I agree.
On April 17, 2024 8:00:48 AM GMT+01:00, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>Package: ftp.debian.org
>Severity: normal
>Tags: ftbfs
>X-Debbugs-Cc: x...@packages.debian.org, Jose M Calhariz ,
>Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a , Mattia Rizzolo
>
>Control: affects -1 + src:x
Hi,
Can anyone do a NMU?
I have no success in finding free time to work on this and I do not want
to delay more this fix.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 12/8/23 21:22, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
Hi at Maintainers,
Hi Jose, Ansgar,
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 11:15:44AM +0200, Helmut Grohne
Thank you for your work. No need for the delay.
Kind regards.
Jose M Calhariz
On December 3, 2023 1:14:09 PM GMT+00:00, Tobias Frost wrote:
>Control: tags 1055253 + patch
>Control: tags 1055253 + pending
>
>Dear maintainer,
>
>I've prepared an NMU for amanda (version
Hi
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:33:58PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Control: found -1 6.1~rc3-1~exp1
> Control: found -1 6.1.55-1
>
> On Saturday, 4 November 2023 20:35:43 CET Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> > > Ok. Please test (when you have time) 6.1.55-1.
> >
> >
Hi
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 07:40:38PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 2 November 2023 18:03:25 CET Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 03:37:39PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 19:07:15 CET Jose M Calhariz w
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 03:37:39PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 19:07:15 CET Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> > Package: src:linux
> > Version: 6.1.27-1
>
> Can you try with the latest version in the 6.1.x s
Hi,
After some research it was found the problem was not HW related, but
related with XFS driver and is present until linux 6.1. So I opened
new bug report on
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040416
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
--
--
A vida feliz, meu Deus, consiste
Hi, I believe my last update fixed the problem can someone double check?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On July 7, 2023 11:26:22 AM GMT+01:00, Jose M Calhariz
wrote:
>I too think it's a race condition. I made some changes to the test but the
>upload to Debian did not went well.
>
>
I too think it's a race condition. I made some changes to the test but the
upload to Debian did not went well.
On July 6, 2023 2:12:59 PM GMT+01:00, Vincent Lefevre
wrote:
>On 2023-07-05 18:58:13 +0200, Johannes Christ wrote:
>> Is there another way to reproduce this issue?
>
>I'm wondering
.
+ * Bug fix: "backups fail with the following summary FAILED [no
+backup size line]", thanks to Norman Lyon (Closes: #1032330).
+ * Bug fix: "Amanda is unusable", thanks to Kamil Jonca (Closes:
+ #1032884).
+
+ -- Jose M Calhariz Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:35:47 +
+
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: ama...@packages.debian.org, jose.calha...@tecnico.ulisboa.pt,
calha...@debian.org, ns-l...@dsi.ist.utl.pt
Control: affects -1 + src:amanda
Please unblock package amanda
[
fix.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 3/15/23 18:29, Kamil Jońca wrote:
Jose M Calhariz writes:
On 3/13/23 13:16, Kamil Jońca wrote:
"Debian Bug Tracking System" writes:
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1032884:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
an amgtar for more information.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 3/4/23 06:17, Norman Lyon wrote:
Package: amanda-client
Version: 1:3.5.1-10
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
upgrade of amanda-{client,common,server} from 1:3.5.1-9+b1 to 1:3.5.1-10
* What
Hi Barry,
Can you please open a new bug report for this problem?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On February 23, 2023 9:40:53 PM GMT+00:00, Barry Trent
wrote:
>I applied this update to my one remaining buster machine and now it is
>refusing to connect to my bullseye-based amanda backup
Hi, just to tell that I am working on CVE-2022-37705, currently checking if the
fix work on my workbench.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On February 15, 2023 11:10:25 PM GMT+00:00, Amanda Trusted
wrote:
>Hi Jose,
>
>Here are the relevant bug fixes -
>[0] CVE - http
Hi,
This is my first security update, can I ask what is the procedure or where is
documented?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On January 28, 2023 12:59:09 PM GMT+00:00, Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
>Source: amanda
>Version: 1:3.5.1-9
>Severity: grave
>Tags: security upstream
&g
Hi,
can someone do a minimal patch proposing a way to solve this issue?
So we can discuss the best way to solve it, before doing the big work of
solving it.
