Bug#300759: Agreed

2006-05-05 Thread Joachim Durchholz
I wish to second the motion. Minesweeper takes away a hotkey, never worked very well anyway (keybindings behaved strangely - I dimly remember I had trouble escaping out of a game), and it's needlessly adding to maintenance. It might be nice to have while an install is in progress. OTOH there

Bug#234516: It's a more general problem...

2006-05-05 Thread Joachim Durchholz
... because aptitude --without-recommends some_package will (surprisingly) deinstall any recommendations installed by other packages. The base problem is that aptitude tries to stick with a general policy about whether to install recommended packages or not. It should have a per-package

Bug#365669: debootstrap doesn't create /dev/hd* entries

2006-05-01 Thread Joachim Durchholz
Package: debootstrap Version: 0.3.3 Subject says it all: no /dev/hd* entries are created by debootstrap. Configuration - VmWare on Windows, with an hda and a hdc drive. Booting from hdc, which carries what I'll call the base system, a netboot image that I ripped off from my

Bug#350441: Possible cause for open /etc/logrotate.d/syslog failed

2006-04-15 Thread Joachim Durchholz
I just had the same error as reported by Rickard. I my case, the error is because I have installed syslog-ng (I don't appreciate opening syslog to DoS attacks just to have a loghost). Regards, Jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#362701: Hiccups on kernels without modules

2006-04-15 Thread Joachim Durchholz
Package: bastille Version: 1:2.1.1-11 Hi, My Linux kernel is running without modules or module tools, for security reasons. Consequently, all modprobe calls fail. I'm not sure whether the lack of module support has any serious consequences; I did get some funny reactions out of the package

Bug#350529: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#350529: Doesn't want to apply against a 2.6.8 kernel)

2006-01-31 Thread Joachim Durchholz
Debian Bug Tracking System schrieb: Actually, you are using the previous version of the package. I thought i have solved this problem in version 1:2.2r2-2, but i have checked anyway. It works well using last version of kernel-patch-squashfs package (1:2.2r2-2), using exactly the

Bug#350529: Doesn't want to apply against a 2.6.8 kernel

2006-01-30 Thread Joachim Durchholz
Package: kernel-patch-squashfs Version: 1:2.1r2-0.1 Severity: important Tags: patch sarge Additional installed package: kernel-source-2.6.8 With this configuration, kernel-patch-squashfs fails to apply, claiming no matching kernel version found (quoting from memory, actual wording is almost

Bug#311919: apt-get -qq accesses /dev/tty

2005-06-04 Thread Joachim Durchholz
Package: apt-get Version: 0.5.4 Severity: minor (Notice: it could also be apt-listchanges 2.18, that depends on where you guys decide to fix the issue.) I'm using a script in /etc/cron.daily that says #! /bin/sh apt-get -qq update apt-get -qq -y upgrade to automatically install updates