Bug#1067192: gtk-d: hard-coded dependency on libgtk-3-0 will become uninstallable on armel/armhf

2024-03-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 19. März 2024 um 22:25 Uhr schrieb Simon McVittie : > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 22:14:12 +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > Am Di., 19. März 2024 um 21:42 Uhr schrieb Simon McVittie : > > > libgtkd-3-0 has a hard-coded dependency on libgtk-3-0, which will need > >

Bug#1067192: gtk-d: hard-coded dependency on libgtk-3-0 will become uninstallable on armel/armhf

2024-03-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi Simon! Am Di., 19. März 2024 um 21:42 Uhr schrieb Simon McVittie : > libgtkd-3-0 has a hard-coded dependency on libgtk-3-0, which will need > to be replaced by libgtk-3-0t64 after checking that the functions that > interact with time_t (methods of GtkRecentInfo) are handled correctly. Will

Bug#1066030: Please move packagekit plugin to Recommends

2024-03-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mo., 11. März 2024 um 13:06 Uhr schrieb Jeremy Bícha : > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 7:54 AM Guido Günther wrote: > > Would it be possible to move > > > > /usr/lib/*/gnome-software/plugins-20/libgs_plugin_packagekit.so > > > > and related files to a separate package and make it a Recommends

Bug#1065072: packagekit spinning cpu

2024-03-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Sa., 9. März 2024 um 07:30 Uhr schrieb Joey Hess : > > Joey Hess wrote: > > It may also be relevant somehow that the topmost update was a thinkpad > > AMD firmware update which "requires restart". > > I masked and stopped packagekit again and now in gnome-software, it > displays only the

Bug#1065072: packagekit spinning cpu

2024-03-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! Am Sa., 9. März 2024 um 04:09 Uhr schrieb Joey Hess : > > I'm confident I saw this same problem today, with packagekit repeatedly > updating and spinning a CPU for 10 minutes. It only stopped at that > point because I stopped and masked it. (Stopping it was not enough, > something was

Bug#1064166: ldc: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Sa., 24. Feb. 2024 um 08:00 Uhr schrieb Steve Langasek : > > Hi Matthias, > > I see you've implemented this as: > > ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), armhf)) > export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS += abi=+time64,+lfs > endif > > Please note that armhf is not the only architecture affected by

Bug#1060016: packagekit: CVE-2024-0217

2024-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mi., 21. Feb. 2024 um 16:05 Uhr schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff : > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:11:35PM +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > The CVE page lists that commit as "patch" now, and given that emitting > > a finished transaction as finished multiple times c

Bug#1060016: packagekit: CVE-2024-0217

2024-02-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! Am Fr., 5. Jan. 2024 um 18:57 Uhr schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso : > [...] > Got a reply from Pedro Sampaio in > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256624#c3 > > It is mentioned that although the following is not a direct fix for > the issue, that the commit in v1.2.7 to reduce the

Bug#1064302: enforcing time64 on 32-bit architectures is wrong for i386

2024-02-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mo., 19. Feb. 2024 um 21:45 Uhr schrieb Matthias Klose : > > Package: src:ldc > Version: 1:1.36.0-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid trixie > > Just reading the changelog: > > * LDC should already work fine with 64-bit time on 32-bit > architectures, just to be on the safe side though,

Bug#1062190: packagekit: locks the dpkg frontened in the middle of a running update by synaptic package manager

2024-01-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi Julian (now CC'ed)! Do you have any idea how this would be possible? Both PK and Synaptic should hold the APT frontend lock, so they should never be able to run at the same time. I also have never once observed this behavior... Cheers, Matthias -- I welcome VSRE emails. See

Bug#1060803: gnome-software: Please don't depend on `software-properties-gtk`

2024-01-16 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 16. Jan. 2024 um 20:03 Uhr schrieb Julian : > > > > Fair point. We could maybe make it so g-s-p is only a recommended > > dependency > > That is what this request is requesting. Just a change from depend to > recommend > > > and modify the code so when g-s-p is not available, it > > falls

Bug#1060803: gnome-software: Please don't depend on `software-properties-gtk`

2024-01-16 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 16. Jan. 2024 um 18:21 Uhr schrieb Julian : > > > That is false, GNOME Software on Debian does depend on s-p-gtk. The > > reason this was implemented is that the PackageKit repository > > preferences dialog does not cover all the options needed on a Debian > > system, and especially not

Bug#1060803: gnome-software: Please don't depend on `software-properties-gtk`

2024-01-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am So., 14. Jan. 2024 um 15:27 Uhr schrieb Arnaud Ferraris : > [...] > GNOME Software does not depend on the Software Properties app. > Installing it changes the way GNOME Software works (for example, with > the source settings). > [...] That is false, GNOME Software on Debian does depend on

Bug#1060284: ITP: laniakea -- Repository management suite for Debian-based OSes

2024-01-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: wnpp Owner: Matthias Klumpp Severity: wishlist Package name: laniakea Version : 0.1 Upstream Contact: Matthias Klumpp URL : https://github.com/lkhq/laniakea License : LGPL-3.0 Programming Lang: Python Description : Repository management suite

Bug#1058924: gnome-software: does not list or find any apt package

2024-01-05 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Fr., 5. Jan. 2024 um 18:20 Uhr schrieb Jeremy Bícha : > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 11:08 AM Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > I do recall something being fixed on that front months ago, but I > > couldn't find the patch (so maybe testing with 46.beta is a good > > plan, to

Bug#1058924: gnome-software: does not list or find any apt package

2024-01-05 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Fr., 5. Jan. 2024 um 15:04 Uhr schrieb Jeremy Bícha : > > Matthias, > > I am experiencing this issue on Debian Testing and that was before > appstream 1.0 migrated to Testing today. Very odd... > I am also experiencing this issue with Ubuntu 24.04 but not with the > stable Ubuntu 23.10, even

Bug#1060016: packagekit: CVE-2024-0217

2024-01-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! Am Do., 4. Jan. 2024 um 20:51 Uhr schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso : > > Source: packagekit > Version: 1.2.6-5 > Severity: important > Tags: security upstream > X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team > > > Hi, > > The following vulnerability was published for packagekit. > >

Bug#1058924: gnome-software: does not list or find any apt package

2023-12-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! Very odd issue... If you run `apt update` in a terminal, do you see any "Components" YAML files being downloaded? What is in /var/lib/swcatalog/? Cheers, Matthias

Bug#1058908: plasma-workspace 4:5.27.10-1 loses appstream and breeze support

2023-12-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mo., 18. Dez. 2023 um 09:09 Uhr schrieb Adrian Bunk : > [...] > ... > -- The following OPTIONAL packages have not been found: > > * Breeze (required version >= 5.27.10) >For setting the default window decoration plugin > * AppStreamQt5 (required version >= 0.10.6), Access metadata for

Bug#1056543: isenkram: No new firmware package with requested firmware detected (but firmware files are missing)

2023-12-16 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Actually, this would even have backwards compatibility - but I haven't tested anything, so not sure if this works: diff --git a/appstream2modaliases b/appstream2modaliases index 1c3e6a2..f7077c9 100755 --- a/appstream2modaliases +++ b/appstream2modaliases @@ -11,15 +11,13 @@

Bug#1056543: isenkram: No new firmware package with requested firmware detected (but firmware files are missing)

2023-12-16 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This patch is probably all you need: diff --git a/appstream2modaliases b/appstream2modaliases index 1c3e6a2..7408107 100755 --- a/appstream2modaliases +++ b/appstream2modaliases @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ import re try: pool = AppStream.Pool() pool.load() -cpts = pool.get_components() +

Bug#1056543: isenkram: No new firmware package with requested firmware detected (but firmware files are missing)

2023-12-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Fr., 15. Dez. 2023 um 10:53 Uhr schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen : > > [Petter Reinholdtsen] > >> But it'll all be doable (from last time I looked, the change will > >> likely just be a one-liner). > > > > Perhaps you have time to prepare a patch? I have not had time to > > study the changes. I am

Bug#1056543: isenkram: No new firmware package with requested firmware detected (but firmware files are missing)

2023-11-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mi., 22. Nov. 2023 um 20:35 Uhr schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen : > > [Alexey Kuznetsov] > > It is working. Huge output https://paste.debian.net/1298974/ > > I am not convinced. It seem to claim that the file is in several > packages, which can not be correct. Matthias, any idea what is going >

Bug#1055293: dub: Please upgrade to a new version

2023-11-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi Nilesh! Am Fr., 3. Nov. 2023 um 17:54 Uhr schrieb Nilesh Patra : > [...] > dub seems to be at a really old version and it is just "limping" to stay > in testing at the moment and the version there was released 3 years > back, this is behind a bunch of new releases. > > I noticed there is a new

