Accepted:
freebsd-libs_9.0-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_9.0-1.debian.tar.gz
freebsd-libs_9.0-1.dsc
to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_9.0-1.dsc
freebsd-libs_9.0.orig.tar.gz
to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_9.0.orig.tar.gz
libalias-dev_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb
Hi,
El 31 de gener de 2012 22:06, Samuel Moritz sa...@timberline.se ha escrit:
root@debian:/# smartctl -a /dev/ad0
smartctl 5.41 2011-06-09 r3365 [GNU/kFreeBSD 9.0-1-amd64 x86_64] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
error sending
El 2 de febrer de 2012 18:27, Robert Millan r...@debian.org ha escrit:
I believe that a rebuild of smartmontools with libcam-dev 9.0 (just
accepted into unstable) would solve the problem.
Could someone test?
We need the rebuild for ABI transition anyway, so it's no harm to
queue it right
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 06:28:52PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
El 2 de febrer de 2012 18:27, Robert Millan r...@debian.org ha escrit:
I believe that a rebuild of smartmontools with libcam-dev 9.0 (just
accepted into unstable) would solve the problem.
Could someone test?
We need the
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 06:28:52PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
El 2 de febrer de 2012 18:27, Robert Millan r...@debian.org ha escrit:
I believe that a rebuild of smartmontools with libcam-dev 9.0 (just
accepted into unstable) would solve the problem.
Could someone test?
We need the
Hi,
for the next upload of ncurses I have updated¹ the xterm* terminfo
entries from xterm 276. One notable feature is that there is now a
single entry point for configuring the behavior of the backspace key²,
meaning that all xterm-* terminfo entries behave consistently in that
respect.
The
El 2 de febrer de 2012 18:54, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net ha escrit:
We need the rebuild for ABI transition anyway, so it's no harm to
queue it right away.
Does it mean that after a rebuild, it won't work anymore with a kernel
8.x?
Probably. After several hours I've given up trying
El 2 de febrer de 2012 19:20, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de ha escrit:
If there is anything else you want me to do, please speak up.
If you ship a new terminfo that matches FreeBSD one and give it a
different name, would this allow FreeBSD 9 users with Debian
GNU/kFreeBSD chroots to fix the
freebsd-utils_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
freebsd-utils_9.0-1.dsc
freebsd-utils_9.0.orig.tar.gz
freebsd-utils_9.0-1.debian.tar.gz
freebsd-utils_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb
freebsd-utils-udeb_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
On 2012-02-02 22:48 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
El 2 de febrer de 2012 19:20, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de ha escrit:
If there is anything else you want me to do, please speak up.
If you ship a new terminfo that matches FreeBSD one and give it a
different name, would this allow FreeBSD 9
devd_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb
to main/f/freebsd-utils/devd_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb
freebsd-geom_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb
to main/f/freebsd-utils/freebsd-geom_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb
freebsd-net-tools-udeb_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
to
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Can I instead suggest someone looks at the kernel and fixes it?
It used to work, it works on the porter machines, it just fails
on the buidds.
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The kernel part is not trivial to solve.
It now fails because of the multiple bind mounts needed by
12 matches
Mail list logo