I am going to check why this is out of my radar.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On December 4, 2022 4:56:51 AM GMT+00:00, Mathias
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 09:55:36PM +0200, Hannes von Haugwitz wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 07:58:21PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> > I am a user of logckeck as I use on all my machines that I sysadmin
> > and I maintain some packages on De
of logcheck.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
--
--
Você faria papel de trouxa? A Betty Faria.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Now I have the repo full updated and I am preparing a new upstream
release of at, with many changes
and bug fixes. Do you mind to do a MR at salsa?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 17/03/2021 20:57, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Source: at
> Version: 3.1.23-1.1
> Severity: normal
>
Hi,
thank you for the patch, I am working to validate that everything works.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 21/08/2021 19:04, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> control: tag -1 + ftbfs
> control: severity -1 serious
>
> On 2020-10-18 15:19, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Source: amanda
>
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:17:36PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 19:35 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 13:32 +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> > > I was expecting to be easy to collect the info in one or 2 files, but
> >
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 12:54:13PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 01:57:35PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 19:02 +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> > > > Did you change/tweak any of the default timeout values ?
> > >
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 01:57:35PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 19:02 +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> > > Did you change/tweak any of the default timeout values ?
> > >
> >
> > Most probably, it is not me that usually setup the iSCSI co
but I remember meeting
you in Capetown.
>
> On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 16:27 +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> > During upgrades of open-iscsi on my environment it fails to run
> > postinst with success. I got the following messages:
> >
> > Setting up open-iscsi (2.1.3-5)
-iscsi (--configure):
installed open-iscsi package post-installation script subprocess returned
error exit status 1
I have tried to change the postinst to wait for more time, for example
120s and it worked, after 40 seconds of wait.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
-- System Information:
Debian Release
On 22/06/2021 22:15, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 22.06.21 um 21:49 schrieb Jose M Calhariz:
>
>>> My first build was with MAILER only on config and tested on a
>>> bullseye
>>> server.
>
> This appears to be correct/sufficient
>
>>> Then I was poi
On 22/06/2021 18:08, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> On 22/06/2021 17:53, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 22.06.21 um 18:39 schrieb Jose M Calhariz:
>>> On 22/06/2021 17:13, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>>> Am 22.06.21 um 16:55 schrieb Jose M Calhariz:
>>>>> +ove
-3.5.1/debian/rules 2021-06-22 13:10:01.0 +0100
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
#!/usr/bin/make -f
# Copyright 1998-2011 by Bdale Garbee. License GPL v2
-# 2016-2017 by Jose M Calhariz. License GPL v2
+# 2016-2021 by Jose M Calhariz. License GPL v2
export DH_VERBOSE=1
@@ -41,7
On 22/06/2021 17:13, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 22.06.21 um 16:55 schrieb Jose M Calhariz:
>> +override_dh_auto_build:
>> + # MAILER: Fix for #296022, #475771 and #990080
>> + MAILER="/usr/bin/mail" dh_auto_build
>
> Are you sure this bit is
/debian/rules 2021-06-22 13:10:01.0 +0100
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
#!/usr/bin/make -f
# Copyright 1998-2011 by Bdale Garbee. License GPL v2
-# 2016-2017 by Jose M Calhariz. License GPL v2
+# 2016-2021 by Jose M Calhariz. License GPL v2
export DH_VERBOSE=1
@@ -41,7 +41,12
0 pid 3770 (tar)
[Mon Jun 21 21:55:08 2021] afs: Error while alloc'ing cache slot for file
203:536870928.1326742.311043289; failing with an i/o error
[Mon Jun 21 21:55:08 2021] afs: failed to store file (0/5)
So it was as explained.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
-- System Information:
Debian Rel
Jose M Calhariz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.0
APT prefers testing-security
APT policy: (500, 'testing-security'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-7-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
No problem, here is the reply to the Debian bug and my coworkers.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 08:26:57PM -0500, Andrew Deason wrote:
> That's a question for Ben. Can you reply to 969...@bugs.debian.org
> instead? (or ask him directly via ka...@mit.edu ). I was re
00202 R12:
00007f39c1ee74a0
[Mon Jun 14 21:09:21 2021] R13: 7ffdc104a2bc R14: R15:
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.0
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-7-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Locale: LA
Hi
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 04:18:27PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> any progress on this? There is anything I can do to help?
Hi, I collected internal debug messages about this using
ClientTracing.py
Is there anyone to send this debug messages and try to solve the
proble
upgrade"
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
--
--
As palavras enchem o espaço. Eu prefiro encher a carteira
--Andy Warhol
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
any progress on this? There is anything I can do to help?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 06:12:30PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have made an update to my private backport. It is better but I still
> see the same errors on the logs.
Hi,
You have my blessing for the NMU. If it helps, you may remove from
DELAYED/14 and upload it
to normal queue.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 29/09/2020 20:03, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch pending
>
> Hi,
>
> I've uploaded a minimal fix to DELAYE
t;apt install openafs-client openafs-modules-dkms" and
later "apt upgrade" and everything was fine and working as expected.
I have more machines needing update to v10.6 that I will use to chase
down the exact circumstances that OpenAFS may stop working during an
upgrade.
Kind reg
volumeinfo
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 07:28:50PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will then update my private backport and see if the things improve.
> I will report here the results of your sugestion. Thank you.
>
> Kind regards
Hi,
I will then update my private backport and see if the things improve.
I will report here the results of your sugestion. Thank you.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 04:07:55PM -0700, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 03:43:37PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wr
an indication of important errors with the openafs
cache code.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.5
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-10-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
happen, so I'm unpleasantly
> surprised to hear that it is not happening.
>
> Once I hear back about the problematic scenario I can try to reproduce in a
> local VM.
I have a local openafs cell just for tests where I can do more tests,
If you need more information.
>
> Thanks
Package: ifupdown
Version: 0.8.35
Followup-For: Bug #805445
In our server VLAN there are IPv6 RA. Every method we tried to disable autconf
and
RA on the clients are not working in buster, being kernel parameter autoconf=0,
by
sysctl.conf or by options in network/interfaces. This bug is
t problems for openafs 1.4 and 1.6, now the openafs client stops
working and I need to do a reboot.
What I am requesting is that if possible to do a live upgrade of the
software and the client does not stop working even if it is necessary
to work with the old software until a reboot.
Kind rega
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 08:19:20PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Jose M Calhariz 2019-07-18 <20190718145028.pfd7ib2wwvgy7...@calhariz.com>
> > I have been working on a new release of at and took the decision to
> > implement your request. Are you still interested in thi
Hi,
I have been working on a new release of at and took the decision to
implement your request. Are you still interested in this feature?
Do you want to review it?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
--
--
Todo homem se torna a coisa que mais despreza.
-- Robert Benchley
Hi,
I am preparing a new release of the at daemon.
Are you still interested in this bug? Are you available to review if
the fix solved the problem?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
--
--
Modems de 2400, por favor transitar na pista a direita.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I am working in a new release of at daemon and I have incorporated
your second patch. Are you interested in reviewing the code and the
if fixed the problem?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
--
--
Modems de 2400, por favor transitar na pista a direita.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Hi,
are you still affected by this problem?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
--
--
Um excêntrico é um homem de tecnologia simples que cria revoluções
--Ernst Friedrich Schumacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
as promised is here the patch. This is a draft so you can look into
the new message and say if you aprove it. The code is not optimized,
so I may change it a bit.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 2300d1a..b013595 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
On July 17, 2019 5:09:01 AM GMT-03:00, Daniel Shahaf
wrote:
>Jose M Calhariz wrote on Wed, 17 Jul 2019 02:03 +00:00:
>> I am working in a new release of at and I have a draft of this
>> feature. If you are interested in beta testing it, I can prepare a
>> package for mo
Hi,
I am working in a new release of at and I have a draft of this
feature. If you are interested in beta testing it, I can prepare a
package for most releases of Debian on i386 ou amd64.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
--
--
Se quer construir algo do nada, comece amando intensamente
Hi,
I been thinking on your solution but I am not certain that is secure.
So for now I think the best solution is to enhance the atq command.
If you are interested I accept patches for the at.c code.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
--
--
Se quer construir algo do nada, comece amando
Do you still interested in this bug? I would well come a patch on how
to handle seconds in the input. I am prepaeing a new release of at
and would like to add this feature.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
--
--
Para que ocorra um tiro a queima roupa é necessário que a vítima esteja vestida
Hi,
Still interested in this bug report? Adding support for seconds to at
daemon?
I am considering to release a new version of at with your patch and
others to support seconds and I am looking for beta testers.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
--
--
Para que ocorra um tiro a queima roupa é
-setup/use_mirror boolean false
+d-i apt-setup/use_mirror boolean true
# Select which update services to use; define the mirrors to be used.
# Values shown below are the normal defaults.
d-i apt-setup/services-select multiselect
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
--
--
O que há de novo no windows 98
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 06:06:37PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Thanks for the follow-up.
> >
> > Jose M Calhariz (2019-04-26):
> > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 03:09:31PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Thanks for the follow-up.
>
> Jose M Calhariz (2019-04-26):
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 03:09:31PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Jose M Calhariz (2019-04-26):
> > > > I am doing this
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 03:09:31PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> Jose M Calhariz (2019-04-26):
> > I am doing this report because I wanted test preseed on buster. I
> > found some problems, by order of priority:
> >
> > - The installation using
To perform my tests, and to reproduce the problems I am using the
following line on the installer:
install fb=false auto url=http://web.ist.utl.pt/ist24403/preseed.cfg
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
--
Uma consciência que já foi comprada uma vez pode ser
compra
by mistake.
In short:
- CD Debian installer works for UFI mode.
- grub-install or install of rEFInd does not work.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
-- Package-specific info:
*** BEGIN /proc/mounts
/dev/vg100/root-picard / ext3 rw,noatime,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered 0 0
/dev
v udf usbfs"
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.5
APT prefers oldstable
APT policy: (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAG
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:39:12AM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 3.16.57-2
> Severity: important
>
> We use OpenNebula on Debian 8 to run KVM guests. Our latest upgrade of the
> host and guests broke badly.
> The host can not run guests wi
and the host.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 3.16.0-6-amd64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc version
4.9.2 (Debian 4.9.2-10+deb8u1) ) #1 SMP Debian 3.16.57-2 (2018-07-14)
** Command line:
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.16.0-6-amd64 root=/dev/mapper
it in another homedir. Upgraded
gpg to version from buster and the problem still persist.
This feature is important for new users with yubikeys and similars,
where is important to play with GPG and the SmarCard until get the
desired result.
Kind Regards
Jose M Calhariz
-- System Information:
Debian
I have included your improvements in source code and will be available in a
future 3.1.21.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
n other systems besides Linux, so I will try to implement
your first suggestion.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
I investigated the source and the latest amstatus was refactored. So the
problem you reported is no longer present in 3.5.1
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On May 25, 2018 5:43:22 PM GMT+08:00, "Heiko Schlittermann (HS12-RIPE)"
wrote:
>Package: amanda-server
>Version: 1:3
Hi,
This error was one shot or happen every day?
Have you look into the amanda logs files on server?
Have you look into the amanda logs files of the failing clients?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
Please send the logs to my email address. I will look into this night.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On March 27, 2018 9:39:35 AM GMT+01:00, "Tobias Köck" <tko...@imap.a2gb.de>
wrote:
>Hi Jose,
>
>it happens every time after I rebooted the system yesterday. I haven't
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.3.18
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am reviewing the ignore rules for ssh on my machines and found some
updates are needed. This is my first approach for in the end generate
a proper patch to update the file ignore.d.server/ssh.
My proposed updates, not a proper
Please go forward with the nmu.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On January 15, 2018 12:30:58 PM GMT+00:00, Laurent Bigonville
<bi...@debian.org> wrote:
>Package: sawfish
>Version: 1:1.11.90-1
>Severity: normal
>Tags: patch pending
>
>Dear maintainer,
>
>I've prepared
.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 14/11/17 19:42, Kamil Jonca wrote:
> Package: amanda-server
> Version: 1:3.5-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> (I am not sure if it is upstream)
>
> I used to make backup two phas
this problem.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 22/10/17 12:22, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> I am OK to wait for the upload
>
> On 22 October 2017 13:26:56 EEST, Jose M Calhariz <j...@calhariz.com> wrote:
>> That is an old problem of amanda that is solved on v3.5. But the error
&g
Please do a nmu.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On October 30, 2017 10:52:13 PM GMT+00:00, "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo"
<manuel.montez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>2016-12-20 19:25 Helmut Grohne:
>>Source: at
>>Version: 3.1.20-1
>>Tags: patch
>>
I did not observe this bug in the past, maybe by chance. But I am
preparing the new v3.5 where I have labelled
new vtapes and S3 tapes. I expect to upload the v3.5 to sid and
backports in the new future.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 09/10/17 07:07, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> Package: ama
for stretch on amd64.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 09/10/17 06:55, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> Package: amanda-server
> Version: 1:3.3.9-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> If one or more backup host is unreachable, the backup of all
t; did
> not fix the problem. My understanding is that it shouldn't anyways;
> autoflush must be set to "yes" if taperflush is greater than 0, but that
> wasn't the case.
>
> On 2017-07-24 11:29 AM, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> > I am not certain that I understand your pro
lush is set to yes, then amdump will schedule all dump on
> # holding disks to be flush to tape during the run.