Bug#1053852: btrfsd: Segfault in libgobject-2.0.so.0.7800.0[7fcec2dff000+34000]

2023-10-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Fr., 13. Okt. 2023 um 12:27 Uhr schrieb Vincent Blut : > [...] > I built btrfsd with 59145f1 (utils: Don't free result twice when checking if > device is on > battery) applied, that fixes the issue. Thanks! Indeed, it was a really dumb oversight to free things manually that automatic cleanup

Bug#1053852: btrfsd: Segfault in libgobject-2.0.so.0.7800.0[7fcec2dff000+34000]

2023-10-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! Thank you for the issue report! How did you run btrfsd exactly? Did you set anything specific in its configuration file? Can you generate a backtrace with debug symbols for btrfsd installed? Cheers, Matthias

Bug#1051471: btrfsd: cron job for calling btrfsd

2023-09-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi Martin! Am Fr., 8. Sept. 2023 um 15:24 Uhr schrieb Martin : > [...] > would you consider to include a cron job into the package in order to > make btrfsd installable on systems without Systemd? Of course a change > regarding package dedepencies would also be required. Sure, that should

Bug#1037214: bullseye-pu: package appstream-glib/0.7.18-1+deb11u1

2023-06-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Do., 8. Juni 2023 um 21:18 Uhr schrieb Simon McVittie : > > On Wed, 07 Jun 2023 at 21:33:29 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > [x] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable > > That was, in fact, a lie. See attached (or the nmudiff on #1037206 if > you'd prefer the unfiltered version).

Bug#1036984: unblock: packagekit/1.2.6-5

2023-05-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package packagekit. [ Reason ] Three things fixed: * A tiny memory leak has been addressed * The daemon package now recommends the tools package again, this was changed late

Bug#1036982: unblock: debspawn/0.6.2-1

2023-05-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package debspawn. [ Reason ] Packaging of the 0.6.2 bugfix release which contains three changes only: * Fixes issue where users could not build packages against

Bug#1036979: unblock: appstream/0.16.1-2

2023-05-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package appstream. [ Reason ] Backports a few fixes from the 0.16.2 release: * Fixes two crashes that can happen when the tool is fed invalid or unexpected input *

Bug#1035904: dpkg currently warning about merged-usr systems (revisited)

2023-05-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Do., 18. Mai 2023 um 20:39 Uhr schrieb Luca Boccassi : > [...] > We heard so much in the past couple of weeks about how important it is > for the project not to cause issues for derivatives and > cross-compatibility use cases, even speculatively. This is not even > speculative, it is certain to

Bug#1035567: debootstrap: Does not support APT repositories with modern split arch:all support

2023-05-05 Thread Matthias Klumpp
quot; priority if you think that is more appropriate for a feature request like this. With kind regards, Matthias Klumpp -- I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/ From 5dd4cef1a5a03dc180eb2ec1d2bfc97023f74d2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Klumpp Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 2

Bug#777595: update-notifier: Wrong license in debian/copyright (compared to COPYING)

2023-04-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi Andreas! This RC bug has nothing to do with gnome-packagekit, and update-notifier was deleted from the archive in 2014. Was this issue reassigned in error? Thanks! Matthias -- I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/

Bug#1033814: apper: An update for it to fix the kded5 crashing problem

2023-04-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am So., 2. Apr. 2023 um 09:15 Uhr schrieb Bob Wong : > > Package: apper > Version: 1.0.0-4 > Severity: important > X-Debbugs-Cc: ybx...@gmail.com > > Dear Maintainer, > > The upstream has released a new version of the apper to fix the kded5 crashing > problem in their Github repo, hope we can get

Bug#1026062: kded5: kded crashes with signal 11

2023-03-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Sa., 11. März 2023 um 17:00 Uhr schrieb Aurélien COUDERC : > > Many thanks to all for tracking this bug, adding info, coordinating with > upstream, following progress, testing the fix, and thanks to Matthias for > uploading the fixed upstream version. > > @Matthias I think we really shouldn't

Bug#1031091: dep11 files missing for bookworm (non-free-firmware)

2023-02-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! Am Sa., 11. Feb. 2023 um 16:44 Uhr schrieb Cyril Brulebois : > Steve McIntyre (2023-02-11): > > As part of the nff changes, debian-cd now looks for dep11 metadata to > > help work out what firmware might be needed. We have that working for > > all other arches, but *not* mipsel. Builds are

