On 16/08/2018 11:52, Vincent Blut wrote:
However your bug report clearly shows that this problem has to be taken
seriously. I’ll work on this on the weekend, hope that’s ok?
Of course, no problems. Thanks!
--
Gustavo Serra Scalet
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Stone [mailto:mst...@debian.org]
> Sent: quarta-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2017 11:09
> To: Gustavo Serra Scalet <gustavo.sca...@eldorado.org.br>;
> 854...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#854053: coreutils: improve 2x-
Hi, it's been 2 weeks and I didn't get a reply.
What else can I do in order to support you on fixing this?
Best Regards,
Gustavo Serra Scalet
Hi, could anyone have a look? I don't know what else to do now.
This is a major performance drop. I hope we could fix it soon.
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Stone [mailto:mst...@debian.org]
> Sent: terça-feira, 7 de fevereiro de 2017 16:25
> To: Gustavo Serra Scalet <gustavo.sca...@eldorado.org.br>;
> 854...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#854053: coreutils: improve 2x-
Hi,
So, is my patch viable or not? If not, what would you then recommend to avoid
this?
Thanks
as they
perform similarly.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Hodson [mailto:myst...@gmail.com]
> Sent: sexta-feira, 3 de fevereiro de 2017 18:21
> To: Gustavo Serra Scalet <gustavo.sca...@eldorado.org.br>
> Cc: Michael Stone <mst...@debian.org>; 854...@bugs.debi
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Stone [mailto:mst...@debian.org]
> Sent: sexta-feira, 3 de fevereiro de 2017 11:38
> To: Gustavo Serra Scalet <gustavo.sca...@eldorado.org.br>
> Cc: 854...@bugs.debian.org; coreut...@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#854053:
an Bug Tracking System [mailto:ow...@bugs.debian.org]
> Sent: sexta-feira, 3 de fevereiro de 2017 11:24
> To: Gustavo Serra Scalet <gustavo.sca...@eldorado.org.br>
> Subject: Bug#854053: Acknowledgement (coreutils: improve 2x-3x sha256sum
> performance on ppc64le due to curr
Package: coreutils
Version: 8.26-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
The sha256sum provided by coreutils (without openssl) is performing
poorly with versions >= 4.9 until 7.0 (currently under development). The
reason for that is the -fschedule-insns optimization that is used with
A fix for LuaJIT usage as a dynamic library was just uploaded and I attached
that patch.
The link on this bug report continues to be valid as the Pull Request was
updated:
https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/pull/54.patch
Source: luajit
Version: 2.1.0~beta1+dfsg-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Please add the following patch to LuaJIT in order to add ppc64le port:
https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/pull/54.patch
Patches applied on top of current 2.1.0~beta1+dfsg-2's tarball and it
Package: luajit
Version: 2.0.3+dfsg-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
There is a new LuaJIT release called v2.0.4:
http://luajit.org/changes.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: ppc64el
13 matches
Mail list logo