Can you turn "autoflush yes", and check if it solves your problem.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
Can you please attach your amanda,conf file and a listing of the
contents of your
holdingdisk?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 23/07/17 21:58, Winston Sorfleet wrote:
> Package: amanda-server
> Version: 1:3.3.9-5
> Severity: normal
> Tags: newcomer
>
> Dear Maintainer,
On 14/07/17 22:41, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> Package: dh-python
> Version: 2.20170125
> Followup-For: Bug #770265
>
>
> This problem prevents a full cross-grade of gnome from i386 to amd64,
> leaving a broken gnome. The list of packages pending configure
> because of this
Package: dh-python
Version: 2.20170125
Followup-For: Bug #770265
This problem prevents a full cross-grade of gnome from i386 to amd64,
leaving a broken gnome. The list of packages pending configure
because of this problem are:
gir1.2-ibus-1.0:amd64
gnome-shell
gnome-shell-extensions
gnome-core
.
The way to exit from this situation is:
dpkg --install --force-breaks
/var/cache/apt/archives/libmate-menu2_1.16.0-2_amd64.deb
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures
Thank you. Your patch seams good and I will add it to the next release
of at.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 26/06/17 10:34, Paul Slootman wrote:
> Package: at
> Version: 3.1.20-3
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> I use at from cronjobs (I can't use cron directly b
eported.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ben
>>
>> On 01/10/2017 12:50 PM, Dhionel Díaz wrote:
>>> El 10/01/17 a las 15:59, Jose M Calhariz escribió:
>>>> Hi, I have contacted the upstream author, Ben Greear, about this
>>>> problem. And he requested
&
On 22/01/17 23:44, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> On Sun, Jan 22 2017, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
>
>> Hi Jose,
>>
>> Sorry, I did not keep up with the upstream because I was busy studying
>> to be a DD.
> no problem! hope your studies went well :)
Ye
the backports. The bug report is
important before I can
update the package via backports.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 21/01/17 23:10, Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz wrote:
> Package: sawfish
> Version: 3:1.12.0-1nano
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I am using the .d
Thank you for pointing me out this defect. I will review it at first
opportunity.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 17/01/17 12:47, Dmitriy Kovalkov wrote:
> Any news about this bug?
>
> Problem exist in
>
> Last in Arch:
>
> [kovalkov@localhost ~]$ at -V
> at version 3.1
Yes, it is annoying. I will talk with the upstream about it, to find a
solution and a workaround.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 16/01/17 20:32, Awtul wrote:
> Package: sawfish
> Version: 1:1.11.90-1
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I get this error mes
never
> actually be trying to call these methods if _root is NULL?
Can you help the author?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 09/01/17 18:42, Dhionel Díaz wrote:
> Package: xorp
> Version: 1.8.6~wip.20160715-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> De
Thank you for your patch. I will study it and see if it is applicable
to 3.3.9, the version on unstable, and against 3.4.1, the latest from
the authors.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 27/12/16 16:54, Will Aoki wrote:
> Package: amanda-common
> Version: 1:3.3.8-1
> Severity: norm
Is to tell that the new 4.9-rc works. Now I can login into the
machine. During the weekend I will do a longer review of the kernel in
search of regressions.
Thank you.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 16/11/16 17:01, Santiago Vila wrote:
> forcemerge 833016 841007
> thanks
>
>
ly as Ubuntu has
> made a release with something based on 1:3.3.9-1. It looks like we need
> to add a Breaks on the perl side to make sure broken combinations can't
> happen.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I investigated this defect and I do not understand what went wrong
because a recompile make it work again.
This package have a pending upload to fix the build with openssl 1.1.0.
Can you downgrade to testing?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 10/11/16 08:49, Kamil Jonca wrote:
> Package: ama
On 24/10/16 03:30, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-10-16 at 21:22 +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
>> Package: src:linux
>> Version: 4.8~rc8-1~exp1
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>>* What led up to the situation?
>&
On 17/10/16 21:06, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Jose M Calhariz wrote:
>
>> And collab-maintainer?
> I would prefer .dsc if that's not too much trouble for you...?
>
>
> Regards,
>
Can you download from here?
http://blog.calhariz.com/public/sft/sawfish/librep_0.92.6-1.dsc
Ki
No worries, I will find out a solution.
On October 17, 2016 9:06:49 PM GMT+01:00, Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org> wrote:
>Jose M Calhariz wrote:
>
>> And collab-maintainer?
>
>I would prefer .dsc if that's not too much trouble for you...?
>
>
>Regards,
>
>-
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
