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
found 757711 netcfg/1.118
severity 757711 grave
Eeww, I missed that.
Sorry, assumed you'd seen this... though I did feel the severity was
justified
I hope someone can explain the intent of the code below from netcfg:
why are DHCP clients killed here? Is it to avoid them clobbering a
manual hostname/domain setting? And is that really an issue in
practice, with whatever DHCP client[s] we use now?
The other thing is, the whole idea of DHCP is
23 matches
Mail list logo
