Hi
On 19-05-2024 6:25 a.m., 陈 晟祺 wrote:
I have made more adjustments, basically skipping some flaky tests in VM.
Now new version 2.2.4-1 is in the archive, please try that again when available.
I already noticed yesterday and had it run; it failed. (Currently) top
one here:
On 2024-05-18 Lyndon Brown wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-05-18 at 16:24 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > On 2024-05-17 Lyndon Brown wrote:
> > > Package: gpgv
> > > Version: 2.2.43-4
> > > Severity: important
[...]
> > afaict that happens in apt-key, what does
> >
> > env LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 gpgv
Package: linux-headers-6.8.9-amd64
Version: 6.8.9-1
When installing a new kernel (images & headers) packages, dkms modules for
that kernel version are compiled twice - once for the linux image package, and
again (almost immediately afterwards) for the linux headers package.
I'm not entirely
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.22.6
Severity: normal
Dear Debian folks,
Trying to decrease the boot time of a desktop system (pressing the power
button to GDM login screen), I noticed `dpkg-db-backup.service` in the
hotpath:
May 19 06:18:53.272044 abreu systemd[1]: Started
Source: mariadb
Version: 1:10.11.8-1
Forwarded: https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-34195
Tags: confirmed, help, ftbfs
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: x32
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-am...@lists.debian.org
After importing 10.11.8 in Debian, dropped the temporary patch and
uploaded with the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rumur":
* Package name : rumur
Version : 2024.05.07-1
Upstream contact : Matthew Fernandez
* URL : https://github.com/Smattr/rumur
* License :
Hi,
>
> The test ran. Unfortunately zfs-test-suite-1 failed.
>
I have made more adjustments, basically skipping some flaky tests in VM.
Now new version 2.2.4-1 is in the archive, please try that again when available.
Thanks,
Shengqi Chen
Package: logcheck-database
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
See attached patch for matching NVMe devices too in smartd logs
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'oldstable-security'), (500, 'unstable'),
(500, 'stable'), (500,
Package: verilator
Version: 5.024-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ybx...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
Package: cpio
Version: 2.15+dfsg-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
here are some notes and editorial fixes for the manual.
The patch is in the attachment.
-.-
The difference between the formatted outputs can be seen with:
nroff -man >
nroff -man >
diff -u
and for
Is there any way to fix or work around this?
It's been blocking new version of obs-studio from
entering testing for a while.
Thanks!
Shmerl.
All --
::: Re: 1071007, ALL CONCERNED :::
I am associated with the upstream project.
This is a real bug. Discovered it some time last week. This seems to have
been introduced when we added the new pyproject file with a setuptools
backend.
For some unknown reason, the installed package would
I am a user, but I will share my findings.
On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 14:35:02 +0100 inasprecali
wrote:
> Package: gnome-software
> Version: 3.38.1-1
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: inasprec...@disroot.org
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When installing new Debian system (stable release 11.2 at the time
Em sáb., 18 de mai. de 2024 às 21:08, Samuel Henrique
escreveu:
>
> Control: reopen -1 =
>
> I see on git that the bug was closed with a Conflicts+Replaces stanza, but
> that's not the correct solution for this issue.
>
> As discussed on this bugreport, the fix is to not ship the file.
>
>
This appears to be similar to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067873[1]
However, I am running a desktop system that only has an IPv4 address and KDE
Connect is working fine (after fixing the nftables problem described in
#1067873).
So, this appears to end up being a system
Control: fixed -1 6.8.9-1
Thanks for the hint about nftables. I had the same problem and this pointed
me in the right direction. (In my case I just uninstalled both iptables and
nftables as I don’t use either one.)
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I would suggest fduncanh to submit a MR to
https://salsa.debian.org/gstreamer-team/gst-plugins-good1.0
but there does not seem to be a branch for stable.
How would one go to submit a MR to gstreamer plugins good?
Cheers,
Alban
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:25:46 -0400 fduncanh wrote:
> Package:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: ber...@debian.org
As per https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070768 with
the agreement of the maintainers I have NMUed bpfcc/0.29.1+ds-1.1 to
remove ppc64el, as it has been failing to build for months and has kept
the package
Package: expect
Version: 5.45.4-3
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
here are some notes and editorial fixes for the manual.
The patch is in the attachment.
