Bug#1026116: Patches not applied in security release deb10u6, FTBFS

2022-12-15 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 12/15/22 18:42, Sven Joachim wrote: > It seems you are slightly mistaken here, as the same problem had been > reported for 2:1.20.4-1+deb10u3 already. It has been fixed post-buster > in 2:1.20.6-1. Oh, sorry, that bug report didn't show up for me. I did search for bug reports against

Bug#1026116: Patches not applied in security release deb10u6, FTBFS

2022-12-15 Thread Mihai Moldovan
[Resent to the bug tracker as well] * On 12/15/22 19:15, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > I'm not sure I understand what the problem is. The patches are in > debian/patches/ and are applied during build using quilt. Thank you for looking into it. > From the amd64's build log [1]: It won't

Bug#1026116: Patches not applied in security release deb10u6, FTBFS

2022-12-14 Thread Mihai Moldovan
Package: xorg-server-source Version: 2:1.20.4-1+deb10u6 Severity: normal Hi It looks like the content of debian/patches/ has not been applied when packaging xorg-server-source. This at least one patch contains a FTBFS fix, it's impossible to build xorg-server out of the box. This is a

Bug#1004863: Bootstrapping a Fedora produces a system with an empty package database

2022-02-13 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 2/12/22 8:51 PM, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 06:51:26PM +0100, Mihai Moldovan wrote: > That's even better, then: it becomes a matter of documenting the > procedure to bootstrap an rpm-based distro from Debian: I can test it > and produce a draft HOWTO. In the sho

Bug#1004863: Bootstrapping a Fedora produces a system with an empty package database

2022-02-12 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 2/11/22 1:57 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 01:33:08PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: >>> However I've downgraded it to important as eg Qubes 4.1 uses dnf on Debian >>> to >>> download upgrades for dom0, which is Fedora based. So the package is >>> certainly >>> not unusable

Bug#1004863: Bootstrapping a Fedora produces a system with an empty package database

2022-02-10 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 2/2/22 6:05 PM, Enrico Zini wrote: > I'm trying to use dnf to bootstrap rpm-based chroots, which seems to > work, but the rpm package database on the resulting distribution is > empty, as in, `rpm -qa` returns no output, and `rpm -q` on any package > complains that it is not installed. The

Bug#988770: python3-hawkey-doc: broken symlinks: /usr/share/doc/python3-hawkey-doc/html/_static/{jquery,underscore}.js

2021-05-21 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 5/21/21 7:32 PM, Frédéric Pierret wrote: > I'll try to fix that quickly, thank you. Yep, just a matter of adding libjs-jquery and libjs-underscore to Depends on python3-hawkey-doc. I've done that on my weird, stretch-based setup with the initial dnf 4.0.9 version. > BTW, Mihai may I change

Bug#988770: python3-hawkey-doc: broken symlinks: /usr/share/doc/python3-hawkey-doc/html/_static/{jquery,underscore}.js

2021-05-19 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 5/19/21 1:46 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: python3-hawkey-doc > Version: 0.55.2-6 > [...] > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates) > a broken symlink. > [...] > Is python3-hawkey-doc missing a Depends/Recommends/Suggests: libjs-jquery, >

Bug#986445: dash: printf builtin does not accept \0ddd sequences

2021-04-06 Thread Mihai Moldovan
Control: close -1 Turns out I'm just stupid. This escape sequence is only allowed in tandem with the "%b" format specifier. Otherwise, only the '\ddd' syntax is supported. dash is behaving correctly: # /bin/dash -c 'printf '"'"'%b\n'"'"' '"'"'\0056'"'" . Closing up here, sorry for the noise.

Bug#986445: dash: printf builtin does not accept \0ddd sequences

2021-04-06 Thread Mihai Moldovan
Package: dash Version: 0.5.11+git20210120+802ebd4-1 Quoting from https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/printf.html : "[...] The following -escape sequences shall be supported: [...] o "\0ddd", where ddd is a zero, one, two, or three-digit octal number that shall

Bug#985689: Needs CONFIG_UNICODE to mount ext4 fs with case-insensitivity feature

2021-03-22 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 3/22/21 9:40 AM, Bastian Blank wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:40:34AM +0100, Mihai Moldovan wrote: >> Currently, mounting an EXT4-formatted volume with the case-insensitivity >> feature >> is impossible since CONFIG_UNICODE i

Bug#985689: Needs CONFIG_UNICODE to mount ext4 fs with case-insensitivity feature

2021-03-22 Thread Mihai Moldovan
the missing feature isn't just convenience, but actually has negative implications when mounting file systems. If that is any argument, Ubuntu 21.04 enables the feature, too. My best guess is that the chance of regressions is very low. Best regards Mihai Moldovan OpenPGP_signature Description

Bug#955568: dh_install (and friends?) doesn't(/don't) remove source dirs ending in slash

2020-04-02 Thread Mihai Moldovan
Package: debhelper Version: 12.10 dh_install* takes a --sourcedir parameter which can be leveraged to pick data from a specific destroot, which is very handy when building a package multiple times with different features and creating conflicting binary packages. Short example

Bug#936806: koji: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-02-01 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 1/31/20 8:57 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > As for yum and yum-utils, their replacements are dnf and > dnf-plugins-core (which have subpackages yum and yum-utils > respectively to act as legacy interfaces). > > My understanding is that Mihai Moldovan was working on this for Debian

Bug#940114: Fix librpm-dev usage (missing libzstd-dev run-time dependency) and backports for upcoming DNF packages

2019-09-12 Thread Mihai Moldovan
for my other work). These patches merely introduce support for new three new tags and should be very safe to apply. When applying the debdiff, please remove the NMU entry, which is only there to make lintian (more or less) happy! Best regards, Mihai Moldovan diffstat for rpm-4.14.2.1+dfsg1 rpm

Bug#889509: Fix CMake module installation, prepare for DNF support

2019-09-12 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 9/6/19 4:43 AM, Mihai Moldovan wrote: > Rebased everything and bumped up to 0.6.36, which also fixes the 3 CVE's > attached to this package. Will upload a new debdiff soon, need to build these > packages for sid and test them for a bit, including the updated dnf stuff. > Should

Bug#889509: Fix CMake module installation, prepare for DNF support

2019-09-05 Thread Mihai Moldovan
> With the greatest embarrased... may I ask you to rebase your .debdiff? Rebased everything and bumped up to 0.6.36, which also fixes the 3 CVE's attached to this package. Will upload a new debdiff soon, need to build these packages for sid and test them for a bit, including the updated dnf

Bug#794495: Mock fails to track installed packages

2019-09-05 Thread Mihai Moldovan
Hi Michal I don't want to be condescending, but can we please, pretty-please stop breaking rpm in Debian? I understand that rpm is not intended to be used as a package manager on Debian systems, but the rpmdb-in-homedir patch does more harm than good, causing trouble in totally legitimate use

Bug#930681: stretch-backports kernel unable to execute (some) older (e.g., CentOS 6) binaries

2019-06-18 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 6/18/19 3:22 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: > See #847154 for the workaround. Thanks. Seems to work fine. This triggered another question, though: can I assume that buster kernels are also affected by that problem by default? Given that the shipped user space is new enough, I figure that option

Bug#930681: stretch-backports kernel unable to execute (some) older (e.g., CentOS 6) binaries

2019-06-18 Thread Mihai Moldovan
Package: linux-image-amd64 Version: 4.19.37-3~bpo9+1 Steps to reproduce: 1.) apt-get install mock 2.) [0] /usr/bin/mock -r /etc/mock/epel-6-x86_64.cfg --init 3.) chroot /var/lib/mock/epel-6-x86_64/root/ => Segmentation fault => [53880.200376] bash[25554] vsyscall attempted with vsyscall=none

Bug#911898: firefox-esr: SIGSEGV on startup on ppc64el

2018-10-25 Thread Mihai Moldovan
Package: firefox-esr Version: 60.3.0esr-1~deb9u1 Severity: important This is essentially a downstream bug report of bz#1477176 ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1477176 ). firefox-esr currently segfaults right on startup on ppc64le during the first memory allocation call. I cannot

Bug#889509: Fix CMake module installation, prepare for DNF support

2018-02-03 Thread Mihai Moldovan
to libsolvext0. + * debian/libsolvext0.symbols: ++ Update. + * debian/control: ++ Add BD: dh-python. + + -- Mihai Moldovan <io...@ionic.de> Fri, 02 Feb 2018 14:33:28 +0100 + libsolv (0.6.30-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ Héctor Orón Martínez ] diff -Nru libsolv-0.6.30/debian/c

Bug#879667: [debhelper-devel] Bug#879667: Missing component in generated control file Section: line for dbgsym packages

2017-10-24 Thread Mihai Moldovan
On 10/24/2017 06:40 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > I have attached a patch that I hope you can test to see if it fixes your > problem. I've rebuilt the debhelper package in sid with the patch applied and inserted it forcefully into an sbuild build environment. Seems to work, the dbgsym packages now

Bug#879667: Acknowledgement (Missing component in generated control file Section: line for dbgsym packages)

2017-10-24 Thread Mihai Moldovan
FWIW, this might be a consequence of running dh_gencontrol in parallel mode. I'm not really able to explain what is going on, though, since only the autogenerated dbgsym packages seem to be affected. The only way this could happen is if package_section($package) is returning something invalid

Bug#879667: Missing component in generated control file Section: line for dbgsym packages

2017-10-24 Thread Mihai Moldovan
Package: debhelper Version: 10.10.3 While building packages for Debian sid, I noticed that dbgsym packages for non-main components got uploaded to the main component in my reprepro-managed repository. reprepro isn't at fault, since a build with sbuild reveals this in the dbgsym packages

Bug#872771: Stretch's aptitude segfaults with qemu-user-static and ARM targets

2017-08-20 Thread Mihai Moldovan
Package: qemu-user-static Version: 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u2 Steps to reproduce: qemu-debootstrap --arch=armhf --variant=minbase --verbose --components=main --resolve-deps stretch /tmp/stretch-armhf chroot /tmp/stretch-armhf/ apt-get install -y aptitude chroot /tmp/stretch-armhf/ aptitude update =>

Bug#869738: Kill off db2html and html-control

2017-07-26 Thread Mihai Moldovan
Open points (also RFC!): - db/ix/full.html o list of all non-archived bugs o no alternative (needs implementation) - db/ix/maintainers.html o list of maintainers (broken, does not consider Maintainers.override) o RewriteRule ^/db/ix/maintainers\.html

Bug#845197: libssh-4 and libssh-dev have different libssl-dependencies

2016-11-25 Thread Mihai Moldovan
FWIW, changing the BD of libssh to "libssl1.0-dev | libssl-dev (< 1.1)" would probably also be a good idea. I have tested these changes in the X2Go repository and with my suggested changes the conflict is finally gone. Mihai signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#845197: libssh-4 and libssh-dev have different libssl-dependencies

2016-11-21 Thread Mihai Moldovan
Package: libssh-4 Version: 0.7.3-1 Source: libssh On Debian Unstable, libssh-4 is built against and (automatically) depends upon libssl1.0.2 - the corresponding dev-package for libssl1.0.2 is libssl1.0-dev. Its corresponding dev-package libbsh-dev hard-depends upon libssl-dev (which is OpenSSL

Bug#705633: spf-milter-python: New upstream version available (0.8.18)

2013-04-17 Thread Mihai Moldovan
/spfmilter.cfg']) Should really be: config = read_config(['spfmilter.cfg','/etc/mail/spfmilter.cfg','/etc/spf-milter-python/spfmilter.cfg']) When packaging the new version, please take care of correctly adding the Debian config file location. Best regards, Mihai Moldovan -- System Information