Bug#313243: Please remove mol-modules-2.6.8 from the archive

2005-06-12 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, please remove the source package mol-modules-2.6.8 and the corresponding binary packages, namely: mol-modules-2.6.8-powerpc mol-modules-2.6.8-powerpc-smp from the archive. They provide modules for an obsolete kernel version. Regards, Jens. -- Sy

Bug#313242: Please remove mol-modules-2.6.10 from the archive

2005-06-12 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, please remove the source package mol-modules-2.6.10 and the corresponding binary packages, namely: mol-modules-2.6.10-powerpc mol-modules-2.6.10-powerpc-smp from the archive. They provide modules for an obsolete kernel version. Regards, Jens. --

Bug#313241: Please remove mol-modules from the archive

2005-06-12 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, please remove the source package mol-modules and the corresponding binary packages, namely: mol-modules-2.4.25-power3 mol-modules-2.4.25-power4 mol-modules-2.4.25-powerpc mol-modules-2.4.25-powerpc-small mol-modules-2.4.25-powerpc-smp from the a

Bug#305170: mol-modules-source: incompatible module format with kernel 2.6.11

2005-04-21 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Hi, Ingo Juergensmann writes: > After enabling that kernel option, MOL works again here as well. Good, at least this narrows it down. > But I still think it's a bug and not a feature. ;) Indeed. I simply wasn't aware of this problem, because both the Debian kernels and my custom kernels have

Bug#305170: mol-modules-source: incompatible module format with kernel 2.6.11

2005-04-20 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Hi, Ingo Juergensmann writes: > Maybe this has something to do with module versioning or so within the > kernel? Well, this may be a hint. Do you have CONFIG_MODVERSIONS set to y? If not, try and see if it helps. Regards, Jens. -- J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe! Le veux aimeb et mqubib pan

Bug#305170: mol-modules-source: incompatible module format with kernel 2.6.11

2005-04-20 Thread Jens Schmalzing
tags 305170 +unreproducible thanks Hi, Ingo Juergensmann writes: > After running debian/rules and installation with dpkg of the resulting > package, I get this: > > # startmol -X > Mac-on-Linux 0.9.70 [Mar 18 2005 11:51] > Copyright (C) 1997-2004 Samuel Rydh > Starting MOL session 1 > Loading

Bug#290693: segfault when using allow: user in /etc/mol/session.map

2005-03-18 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Hi, apparently, your patch broke mol for a couple of users including myself. See Bug#300188 for further information. Therefore, I have backed out the patch again. I have also tried to reproduce your problem - so far unsuccessfully. Can you provide more information (configuration files, permiss

Bug#298559: Please remove mol-modules-2.4.27

2005-03-08 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi, for the PowerPC port, the 2.4 kernel series is deprecated and should soon be removed from the archive. Therefore, the above-mentioned source package mol-modules-2.4.27, which supplies kernel modules for one specific application only, should be remov

Bug#298044: Please remove mol-modules-2.6.9

2005-03-04 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi, The kernel release 2.6.9 is obsolete in sid and has never entered sarge, so please remove my source package mol-modules-2.6.9 and the related binary packages mol-modules-2.6.9-powerpc and mol-modules-2.6.9-powerpc-smp from the archive. Regards, Jens

Bug#290823: Could hpfsck be fsck.hfsplus?

2005-01-17 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Hi, Michael Shields writes: > There is [...] hpfsck from the hfsutils package. Could it set the > clean flag and be made fsck.hfsplus? No, unless a new upstream maintainer takes over. I haven't heard from the original author in years. Of course, Darwin contains the utilities newfs and fsck fo