Bug#828682: pesign: broken command line parsing for most commands

Source: pesign Version: 0.112-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream patch fixed-upstream Hi, most commands shipped with pesign got their command line parsing broken in February. Fixed upstream with https://github.com/rhinstaller/pesign/commit/5be0515dee24308fd7e270bf2e0fb5e5a7a78f32 Cheers,

Bug#828639: Pending fixes for bugs in the libmarpa-r2-perl package

tag 828639 + pending thanks Some bugs in the libmarpa-r2-perl package are closed in revision 18c52361a3d4a1da639626b8a0eec48fb4131311 in branch 'master' by intrigeri The full diff can be seen at https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-perl/packages/libmarpa-r2-perl.git/commit/?id=18c5236 Commit

Bug#827746: mirror submission for mirrors.xjtu.edu.cn

control: tag -1 +moreinfo Hello, Thank you for your support and for mirroring Debian. Your submission looks good, please change your update frequency to 4 times per 24 hours, rather than 2. Please respond to this email when this change has been made and we will add you to the official listing.

Bug#828681: keyutils: please make the build reproducible

Source: keyutils Version: 1.5.9-9 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that keyutils could not be

Bug#828046: ess: taking a *huge* time to load in emacs

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 07:56:51AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > I can't really help you. I don't program elisp. I can forward this for you > (you know how it goes) but I honestly think we should close this here and you > refile at > >https://github.com/emacs-ess/ESS/issues > > I

Bug#778911: vlc: Please make N Curses interface configurable

Control: tags -1 upstream Hi Axel On 2015-02-21 18:40:03, Axel Stammler wrote: > Package: vlc > Version: 2.0.3-5+deb7u2+b1 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > VLC works well with this interface (sometimes I think it works better than > using a > graphical interface), so I would

Bug#824901: Updates on gpg2 segfault? -- gone in 2.1.13

Hi! Christoph Egger writes: > Hi! > > FWIW I've just upgraded to .13 and gpg does not seem to segfault any > more Actually not really. I can now do most things but | $ gpg --check-trustdb | | gpg: signal Segmentation fault caught ... exiting | zsh: segmentation fault

Bug#828680: debiandoc-sgml-doc-pt-br: please make the build reproducible

Source: debiandoc-sgml-doc-pt-br Version: 1.1.12+nm Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: locale X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that

Bug#824901: Updates on gpg2 segfault? -- gone in 2.1.13

Hi! Christoph Egger writes: > Actually not really. > > I can now do most things but > > | $ gpg --check-trustdb > | > | gpg: signal Segmentation fault caught ... exiting > | zsh: segmentation fault gpg --check-trustdb Ignore me, didn't update *all* systems from

Bug#828679: llgal: Typo in man llgalrc

Package: llgal Version: 0.13.17-2 Severity: minor Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, There is a small typo in man llgalrc that bugged me before I understand it: The "make_caption_from_image_comment" is written twice, the second one instead of "make_caption_from image_timestamp". Patch attached for

Bug#827686: pink-pony: port to glfw3

Control: tags -1 pending On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 17:33 +0100, James Cowgill wrote: > Source: pink-pony > Version: 1.4.1-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: sid stretch patch > > Hi, > > At some point I would like to remove the old version of glfw which is > no longer maintained upstream. The last

Bug#811682: FTBFS with GCC 6: could not convert a from x to y

Are you sure? > It fails to build from source in unstable. > > View.cc: In member function 'SmartPtr View::getCharAt(const > scaled&, const scaled&, CharIndex&, Point*, BoundingBox*) const': > View.cc:294:10: error: 'nullptr' was not declared in this scope >    return nullptr; Arrg, "nullptr" is

Bug#828518:

Control: tag -1 + pending upstream Upstream have OpenSSL 1.1.0 support nearly ready to go, basically just waiting on the final 1.1.0 release to be out. See: https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/milestones/1.1.0%20Support

Bug#828281: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#828281: dcmtk: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Control: tags -1 pending  Thanks for reporting. An updated version fix this will be uploaded once the current upstream release has passed the NEW pipeline.  Best,  Gert 

Bug#826166: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#826166: Bug#826166: libgphoto2-dev: location of gphoto2-config is not in PATH

Hi, Em Dom, 2016-06-26 às 10:23 -0500, Steve M. Robbins escreveu: > Hi, > > I'm the debian maintainer of digikam and just ran into the same problem. > > On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 20:43:58 -0300 "Herbert Fortes (hpfn)"   > wrote: > > > > I recon these files should be in /usr/bin

Bug#811682: FTBFS with GCC 6: could not convert a from x to y

Le 26/06/2016 à 14:27, Gert Wollny a écrit : > Control: tags -1 patch > > Hello, > > the attached patch fixes the reported compile error and also fixes the > "narrowing conversion" errors that came up with g++-6. > > The package now builds with g++-6 (but it is not lintian-clean). > > Best, >

Bug#828633: mount in testing/unstable should conflict with old bash-completion

On 2016-06-26 18:42 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Control: tags -1 + pending > Control: severity -1 serious > > Hello! > > Thanks for your bug report. I apparently forgot to bump the version > of the already existing Breaks/Replaces statements in previous upload. > Fixed in git, will be part

Bug#828457: nodejs: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 12:23 GMT+02:00 Kurt Roeckx : > Source: nodejs > Version: 4.4.3~dfsg-1 > Severity: important > Control: block 827061 by -1 > > Hi, > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build

Bug#828678: dibbler-client: overwrites /etc/resolv.conf link (aka. no resolvconf support)

Package: dibbler-client Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: normal Tags: ipv6 patch Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Installed dibbler-client * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Start the dibbler-client daemon * What was the outcome

Bug#820822: vlc consumes all RAM within seconds and system swaps and freezes

Control: reassign -1 libvdpau-va-gl1 0.3.6-1 Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On 2016-04-14 13:03:30, Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote: > On 12/04/16 22:59, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > > > On 2016-04-12 22:36:30, Giorgos Pallas wrote: > > > Package: src:vlc > > > Version:

Bug#828636: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#828636: Bug#828636: libembperl-perl: please make the build reproducible

Hi! gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:16:52 +0200, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > > > Sorry, but that's wrong: > > > > > > → dpkg -L libembperl-perl | egrep man/de/man./ > > > /usr/share/man/de/man3/Embperl::Features.3pm.gz > > > → man /usr/share/man/de/man3/Embperl::Features.3pm.gz > >

Bug#828369: krb5: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

I believe that https://github.com/krb5/krb5/pull/447 has upstream's efforts at OpenSSL 1.0 compatibility. -Ben

Bug#828633: mount in testing/unstable should conflict with old bash-completion

Control: tags -1 + pending Control: severity -1 serious Hello! Thanks for your bug report. I apparently forgot to bump the version of the already existing Breaks/Replaces statements in previous upload. Fixed in git, will be part of next upload. Regards, Andreas Henriksson

Bug#828677: tech-ctte: user/root password occasionally appear in clear text when rebooting from CLI

Package: tech-ctte Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Before version 8 jessie, I frequently rebooted/shutdown from the CLI... When I tried doing so since installing version 8 ( I think I was up to 8.3?) I would get varying results: mostly the machine would "Hang" for a minute or

Bug#775555: vlc: VLC segfaults when converting a DVD with a title number greater than zero

Hi Derek almost a year past, my bad :( On 2015-07-20 15:54:48, Derek wrote: > It still happens > > I've included attachments: > vlc-vvv.txt: contains the output when calling vlc from the command line > vlc_gdb_bt.txt: the output of "bt" when running vlc within gdb > vlc_bt_full.txt: the output

Bug#828630: jessie-pu: package libbusiness-creditcard-perl/0.33-1+deb8u1

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:00:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2016-06-26 at 15:10 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > > I've prepared an update for libbusiness-creditcard-perl in > > jessie{,-updates} which fixes #814479 for stable users. The issue at > > hand is that the credit card ranges of

Bug#828674: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-django-treebeard Version: 4.0.1+dfsg-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-django-treebeard FTBFS with

Bug#828675: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-jingo Version: 0.8-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-jingo FTBFS with 1.10. Please update your package

Bug#828673: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-django-tagging Version: 1:0.4.1-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-django-tagging FTBFS with 1.10.

Bug#828672: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-django-registration Version: 2.0.4-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-django-registration FTBFS with

Bug#828676: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-restless Version: 2.0.1-5 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-restless FTBFS with 1.10. Please update your

Bug#828663: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-django-contact-form Version: 1.2~git23.8413069-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-django-contact-form

Bug#828664: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-django-debug-toolbar Version: 1:1.4-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-django-debug-toolbar FTBFS with

Bug#828669: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-django-mptt Version: 0.8.3-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-django-mptt FTBFS with 1.10. Please

Bug#828666: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-django-feincms Version: 1.11.4-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-django-feincms FTBFS with 1.10.

Bug#828671: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-django-pyscss Version: 2.0.2-4 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-django-pyscss FTBFS with 1.10. Please

Bug#828665: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-django-extensions Version: 1.6.7-2 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-django-extensions FTBFS with 1.10.

Bug#828661: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-django-bootstrap-form Version: 3.1.0-6 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-django-bootstrap-form FTBFS with

Bug#828668: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-django-jsonfield Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-django-jsonfield FTBFS with 1.10.

Bug#828662: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-django-compressor Version: 2.0-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-django-compressor FTBFS with 1.10.

Bug#828667: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-django-formtools Version: 1.0-2 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-django-formtools FTBFS with 1.10.

Bug#828670: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: python-django-openstack-auth Version: 2.2.1-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that python-django-openstack-auth FTBFS with

Bug#828209: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#828209: libssw: FTBFS on non-SSE architectures

Sascha Steinbiss writes: > I can’t see why code containing SSE instructions would run on i386? My expectation ws that depending on the processor's capabilities, this code would either succeed (on reasonably modern processors) or fail with SIGILL (Illegal instruction).

Bug#828660: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: mini-buildd Version: 1.0.12 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that mini-buildd FTBFS with 1.10. Please update your package

Bug#828650: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-markupfield Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-markupfield FTBFS with 1.10. Please

Bug#828647: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-floppyforms Version: 1.6.2+dfsg-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-floppyforms FTBFS with 1.10. Please

Bug#828657: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-sitetree Version: 1.5.1-2 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-sitetree FTBFS with 1.10. Please update your

Bug#828646: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-countries Version: 3.4.1-2 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-countries FTBFS with 1.10. Please update

Bug#828652: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-nose Version: 1.4.3-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-nose FTBFS with 1.10. Please update your package

Bug#828651: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-model-utils Version: 2.4-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-model-utils FTBFS with 1.10. Please update

Bug#828654: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-polymorphic Version: 0.9.2-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-polymorphic FTBFS with 1.10. Please

Bug#828658: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-stronghold Version: 0.2.7+debian-2 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-stronghold FTBFS with 1.10. Please

Bug#828659: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-taggit Version: 0.20.0-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-taggit FTBFS with 1.10. Please update your

Bug#828649: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-localflavor Version: 1.2-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-localflavor FTBFS with 1.10. Please update

Bug#828648: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-hijack Version: 2.0.7-2 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-hijack FTBFS with 1.10. Please update your

Bug#828653: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-pipeline Version: 1.6.8-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-pipeline FTBFS with 1.10. Please update your

Bug#828656: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-sekizai Version: 0.9.0-3 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-sekizai FTBFS with 1.10. Please update your

Bug#828655: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-recurrence Version: 1.3.0-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-recurrence FTBFS with 1.10. Please update

Bug#828641: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: celery-haystack Version: 0.10-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that celery-haystack FTBFS with 1.10. Please update your

Bug#828645: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-compat Version: 1.0.12-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-compat FTBFS with 1.10. Please update your

Bug#828643: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-celery-transactions Version: 0.3.6-1 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-celery-transactions FTBFS with

Bug#828644: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-classy-tags Version: 0.7.2-2 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-classy-tags FTBFS with 1.10. Please

Bug#828642: FTBFS under Django 1.10

Source: django-celery Version: 3.1.17-3 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django110 django110-ftbfs Hi, Whilst rebuilding all reverse build-dependencies of python-django with the latest beta, I noticed that django-celery FTBFS with 1.10. Please update your

Bug#828639: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#828639: libmarpa-r2-perl: please make the build reproducible

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 05:58:37PM +0200, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > The attached patch makes it honour SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, if it is > available, to get a deterministic timestamp. Sorry, the patch contained one line too much. Updated patch attached. diff --git

Bug#828636: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#828636: libembperl-perl: please make the build reproducible

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:16:52 +0200, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > > Sorry, but that's wrong: > > > > → dpkg -L libembperl-perl | egrep man/de/man./ > > /usr/share/man/de/man3/Embperl::Features.3pm.gz > > → man /usr/share/man/de/man3/Embperl::Features.3pm.gz > > > > That's clearly my mother tongue.

Bug#828344: Processed: httrack: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Hi! This should be fixed by 3.48.23-1 (uploaded few minutes ago, the culprit was a libtool issue) Thanks for the report, Xavier

Bug#828509: postgis: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo Hi Kurt, Thanks for your work on OpenSSL. On 06/26/2016 12:23 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: >

Bug#828640: conky: Segmentation fault at start (conky 10.10.2)

Package: conky Version: 1.10.2-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, when I start conky, I imediately get a segmentation fault error. - standard configuration, nothing changed ___ $conky --version conky 1.10.2 compiled Wed May 4 00:32:04 UTC 2016 for Linux 3.16.0-4-powerpc64 ppc Compiled in

Bug#828639: libmarpa-r2-perl: please make the build reproducible

Source: libmarpa-r2-perl Version: 2.086000~dfsg-5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch upstream User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed

Bug#828227: jessie-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.75-2+2016e

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:46:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2016-06-26 at 12:19 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > > I've prepared an update for libdatetime-timezone-perl in > > jessie{,-updates} to include the new data from the Olson db 2016e. > > This includes contemporary change for

Bug#828630: jessie-pu: package libbusiness-creditcard-perl/0.33-1+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2016-06-26 at 15:10 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > I've prepared an update for libbusiness-creditcard-perl in > jessie{,-updates} which fixes #814479 for stable users. The issue at > hand is that the credit card ranges of several providers need to be >

Bug#828585: unworkable: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

I’ve submitted a fix upstream at https://github.com/niallo/Unworkable/pull/2. In case upstream merges it in a timely manner and releases a new version, I’d prefer packaging the new version. Otherwise, we can apply the patch in Debian directly. On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Kurt Roeckx

Bug#828629: nvidia-driver 355.11-2 (experimental, amd64) not installable

On Sun, 2016-06-26 at 17:40 +0200, Roman Horník wrote: > apt: > > # apt install nvidia-driver=355.11-2 You are using the wrong command. You need to pass -t experimental apt-get install -t experimental nvidia-driver=355.11-2 But you should be aware that if you

Bug#828227: jessie-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.75-2+2016e

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2016-06-26 at 12:19 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > I've prepared an update for libdatetime-timezone-perl in > jessie{,-updates} to include the new data from the Olson db 2016e. > This includes contemporary change for Egypt becoming effective on 7 > July.