-.-
The difference between the formatted outputs can be seen with:
nroff -man >
nroff -man >
diff -u
and for
Control: reopen -1 =
I see on git that the bug was closed with a Conflicts+Replaces stanza, but
that's not the correct solution for this issue.
As discussed on this bugreport, the fix is to not ship the file.
Reopening to block the problematic package to migrate to testing.
Cheers,
--
Samuel
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "streamlink" for a new
upstream version 6.7.4.
* Package name: streamlink
Version : 6.7.4-1
Upstream Author : Streamlink Team
* URL :
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 09:42:56PM +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2024 12:47:44 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
> > >
> > > * Don't fixed: P: imsprog source:
> > > package-uses-old-debhelper-compat-version 12 - I want to maintain
> > > compatibility for |Jammy| and |Focal|
On 18.05.2024 22.58, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Using the use case in elpa-debian-el as an example, we handle CCing
> oneself in ELisp, so we assume reportbug is invoked without "list-cc-me"
> by not passing that argument. However, if the user has a
> "~/.reportbugrc" with "list-cc-me" in it, it will
Control: severity -1 important
This bugs seems to be at least partially fixed, at least it seems that
the messages are now showing up, so this bug should no longer be RC.
(If I'm wrong, severity can be readjusted if needed)
--
tobi
Hi Nis,
Nis Martensen writes:
> On 12.05.2024 23.11, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>> Nis Martensen writes:
>>
>>> On 11.05.2024 08.23, Xiyue Deng wrote:
I'd like to propose adding an option to skip loading configuration files
(/etc/reportbug.conf and ~/.reportbugrc). The use case is for
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.8.9-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
booting kernel 6.8.9-1 with dracut, systemd, and btrfs as the root device fails
to mount the root partition. I just tried the kernel from sid and it seems
indeed \
affected. The 6.7 kernel from trixie is
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 10:47:55AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2024-05-18 Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 08:16:25AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>
> >> You seem to argue that it is major problem for a gnutls client to *send*
> >> e.g. "127.0.0.1" as SNI. My
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
I'm sorta asking for advise.
I took over the maintenaxce of gogglesmm which has been in Debian in oldstable
and then was orphaned and removed, so it wasn't in stable.
I uploaded the new package and it went through the usual processes and ran
into
Package: binutils-common
Version: 2.42-4
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
here are some notes and editorial fixes for the manual.
The patch is in the attachment.
-.-
The man page is created by Pod::Man. So fixes should be
applied to the source file for the man page, and maybe
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
X-Debbugs-Cc: fos...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:fossil
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
this bug was opened by previous arrangement with maintainer.
[ Reason ]
fossil is affected by a
> There is already a newer driver version in oldstable-proposed-updates.
> Does it fix the issue?
Perhaps that was just a question out of politeness, and I’m not the OP, but
it did for me. Thank you both - so much easier when a search engine query
shows that someone else has gone first.
On Thu, 16 May 2024 12:47:44 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
> >
> > * Don't fixed: P: imsprog source:
> > package-uses-old-debhelper-compat-version 12 - I want to maintain
> > compatibility for |Jammy| and |Focal| releases.
>
> If you package for different distributions, let me recommend me
Package: gogglesmm
Version: 1.2.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs help
Justification: fails to build from source on some architectures
Forwarded: https://github.com/gogglesmm/gogglesmm/issues/118
This is for documentation
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=gogglesmm=1.2.5-1
Package: curl
Version: 7.88.1-10+deb12u5
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: dan...@haxx.se, debbug.c...@sideload.33mail.com
For years a script ran fine which contained a command like this:
$ curl -x socks5h://127.0.0.1:9050 --url 'ftps://host.domain.com/word1
word2/dir/' -T
Package: mediathekview
Version: 13.2.1+ds-1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@users.sourceforge.net
Dear Maintainer,
It would be great if radio programmes could be included, e.g. radio theatre from
Deutschlandfunk and science from BR24.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT
Source: rust-debversion
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.3.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: tracker
Version: 3.4.2-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.7.3-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1068468
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Package: bcc
Version: 0.16.17-3.6
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
the man page of 'bcc.1' is not compressed as (almost) all
others are.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Source: diffoscope
Version: 259
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 267
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: fakeroot
Version: 1.33-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.34-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Package: bin86
Version: 0.16.17-3.6
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The following files in '/usr/share/man/man1' are not compressed
ar86.1
as86.1
ld86.1
objdump.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
APT policy: (500,
Package: lintian
Version: 2.117.0
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: invernom...@paranoici.org
Hello!
Lintian has the very useful option -F (--ftp-master-rejects) for running
only the checks that issue tags that result in automatic rejects
from the Debian upload queue.
This is great, but requires
Package: freecad
Version: 0.21.2+dfsg1-1
Followup-For: Bug #1071283
Control: tags -1 ftbfs fixed-upstream
Seems so that there is an upstream fix:
https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/pull/11909/commits/8d94e48921be080de4e0b44abeb642d57d38512f
(The patch does not apply cleanly to the version
Hi Andre,
thank you for the patch! I now created a new version with the patch and
uploaded it. I also added a simple test as you proposed.
Indeed, I normally just take the tarball from the repository and if I
cant directly find a later fix, I ask upstream about what to do :-)
CMake is still
Package: gnulib
Severity: wishlist
The current logic of dh_gnulib_patch to try each patch in a .d
sub-directory and pick one patch that applies. It was suggested to use
a more clever method to pick the "right" patch. One more clever
approach would be "git merge --is-ancestor" to programtically
Package: gnome-calculator
Version: 1:46.0-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: jose.antonio...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I've update Debian.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Type gnome-calculator in
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 bsp-2024-05-mdc-ber
Hi,
Thank you Athos for performing all those build and filing the apropriate
bug reports!
Le Mon, May 06, 2024 at 11:31:30AM -0300, Athos Ribeiro a écrit :
> phpunit 11 is out and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: mechti...@debian.org, werdah...@riseup.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: webext-dispmua
Version : 2.9.13
Upstream Contact: Toshi
* URL :
Source: geoalchemy2
Version: 0.13.3-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.14.6-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: gnome-shell-extension-arc-menu
Version: 49+forkv29-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 55-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable
Source: cross-toolchain-base-mipsen
Version: 27
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies
Source: specutils
Version: 1.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: ndcube
Version: 2.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: tea-cli
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: ngspetsc
Version: 0.0~git20240318.f83b50a-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies
Control: retitle -1 firmware-iwlwifi: Please update to newest kernel version
Hi there,
any updates on this bug on when the new version will be uploaded?
Regards
Package: apt-move
Version: 4.2.27-6
Severity: important
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: leeejobsacco...@mail.co.uk
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I ran apt-move packages and found that when I then ran apt-update it reported
the
following warning:
mirrors/debian bookworm
Em seg., 6 de mai. de 2024 às 07:33, Helmut Grohne escreveu:
>
> Source: nbtscan
> Version: 1.7.2-2
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> I was running the autopkgtest of nbtscan on a dedicated server and the
> relevant provider captured the scanning and was not happy. Given that
> the test does not actually
Package: runit
Version: 2.1.2-59
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Some package call invoke-rc.d for theirs functions. For example, anacron
have
installed /etc/cron.d/anacron which uses `/usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d anacron
start'
on non-systemd systems. And on non-systemd systems, `invoke-rc.d script
Hi,
On Fri, 2024-05-17 at 11:44 +0200, Eduardo Casais wrote:
>
> Everything works perfectly. After several hours, I have yet to
> experience any trouble with keyboard, mouse, or trackpad. With kernel
> 6.1.0-21, device input starts going haywire after about about 5
> minutes,
> at which
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "guile-curl":
* Package name : guile-curl
Version : 0.9-1
Upstream contact : Mike Gran
* URL : https://github.com/spk121/guile-curl
* License :
> Gesendet: Dienstag, den 14.05.2024 um 17:21 Uhr
> Von: "Debian Bug Tracking System"
> An: scpcom
> Betreff: Bug#1070959 closed by Jessica Clarke (Re:
> Bug#1070959: /usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.6.0.0: apt: riscv64:
> sun20i-d1: http(s): unhandled signal 4 code 0x1 in
On Sat, 2024-05-18 at 16:24 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2024-05-17 Lyndon Brown wrote:
> > Package: gpgv
> > Version: 2.2.43-4
> > Severity: important
>
> > Since sometime last night I'm seeing an error as below when using
> > `apt-
> > get update` or `aptitude update`. I'm guessing wrt.
Hi.
I have resolved this by doing a new upstream release as the base for
the Debian release. There was also a modified configuration in the
debian branch that was adapted for the Debian package. This is now a
quilt patch. If I understood you correctly the debian branch should not
differ from
Package: graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat
Version: 1.4+really1.3.43-1
Severity: normal
For unknown reasons salsa CI installed graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat
instead of imagemagick and I wound up with a build error.
(sid)ametzler@argenau:/tmp/GNUPG2/gnupg2-2.4.5$ convert
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Shriram Ravindranathan
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, s...@ters.dev
* Package name: guile-curl
Version : 0.9
Upstream Contact: Mike Gran
* URL : https://github.com/spk121/guile-curl
* License : GPL-3+
You wanted to "track down an actual reason for this change" ?
Try this:
CVE-2011-3148
CVE-2011-3149
As summarised by Redhat
(https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/6/html/6.4_technical_notes/pam):
If an application's PAM configuration contained user_readenv=1,
On 2024-05-17 Lyndon Brown wrote:
> Package: gpgv
> Version: 2.2.43-4
> Severity: important
> Since sometime last night I'm seeing an error as below when using `apt-
> get update` or `aptitude update`. I'm guessing wrt. the earliest
> affected version. I've no idea how important an issue this
You wanted to "track down an actual reason for this change" ?
Try this:
CVE-2011-3148
CVE-2011-3149
As summarised by Redhat
(https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/6/html/6.4_technical_notes/pam):
If an application's PAM configuration contained user_readenv=1,
On 18 May 2024 at 07:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| Hi Laurent,
|
| We a build issue in Debian found via bulk rebuilds. Which everything current
| in 'unstable', rpy2 (version 3.5.16) segfaults in a test when embedding.
|
| Details are at https://bugs.debian.org/1071362
|
| If you kee
Hi Ole,
Thanks for looking into this. I did some analysis and found that Radler
was in fact still build as static library in wsclean version 3.4. This
was corrected only in:
- https://git.astron.nl/RD/radler/-/merge_requests/123
and
- https://gitlab.com/aroffringa/wsclean/-/merge_requests/591
On 12.05.2024 23.11, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Nis Martensen writes:
>
>> On 11.05.2024 08.23, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>>> I'd like to propose adding an option to skip loading configuration files
>>> (/etc/reportbug.conf and ~/.reportbugrc). The use case is for external
>>> programs that runs reportbug
Control: tags -1 patch
My 0.9 package (see above link) passed reverse dependencies testing:
https://launchpad.net/~rebecca-palmer/+archive/ubuntu/tabulate0p9
Note that this is only a build test, not autopkgtest, and azure-cli,
pymatgen and python-django-ca are excluded as they do not exist in
Package: beep
Version: 1.4.9-1.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
here are some notes and editorial fixes for the manual.
The patch is in the attachment.
-.-
The difference between the formatted outputs can be seen with:
nroff -man >
nroff -man >
diff -u
and for
Appears to be a duplicate of 1071379, maybe check if your script meant to
remove another one.
Dirk
--
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
On 17 May 2024 at 23:05, Santiago Vila wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Is there a chance this could be spurious?
|
| Unlikely because it also happens here:
|
| https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/rpy2.html
Ok, I will get in touch with Laurent.
Dirk
|
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi Andre,
sorry that I only now found time to look into your Debian bug. Indeed,
from the build log [1] the libradler is build as shared lib, but not
installed into the package, while it was supposed to be built as a
static lib.
However, I couldn't figure out why
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pixz":
* Package name : pixz
Version : 1.0.7-3
Upstream contact : Dave Vasilevsky
* URL : https://github.com/vasi/pixz
* License : BSD-2-Clause
* Vcs :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cglm":
* Package name : cglm
Version : 0.9.4-1
Upstream contact : Recep Aslantas
* URL : https://github.com/recp/cglm
* License : Expat
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/cglm
Section
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
I removed arch ppc64el from the Architecture list because of an unresolved bug
specific to this arch (#1060786 and #1060295). However, according to the
tracker,
this package is marked as `missing build' and `not built yet' on this arch.
These
On Wed, 15 May 2024 15:54:03 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> which is https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=121352
>
> Additionally the distribution has some other open issues (where I'm
> not sure how much they would affect Debian now):
>
I tried to update to version 1.5.1, but am unsure how to test if it is
using SDL 1.2 or 2. I fail to find a package ruby-sdl2 in Debian, which
seem to be the key dependency controlling which version of SDL is used.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: python3-exabgp
Version: 4.2.21-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
Installing python3-exabgp on Trixie prints the following Python warnings
on trixie:
Setting up python3-exabgp (4.2.21-2) ...
update-alternatives: using /usr/sbin/python3-exabgp to provide /usr/sbin/exabgp
(exabgp) in auto mode
Package: yt-dlp
Version: 2023.03.04-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: debbug.yt-...@sideload.33mail.com
The app incorrectly interprets a SOCKS proxy as an HTTP proxy. The
host machine has both kinds of proxies configured for Tor as follows:
* SOCKS proxy listening on port 9050
*
Hi
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 09:20:08AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 09:06:47AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 08:12:28AM +0200, bouv...@buxtehude.debian.org
> > wrote:
> > > FWIW, and following Jacob Rhoads' remark, we are also running CrowdStrike
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 10:49:34AM +0200, Manny wrote:
> ** Tainted: OE (12288)
> * externally-built ("out-of-tree") module was loaded
> * unsigned module was loaded
>
> ** Loaded modules:
> tp_smapi(OE)
> thinkpad_ec(OE)
You run with modules that modify low level
Package: wmenu
Version: 0.1.7-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
wmenu version [0.1.8] is available, please consider packaging it.
It provides a new wmenu-run executable and fixes some bugs.
Best regards
Hannes
[0.1.8]
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools":
* Package name : udftools
Version : 2.3-2
Upstream contact : Pali Rohár
* URL : https://github.com/pali/udftools
* License : GPL-2+
Package: gnome-core
Version: 1:43+1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: inasprec...@disroot.org
Dear Maintainer,
to this day, gnome-core still recommends network-manager-gnome.
While this may sound reasonable given the package names, the situation
is misleading: what network-manager-gnome offers
On Thu, 02 May 2024 12:28:29 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
The jbig2 manual page is broken. Looks like it was generated via
help2man using the binary in the build tree but without using
LD_LIBRARY_PATH so the binary could not find libraries it uses,
so jbig2 could not start, so it didn't print the
Hi John,
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 04:01:56PM -0400, John Waffle wrote:
> This report came from a free tool, trivy, I filed a Github discussion about
> it here: https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy/discussions/6722
Thanks a lot for bringing that upstream.
So to add some additional datapoint: The
On 2024-05-18 Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 08:16:25AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> You seem to argue that it is major problem for a gnutls client to *send*
>> e.g. "127.0.0.1" as SNI. My point is that this is not a problem but at
>> most uncomely since client-side
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.1.66-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: debbug.linux-image-am...@sideload.33mail.com
Control: affects -1 linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64
Control: affects -1 linux-image-6.1.0-21-amd64
An upgrade from Debian Bullseye to Bookworm resulted in a kernel that
Source: nodejs
Version: 20.13.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
The test sequential/test-worker-heapsnapshot-options is flaky. The
builds of 20.13.1+dfsg-1 failed on mips64el and
Control: tags 1071335 pending
James Cameron wrote...
> You may be interested in these upstream commits;
>
> b01478d ("Fix some parts of macro expansion are not guarded")
> 0194b80 ("strerror and memset require string.h")
Thanks a lot for having an eye on the Debian packaging. As you'd expect,
Control: retitle -1 rust-snow: autopkgtest failures
rust-snow builds now but its autopkgtests fail which blocks migration
to Testing.
I saw this in a brief look at the autopkgtest log but there may be other errors:
error: no matching package named `aes-gcm` found
On 17/05/2024 22:19, Steve McIntyre wrote:
The process of getting a new version of shim-signed is long and
complex, and not entirely under our control:
1. Build shim, test the hell out of it.
2. Upload shim, wait for it to build, check that the binary is
reproducible.
3. Submit a
Hi,
On Fri, 17 May 2024 21:16:15 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2024 14:06:37 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
>
> > This issue was already fixed in upstream.
> >
> > Non-public Abseil API is used for CLI parsing
> >
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-randomfie...@packages.debian.org,
debia...@lists.debian.org, 1071...@bugs.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-randomfields
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
Hi ftpmasters,
this package was removed from
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
