On 2024-02-27 04:20:02, Walter Bleach wrote:
>
> This is my first time trying out nix, however I could not get it to
> work.
>
> ~$ sudo nix-shell -p cowsay
> [sudo] password for farhad:
> error: file 'nixpkgs' was not found in the Nix search path (add it using
> $NIX_PATH or -I)
Do you want
Wim,
Is the issue you describe similar to #1004113, and therefore, was it
fixed by Thomas in 2.7.0+dfsg-1?
-Jordan
signature.asc
Description: signature
Control: retitle -1 ITA: nix -- Purely functional package manager (binaries)
Control: owner -1 !
Control: owner -1 Jordan Justen
Control: retitle -1 ITA: nix -- Purely functional package manager (binaries)
signature.asc
Description: signature
Lucas,
The llvm-spirv dependency has " | hello". Shouldn't this package be
usable as an alternative to llvm-spirv in bookworm?
https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/hello
I see that the "Filtered Build-Depends" drops this as an alternative.
Do you happen to know why?
-Jordan
signature.asc
On 2022-03-28 12:57:38, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Right, multiarch.
> Rebuilding on all architectures wouldn't help, as the other
> architectures would be bumped too, so we only want to rebuild ia64
> and riscv64. Scheduled.
Thanks for the clarifications. I think based on this that in the
future I
On 2022-03-28 11:57:14, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Jordan,
>
> On 28-03-2022 10:20, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > nmu libxxf86vm_1:1.1.4-1+b2 . ANY . unstable . -m "riscv64 arch is at
> > 1:1.1.4-1
> > while others are at 1:1.1.4-1+b2"
>
> It may be obvious
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libxxf86vm_1:1.1.4-1+b2 . ANY . unstable . -m "riscv64 arch is at 1:1.1.4-1
while others are at 1:1.1.4-1+b2"
Hopefully this merge-request can help fix #993904 & #995069.
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-llvm-team/llvm-toolchain/-/merge_requests/74
signature.asc
Description: signature
On 2021-04-24 00:49:14, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for waffle (versioned as 1.6.3-1.1) and uploaded it
> to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
I pulled your change in along with a couple other changes and uploaded
1.6.3-2. Let me know if you still see an
Lucas,
The renderdoc package was marked with autorm based on this bug.
The issue arose because glslang 11.1.0-1 was uploaded to unstable.
I therefore released renderdoc 1.11+dfsg-5 which fixed the
compatibility issue with glslang 11.
Unfortunately, I then found out that glslang 11 was actually
On 2020-11-20 15:04:56, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 7:36 AM Jordan Justen wrote:
>
> > This Standards-Version is not yet recognized by lintian.
>
> When lintian is wrong about the Standards-Version being too new, it is
> best to ignore it and wait unt
On 2020-11-19 01:01:28, Leon Marz wrote:
>
> cglm (0.7.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* New upstream release
>* Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.1
This Standards-Version is not yet recognized by lintian. You can
verify this with lintian, and it is also shown in the lintian section
on
Leon,
I reviewed the 0.7.1-1 packaging you posted on mentors.debian.net. I
didn't see any major issues, but maybe some suggestions.
The license is MIT, and debian/copyright has it listed properly.
I think packages often will call out the debian directory in
debian/copyright, even if it matches
I opened a merge request in salsa to potentially help fix this bug:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/libs/python-doc8/-/merge_requests/1
It seems like the python-oslosphinx package is causing the FTBFS,
since it's not compatible with Sphinx 2.4.
I found a new upstream location for doc8,
I got this fixed in upstream:
https://github.com/pazz/alot/commit/916b446317980e9794a02bfb79456da4fc2768a4
Since it's a warning, I was planning to *not* bother adding an `alot`
package patch, and just wait for the next upstream release. Or, do you
think I should cherry-pick the upstream patch
Jonas,
This upstream bug sounds similar.
https://github.com/pazz/alot/issues/1434
What do you think?
