Re: Debian GNU/(k)NetBSD and sparc32 hardware?

2007-07-29 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, BERTRAND Joël [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe, but NetBSD kernel does not correctly work on sun4m/SMP, like Linux. Today, no one OS can be used on sun4m/SMP workstations, and I think that it will be easier to fix linux 2.6 sparc32 kernel than work on debian/xBSD sparc32 port. I

Re: Debian GNU/(k)NetBSD and sparc32 hardware?

2007-07-29 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Ulrich Teichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That's not quite true. Dave Miller is still collecting patches, Mark Fortescue, Krzysztof Helt and others are producing them. See the respective posts on [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's just that there is no real maintainer for the port. [...] Call me

Re: Debian GNU/(k)NetBSD and sparc32 hardware?

2007-07-30 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Ulrich Teichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What we've seen here is classic bitrot, IMHO. Of course, the main Linux development platform is x86 and quite a lot kernel developers only work on one platform. This has introduced bugs for all other ports (and will continue to do so), which I

Re: tomcat6

2009-05-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Anton Andreev antonandr...@fmi.uni-sofia.bg writes: Is tomcat available on Debian / kfreeBSD? Apparently yes: http://packages.debian.org/sid/tomcat6 . BTW, the proper name is Debian GNU/kFreeBSD. Thanks, Ludo'. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8

2009-07-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Luca Favatella slacky...@gmail.com writes: [...] on the deb package, there is a different script for GNU/kFreeBSD and GNU/Linux, but the GNU/kFreeBSD version needs ifconfig and route. I considered porting and switching to BusyBox udhcpc. (I haven't studied the question in depth, so

Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8

2009-07-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Luca Favatella slacky...@gmail.com writes: It seems it is not enough. It has only ifconfig http://packages.debian.org/sid/kfreebsd-i386/inetutils-tools/filelist Hmm, actually it has more than this, but it seems to lack `route', for instance:

Re: ZFS on kFreeBSD

2009-09-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz writes: Fou our specifics, take a look at our SVN repository http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/glibc-bsd/trunk/, namely freebsd-libs, freebsd-util. Start with target get-orig-source in debian/rules. Out of curiosity, is there any plan to get the

Re: Detecting kfreebsd kernel while compiling

2010-01-30 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes: There's __FreeBSD__ for plain FreeBSD, and __FreeBSD_kernel__ for GNU/kFreeBSD (which doesn't define the former, so that people can distinguish). And ‘__GLIBC__’, which is what most applications really want to know. Thanks, Ludo’. -- To

Re: Detecting kfreebsd kernel while compiling [hurd]

2010-01-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de writes: But I don't now how can I specify a GNU/Hurd (with mach-Kernel) system (hurd-i386), which is still an unofficial port of Debian. I have only tried 'defined (__hurd__)' which does not work. I think if I say 'defined (__GNU__)' this is always

Re: porting userland ppp to kfreebsd

2010-03-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, The Anarcat anar...@koumbit.org writes: +#if defined(__linux__) || defined(__GNU__) || defined(__GLIBC__) Only the last one makes sense: ‘__linux__’ is for the Linux kernel and ‘__GNU__’ is for GNU (aka. GNU/Hurd). Thanks, Ludo’. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to