Bug#776999: efivar: broken 32-bit userland on 64-bit kernel

Hi Adam, Are you still seeing this bug in efivar 0.23-2? --Jared -- Jared Domínguez OS Architect Linux Engineering Dell | Client Software Group

Bug#815846: ITP: tpm2-tss -- TPM (Trusted Platform Module) 2.0 Software Stack

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 08:08:58PM -0600, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre" * Package name: tpm2-tss Version : 0.9.8 Upstream Author : Will Arthur * URL :

Bug#815849: ITP: tpm2-tools -- TPM (Trusted Platform Module) 2.0 tools

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 08:25:28PM -0600, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre" * Package name: tpm2-tools Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Gang Wei * URL :

Bug#702255: efitools: changing back from ITP to RFP

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:58:19PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:14:35AM +0200, pollux wrote: On 04/19/2016 01:29 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:43:24 +0200 Pierre Chifflier wrote: retitle 702255 ITP: efitools -- Tools to

Bug#794798: libnspr4-dev: pthread missing from pkg-config lib deps

It turns out this is the same bug as https://github.com/rhinstaller/pesign/issues/18 -- Jared Domínguez OS Architect Linux Engineering Dell | Client Software Group

Bug#811939: pesign: FTBFS with GCC 6: defined but not used

My apologies for missing this. I just uploaded 0.112-1. Could you check if it's fixed there? If not, you should file a bug upstream, as 0.112-1 is unpatched upstream code. --Jared -- Jared Domínguez OS Architect Linux Engineering Dell | Client Software Group

Bug#819766: pesign: new upstream release out

On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 01:29:04AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: Package: pesign Version: 0.110-2 Severity: wishlist 0.111 seems to be out, can this be packaged please? Hi Tollef, Yes, it's on my to-do list. --Jared -- Jared Domínguez OS Architect Linux Engineering Dell | Client Software

Bug#617820: biosdevname: changing from ITP to RFP

On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 06:16:58AM -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: retitle 617820 RFP: biosdevname -- takes a kernel device name as an argument, and returns the BIOS-given name. noowner 617820 tag 617820 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging biosdevname.

Bug#789746: efibootmgr fails to delete or modify boot entries

Are you still seeing this issue with libefivar0 version 0.20-4? -- Jared Domínguez Infrastructure Software Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#785786: efibootmgr: Could not delete boot variable: Success

Are you still seeing this issue with libefivar0 0.20-4 and efibootmgr 0.12-3? -- Jared Domínguez Infrastructure Software Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#789746: efibootmgr fails to delete or modify boot entries

Can you run this and send the output of it (/root/efibootmgr.*)? sudo strace -o /root/efibootmgr.$RANDOM efibootmgr -b 0016 -B --Jared -- Jared Domínguez Infrastructure Software Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#785786: efibootmgr: Could not delete boot variable: Success

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:14:33PM -0500, Phil wrote: On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:00:56 +0200 Ricardo Ribalda Delgado ricardo.riba...@gmail.com wrote: root@neopili:/home/ricardo# grub-install Installing for x86_64-efi platform. efibootmgr: Boot entry 001A not found efibootmgr: Could not delete boot

Bug#785786: efibootmgr: Could not delete boot variable: Success

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:05:14AM -0500, Phil wrote: I found that I saw the same issue, but when I rebooted, efibootmgr 0.12-1 with efivar 0.20 worked fine for me. Rebooting didn't solve the problem for me. I've also made plenty of reboots yesterday and they didn't solve the problem for me,

Bug#789746: efibootmgr fails to delete or modify boot entries

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:45:51PM -0500, D. Jared Dominguez wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:01:03PM -0500, Robert Lange wrote: Package: efibootmgr Version: 0.12-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Until about 1 month ago, efibootmgr was able to modify and delete boot menu items. I do

Bug#789746: efibootmgr fails to delete or modify boot entries

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:01:03PM -0500, Robert Lange wrote: Package: efibootmgr Version: 0.12-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Until about 1 month ago, efibootmgr was able to modify and delete boot menu items. I do not know exactly when it started failing, but I just noticed it today.

Bug#785786: efibootmgr: Could not delete boot variable: Success

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:32:53PM -0500, Phil wrote: Thank's for your fast reply. On 06/24/2015 05:31 AM, D. Jared Dominguez wrote: Do you see the same issue with 0.15-3? Yes, downgrading libefivar to 0.15-3 and efibootmgr to version 0.11 resolves the problem too. So I guess libefivar 0.20

Bug#787590: appstream-glib: Please update to latest appstream-glib (or at least 0.3.5)

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 07:49:33AM -0500, Matthias Klumpp wrote: 2015-06-03 18:25 GMT+02:00 D. Jared Dominguez jared_doming...@dell.com: On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 05:49:09AM -0500, Matthias Klumpp wrote: [...] However, I have packaging for the 0.4 release almost ready, and you can expect

Bug#787590: appstream-glib: Please update to latest appstream-glib (or at least 0.3.5)

On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 05:49:09AM -0500, Matthias Klumpp wrote: Hi! 2015-06-03 9:23 GMT+02:00 Daniel Jared Dominguez jared_doming...@dell.com: Package: appstream-glib Severity: wishlist I need at least appstream-glib 0.3.5 for packaging fwupd (https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd) into Debian

Bug#785786: efivar: Could not delete boot variable: Success

What's the output of sudo efibootmgr -v? -- Jared Domínguez Infrastructure Software Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#785786: efivar: Could not delete boot variable: Success

Ricardo, Okay, I've poked around some, and it seems like efibootmgr won't even *build* with the most recently released libefivar0. There are a bunch of changes to efibootmgr upstream (dp branch in the efibootmgr git repo) that look like they resolve this, but since those changes aren't merged

Bug#785137: ITP: fwupdate -- Tools to manage UEFI firmware updates

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 09:56:37AM -0500, Peter Jones wrote: (Just filling in details of my thoughts here, not arguing for or against however you guys decide to name things.) On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:12:11AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 17:48 -0500, D. Jared Dominguez

Bug#785137: ITP: fwupdate -- Tools to manage UEFI firmware updates

Okay, well, I talked to Peter on IRC. He pointed out that: - While there may be other platforms with firmware update mechanisms that work in Linux, they're fringe. - It's in Fedora as fwupdate already, so having a different name is confusing. - Its name doesn't currently collide with other

Bug#776999: broken 32-bit userland on 64-bit kernel

On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:54:41PM -0600, Dominguez, Jared wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:40:28PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:36:06PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:25:59PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:12:09PM

Bug#776999: broken 32-bit userland on 64-bit kernel

On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:40:16PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: Package: efivar Version: 0.15-3 Severity: serious I'm afraid the patch 07-num_bits.patch breaks the case of 32-bit userland on a 64-bit kernel. As far as I know, this is how i386 would get installed on any non-ancient machine if

Bug#776999: broken 32-bit userland on 64-bit kernel

On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:57:52PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:48:23PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote: On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:40:16PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: I'm not convinced that this doesn't break the use case in #773412 [1] since you're looking to define

Bug#776999: broken 32-bit userland on 64-bit kernel

On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:25:59PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:12:09PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:57:52PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: If I read that correctly, #773412 fixed i386 on an i386 kernel. As you can see in the dumps above

Bug#776999: broken 32-bit userland on 64-bit kernel

On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:40:28PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:36:06PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:25:59PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:12:09PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:57

Bug#774914: firmware-linux-nonfree: Include the intel sst firmwares required for audio on Bay Trail

I second as adding these will add firmware needed for Broadwell SST DSP (IntcSST2.bin). --Jared -- Jared Domínguez Server OS Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#773689: Actually useful debdiff

Let me try sending a proper debdiff this time. :) diff -Nru efivar-0.15/debian/changelog efivar-0.15/debian/changelog --- efivar-0.15/debian/changelog2014-11-03 10:26:48.0 -0600 +++ efivar-0.15/debian/changelog2014-12-17 22:28:23.0 -0600 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +efivar

Bug#773726: efibootmgr: duplicate bootnum created

Looks like this bug also needed this, which was already in 0.11.0-1: https://github.com/vathpela/efibootmgr/commit/301c0628f7fa7333791d2b5d79eb8e02fc848ee7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#773327: debian-efi mailing list

I maintain efibootmgr and efivar in Debian and would find such a list very useful. --Jared -- Jared Domínguez Server OS Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#768880: tags jessie sid

control: tags -1 + jessie control: tags -1 + sid -- Jared Domínguez Server OS Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#773007: tags jessie sid

control: tags -1 + jessie control: tags -1 + sid -- Jared Domínguez Server OS Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#768889: tags jessie sid

control: tags -1 + jessie control: tags -1 + sid -- Jared Domínguez Server OS Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#773007: Doesn't work on i386, crashes also

Hrmph. There was a 32-bit issue in 0.9.0-1 that was supposed to be fixed in 0.9.0-2: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764797 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764796 Any chance you can test with efibootmgr from unstable? I've looked at the changes upstream and

Bug#768880: efibootmgr: unusable if reading any boot variable fails

Jan, My apologies for not seeing this bug report earlier. I just noticed it this morning thanks to Bastien. I reviewed the patch. It looks like it should be fine for at least restoring previous behavior, so I passed it along to Peter Jones, the upstream maintainer, to see whether he concurs

Bug#756179: grub-efi-amd64: Boot failure after upgrade to 2.02~beta2-11

Control: fixed -1 0.9.0-2 There are newer versions of efibootmgr in both jessie and sid. Please test 0.9.0-2 in jessie, as it should resolve this issue (at least the one Colin references). I'm closing this bug report for now since the reporter hasn't replied in nearly a month anyway. Please

Bug#764386: libefivar0: Segmentation fault in vars_get_variable() (vars.c:165)

Jan, I passed your patch upstream. Peter Jones is looking at it. It'd probably help him to know more details about what system you're on, though, like what make/model this is and probably an strace if you can. --Jared -- Jared Domínguez Server OS Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions

Bug#764386: libefivar0: Segmentation fault in vars_get_variable() (vars.c:165)

Actually, never mind. Peter broke out your patch and applied it upstream. I've just uploaded efivar 0.15-2. Please verify that it works correctly on your system. On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:58:20AM -0600, Dominguez, Jared wrote: Jan, I passed your patch upstream. Peter Jones is looking at it.

Bug#764386: libefivar0: Segmentation fault in vars_get_variable() (vars.c:165)

On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 06:14:59PM -0500, Jan Echternach wrote: Package: libefivar0 Version: 0.12-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Upgrading libefivar0 from version 0.10-5 to 0.12-1 causes a segmentation fault when running efibootmgr without arguments (I tried it

Bug#764797: efibootmgr has multiple bugs in its 32bit version

I just uploaded new efi{var,bootmgr} packages with these patches. On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 02:30:21AM -0500, Michael Tokarev wrote: Package: efibootmgr Version: 0.9.0-1 Severity: serious 32bit version (i386 package) of efibootmgr has several bugs which makes it unusable at least with large

Bug#764796: efibootmgr is not multiarch-aware

The efibootmgr I just uploaded (0.9.0-2) should be multi-arch aware. Please, if you can, verify that it works as expected for you. On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 02:22:31AM -0500, Michael Tokarev wrote: Package: efibootmgr Version: 0.9.0-1 Severity: normal efibootmgr package in debian is not marked

Bug#762621: efibootmgr: Please build efivar + efibootmgr for armel

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:08:55PM -0500, Ian Campbell wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 13:52 -0500, D. Jared Dominguez wrote: I'm just about to package efibootmgr 0.9.0 and efivar 0.12. I will add armel to the architecture list. Excellent, thanks! Ian. FYI, I got around to finishing them up

Bug#762621: efibootmgr: Please build efivar + efibootmgr for armel

On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 04:53:19PM -0500, Ian Campbell wrote: Hi Daniel, On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 20:49:51 +0100 Ian Campbell i...@debian.org wrote: As of version 2.02~beta2-13 the grub-efi-arm-bin package now depends on efibootmgr. Since grub-efi-arm-bin is built for armel as well as armhf that

Bug#617820: biosdevname Debian package

Anyone willing to sponsor? On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:15:34AM -0500, D. Jared Dominguez wrote: I would like to take over maintaining this package in Debian and need someone to sponsor me. I've CCed Colin in case he's interested in sponsoring. :) I've packaged and tested biosdevname 0.5.1

Bug#754410: ITP: cim-schema -- The DMTF Common Information Model Schema

I'm happy to comaintain this, the sfcb and wsman stuff with you. I'm hopefully going to be a Debian Maintainer soon so may be able to help with uploading. On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 02:55:41PM -0500, Kent Baxley wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kent Baxley kb4x...@gmail.com *

Bug#617820: biosdevname Debian package

I would like to take over maintaining this package in Debian and need someone to sponsor me. I've CCed Colin in case he's interested in sponsoring. :) I've packaged and tested biosdevname 0.5.1 based on the latest package in Ubuntu. Aside from the newer upstream version, other changes include

Bug#753644: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

FYI, upstream has accepted all the patches. I've included them in efibootmgr 0.7.0-2, which should hopefully be uploaded shortly. -- Jared Domínguez Server OS Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#753644: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

Thanks. I cleaned up and broke out your patch into logically separate patches for submission upstream. I have one question, though. This one is somewhat unrelated to the rest of your patch: --- efibootmgr-0.7.0/src/include/scsi_ioctls.h 2014-04-01 22:53:43.0 +0400 +++

Bug#752273: efivar FTBFS on armhf, patches attached

Thank you. On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 08:11:03PM -0500, Adam Conrad wrote: Package: efivar Version: 0.10-2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu utopic ubuntu-patch In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * Pull

Bug#725457: Status

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 03:43:50PM -0500, Jan Henke wrote: Hi, what is the status of this bug? Is 0.6.x expected to migrate to Testing soon? Either a 0.6.x upstream version or applying the patch in bug #741235 is required to install Debian on generation 2 Hyper-V VMs. The current version can

Bug#741235: verify fix

Per the discussion for bug 725457, please verify if efibootmgr 0.6.1-3 in unstable resolves this issue. Thanks, Jared -- Jared Domínguez Server OS Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#658815: ITP: ledmon -- Enclosure LED Utilities

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Daniel Jared Dominguez jared_doming...@dell.com * Package name: ledmon Version : 0.3.1 Upstream Author : Intel * URL : http://ledmon.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : Enclosure