Hello,
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 13:42:01 +0200 Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 08:52:33AM +0200, Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
>
> > Could be. How can I turn it off?
>
> Menu -> Preferences -> Web Content
Epiphany's ad blocker has just received a rewrite [1] to use the content
filtering
Just a quick heads up: I have updated to the latest CVS upstream
sources and added a “v9” tag.
(and: Happy new year!)
--
Adrian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I have merged the two pull-requests at GitHub dealing with man page
formatting, updated to the latest CVS sources (almost no changes),
and added the “v8” tag. I hope that helps in getting Signify packaged
neatly in Debian. Feel free to ping me if there is something else I
could do to make that
Uploading today.
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
sebast...@breakpoint.cc wrote:
Package: swt-gtk
Version: 3.5.1-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch sid
User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
Usertags: powerpcspe
The patch attached fixes the build issue for your
Indeed, this is a regression. I hope you're available next days, I
could use your help. I'm now really back by the way.
2010/8/27 أحمد المحمودي aelmahmo...@sabily.org:
Package: src:swt-gtk
Version: 3.5.1-2.1
Severity: normal
Hello,
I have prepared a package for SWT 3.6 (based on the
Thanks for the patch. Added to the forcoming upload.
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.org wrote:
Source: swt-gtk
Version: 3.5.1-2.1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@superh.org
Usertags: sh4
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-sup...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/06/2010 03:36 AM, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
Hello,
This bug was fixed in Ubuntu by the attached diff.
Adrian, obviously you are busy recently, do you mind that I commit
this changes to git, and ask for sponsorship ?
While I am at
Hi Carl,
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:23:39 +0200
Carl Chenet cha...@ohmytux.com wrote:
It seems that the upstream is not aware of this issue or at least does
not seem aware of the bug report on Savannah. I have forwarded it to
the upstream to know what they think of it and in the same time I'll
Hi,
Where I work we are using rdiff-backup heavily, and we depend on this
fix. I can confirm that it applies cleanly over the current Lenny
source package because we made our own packages, but it would be
definitely great to have this fixed in the official .deb.
Thank you,
--
Adrian Perez ape
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm preparing next azureus upload. It fixes the symlink bug. It will be
uploaded soon to the archives.
- --
Best Regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez-...@ubuntu.com,
adrianperez@gmail.com
+ Ubuntu Developer. http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What does debian-legal has to say about this. Do you think the license
exception posted before will solve this issue? Hoping from answer for a
debian/copyright emacs night soon.
- --
Best Regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez-...@ubuntu.com
that there are in
there also in lucid. So I can't see this bug. If you're willing to take
me through the exact steps cause I can't see it.
--
Best Regards,
Adrian Perez adr...@adrianperez.org,
adrianperez-...@ubuntu.com,
adrianperez@gmail.com
+ Ubuntu Developer
should directly link to
/usr/share/java/swt-3.4.jar as far as I can see.
--
Best Regards,
Adrian Perez adr...@adrianperez.org,
adrianperez-...@ubuntu.com,
adrianperez@gmail.com
+ Ubuntu Developer. http://www.ubuntu.com
+ Debian Maintainer
Widget Toolkit for GTK+
J
libswt-gtk-3.5-java recommends no packages.
Versions of packages libswt-gtk-3.5-java suggests:
pn libswt-gtk-3.5-java-gcj none (no description available)
-- no debconf information
--
Best Regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez-...@ubuntu.com
Ubuntu
tag 558663 + pending
--
Hello.
I finished the packaging (available on the git repo), should be uploaded
today.
Sorry about not taking a look at your PPA, but if you're interested any
sort of future help could be used.
Best Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
severity 558663 wishlist
--
Working on it. I have already packaged that as part of the eclipse
package, but since it appears that the best solution is to maintain both
packages separately, I will expect to upload a new version of this
package soon.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello.
Thanks for your feedback, I'll be working on backporting the patch over
the weekend and Monday.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
September 2009 at 16:28, Adrian Perez wrote:
tag 502879 + pending
--
TuxPaper managed to provide us with a patch that fixes the issue.
I have manually backported it, and added some variable that was missing
from it; that said, the changes are already integrated and should be
uploaded soon
.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
connected to the WoT, and his key is signed by several DDs, I met him in
person. Feedback is welcome.
Thanks for your attention.
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 08:05 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
tag 544566 moreinfo
thanks
Re: Adrian Perez 2009-09-01 1251820301.13249.19.ca...@desktop
| pub 1024D
Package: debian-maintainers
Version: 1.64
Severity: normal
Please accept my application as a DM.
The jetring changeset is attached below.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com
Comment: Add Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com as a Debian Maintainer
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11
Upstream developer Scott Wolchok gave me a patch to disable SpeedTest
authentication on the client-side of azureus.
So, there's probably a fix on the server in the next few days, hopefully
I could release 4.2.0.8 with a working speedtest.
Stay tunned.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez
Toolkit for GTK+
J
libswt-gtk-3.4-java recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
to tweak udp incoming).
- gateway [router]: working NAT OK.
So I'll probaby close the bug again soon, since it's definitely an issue
with your network configuration, and neither with azureus nor the
packaging work.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description
contacting the
developers, the pointed me that the code in azureus binding to :: will
comprise ipv4 and ipv6. It will bind to ipv6 when available only, but
ipv4 will always work.
Please provide the log of the Network Status and the NAT/Firewall Test.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez
-maintainers
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com
$ azureus
[debug] /usr/bin/azureus: Found JAVA_HOME = '/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk'
[debug] /usr/bin/azureus: Found JAVA_CMD = '/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java'
[debug] /usr/bin/azureus: Environment variable CLASSPATH is ''
[debug
Sorry about the typo. I have tested in chroot too. it doesn't seem to
happen. Waiting for your log output.
tags 542392 + unreproducible moreinfo
severity 542392 important
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-wrappers.sh
export JAVA_{HOME,CMD}=
DEBUG_WRAPPER=1 find_java_runtime openjdk
You've tried to reset alternatives back with:
update-alternatives -s java-6-openjdk
or (for runtime only),
update-java-alternatives --jre --set java-6-openjdk
Hope that helps.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez
you.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
What kind of port forwarding you're performing? iptables?
Could you please provide more information.
Binding to :: will comprise ipv4 too, AFAIK.
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 19:44 +0200, Achim Schaefer wrote:
which seems not allowed any more
to port 46949. now I can see only ipv6 ports open:
are there.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Here's the original bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=502879
There are problems with decoding filename torrents.
I haven't checked against the latest CVS snapshot, but please tell me if
it still persists or if it was fixed before.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez
+ tags fixed-upstream
This is fixed at current 4.2.0.4.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- tags fixed-upstream pending
+ tags confirmed
It's actually present on current 4.2.0.4:
requesting test...
Test request not accepted: NullPointerException
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
It was fixed in the CVS repository. Please way for a new release since
the feature isn't critical to functioning.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
anything and is an advantage of using a modular architecture for
software development and updates (similar in model to
firefox/thunderbird addons for example).
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
package azureus vuze
tags 495702 + fixed-upstream pending
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
This was fixed in previous version.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
it and work on it.
If not then you can IMO go ahead and prepare a new package and upload it
to mentors.debian.net and find a sponsor.
Unfortunately I can't sponsor it, because I'm just a DM not a DD.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com
Title: TODO list for azureus package
it, because I'm just a DM not a DD.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello.
There's any chance I can adopt azureus and vuze?
I use the program in a daily basis (from homepage tarball, current repo
version outdated).
I'm pretty knowledgeable of its programming language (java).
I also care about Vuze being included in debian repositories.
41 matches
Mail list logo
