Source: elastix
Version: 4.8-3
Severity: wishlist
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that elastix could not be built reproducibly [2] because it is using the
current date to replace the
Source: bash
Version: 4.3-14
Severity: wishlist
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Hi,
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that bash could not be built reproducibly.
There are two problems:
1. Bash uses an embedded copy of
Source: fftw
Version: 2.1.5-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Hi!
fftw is using an embedded copy of texi2html which leads to
unreproducible html output [1].
texi2html has been patched [2] to use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH which allows
Source: man2html
Version: 1.6g-7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the reproducible builds effort [1], we have noticed
that man2html does not allow
Hi,
On 08/08/2015 08:52 PM, Hilko Bengen wrote:
Can you tell me a reliable source for that copyright information?
I found that information on the debian/copyright of the Debian texi2html
which I expect should be a reliable source.
Thanks for the quick reply!
akira
signature.asc
Source: maxima
Version: 5.36.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.5
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Your packages contains an embedded code copy of texi2html which is
copyright Lionel
Source: python-xlib
Version: 0.14+20091101-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.5
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Your packages contains an embedded code copy of texi2html which is
Hi,
In addition to my last update to this bug I have now also patched
texi2html to sort its hash values, which solves the issue
randomness_in_html_generated_by_texi2html [1].
The attached debdiff fixes this an also includes the changes of the
previous patches and is ready to be QA uploaded.
Source: gperf
Version: 3.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.5
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Hi,
Your packages contains an embedded code copy of texi2html which is
copyright Lionel Cons and others and is licensed under the GPL and
Creative
Hi,
On Sun, 17 May 2015 20:25:31 -0300 Juan Picca jumap...@gmail.com wrote:
Modified patch after comments and advices of Jérémy Bobbio.
The option was renamed to --build-date and now expects an unix time
integer which is formatted using pretty_time instead of using a given
string to show as
Source: camitk
Version: 3.4.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that camitk could not be
Source: doxygen
Version: 1.8.9.1-4
Severity: normal
Hi,
I built doxygen twice in a clean chroot, the first built was successful
but the second built failed. I recorded the std error and std output
information in the attached file.
Kind regards,
akira
dpkg-buildpackage: source package doxygen
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:30:49 +0200 =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly6W15?= Bobbio
lu...@debian.org wrote:
Tiny nitpick: the option might now have the best name. `unsquashfs`
currently supports `-l` = `-ls` and `-ll` = `-lls`. I guess the latter
is far 'long ls'. Puting the 'n' in the middle of 'ls' seems a
Control: tag -1 + patch
Hi,
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:38:37 +0200 =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly6W15?= Bobbio
lu...@debian.org wrote:
Adding a `--numeric-uid-gid` (like cpio) or `--numeric-owner` (like Tar)
option
would be greatly appreciated.
`-
Attached patch fixes
Source: zipios++
Version: 0.1.5.9+cvs.2007.04.28-5.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that
Source: libsyncml
Version: 0.5.4-2.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that libsyncml could
Source: cdbs
Version: 0.4.130
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
The Debian reproducible builds team [1] recently proposed a new
environment variable
Hello,
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 03:39:11 -0300 Juan Picca jumap...@gmail.com wrote:
Ximin:
Thanks for point me to the timestamps proposal page.
I modified the patch according it.
I made a patch for doxygen that works by setting the timestamp through
$SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH and this patch applies to the
Source: markdown
Version: 1.0.1-7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that markdown could not be
Source: ssmtp
Version: 2.64-8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that ssmtp could not be built
Source: socklog
Version: 2.1.0-8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that socklog could not be
Source: slrnface
Version: 2.1.1-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that slrnface could not be
Source: supercat
Version: 0.5.5-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that supercat could not be
Source: mimefilter
Version: 1.7+nmu1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that mimefilter could
Source: mailto
Version: 1.3.2-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that mailto could not be
Source: ldapvi
Version: 1.7-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that ldapvi could not be built
Source: sendfile
Version: 2.1b.20080616-5.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that sendfile
Source: sgmltools-lite
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-17
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that
Source: sauce
Version: 0.9.0+nmu3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that sauce could not be
Source: rockdodger
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that rockdodger could not
Source: rungetty
Version: 1.2-15
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that rungetty could not be
Source: libtnt
Version: 1.2.6-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that libtnt could not be
Source: leave
Version: 1.12-2.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that leave could not be built
Source: joe
Version: 3.7-2.4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that joe could not be built
Source: magicfilter
Version: 1.2-64
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that magicfilter could
Source: mailfront
Version: 1.16-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that mailfront could not be
Source: lpe
Version: 1.2.7-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that lpe could not be built
Source: rsbackup
Version: 1.1-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that rsbackup could not be
Source: rbootd
Version: 2.0-10
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that rbootd could not be built
Source: tetradraw
Version: 2.0.3-8.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that tetradraw could not
Source: signify
Version: 1.14-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that signify could not be
Source: the
Version: 3.3~rc1-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that the could not be built
Source: tinydyndns
Version: 0.4.2.debian1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that tinydyndns
Source: trscripts
Version: 1.16
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that trscripts could not be
Source: taggrepper
Version: 0.05-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that taggrepper could not
Source: netmaze
Version: 0.81+jpg0.82-14.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that netmaze could
Source: ratfor
Version: 1.0-15
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that ratfor could not be built
Source: postfix-gld
Version: 1.7-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that postfix-gld could
Source: qmail-run
Version: 2.0.2+nmu1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that qmail-run could
Source: pixmap
Version: 2.6pl4-18
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that pixmap could not be
Source: nitpic
Version: 0.1-15
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that nitpic could not be built
Source: mpack
Version: 1.6-8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that mpack could not be built
Source: netris
Version: 0.52-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that netris could not be built
Source: mime-support
Version: 3.58
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that mime-support could
Hi,
On 07/20/2015 02:49 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Oh god, another one of these (I'm referring to #792945). Thank you,
and once again, I apologise.
In the meantime, FTR, I would be happy with an NMU.
Sorry for the late reply. I will do an NMU this weekend for both
packages =).
Cheers,
akira
Hi,
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:30:41 +0100 Matthew Vernon matt...@debian.org
wrote:
I think this isn't the correct answer, and in fact the thing to do is
add -p to the cp and install calls, to preserve timestamps?
I tried to build xbs using the -p option as you suggested, and while
files become
Source: argus-client
Version: 2.0.6.fixes.1-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that argus-client could not be built reproducibly.
The attached patch
Source: authbind
Version: 3.0.3.5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that authbind could not be
Source: authbind
Version: 3.0.3.5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that authbind could not be
Source: gerstensaft
Version: 0.3-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that gerstensaft could not
Source: integrit
Version: 4.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that integrit could not be
Source: uruk
Version:20150401-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that uruk could not be built
Source: xbs
Version: 0-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that xbs could not be built
Source: luakit
Version: 2012.09.13-r1-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that luakit could not
Source: liblockfile
Version: 1.09-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that liblockfile could
Source: fortunes-bg
Version: 1.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that fortunes-bg could not
Source: enemies-of-carlotta
Version: 1.2.6-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that
Source: flowscan
Version: 1.006-13.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that flowscan could not
Source: dtaus
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that dtaus could not be built
Source: dhcpdump
Version: 1.8-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that dhcpdump could not be
Source: dhcping
Version: 1.2-4.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that dhcping could not be
Source: runit
Version: 2.1.2-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that runit could not be built
Source: tworld
Version: 1.3.0-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that tworld could not be
Source: wmweather
Version: 2.4.5-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that wmweather could not
Source: freecdb
Version: 0.75
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that freecdb could not be built
Source: ipsvd
Version: 1.0.0-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that ipsvd could not be built
Source: jargon
Version: 4.0.0-5.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that jargon could not be
Source: cvs-mailcommit
Version: 1.19-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that cvs-mailcommit
Source: dbview
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that dbview could not be
Source: chimera2
Version: 2.0a19-8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that chimera2 could not be
Source: ccze
Version: 0.2.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that ccze could not be built
Source: cgoban
Version: 1.9.14-17
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that cgoban could not be
Source: skalibs
Version: 0.47-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that skalibs could not be
Source: gpsmanshp
Version: 1.2.3-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that gpsmanshp could not
Source: ftpcopy
Version: 0.6.7-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that ftpcopy could not be
Source: erc
Version: 5.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that erc could not be built
Source: logapp
Version: 0.15-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that logapp could not be built
Source: junior-doc
Version: 1.16.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that junior-doc could not
Source: liblip
Version: 2.0.0-1.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that liblip could not be
Source: blosxom
Version: 2.1.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that blosxom could not be
Source: chiark-utils
Version: 4.4.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that chiark-utils could
Source: console-cyrillic
Version: 0.9-16.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that
Source: dpatch
Version: 2.0.35
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that dpatch could not be built
Source: elida
Version: 0.4+nmu1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that elida could not be built
Source: dput
Version: 0.9.6.4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that dput could not be built
Source: angband-doc
Version: 3.0.3.5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that angband-doc could
Source: libmsv
Version: 1.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that libmsv could not be built
Source: libjama
Version: 1.2.4-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that libjama could not be
Source: nec
Version: 2-16
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that nec could not be built
Source: beav
Version: 1:1.40-18
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that beav could not be built
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo