Hi!
On Sat, 2014-03-15 at 20:55:38 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
[ CCing src:dpkg and src:apt as I have no idea why this is happening ]
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:51:11PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
During the latest upgrade, I got the following error message:
Preparing to unpack
Source: binutils-avr
Version: 2.23.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on
Source: libsieve
Version: 2.2.6-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one
Source: liece
Version: 2.0+0.20030527cvs-11
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build
Source: qwo
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or more) of these
Source: riece
Version: 8.0.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
I had a look at how to implement this, and came up with the attached
patch. It is able to set up btrfs, but the resulting image do not
boot. I do not understand why, so I thought it was time to ask for
feedback. :)
I managed to get the resulting image booting by
at bottom :-
On 3/16/14, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
Control: tags -1 +fixed-upstream
Hi,
It was solved in upstream
Wednesday March 17 2010
75c3d35: - remove hal dependency
Now upstream has tagged 20.1, so I'd try to package it.
--
Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp
Hi
Hi,
Quoting very selectively here:
[Original report]
Fails to find rspec: Could not find rspec (= 2.0.0) amongst []
[unreproducible]
I'm unable to reproduce the problem.
ii ruby 1:1.9.3
ii ruby1.9.1 [ruby-interpreter] 1.9.3.484-1
ii ruby
Source: cbflib
Version: 0.9.2.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
it seems that a new version which allow to read hdf5 files and NeXus file is
available.
could you package it
thanks
Frederic
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Control: tags -1 +patch +pending
Hi William,
hwinfo package has RC bug (#613184) due to dependency to HAL.
It was solved in upstream and tagged as 20.1 as newest release
in their git repository. See https://gitorious.org/opensuse/hwinfo
I've prepared new upstream version package for hwinfo
same problem, tried also clean install after apt-get remove clamav
clamav-base clamav-daemon clamav-docs clamav-freshclam libclamav6 --purge:
root@abcdefg:~# apt-get install clamav clamav-base clamav-daemon
clamav-docs clamav-freshclam libclamav6
Reading package lists... Done
Building
Thanks, Andras. dkms.parallelism.diff is working well for me. With 8
cores, spl+zfs now install in 4m47s instead of 6m18s.
I tested the patch with dkms 2.2.0.3-1.1ubuntu5 on Ubuntu 14.04.
Ivan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
returned to older version and everything works:
root@abcdefg:~/temppi# apt-get remove clamav clamav-base clamav-daemon
clamav-docs clamav-freshclam libclamav6 --purge
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be
Package: yi
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream patch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Dear Maintainer,
I tried building yi and got the following error:
# apt-get build-dep yi
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Hi,
Steven Chamberlain:
I'm unfamiliar with xorriso but the man page mentions -joliet on
The problem is that argument -- marks the end of the parameter
list of xorriso command -as mkisofs.
Both versions of grub-mkrescue start xorriso with that command and
use mkisofs-ish options to define the
Control: retitle -1 latex-beamer should depend on texlive-pictures instead of
pgf
On 2006-09-15 17:11:38 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
latex-beamer is currently uninstallable together with texlive,
because it depends on pgf. texlive itself depends on texlive
pictures, which contains pgf.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 03:22:02AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Package: obnam
Version: 1.7-1
Severity: serious
obnam depends on python-tracing (= 0.8~) [amd64, i386] but that version
is not available in unstable.
Looks like a tainted build environment.
Uploading that version now. Thanks!
Control: reassign -1 gnome-shell
Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org writes:
So, I think the problem is in how gdm figures out whether it should
talk to logind in the first place, not in any systemd component. Can
you verify this? (And if so, can you please reassign the bug?)
①
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 07:17:02PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Here's a feasible attack on obnam due to its use of md5.
I agree that this attack would work. It's not exactly likely (MD5
collisions are still not trivial, in my understanding, to generate),
but it's clear Obnam needs to switch.
If I
* Tuxicoman deb...@jesuislibre.net [2014-03-14 19:53 +0100]:
I use Debian Jessie now with kernel 3.13 and still I got this in dmesg :
[ 14.226208] systemd-logind[4077]: New seat seat0.
[ 14.226589] systemd-logind[4077]: Watching system buttons
on /dev/input/event4 (Power Button)
[
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 08:23:18PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
Package: lightdm
Version: 1.8.8-1
Severity: important
After upgrading to lightdm 1.8.8-1, the shutdown and restart options are
no longer available to me. When I downgrade to lightdm 1.8.7-1,
everything works fine.
Do you
Source: grub
Version: 2.02~beta2-7
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
grub: generated grub.cfg leads to non booting system. Drops to rescue shell
after not finding root device.
Updating from older grub to grub 2.02~ beta2-7
update-grub - generated same
* Andoru andoru.b...@gmail.com [2014-03-13 20:50 +0200]:
Package: alsa-base
Version: 1.0.25+3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I've been having this problem on CrunchBang 11 Waldorf which is
based off Debian Wheezy (I think) I've had to restart the PC 4
times because of this.
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.64.1-1
Severity: wishlist
It would be great if sbuild-createchroot would allow to set a custom
suffix while creating chroots. At the moment, -sbuild suffix is
hardcoded:
# Write out schroot chroot configuration.
my $chrootname = ${suite}- . $conf-get('BUILD_ARCH') .
I am sorry, that my technical skills and time resources are to low to
work active on that problem.
But did anyone noticed Bodhi-Linux? It is a Ubuntu-based distro which
use E17 as its default desktop. And it includes Terminolgoy.
Maybe there is someone to help or we can learn from the
Could someone please describe detailed the current state of the
packages and what are the detailed problems (dependencies) about that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: apt
Version: 0.9.16.1
Severity: important
File: /usr/bin/apt-get
The obnam package is upgradeable but apt-get install obnam fails to upgrade
it without printing any reason why. Before I force upgrade by
uninstalling+installing obnam, is there a way to get more useful debug output?
I
Script started on Sun 16 Mar 2014 06:21:45 AM EDT
jude@d-216-36-20-9:~$ uname -ar
Linux d-216-36-20-9 3.13-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.13.5-1 (2014-03-04) x86_64
GNU/Linux
jude@d-216-36-20-9:~$ exit
Script done on Sun 16 Mar 2014 06:21:55 AM EDT
With the kernel version and other recent updates shown
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:51:31AM -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
That's fine but I personally do not require this for sponsoring. I
always fetch the packaging from VCS.
Ok. debian/changelog pushed to alioth. Though I still haven't pushed a
release
tag.
Not really - perhaps you forgot
tag 714796 + patch
thanks
On 2013-07-02 23:41, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy
debsums reports modification of the following files,
from the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Hi,
On Dienstag, 4. März 2014, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Would it be possible to backport fonts-crosextra-carlito and
fonts-crosextra- caladea from jessie to wheezy-backports?
Maybe Holger would like to have a look?
I'll have a look on this soon.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
On 2014-03-16 11:45, Christian Kastner wrote:
On 2013-07-02 23:41, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy
debsums reports modification of the following files,
from the attached log (scroll to the
On 2014-03-06 07:46, Daniel Bolton wrote:
Package: apt-file
Version: 2.5.2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Commands of the format `apt-file list [valid package name]` produce no
output and exit with 0. I also tried the -x option (remembering an older
bug) with identical results.
Control: forcemerge 730768 687419
Hi,
these two bugs seem to be the same, merging.
Also note that I applied a small fix to the patch in
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/devscripts.git;a=commit;h=a727137d502a1667a984ad262acd59825ff4ba46
Andreas, can you check that it is indeed
Package: nvidia-driver
Version: 331.49-1
Followup-For: Bug #740016
I've found that running a composition manager (such as xcompmgr) makes this
problem go away most of the time. However, occasionally a single frame still
gets painted on top of everything else. It does not happen very frequently,
Hello Paul!
Your bug report shows up as one of the highest priority tasks
on my debian maintainer dashbord since you've marked
it as render package unusable.
I'm using totem myself and it works very well for me.
On the other hand my computer doesn't even contain
a DVD drive
Are you sure
Hello,
I just installed PACPL 5.0.1 from the git repository… and this solves the
problem.
Maybe a good incentive to package this new release ;-)
Cheers
Michel
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Control: severity -1 important
Hello Alexandre!
Thanks for your bug report and sorry to hear you're having problems.
Unfortunately your bug report doesn't contain any information that
makes it possible for me to investigate it. Also, while it
might 'render package
Control: reassign -1 dbus
Control: affects -1 gnome-maps
Control: fixed -1 1.8.0-2
Hello!
I remember us discussing this on IRC, and if I'm not mistaken
the problem went away when manually reloading/restarting dbus.
