Control: tags 853585 + patch
Control: tags 853585 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for opal (versioned as 3.10.10~dfsg2-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
svgpp (1.2.3+dfsg1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
...
* [834c29e] Mark libsvgpp-dev as arch: all.
-- Anton Gladky Thu, 21 Sep 2017 20:43:06 +0200
Thank you wery much :-) It would be great if tis new version would be
available for the Stretch too in the backports repository.
Package: gnome-shell
Version: 3.26.1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
This bug:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788666
was recently patched upstream. I can confirm that Debian is also
affected. It would be nice if the fix made it into the Debian packages.
Thanks!
Andreas
--
Package: icewm-common
Version: 1.4.3.0~pre-20171002-2
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc/icewm-common/html/icewm.html
Too many identical looking Theme(s) sections in document:
$ w3m -dump file:///usr/share/doc/icewm-common/html/icewm.html|grep '• Theme'
• Theme
• Theme Settings
•
على الخميس 12 تشرين الأول 2017 17:44، كتب Sebastian Andrzej Siewior:
> Hi,
>
> this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
> remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
> of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that
Upstream helped identify the problem and solution:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/scm-discuss/2017-10/msg9.html
I've tested and the cherry-picked patch fixes the test problem on a 32-bit
x86 virtual machine; I have a 5f2-2 with the patch in mentors.d.n.
--bryan
On Sun, 3 Sep 2017,
There's a new upstream for moonshot-trust-router that I believe should
work with openssl 1.1.
Realistically, I should be able to deal with moonshot-gss-eap #848680
within a month.
I think it may be more like two months to deal with both
moonshot-gss-eap and moonshot-trust-router, both of which
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove the *SOURCE* package prosper as prosper is now
incorporated into TeX Live, and src:texlive-base builds a
transitional package prosper.
Thanks
Norbert
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
zp[1][2] and zpaq[3][4] are orphan, have the same upstream and were
introduced in Debian by Jari Aalto, in 2010. They have a very very
very similar source code. The mcdiff command is useful to see it.
Important considerations:
- Current zp revision
forwarded https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/CDRIVER-2325
Thanks, we'll fix for 1.8.1.
X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org sebast...@breakpoint.cc
在 2017年10月12日星期四 CST 下午11:44:37,Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 写道:
> Hi,
>
> this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
> remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
> of this bug to
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:44:51PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
> remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
> of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
found 821269 52.4.0esr-1~deb9u1
thanks
Right. Under the assumption that myspell is replaced by hunspell, the
same change should occur in firefox. As of today, it is still not the case.
Leon
Source: gpyfft
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Justification: fails to build from source
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Builds of gpyfft for kFreeBSD (admittedly not a release architecture)
have been failing:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "setup.py", line
Source: collectd
Version: 5.7.2-1
Severity: serious
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/collectd.html
...
checking for LIBSIGROK... no
...
configure:40804: checking for LIBSIGROK
configure:40811: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "libsigrok < 0.4"
Requested
Control: tag -1 + pending
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Some recent change in unstable makes unburden-home-dir FTBFS and Debci fail:
>
> *sigh* According to the output, this is caused by
> https://bugs.debian.org/813164
Nope. I already covered that.
But "mv" seems to emit the
Source: supercollider
Version: 1:3.8.0~repack-1
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=supercollider=armel=1%3A3.8.0~repack-1=1507298859=0
...
cd "/<>/obj-arm-linux-gnueabi/external_libraries" && /usr/bin/c++
-DBOOST_CHRONO_HEADER_ONLY -DBOOST_NO_AUTO_PTR
Source: supercollider
Version: 1:3.8.0~repack-1
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=supercollider=sid
...
c++: error: unrecognized command line option '-msse'; did you mean '-fdse'?
c++: error: unrecognized command line option '-msse'; did you mean '-fdse'?
c++:
Package: selinux-policy-default
Version: 2:2.20161023.1-10
Severity: important
User: hlieber...@debian.org
Usertags: selinux_desktop
Hello maintainers,
I'm seeing a bug in the policy around NetworkManager. It seems that
there are a lot of problems with NetworkManager; I'm seeing lots of
denied
Package: libaugeas-dev
Version: 1.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 src:lua-augeas
lua-augeas FTBFS:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/lua-augeas.html
...
debian/rules override_dh_auto_build
make[1]: Entering directory '/build/1st/lua-augeas-0.1.1'
Hi Adrian,
thanks for the bug report.
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Some recent change in unstable makes unburden-home-dir FTBFS and Debci fail:
*sigh* According to the output, this is caused by
https://bugs.debian.org/813164
Will see that I "fix" this by extending the regular expression to
match old
Package: libmongoc-dev
Version: 1.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 src:syslog-ng
syslog-ng FTBFS:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/syslog-ng.html
...
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lsnappy
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
...
Makefile:7259:
Okay, that sounds reasonable, of course.
Surely, it's better to have packages containing only what people really
need.
Sorry, if I am not familiar with the processes involved in packaging as
this is my first usage of the Debian reporting system. Thus, I also
apologize for the duplicate #878263,
Package: diffoscope
Version 87
Severity: important
Today I tried to manually run diffoscope over a build of src:wine to see
whether we could get a usable diff.
Unfurtunately, diffoscope died with ENSPC after 3 hours and half. The
partition had ~50 GB free when I started diffoscope, and after it
Package: librem-dev
Version: 0.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 src:baresip
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/baresip.html
...
CC [M] build-x86_64/modules/g726/g726.o
gcc -DRELEASE -Wall -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Hi Gerald,
Gerald Turner (2017-06-15):
> In preparation for upgrading several hosts from jessie to stretch, my
> colleague and I discovered that phpldapadmin was removed from stretch
> due to this bug.
>
> Attached is a trivial one-line patch
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Am 12.10.2017 um 15:05 schrieb Andrey Gursky:
> Source: mediathekview
> Version: 3.0.2-2
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> a new version 13.0.3 has been released on October, 10 2017. Though it is
> only a "hotfix" patch release, now okhttp3 (com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp)
>
Package: libmariadbclient-dev-compat
Version: 10.1.26-0+deb9u1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I'm trying to compile a software that requires a mysql client library. CMake
is unable to detect that libmariadbclient-dev-compat package is installed on my
system, and running pkg-config against
Package: golang-github-nbutton23-zxcvbn-go-dev
Version: 0.0~git20170830.0.f4cd9f5-1
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 src:golang-github-chzyer-readline
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/golang-github-chzyer-readline.html
...
# github.com/nbutton23/zxcvbn-go
Control: tags 873780 + unreproducible help
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 at 22:38:39 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Version: 52.3.1-3
>
> The build of mozjs52 for kfreebsd-amd64 (admittedly not a release
> architecture) failed:
>
> TEST-KNOWN-FAIL | ecma_7/TypedObject/memory.js | (args: "") | (SKIP)
>
Hi Sebastian,
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:44:58PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Please react before that happens.
This is being tracked upstream. I made initial efforts to port it to
OpenSSL 1.1 and sent them upstream (see second comment in the upstream
bug), but things are
Hi,
Apparently I forgot to subscribe to bugs for distributed so missed this
one.
And it appears yes I did forget to declare the dependency on sphinx-
rtd-theme.
Thank you for letting me know. I'll try to fix it tongight.
Diane
Source: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.173d1
Severity: serious
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/gcc-defaults.html
...
dh_compress -s -Ncpp-aarch64-linux-gnu -Ncpp-arm-linux-gnueabi
-Ncpp-arm-linux-gnueabihf -Ncpp-doc -Ncpp-mips-linux-gnu
-Ncpp-mips64el-linux-gnuabi64
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 01:31:08 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> powerpc64 (pizzetti) gets the same test failures as s390x (zelenka),
> suggesting that they are something that happens on big-endian 64-bit.
> hppa doesn't seem to have a porterbox and sparc64's (notker) was
> unresponsive, so I can't
Hi,
2016-10-30 22:14 Helmut Grohne:
Package: x11-xkb-utils
Version: 7.7+3
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Control: affects -1 + src:cinnamon-settings-daemon src:libwx-perl
src:libxkbcommon src:openjdk-8 src:xdotool
The affected packages transitively depend on
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 08:08:42 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 01:31:08 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I've left mozjs52
> > compiling on mips (minkus) overnight to see whether both big-endian
> > 32-bit architectures behave the same.
>
> Unfortunately mips has new and
Source: node-grunt-contrib-concat
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
https://ci.debian.net/packages/n/node-grunt-contrib-concat/unstable/amd64/
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/node-grunt-contrib-concat.html
...
debian/rules
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 01:37:51 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On mips64el there are a couple of timeouts (knowing mips*, probably
> an arbitrary timeout is just too short):
>
> TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | js1_5/Array/regress-157652.js | (args: "") | (TIMEOUT)
> TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL |
2017-04-13 16:35 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
Hi,
2016-03-06 21:08 Helmut Grohne:
Control: block -1 by 807516
[...]
The attached patch implements that proposal. Please consider applying
it. The ":native" is supported in apt and dpkg since wheezy. If in
doubt, don't hesitate to ask for
Source: unburden-home-dir
Version: 0.4.0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
Some recent change in unstable makes unburden-home-dir FTBFS and Debci fail:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/u/unburden-home-dir/unstable/amd64/
Source: haskell-x509-util
Version: 1.6.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
Some recent change in unstable makes haskell-x509-util FTBFS:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/haskell-x509-util.html
Hi,
2016-01-21 20:29 Ian Jackson:
Helmut Grohne writes ("Bug#812229: adns FTCBFS: does not support
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck"):
Source: adns
Version: 1.5.0~rc1-1
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
...
ands fails to cross build from source, because the test suite does
Hi,
> TL;DR...
Yes, I knew about that risk. But shorter messages have failed to draw
attention to a supposedly "important" bug.
I expected that the original patch was good to go, but I somehow forgot
that a 720+ day old patch is subject to bitrot. Please correct me if
I'm wrong, but wouldn't we
Package: catdoc
Version: 1:0.95-4
Tags: patch
This issue happens when running 'xls2csv' on XLS files containing
international characters (mainly from the ISO-8859-1 or CP1252 sets) and
when the default source charset is not apropriate to convert the characters.
You can reproduce it with the
Source: tree-puzzle
Version: 5.2-9
Severity: important
Tags: patch
dh compat 10 defaults to parallel building, which frequently
causes FTBFS like:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/tree-puzzle.html
...
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -Wdate-time
Package: linux-armmp-lpae
Version: 4.12+85~bpo9+1
Severity: important
Hi,
starting with kernel 4.12 (but I also tested 4.13 from sid). My Raspberry pi 2
hangs at boot with this. All I get at boot is this:
U-Boot 2017.09+dfsg1-3 (Oct 09 2017 - 22:14:03 +)
DRAM: 998 MiB
RPI 2 Model B
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hello maintainer(s),
2017-01-11 11:51 Helmut Grohne:
Source: nasm
Version: 2.12.01-1
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
nasm fails to cross build from source, because it does not pass --host
to ./configure. The easiest way of doing so is letting dh_auto_configure
handle
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Phil kindly gave me access to his OpenRD rig earlier today and I've been
able to get this working.
Firstly, the change needs to be made for ftdi_channel to be 0 instead of
1.
Secondly the changes at the start of the bug report regarding
ftdi_device_desc and adapter_khz need to be made (though I
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
1 - 100 of 321 matches
Mail list logo