-Jordan
signature.asc
Description: signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
s390x was removed from the latest glslang (8.13.3559-2) unstable upload:
https://salsa.debian.org/xorg-team/vulkan/glslang/commit/6466e35acadc5de8d75b7285eaaf1312b81b054d
the s390x arch missing is preventing glslang from migrating to testing:
Hi. Does the 2.14-1 release fix this? I see that upstream included at
patch exactly like yours:
commit 9f45a77f46829e666b35530939b9237cf978d4dc
Author: Cyrill Gorcunov
Date: Sat Feb 10 00:40:46 2018 +0300
nasmlib: Drop pure_func attrib from seg_alloc
This patch should have been included
On 2018-08-25 03:38:08, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 07:52:28AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
>
> > Santiago, how were you able to reproduce the issue?
>
> My building environment is described here:
>
> https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/my-building-environment.txt
I haven't
On 2018-12-12 06:05:57, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> alot 0.8 is out, with exciting changes - esp. notmuch named queries.
>
> Please package it.
>
I'm almost done with the changes for 0.8. :)
-Jordan
On 2017-07-08 08:43:18, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> I will be requesting removal of pygpgme from unstable at the end of
> this month (but it's up to ftp masters if they do so immediately and break
> things, or wait for dependencies to be resolved).
Jonathan, I wanted to give an update for 'alot'
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>
* Package name: renderdoc
Version : 0.34
Upstream Author : Baldur Karlsson <bald...@baldurk.org>
* URL : https://renderdoc.org/
* License : MIT
Program
Control: owner -1 !
I rebased your patch. Some portions of the patch seem to have been
adopted upstream. I need to verify that it still fixes the issue.
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/nasm.git/commit/?id=6ca604a0
signature.asc
Description: signature
On 2017-04-21 06:12:21, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Ben Finney (2017-04-21 14:44:52)
> > Jordan, have you made more changes that should be released?
> >
> > Johannes, are you waiting on any changes before you approve and upload
> > this package?
>
> Jordan and I were writing each other
On 2017-02-17 05:29:44, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Gianfranco Costamagna (2017-02-17 11:11:35)
> > lets review:
> > a) PAPT seems more appropriate
> > b) "alot (0.3.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium"
> > this never went in unstable, please merge the two changelog entries
> > together with the
Control: owner -1 !
It looks like upsteam is willing to pull in this change. In fact, the
project owner rebased the patches.
https://github.com/pazz/alot/pull/915
But, Daniel said he has also rebased the patches.
I think we should hold off a bit more to see if this gets merged
upstream soon.
Package: alot
Version: 0.3.6-1
Severity: wishlist
Owner: jljus...@gmail.com
Suggested by Gianfranco in #855354.
signature.asc
Description: signature
On 2017-02-16 23:59:07, Simon Chopin wrote:
> I do have reservations about moving the package from the PAPT umbrella into
> collab-maint, but it's not my call anymore.
I'm sorry. I meant to say that I planned to put it into git under the
PAPT, not collab-maint. So, the change would be moving from
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: low
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nasm"
Package name: nasm
Version : 2.12.02-1
Upstream Author : "H. Peter Anvin"
URL : http://www.nasm.us/
License : BSD-2-clause
Section
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: low
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "alot"
Package name: alot
Version : 0.5.1-1
Upstream Author : Patrick Totzke
URL : https://github.com/pazz/alot
License : GPL-3+,
On 2016-12-14 09:58:16, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Control: tags 846704 + patch
> Control: tags 846704 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for waffle (versioned as 1.5.2-2.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
There's
Package: debian-maintainers
Severity: normal
Hello,
Please add Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com as a Debian Maintainer.
I'm attaching here the jetring changeset.
Please, note that the adress I'm using for Packaging
(jordan.l.jus...@intel.com) isn't the primary UID of my OpenPGP
key
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jordan Justen jljus...@gmail.com
* Package name: piglit
Version : 0.0.0
Upstream Author : Piglit pig...@lists.freedesktop.org
* URL : http://piglit.freedesktop.org/
* License : MIT, GPL
Programming Lang: C, C++, Python
Package: waffle
Version: 1.3.0
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: waffle
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream Author : Chad Versace chad.vers...@linux.intel.com
* URL : http://people.freedesktop.org/~chadversary/waffle
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description
35 matches
Mail list logo