This makes me suspect the automatic reloading of dbus did not
work properly and
Package: exim4-config
Version: 4.80-7
Severity: important
For checking this bug edit /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf:
asd@marian1000:~$ cat /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.con
$ cat /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf
# /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf
#
# Edit this file and /etc/mailname by hand
On Sunday, February 09, 2014 11:22:09 AM Thomas Koch wrote:
Hi,
I've just read the emacs policy (from stable, which is outdated) because
I'd like to have a few modes packaged and found this discussion.
Please tell me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't emacsen-common just use dpkg
triggers? By
Fixed upstream, thanks for the report.
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=bash-completion/bash-completion.git;a=commitdiff;h=867282a
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: wxsqlite3
Version: 3.0.6.1~dfsg0-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: freewx-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: wx3.0
Dear maintainer,
We're aiming to migrate the archive to using wxwidgets3.0 instead of
wxwidgets2.8.
Looking at the wxsqlite3 sources, I see indications that it
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sun, 2014-03-16 at 13:23 +0200, Corcodel Marian wrote:
Edit /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf and on dc_local_interfaces put
127.0.1.1 (dc_local_interfaces='127.0.0.1')
Thus telling exim to only listen on an interface local to the machine
(i.e. not
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package osmpbf
Package name: osmpbf
Version : 1.3.3-1
Upstream Author : Scott A. Crosby sc...@sacrosby.com
URL : http://github.com/scrosby/OSM-binary
License :
Package: xmlcopyeditor
Version: 1.2.0.12-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: freewx-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: wx3.0
Dear maintainer,
We're aiming to migrate the archive to using wxwidgets3.0 instead of
wxwidgets2.8.
I've built and done some simple testing of xmlcopyeditor with
Package: ruby
Version: 1:1.9.3.4
Severity: serious
I try to upgrade ruby from version 1:1.9.3 to version 1:1.9.3.4 .
Aptitude refuses to do it, because I must install ruby1.9.1 version =
1.9.3.194-1 . I try to be sure and install version 1.9.3.484-2 . It
depends on ruby version = 1:1.9.3.1 .
Package: sendip
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Usertags: clang-ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
Your package fails to build with clang instead of gcc.
The attached patch fixes it.
Best regards,
Alexander
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.7+6
Severity: normal
Since some weeks the xserver gets worse more and more. It started some
month agou with the font issue (Bug #674929) and now since some weeks
(1-5) I see that after a locked screen with
/control
must be updated if you agree what I said above.
Hi,
I completely agree with you Tomasz!
I've just uploaded a new version of libx86emu on mentors.
It build fine in sid:
$ curl http://pub.sebian.fr/pub/libx86emu_1.4-2_amd64-20140316-1301.build
@Johann or @Vincent, if you agree, can you
Package: minetest
Version: 0.4.9+repack-4
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
While researching another problem, I invoked minetest as follows:
minetest --trace
This shows several sound files as missing from the package:
08:14:16: INFO[main]: Audio: Error opening
Package: unattended-upgrades
Version: 0.83.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
Hi,
please find attached the newest German translation of unattended-upgrades.
Kind regards,
Chris.
de.po.gz
Description: application/gzip
Package: zoneminder
Version: 1.26.5-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I tied to enable all logs of zoneminder but the only information I got is the
same of apache error log:
[Sun Mar 16 13:05:30.095183 2014] [:error] [pid 4383] [client ::1:53603] ERR
Source: wbar
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: clang-ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
Your package fails to build with clang instead of gcc.
The attached patch fixes it.
Best regards,
Alexander.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT
Package: ledger
Version: 3.0.0+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
ledger bundles an SHA-1 C++ implementation by Paul E. Jones which is
licensed under a Freeware Public License. This license does not allow
modification and therefore does not adhere to the DFSG.
The ledger source tree contains these
* Mason Loring Bliss ma...@blisses.org, 2013-03-01, 12:44:
s/Usefull/Useful/
This one seems to be already fixed.
s/intervall/interval/
s/eg /e.g. /
These are not fixed yet.
And I spotted another one:
s/exstance/existence/
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
FYI I've packaged speedpad for Debian and filed the RFS following the then
documented procedure:
https://code.google.com/p/speedpad/source/browse/debian/?name=debian(debian
branch of the git repo)
Original RFS is still sitting on debian-mentors:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am So den 16. Mär 2014 um 13:30 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 13:20:11 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
[60.601] (II) LoadModule: nvidia
[60.601] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so
[60.764] (II)
://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733578
³http://pub.sebian.fr/pub/hwinfo_21.0-1_amd64-20140316-1308.build
--
Sebastien Badia
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: mediainfo
Version: 0.7.67-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: freewx-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: wx3.0
Dear maintainer,
We're aiming to migrate the archive to using wxwidgets3.0 instead of
wxwidgets2.8.
I've built and done some simple testing of mediainfo-gui with the
tags 679995 upstream
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Source: kicad
Version: 0.20140224+bzr4027-3
Severity: serious
Hello,
kicad currently FTBFS on all architectures.
See here for the build logs:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=kicad
Maxi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Control: forwarded -1 https://code.google.com/p/wbar/issues/detail?id=87
Thanks for your report. I have forwarded your patch to the upstream
developers of wbar.
Regards,
Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 13:26:53 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.12.1.902-1
Severity: important
Hi!
The xserver is crashing here on kfreebsd. Downgrading to 1.11.4
works again. This bug report is written with
Source: minc
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: clang-ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
Your package fails to build with clang instead of gcc.
The attached patch fixes it.
Best regards,
Alexander
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm no longer interested in the zeromq packages so I'm orphaning them. zeromq3
is in good state and with an active and responsive upstream. The only
outstanding task should be to enable CurveZMQ support as soon as the libsodium
package enters Debian (cfr. #701962).
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm no longer interested in the zeromq packages so I'm orphaning them. zeromq
tracks the legacy 2.x upstream branch, which will not receive any new upstream
releases, and should probably be removed as soon as there are no reverse
dependencies left (libzeromq-perl
Hello,
I am usind Debian with Gnome 3.4.2 and I am also not able to deactivate
bluetooth in the standard startup configuration. Fujitsu Lifebook S7110
Debian Gnome 3.4.2.
It means after a restart the configuration is switched to on again
(activated bluetooth), it does this on its own...
Hi
On many users this situation is more confusing and not know how to
handle this situation.
When set internet site on IP-addresses to listen on for incoming SMTP
connections must instruct users to do not put 127.0.0.1 an this field
but on many cases this configuration is set on local which
Source: nose
Version: 1.3.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: sqsh
Version: 2.1.7-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
On new readline versions old-style function
Source: ca-certificates-java
Version: 20130815
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: morris
Version: 0.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
checking for
Source: haskell-bindings-libzip
Version: 0.10.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: commons-vfs
Version: 2.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
debian/rules
Source: odt2txt
Version: 0.4+git20100620-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
cc -g
Source: node-zipfile
Version: 0.4.0+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: vowpal-wabbit
Version: 7.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
checking
Source: ruby-literati
Version: 0.0.4~git.20130318.3b3ea30-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: repsnapper
Version: 0+git20130603.7c690471-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: dico
Version: 2.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
On new readline versions old-style function
Source: micropolis-activity
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: clang-ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
Your package fails to build with clang instead of gcc. [-Wreturn-type]
The attached patch fixes it.
Best regards,
Alexander
-- System Information:
Debian
Source: timps
Version: 0.25-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
On new readline versions old-style function
Source: gnu-fdisk
Version: 1.2.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
On new readline versions old-style
Source: tclreadline
Version: 2.1.0-12
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
On new readline versions old-style
Source: network-manager-iodine
Version: 0.0.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: libmoosex-getopt-perl
Version: 0.59-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: ruby-fakeweb
Version: 1.3.0+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: gretl
Version: 1.9.14-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
On new readline versions old-style function
Source: jgit
Version: 3.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
debian/rules
Source: zssh
Version: 1.5c.debian.1-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
On new readline versions old-style
Source: python-bcrypt
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: lsh-utils
Version: 2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
On new readline versions old-style function
Source: quagga
Version: 0.99.22.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
On new readline versions old-style
Source: libgrip
Version: 0.3.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[3]:
Source: ruby-net-ssh-multi
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: crmsh
Version: 1.2.6+git+e77add-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: modules
Version: 3.2.10-8
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
checking for
Hi Jonathan,
unfortunately you haven't forwarded my and Alexander's request to join
collab-maint to n...@debian.org. Thus we still don't have access to the
repository you created.
Are you still interested in packaging FFmpeg for Debian?
Best regards,
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
1 - 100 of 375 matches
Mail list logo