Bug#823864: libpam-cgfs: installing libpam-cgfs from backport on stable prevent session from opening

Hi Xavier, On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:00:47PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: > > To reproduce the problem, both boxes need : > > (1) sysinit (no systemd) as system startup > > (2) cgroupfs-mount installed > > One thing was missing from that list: libpam-systemd. > I was able to reproduce this by

Bug#828192: /lib/systemd/system/pesign.service is a directory

Control: tag -1 patch On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 00:51:50 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Package: pesign > Version: 0.112-1 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > the service shipped in this package is not installed correctly: > > /lib/systemd/system/pesign.service/pesign.service > > That should be >

Bug#828411: libre: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Control: tag -1 +pending Hi Kurt, Kurt Roeckx writes: > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: >

Bug#826166: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#826166: libgphoto2-dev: location of gphoto2-config is not in PATH

Hi, I'm the debian maintainer of digikam and just ran into the same problem. On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 20:43:58 -0300 "Herbert Fortes (hpfn)" wrote: > > I recon these files should be in /usr/bin unless I am missing something? > > > > It is about lintian tag[0]

Bug#828636: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#828636: libembperl-perl: please make the build reproducible

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 05:07:54PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > I currently fail to see why this can catch Embperl::Syntax::POD in one > build, but not in another. IMHO this should happen with every build. > Will investigate. It's actually related to the shell... $ touch aD bD cD dD eD AD BD $

Bug#816059: lua5.2 spews garbage to the terminal when it exits on mips64el

control: tag -1 + patch On 2016-02-26 21:08, James McCoy wrote: > Package: lua5.2 > Version: 5.2.4-1 > Severity: important > File: /usr/bin/lua5.2 > > Taking the first few lines of lua output (piped through "cat -A" to show > the non-printables) from the Vim build on mips64el[0]: > >

Bug#828636: Pending fixes for bugs in the libembperl-perl package

tag 828636 + pending thanks Some bugs in the libembperl-perl package are closed in revision 1be07d0920e81edc12efcb9aed0e50b4c7f1710f in branch 'master' by gregor herrmann The full diff can be seen at https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-perl/packages/libembperl-perl.git/commit/?id=1be07d0 Commit

Bug#828636: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#828636: libembperl-perl: please make the build reproducible

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 05:07:54PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > > In one build the manpage Embperl::Syntax::POD.3pm is incorrectly sorted > > to the German manpages (Embperl::FeaturesD too), because their names end > > with D. > > Why only in one build? Due to different locale settings? Anyway,

Bug#828638: emacs24: Bug in bytecompilation of ob-core.el

Package: emacs24 Version: 24.4+1-5 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, When trying to evaluate an org SRC block on a file edited remotely through tramp, it failed with the error org-babel-local-file-name: Invalid function: with-parsed-tramp-file-name The problem seem to be that ob-core.el

Bug#828635: Pending fixes for bugs in the libnet-tclink-perl package

tag 828635 + pending thanks Some bugs in the libnet-tclink-perl package are closed in revision 8f2b28a46fafc3d3556ee7137e4b632d04fc90c4 in branch 'master' by gregor herrmann The full diff can be seen at https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-perl/packages/libnet-tclink-perl.git/commit/?id=8f2b28a

Bug#828636: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#828636: libembperl-perl: please make the build reproducible

Control: tag -1 - patch Control: severity -1 normal Hi Reiner, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed > that libembperl-perl could not be built reproducibly. Thanks for the examination and the bug report. > In one build the manpage

Bug#827721: apt-cacher-ng stalls on upgrade

Control: forcemerge 825154 827721 Control: tags 827721 +pending Hallo, * Joerg Dorchain [Mon, Jun 20 2016, 10:17:20AM]: > Here, Acquire::http::Proxy setting points to the apt-cacher-ng > itself running on the local machine. This stalls, as at this time > of the upgrade cycle, the old

Bug#790969: Same here...

I came acrosss this bug since it describes exactly my problem - except that I can rule out any hardware fault. My setup is working fine under Ubuntu 12.04 with Kernel 3.13 and LIRC 0.9.0. I installed Debian 8.5 on the same machine on another partition, using the same lircd.conf and getting

Bug#828072: Pending fixes for bugs in the golang-gopkg-ini.v1 package

tag 828072 + pending thanks Some bugs in the golang-gopkg-ini.v1 package are closed in revision ec7195ca60531b8d491bc996fedd97f5f73487d0 in branch 'master' by Martín Ferrari The full diff can be seen at https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/golang-gopkg-ini.v1.git/commit/?id=ec7195c

Bug#825382: java.io.IOException: Transport scheme NOT recognized: [stomp]

Hello, On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 03:39:51PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > the stomp module is not activated in Debian's Stretch version and in > Jessie it didn't exist as a separate module. I have just enabled it and > will upload a new package soon. We had to disable more modules due to >

Bug#828637: [zhcon] --utf8 functionality broken

Package: zhcon Version: 1:0.2.6-10 Severity: normal Hi, zhcon for jessie cannot even correctly parse the `--utf8` option, and the usage of `--utf8` will trigger an abort. -- Best, Lumin

Bug#814426: sympa: New upstream version available (6.2.12)

Quoting Jérôme Lebleu (2016-06-26 16:02:22) > Hi Jonas, > > On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 13:45:22 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Jérôme Lebleu (2016-06-25 11:22:11) > >> I've just never contributed yet and I'm not a Debian developer too > >> - but after reading

Bug#826089: [check-all-the-things] 02/02: Only act on arguments once when parsing text for the -c/-f options

On Sun, 2016-06-26 at 16:40 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > After this commit, the command > > check-all-the-things -f=-network > > no longer disables network access. :-( There are more bugs introduced by it too, working on fixing that now. > I don't think there's a sane way to fix #826089 without

Bug#828636: libembperl-perl: please make the build reproducible

Source: libembperl-perl Version: 2.5.0-6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: randomness X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that libembperl-perl

Bug#826089: [check-all-the-things] 02/02: Only act on arguments once when parsing text for the -c/-f options

* Paul Wise , 2016-06-26, 09:45: commit 8f70b2e913bf82c7bd2eea5a006e95dbef843063 Author: Paul Wise Date: Sun Jun 26 11:41:56 2016 +0200 Only act on arguments once when parsing text for the -c/-f options After this commit, the command

Bug#828398: libmongoc: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Thanks; we're tracking this in the upstream bug tracker here: https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/CDRIVER-1066 On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Source: libmongoc > Version: 1.3.5-1 > Severity: important > Control: block 827061 by -1 > > Hi, > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is

Bug#811970: blackbox: FTBFS with GCC 6: symbol changes

Hi, On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 20:09:51 -0800 Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Package: blackbox > Version: 0.70.1-30 > Severity: important > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-6 gcc-6-symbols >  > This package fails to build with GCC 6.  GCC 6 has not been released > yet,

Bug#828625: nethack-console: wizard mode permanently identify does not works on armhf port

Control: forwarded -1 devt...@nethack.org Control: tags -1 pending Hi, On Sun, 2016-06-26 at 20:02 +0800, Mo Jun wrote: > Package: nethack-console > Version: 3.6.0-3 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Dear Maintainer, > > 1. This bug is only found on armhf port; it is not found on amd64

Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

block 828618 by 828462 thanks On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 03:15:30PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote: > > I don't mind. I guess blocks might be better, to remind me to test it > when the ocaml-ssl bug is fixed. So I've set that.

Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

On 26 June 2016 at 13:15, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:20:33PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote: >> On 26 June 2016 at 11:24, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using >> >

Bug#828088: licensecheck invokes find with -follow

On Friday 24 June 2016 22:51:56 Sandro Mani wrote: > I think [-follow] should be removed, for > three reasons. Reason 1: self loops like the one in giac make find, and > therefore licensecheck, fail. Reason 2: symlinks can point anywhere. Do > you really want to let licensecheck run over

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >