Bug#996569: getmail6 naming issues

2021-11-08 Thread Charles Cazabon
kage maintainer - doesn't give a damn about doing the right, ethical thing here. Charles -- -- Charles Cazabon Software, consulting, and services available at http://pyropus.ca/ --

Bug#996569: getmail6 naming issues

2021-11-07 Thread Charles Cazabon
why do you object to renaming a hostile fork of an actively-developed project which is namesquatting on the original project name? 2. If (1) is rejected, then drop "getmail6" completely. Restore the getmail package that depends on python2.7 and everything will continue to work

Bug#996569: OT: Roland Puntaier / "getmail6" drama

2021-10-29 Thread Charles Cazabon
Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > Marking this bug as serious and the binary packages should be removed > in the next 30 days. Thank you. Charles -- ------ Charles Cazabon Software, consulting, and services

Bug#996569: Advice needed for a strange request about getmail vs. getmail6

2021-10-28 Thread Charles Cazabon
getmail predates that registration by more than 17 years. I'm not sure if you're trying to be disingenuous or what. Charles -- -- Charles Cazabon Software, consulting, and services available at http://pyropus.ca/ --

Bug#996569: OT: Roland Puntaier / "getmail6" drama

2021-10-28 Thread Charles Cazabon
laces getmail betrays the trust of getmail's users, and drags the good reputation of getmail through the mud. Please change the name of this package and its executable. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon GPL'ed software available at: http://pyropus.ca/software/ ---

Bug#996569: getmail6 naming issues

2021-10-18 Thread Charles Cazabon
t;imposing a significant > support burden". Since I'm the one that burden is imposed on, and you cannot even see it, I'm curious why you belive you would be able to judge whether that burden is significant or not. Charles --

Bug#996569: getmail6 naming issues

2021-10-17 Thread Charles Cazabon
Hi, Sudip, Thanks for the response. > > On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:55:40 -0600 Charles Cazabon wrote: > > > > > > I would appreciate it if this package/project was renamed to something > > > that does not contain the word "getmail" or anything confusingly

Bug#996569: getmail6 naming issues

2021-10-16 Thread Charles Cazabon
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:55:40 -0600 Charles Cazabon wrote: > > So: fork is fine. Imposing a large support burden on the original project is > not. I would appreciate it if this package/project was renamed to something > that does not contain the word "getmail" or anything c

Bug#996569: getmail6 naming issues

2021-10-15 Thread Charles Cazabon
name, or can rename the Debian package if not. Thank you, Charles -- ---------- Charles Cazabon Software, consulting, and services available at http://pyropus.ca/ --

Bug#833190: Please provide an option to not add X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox header

2017-12-18 Thread Charles Cazabon
ing the header off does not break %(mailbox) substitution in MDA_external aguments in my testing. If you can show me how to reproduce this problem, I'll take a look at it. Charles -- ----------- Charles Cazabon GPL'ed software available at

Bug#833190: Please provide an option to not add X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox header

2017-12-18 Thread Charles Cazabon
guration. Without knowing what problem this is trying to solve, it's difficult to estimate the cost/benefit ratio of adding such a feature. Charles -- ----------- Charles Cazabon GPL'ed software available at: http://pyropus.ca/software/ ---

Bug#872395: cinnamon: Re-enable moving default panel to top of screen

2017-08-23 Thread Charles Cazabon
Charles Cazabon <charlesc-bugs.debian@pyropus.ca> wrote: > - this preference is no longer present in the configuration/settings app. I'm an idiot. It's not exposed anywhere in the settings dialogs that I can find, but you can actually move it to the top of the screen by right

Bug#872395: cinnamon: Re-enable moving default panel to top of screen

2017-08-16 Thread Charles Cazabon
Package: cinnamon Version: 3.2.7-4 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream Dear Maintainer, Hi - Cinnamon in previous versions had an exposed preference to allow you to move the default panel from the bottom of the screen to the top. It appears in Cinnamon 3 - at least in 3.2.7 as shipped by Debian

Bug#872394: cinnamon: In-panel application launcher hover text wrong; always displays "Files"

2017-08-16 Thread Charles Cazabon
Package: cinnamon Version: 3.2.7-4 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, Hi - a minor bug but it affects usability. If you "add applets" to the default panel, choose to add an "application launcher", then it adds a default launcher pointing to the file browser application, with appropriate folder

Bug#871228: Add FAQ: do the oldmail files just grow and grow?

2017-08-08 Thread Charles Cazabon
about it. Charles -- ---------- Charles Cazabon <charl...@pyropus.ca> Software, consulting, and services available at http://pyropus.ca/ --

Bug#871228: Add FAQ: do the oldmail files just grow and grow?

2017-08-08 Thread Charles Cazabon
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jida...@jidanni.org> wrote: > >>>>> "CC" == Charles Cazabon <charl...@pyropus.ca> writes: > > getmail will remove entries from them that it knows are no longer needed > > That is great to know! However [...] > all say

Bug#871228: Add FAQ: do the oldmail files just grow and grow?

2017-08-08 Thread Charles Cazabon
iscussion of getmail. Maintainer, please close this bug as invalid. There is no issue here to solve. Charles -- ---------- Charles Cazabon <charl...@pyropus.ca> Software, consulting, and services available at http://pyropus.ca/ --

Bug#871228: Add FAQ: do the oldmail files just grow and grow?

2017-08-07 Thread Charles Cazabon
Correction: Charles Cazabon <charl...@pyropus.ca> wrote: > You can remove all the messages you want from your destination maildirs or > mbox files with affecting getmail, [...] That's a typo. I meant "without affecting g

Bug#871228: Add FAQ: do the oldmail files just grow and grow?

2017-08-07 Thread Charles Cazabon
-> downsteam. Now all is deleted from > upstream. > 2. Now delete the oldmail files. > 3. Now reconnect the server. Sorry, but you seem to have completely misunderstood how this works. That wouldn't do what you think it would - not even close. Charles -- -----

Bug#871228: Add FAQ: do the oldmail files just grow and grow?

2017-08-07 Thread Charles Cazabon
Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org> wrote: > "CC" == Charles Cazabon <charl...@pyropus.ca> writes: > > > > In short: no, you can never safely trim them. You can remove them only if > > you never want to retrieve mail from the corresponding POP/I

Bug#871228: Add FAQ: do the oldmail files just grow and grow?

2017-08-06 Thread Charles Cazabon
e them only if you never want to retrieve mail from the corresponding POP/IMAP account or folder again. The files are absolutely tiny by any modern standard, so there will never, ever be a need to "trim" them. Charles -- ----------

Bug#766670: Security fix without feature enhancement for 4.32.0 and 4.20.0

2014-11-22 Thread Charles Cazabon
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 01:30:41PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: As Linus Torvalds says, there's no real difference between bugfix and security fix, and I would argue there's almost as little difference between bugfix and new feature. If you added

Bug#709170: no option to set the SSL protocol version?

2013-05-30 Thread Charles Cazabon
-- -- Charles Cazabon charlesc-getmail-b...@pyropus.ca Software, consulting, and services available at http://pyropus.ca/ -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ

Bug#709170: no option to set the SSL protocol version?

2013-05-30 Thread Charles Cazabon
a new version of the package to get this fix out to other folks that have been affected. Thanks, Jidanni. Charles -- -- Charles Cazabon charlesc-getmail-b...@pyropus.ca Software, consulting, and services available

Bug#701844: Patch breaks getmail

2013-05-30 Thread Charles Cazabon
patching getmail to fix. Charles -- -- Charles Cazabon charlesc-getmail-b...@pyropus.ca Software, consulting, and services available at http://pyropus.ca

Bug#709170: no option to set the SSL protocol version?

2013-05-29 Thread Charles Cazabon
-- -- Charles Cazabon charlesc-getmail-b...@pyropus.ca Software, consulting, and services available at http://pyropus.ca/ -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist

Bug#668602: Peek support in getmail

2012-04-14 Thread Charles Cazabon
-- -- Charles Cazabon charl...@pyropus.ca Software, consulting, and services available at http://pyropus.ca/ -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#513570: (no subject)

2011-01-27 Thread Charles Cazabon
-- -- Charles Cazabon charl...@pyropus.ca Software, consulting, and services available at http://pyropus.ca/ -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#513570: Fixed upstream

2011-01-27 Thread Charles Cazabon
I ran into this as well. I can confirm that it's already been fixed upstream; the current git tree has no problem with a 5.5TB partition I tested. Charles -- -- Charles Cazabon charlesc-web-bugs.debian@pyropus.ca

Bug#516759: Invalid

2010-04-28 Thread Charles Cazabon
This isn't a bug, it's a configuration error. That configuration should specify the -f option in such a way that it always gets a value: arguments = (-i, -f, %(sender), mym...@mydomain.com) Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon

Bug#400304: Fixed upstream

2007-01-17 Thread Charles Cazabon
Wishlist/bug 400304 fixed upstream in getmail verison 4.6.6. -- --- Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#296524: License problem with debian memtester package

2005-02-22 Thread Charles Cazabon
updated to version 4 of memtester, which has much nicer code and a better/more portable build system. Thanks. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED