On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 02:06:25AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Also if udeb:s are going to be using xz then it makes even more sense to use
it for everything.
µdebs won't use the xz default, though. (The compression for them will be
handled in debhelper.)
With the compression scheme I posted
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 21:50:44 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
* Linux kernel installation fails on old x86 processors (earlier
than 686, or 686 without PAE) (#672611).
Should just be 686 without PAE I think, older CPUs would get the 486
flavour, not 686.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Hi Steven,
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (13/05/2012):
Hi Miguel,
Which kernel did you choose? Do both kfreebsd-8 and kfreebsd-9 have
this problem?
And which version of VirtualBox was this? I believe a bug in vbox 3.2
leads to regular panics of kfreebsd-9. vbox 4.x or
Same for the keymap selection screen: if you select a wrong one, the
go back button doesn't work.
(Also, it's strange that typing po selects Persian instead of Polish
-- one would expect that if a prefix search doesn't work, it'd go to O
instead).
--
âThis is gonna be as easy as cheating on
The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the first alpha
release of the installer for Debian Wheezy.
Improvements in this release of the installer
=
Network configuration
-
* Add WPA support to installer (#327309).
*
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 15:55 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the first alpha
release of the installer for Debian Wheezy.
Improvements in this release of the installer
=
I assume these will also be
Your message dated Sun, 13 May 2012 17:20:09 +0100
with message-id 4fafdf39.9050...@debianpt.org
and subject line Re: Bug#671884: kfreebsd panic: page fault on installer image
has caused the Debian Bug report #671884,
regarding kfreebsd panic: page fault on installer image
to be marked as done.
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 12:45:03AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Philipp Kern wrote:
So now to the question: What's the policy for dpkg(-deb) feature use in
debhelper? Would it be feasible to add '-z1', '-Zxz', '-Sextreme' to the
dpkg-deb arguments for udebs within
Hi,
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 01:19:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 12:45:03AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Philipp Kern wrote:
So now to the question: What's the policy for dpkg(-deb) feature use in
debhelper? Would it be feasible to add '-z1',
2012/5/13 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org:
kFreeBSD Specific
-
* Kernel updated to version 8.3.
* Option to use new 9.0 kernel during install.
* Detect LVM devices.
LVM detection is still not complete, we still need to figure out where
to put the command to load LVM
2012/5/13 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
* Re-enable ZFS on kfreebsd-i386.
* Allow stripped ZFS for root filesystem.
Presumably 'striped' not 'stripped'.
Yep. Btw, root on mirrored ZFS is supported too (but not on RAID-Z).
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
2012/5/13 Robert Millan r...@debian.org:
2012/5/13 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
* Re-enable ZFS on kfreebsd-i386.
* Allow stripped ZFS for root filesystem.
Presumably 'striped' not 'stripped'.
Yep. Btw, root on mirrored ZFS is supported too (but not on RAID-Z).
Sorry, I meant
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hey folks,
Remembering the fun that we had during the Squeeze release with trying
to make single-CD installations work well, it's time to consider what
we're going to *claim* to support in Wheezy. We've had a history of
supporting the
On Sun, 13 May 2012 18:36:09 -0400
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hey folks,
Remembering the fun that we had during the Squeeze release with trying
to make single-CD installations work well, it's time to consider what
Neil Williams wrote:
supporting only the smaller/lighter desktop environments is exactly
what comes out of accepting that the first two options just won't be
acceptable. Changing compression is only putting off the inevitable.
There's *no* reason to think that GNOME or KDE are going to get
On May 14, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
I'd support XFCE4 as the default Graphical Desktop Environment and
possibly putting GNOME (and KDE) as alternative options.
What is the point of providing a default which is not what people
usually want?
Just document that a normal desktop
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:armel May 08 08:10 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log
* OLD BUILD:armel May 08 08:13 buildd@ancina
On Dom 13 May 2012 21:40:10 Marco d'Itri escribió:
[snip]
Does anybody actually know that people routinely try to install desktop
systems with only a CD and no networking, and why?
What is the use case for this? Cheap DVD readers have been around for
over 10 years now.
Actually, I was going
Hello,
Joey Hess, le Sun 13 May 2012 20:39:20 -0400, a écrit :
Neil Williams wrote:
supporting only the smaller/lighter desktop environments is exactly
what comes out of accepting that the first two options just won't be
acceptable. Changing compression is only putting off the inevitable.
On 12-05-13 at 10:26pm, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
On Dom 13 May 2012 21:40:10 Marco d'Itri escribió:
[snip]
Does anybody actually know that people routinely try to install desktop
systems with only a CD and no networking, and why?
What is the use case for this? Cheap DVD
20 matches
Mail list logo
