Re: Maybe FAQ

2007-01-02 Thread Vim Visual
Hi, yes, I know. I have read the installation page. I come from an OpenBSD mailing list and you're _strongly_ encouraged to read well the documentation before posting anything in the list ;) Still, I had the before-mentioned problem merci! Pau Amaro Seoane 2007/1/2, Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL

Re: installing gnome [FIXED]

2007-01-02 Thread Vim Visual
Yes, currently this tool is lacking in freebsd-utils or freebsd-hackedutils. It has to be packaged. This should be in the same place as on a plain FreeBSD system, but I don't know the exact location. At the end we will probably move that to /lib/firmware, but there is plenty things to do on

Re: installing gnome [FIXED]

2007-01-02 Thread Vim Visual
Yes, currently this tool is lacking in freebsd-utils or freebsd-hackedutils. It has to be packaged. This should be in the same place as on a plain FreeBSD system, but I don't know the exact location. At the end we will probably move that to /lib/firmware, but there is plenty things to do on

Re: Debian GNU/NetBSD: anyone still interested in development?

2007-01-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello :) Thanks for replying! Well that could be, but note the GNU/kFreeBSD port is using a GNU libc which help a lot to build Debian package without patches. I think that the work for kernel independence has a positive influence on the chances of another port to work with little patches.

Re: Debian GNU/NetBSD: anyone still interested in development?

2007-01-02 Thread Vim Visual
why not GNU/OpenBSD ? :) 2007/1/2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello :) Thanks for replying! Well that could be, but note the GNU/kFreeBSD port is using a GNU libc which help a lot to build Debian package without patches. I think that the work for kernel independence has a

Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r1827 - trunk/web/patches

2007-01-02 Thread Petr Salinger
Hi. First the change from elf64-x86-64 to elf64-x86-64-freebsd breaks the build of the kernel (ld: target elf64-x86-64 not found). This can probably be fixed, but I wonder to know if this change is really necessary? Plain FreeBSD amd64 seems to use elf64-x86-64. The plain FreeBSD does it in

Re: Debian GNU/NetBSD: anyone still interested in development?

2007-01-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 02/01/2007 20:35:54, Vim Visual wrote: why not GNU/OpenBSD ? :) Why not? Please, make! :) It is very likely that OpenBSD kernel + GNU libc reacts very well now. I am on the NetBSD train now, if I stop to jump on another train, I will loose both! Bye gl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r1827 - trunk/web/patches

2007-01-02 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Petr Salinger a écrit : Hi. Hi! First the change from elf64-x86-64 to elf64-x86-64-freebsd breaks the build of the kernel (ld: target elf64-x86-64 not found). This can probably be fixed, but I wonder to know if this change is really necessary? Plain FreeBSD amd64 seems to use elf64-x86-64.