Bug#1030719: RM: webapps-metainfo -- ROM; Superseded

2023-02-06 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: ftp.debian.org User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Severity: normal Hi! Please remove webapps-metainfo from unstable/testing. It was a nice idea years ago to provide metainfo files for suitable web applications as a package, but this method has been replaced by a

Bug#1030718: RM: stdx-allocator -- ROM; Dead upstream

2023-02-06 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: ftp.debian.org User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Severity: normal Hi! Please remove stdx-allocator from unstable/testing. It has been dead upstream for a while, and people seem to generally use the version available in the D standard library now, which is much

Bug#1027831: libpackagekitqt5-1: Discover does not notify about pending updates

2023-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! Can you please report this against PackageKit-Qt so we have a reference there? It's an odd bug for sure, the amount of changes for the new QPK was quite small and overall the library seems to be working fine. I wonder whether this is a case of Discover not having adjusted to handle plural

Bug#1026076: gnome-software: Download size is unknown for apps from Debian archive

2022-12-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! Am Mi., 14. Dez. 2022 um 11:51 Uhr schrieb Danial Behzadi : > [...] It couldn't be so hard to fix this as we already > have download size for packages in apt lists and it could be even port > to upstream. [...] It's actually not that easy, because a package has a bunch of dependencies that

Bug#1018801: stdx-allocator ftbfs: assertThrown failed: No Exception was thrown.

2022-08-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mi., 31. Aug. 2022 um 03:01 Uhr schrieb Steve Langasek : > > Source: stdx-allocator > Version: 3.1.0~beta.2-3 > Severity: serious > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic > > Hi Matthias, > > After fixing up stdx-allocator build-deps so that they're installable, >

Bug#1018796: mir-core: FTBFS with gdc: unrecognized commandline option -preview=dip1008

2022-08-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mi., 31. Aug. 2022 um 01:09 Uhr schrieb Steve Langasek : > > Package: mir-core > Version: 1.1.111-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > Justification: ftbfs > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic ubuntu-patch > > Hi Matthias, > > The mir-core package is failing

Bug#1018795: dh-dlang: support for mapping dpkg-buildflags for ldc but it's not used

2022-08-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! Am Mi., 31. Aug. 2022 um 00:57 Uhr schrieb Steve Langasek : > > Package: dh-dlang > Version: 0.6.5 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic ubuntu-patch > > Hi Matthias, > > I noticed in Ubuntu when trying to rebuild most

Bug#1018732: mir-core: FTBFS: ERROR: Unable to detect linker for compiler `ldc2 -L=--version /tmp/tmpq8z68wht.d -Wl,-z,relro -O -g -release -wi`

2022-08-29 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Control: reassign -1 meson 0.63.1-1 Control: forcemerge -1 1017087 Control: affects 1017087 + mir-core This is due to a regression in Meson itself reported as bug #1017087 Hopefully we will get a fix into Debian soon, merging this with the original bug. Cheers, Matthias -- I welcome VSRE

Bug#1017087: meson: All ldc related packages FTBFS with 0.63.1-1

2022-08-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! I was going to report this bug, but fortunately checked whether someone already created it beforehand :-) So, the culprit is highly likely https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/commit/0ec039d2597526c670f7e0478a7b5008e14ff474 This passes LDFLAGS from the environment to the compiler to figure out

Bug#1017077: sets compiler and flags wrong for armhf

2022-08-13 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! I haven't looked deeply into this, bit for armhf using GDC is the intended choice - it has way fewer bugs than LDC, which generally seems to work better on 64bit architectures. That's why this was changed in the past (so at least of stuff compiles with gdc, the resulting binary will work). I'm

Bug#1010421: gir-to-d: FTBFS with ldc 1.29

2022-08-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
severity 1010421 important thankyou Hi! I'm reducing the severity since an easy-ish workaround is available and keeping this at a blocking severity prevents the workaround-included gir-to-d version to migrate. This is still an important issue though which should be fixed for the release, as

Bug#1008687: FTBFS: as-test_pool FAIL killed by signal 6 SIGABRT

2022-04-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi Florian! Am Mo., 11. Apr. 2022 um 09:30 Uhr schrieb Florian Ernst : > > Hello Matthias, > > thank you for your reply and for the appstream update. > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 11:08:40PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > Am Mi., 30. März 2022 um 20:21 U

Bug#1008687: FTBFS: as-test_pool FAIL killed by signal 6 SIGABRT

2022-04-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hello! Am Mi., 30. März 2022 um 20:21 Uhr schrieb Florian Ernst : > > Source: appstream > Version: 0.15.2-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > > Hello there, > > during a rebuild of the reverse b-d of libyaml I found that this package > failed to build on my

Bug#1006949: src:ldc: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armhf and i386

2022-04-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi Paul! Am Sa., 9. Apr. 2022 um 17:30 Uhr schrieb Paul Gevers : > > Hi, > > On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 21:00:25 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > > Your package fails to build from > > source on armhf and i386 while it successfully built there before. > > > This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate.

Bug#1006269: appstream: apt hook shows non-actionable warnings if Flathub metadata has issues

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! Am Di., 22. Feb. 2022 um 11:33 Uhr schrieb Simon McVittie : > > Package: appstream > Version: 0.15.1-1 > Severity: normal > > I cannot reproduce this right now (it seems to be intermittent?), but > the steps that previously reproduced it were: > > * Have flatpak installed > * Have Flathub

Bug#971241: debconf-kde-helper: Boolean inputs are always set to true/yes position, no matter what the actual state is

2022-02-16 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi Jaakko! Thank you *very* much for the script to reproduce this, thanks to the script I was able to fix this in a few minutes after years of not touching debconf-kde (in preparation of a bugfix release). This issue will be resolved with the next upload. Cheers, Matthias

Bug#1001460: debspawn: Remove downloaded .deb files from the tarball

2021-12-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Fr., 10. Dez. 2021 um 15:24 Uhr schrieb Alberto Garcia : > > Package: debspawn > Version: 0.5.0-1 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > Creating a new image with e.g. 'debspawn create sid' leaves a lot of > .deb files in /var/cache/apt/archives/, making the resulting tarball > bigger. > > Those files

Bug#997960: Debspawn deletes anything mounted in a container

2021-11-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi Sam! Am Mi., 27. Okt. 2021 um 21:24 Uhr schrieb Sam Hartman : > > Package: debspawn > Version: 0.5.0-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: Significant data loss > > I used debspawn interact to interactively explore what I needed to do to get > a new upstream package building. > To make that

Bug#998810: debspawn: does not honor InjectedPkgsDir

2021-11-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi Ritesh! Am Mo., 8. Nov. 2021 um 08:33 Uhr schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf : > > As per the manual page, settings defined in /etc/debspawn/global.json > should override the defaults. I think you read the manual page wrong: It's `/etc/debspawn/global.toml` (see

Bug#989907: debspawn filesystems are non-minimal/fat by default

2021-11-06 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi Helmut! Am Di., 15. Juni 2021 um 19:09 Uhr schrieb Helmut Grohne : > I looked into why the .tar.zst images for debspawn are so big. Indeed, > they contain a lot of stuff that does not belong there. Examples > include: > > * dmidecode > * fdisk > * ifupdown > * init > * isc-dhcp-client >

Bug#991471: ITP: systemd-zram-generator -- Auto generator for zram devices to systemd service.

2021-10-05 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi Heysion! Are there any news or progress on this packaging effort? We would like to use the zRAM-generator in the PureOS Debian derivative, and therefore packaging it for Debian makes a lot of sense. So, if you need any help with this, be it packaging, maintenance or upload sponsorship, please

Bug#981078: transition: libxmlb (freeze exception)

2021-08-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! Am Fr., 20. Aug. 2021 um 00:21 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher : > [...] > > Please go ahead. Done, and it looks like everything has rebuilt just fine :-) Cheers, Matthias -- I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/

Bug#991244: Support extra-package and extra-repository options

2021-07-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! Am So., 18. Juli 2021 um 16:57 Uhr schrieb Pirate Praveen : > > Package: debspawn > Version: 0.5.0-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Extra package option is very useful when you have a build dependency > still in NEW but you don't want to wait for it to clear NEW before > building other packages. >

Bug#988827: appstream: Please disable libappstream-compose library on architecture where librsvg is not building

2021-07-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Do., 20. Mai 2021 um 08:24 Uhr schrieb Laurent Bigonville : > Hello, > > libappstream-compose library requires librsvg library, but librsvg is > not building anymore as it has been rewritten to rust. > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=librsvg=unstable > > Not building

Bug#990213: pre-approval unblock: appstream/0.14.4-1

2021-07-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi Graham! Am Sa., 10. Juli 2021 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Graham Inggs : > [...] > On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 at 03:12, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > Let me know what you think! > > Assuming it can happen soon, please go ahead upload to unstable, and > remove

Bug#990637: Why do marble have several .desktop files?

2021-07-06 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 6. Juli 2021 um 23:02 Uhr schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen : > > [Sune Stolborg Vuorela] > > I hope this is sufficient response to "is there a good reason", and I > > think the script you use should be adapted to work with this pattern. > > Note, the script I use operate on the appstream data

Bug#990213: pre-approval unblock: appstream/0.14.4-1

2021-06-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package appstream This is currently a pre-approval request, as the changes - even though almost all of them are bugfixes - are larger, in a key package, and we're close to

Bug#989884: isenkram-cli: isenkram-autoinstall-firmware doesn't find any firmware packages

2021-06-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 15. Juni 2021 um 11:19 Uhr schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen : > [...] > I ran this test on a few of my machines, and it provide several matches: > > for f in $(find /lib/firmware/ -type f |sed s%/lib/firmware/%%); do > appstreamcli what-provides firmware:runtime $f > done Without

Bug#987547: Touch RC bugs to (maybe) prevent package autoremoval

2021-06-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! This mail just touches the debspawn RC bugs to maybe prevent an early autoremoval, if that's still a thing during soft-freeze. I need some extra time to sort out the package's migration, as it will not automatically migrate due to Debian's CI not having the machines to run the autopkgtest of

Bug#989481: unblock: debspawn/0.5.0-1

2021-06-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package debspawn [ Reason ] Debspawn is a nspawn-based package builder for Debian with a popcon value of 52, therefore it would normally migrate in this phase of the freeze

Bug#989049: debspawn: privilege escalation via uid reuse

2021-05-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 25. Mai 2021 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso : > [...] > > > > Can you please elaborate on why you reopened this issue? I believe it > > has indeed been addressed with version 0.4.2-1, there is no more uid > > reuse for the build user and Debspawn will pick a free uid that is not

Bug#989049: debspawn: privilege escalation via uid reuse

2021-05-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi Salvatore! Am Di., 25. Mai 2021 um 06:51 Uhr schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System : > > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > found 989049 0.4.2-1 > Bug #989049 {Done: Matthias Klumpp } [debspawn] debspawn: > privilege escalation via uid reuse >

Bug#987312: please allow ignoring recommends/suggests

2021-04-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mi., 21. Apr. 2021 um 15:51 Uhr schrieb Marc Haber : > > Package: debspawn > Version: 0.4.1-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > > I would like to have a possibility to not install recommends/suggests in > the container, to keep the containers small. Does passing `--variant=minbase` to `debspawn

Bug#980686: ldc: FTBFS: dh_auto_configure: error: cd bootstrap-stage2

2021-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi Ivo! Am Di., 23. Feb. 2021 um 00:03 Uhr schrieb Ivo De Decker : > > Hi Matthias, > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 09:48:32PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Source: ldc > > Version: 1:1.24.0-1 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs > > Usertags:

Bug#981229: dub: autopkgtest regression

2021-01-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Do., 28. Jan. 2021 um 00:33 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher : > > Source: dub > Version: 1.24.0-1 > Severity: serious > X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org > > | autopkgtest [03:11:10]: test run: [--- > | Package dub not found for registry at https://code.dlang.org/ (fallbacks

Bug#906072: ITP: ogon -- ogon session manager and RDP server

2021-01-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi Mike and everyone else involved with this packaging project! First of all, thank you for working on this, ogon looks like a rather complicated thing to package. I would like to ask what the status of this project currently is. Do you think that there is any chance this could still make it into

Bug#981078: transition: libxmlb (freeze exception)

2021-01-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: mario.limoncie...@dell.com Severity: normal Hi! As we are already in transition freeze for bullseye, I would like to request permission to do a transition of libxmlb1 --> libxmlb2 which

Bug#978703: gives strange error messages on outdated images

2020-12-30 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mi., 30. Dez. 2020 um 14:57 Uhr schrieb Marc Haber : > > Package: debspawn > Version: 0.4.1-1 > Severity: minor > > Hi, > > I recently tried to use debspawn build building into a slightly outdated > image of Debian sid and received a message that dsrun didn't like the > "--suite sid" option

Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only?

2020-12-29 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 29. Dez. 2020 um 17:39 Uhr schrieb Marco d'Itri : > > On Dec 29, Ansgar wrote: > > > as suggested in [1], I would like to see Debian to move to support > > only the merged-usr filesystem layout. This would simplfy things for > > the future and also address the problem with installing

Bug#974107: Segfault when running isenkram-lookup

2020-11-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Fr., 13. Nov. 2020 um 01:28 Uhr schrieb Gunnar Hjalmarsson : > > On 2020-11-12 23:20, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > You want this patch for AppStream: > > https://github.com/ximion/appstream/commit/b52858bff55d358f925b8e64bab77b953067f248 > > But only comments are change

Bug#974107: Segfault when running isenkram-lookup

2020-11-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Do., 12. Nov. 2020 um 23:20 Uhr schrieb Matthias Klumpp : > [...] > You want this patch for AppStream: > https://github.com/ximion/appstream/commit/b52858bff55d358f925b8e64bab77b953067f248 > Basically, Python thought it could free more objects than it should > actually have freed

Bug#974107: Segfault when running isenkram-lookup

2020-11-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Do., 12. Nov. 2020 um 22:21 Uhr schrieb Gunnar Hjalmarsson : > > On 2020-11-12 21:28, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > [Gunnar Hjalmarsson] > >> Additional observations: > >> > >> * The testing failure in Ubuntu started around October 31. > >> > >> * The test-command-line script fails on amd64

Bug#974107: Segfault when running isenkram-lookup

2020-11-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 10. Nov. 2020 um 01:08 Uhr schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen : > > [Gunnar Hjalmarsson] > > On an updated Debian testing: > > > > $ isenkram-lookup > > /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/isenkram/lookup.py:85: Warning invalid > > uninstantiatable type '(null)' in cast to 'AsProvided' > >provided

Bug#966914: sambamba: FTBFS: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

2020-08-05 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 4. Aug. 2020 um 11:23 Uhr schrieb Andreas Tille : > > Control: tags -1 help > > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 10:06:32AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > lto1: fatal error: bytecode stream in file > > > ‘/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhts.a’ generated with GCC compiler older > > > than

Bug#966249: appstream-generator FTBFS with gdc: error: undefined identifier ‘JSONType’

2020-07-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
severity 966249 whishlist thankyou Am Sa., 25. Juli 2020 um 15:30 Uhr schrieb Adrian Bunk : > > Source: appstream-generator > Version: 0.8.2-2 > Severity: important > Tags: ftbfs > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=appstream-generator > > ... > ../src/asgen/config.d:443:61: error:

Bug#961490: fwupd: version in stable too old, no updates possible

2020-05-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 26. Mai 2020 um 20:24 Uhr schrieb : > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ansgar > > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 8:01 AM > > To: Steffen Schreiber; 961...@bugs.debian.org > > Subject: Bug#961490: fwupd: version in stable too old, no updates possible > > > > > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] > > >

Bug#959893: appstream-generator: Link against libglibd-2.0.so broken

2020-05-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mi., 6. Mai 2020 um 19:57 Uhr schrieb Markus Frosch : > > Package: appstream-generator > Version: 0.8.1-1+b1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Hi maintainer, > the package possible needs rebuilding. > > > appstream-generator: error while loading shared libraries:

Bug#932747: apt-get: AppStream system cache updated, failing on APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Success

2020-04-06 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Do., 2. Apr. 2020 um 23:35 Uhr schrieb shirish शिरीष : > > at bottom :- > > On 02/04/2020, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > > > > > In the case of newer Debian releases, the issue is actually a regression > > in GNOME Software, which is fixed now, once agai

Bug#932747: apt-get: AppStream system cache updated, failing on APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Success

2020-04-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:39:10 +0200 Jo Drexl wrote: [...] I've seen this error being persistent on some machines, while others were thrown off repeatedly. A popular suggestion on the internet is to comment out the test statement and proceed without a refreshed appstream cache, which seems to

Bug#947847: please install systemd-sysusers using update-alternatives

2020-01-29 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mi., 29. Jan. 2020 um 20:39 Uhr schrieb Simon McVittie : > [...] > I think there are three categories of systems that it might make sense > to consider separately here. In ascending order of "amount of systemd": > > - non-Linux ports to which systemd does not intend to be portable (and > I

Bug#936551: C++ help for freebayes needed

2019-12-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 17. Dez. 2019 um 15:08 Uhr schrieb Andreas Tille : > > Hi, > > I intended to upgrade freebayes to its latest upstream version. Unfortunately > it does not build against the Debian packaged libs. I've reported this > upstream > as issue > > https://github.com/ekg/freebayes/issues/579

Bug#907489: Fixing sambamba 0.8.6

2019-12-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am So., 15. Dez. 2019 um 10:16 Uhr schrieb Pjotr Prins : > [...] > > Therefore, the way of least resistance was to just use Meson for > > building, as that does everything we need in Debian. Both BioD and > > Sambamba build well with Meson. > > That is great. We can add the meson builds in the

Bug#938431: Fixing sambamba 0.8.6

2019-12-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Do., 28. Nov. 2019 um 16:37 Uhr schrieb Pjotr Prins : > > When 1.18 arrives I think it is a good time to get sambamba and biod > in Debian again. They always were in Debian, just not in a release because the packages were broken ^^ The LDC transition went really well this time, I don't think

Bug#946188: RM: tilix [armhf] -- ROM; FTBFS due to GDC bug and blocks other architecture fixes

2019-12-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi! Please remove the tilix package binaries for the armhf architecture temporarily. The armhf arch is affected by GDC bug #944380 for a while now, and the package does not migrate to testing while it's not built on armhf. Meanwhile, all packages depending

Bug#907489: Fixing sambamba 0.8.6

2019-11-28 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Do., 28. Nov. 2019 um 15:19 Uhr schrieb Andreas Tille : > > Hi Pjotr, > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 07:50:34AM -0600, Pjotr Prins wrote: > > Dear Andreas and Matthias, > > > > Good news, I think I have fixed the Sambamba bug! After a 3 day bug > > hunt. Thanks Andreas for pushing me again. Let me

Bug#944640: gtk-d: FTBFS on armel/armhf with many "multiple definition" messages

2019-11-13 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mi., 13. Nov. 2019 um 08:45 Uhr schrieb Raphaël Hertzog : > > Source: gtk-d > Version: 3.9.0-2 > Severity: important > Tags: ftbfs > > Hi, > > can you make a new source upload to let the package migrate to testing > please ? > > I also noticed that the package still fails to build on

Bug#944380: GDC generates duplicate symbols when using mixins/interfaces

2019-11-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Sa., 9. Nov. 2019 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Matthias Klose : > > Control: found -1 9.2.1-16 > Control: severity -1 important > > according to the upstream report, also with 9.2.0. > > On 08.11.19 23:18, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > Package: gdc-9 > > Version: 9.2.1-17

Bug#944383: RM: gtk-d [armhf] -- ROM; FTBFS due to GDC bug and blocks other architecture fixes

2019-11-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Sa., 9. Nov. 2019 um 03:54 Uhr schrieb Scott Kitterman : > On November 9, 2019 1:58:50 AM UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > >Am Fr., 8. Nov. 2019 um 23:29 Uhr schrieb Matthias Klumpp > >: > >> [...] > >> Please remove the gtk-d package binaries for the

Bug#944395: RM: glib-d [armhf] -- ROM; FTBFS due to GDC bug and blocks other architecture fixes

2019-11-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi! Please remove the glib-d package binaries for the armhf architecture temporarily. The armhf arch is affected by GDC bug #944380 for a while now, and the package does not migrate to testing while it's not built on armhf. Meanwhile, all packages

Bug#944394: RM: appstream-generator [armhf] -- ROM; FTBFS because it needs newer D features

2019-11-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi! Please remove the appstream-generator package binaries for the armhf architecture temporarily. The armhf arch is affected by GDC bug #944380 for a while now, and appstream-generator depends on glib-d which is affected by this issue. Furthermore, asgen

Bug#944383: RM: gtk-d [armhf] -- ROM; FTBFS due to GDC bug and blocks other architecture fixes

2019-11-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Fr., 8. Nov. 2019 um 23:29 Uhr schrieb Matthias Klumpp : > [...] > Please remove the gtk-d package binaries for the armhf architecture > temporarily. > [...] Speaking of which, could the armhf packages of appstream-generator and glib-d also be removed? The former suffers from

Bug#944383: RM: gtk-d [armhf] -- ROM; FTBFS due to GDC bug and blocks other architecture fixes

2019-11-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi! Please remove the gtk-d package binaries for the armhf architecture temporarily. The armhf arch is affected by GDC bug #944380 for a while now, and the package does not migrate to testing while it's not built on armhf. Meanwhile, all packages depending

Bug#944380: GDC generates duplicate symbols when using mixins/interfaces

2019-11-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: gdc-9 Version: 9.2.1-17 Severity: serious Hi! Currently, GDC can't build package like gtk-d because it generates duplicate non-weak symbols in object files, causing a collision when linking. This seems to happen when using mixins / interfaces. For more information and a workaround,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >